Sıcaklık Değişimlerinin Ostrakod (Crustacea) Türlerinin Mekansal Dağılımı ve Ekolojisi Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Ortam sıcaklığındaki değişimlerin ostrakodların mekansal dağılımı ve ekolojisi üzerindeki olası etkilerini anlamak için, 2012 yazında Hatay (Türkiye) ilinden 12 farklı habitat türüne sahip 70 su sahasından rastgele örnekler toplanmıştır. Elde edilen 19 türden 14 tanesi Hatay için yeni kayıttır. CCA’nın ilk iki ekseni en yaygın 12 tür ile beş çevresel değişken arasındaki ilişkinin toplam varyansının %79,7'sini açıklamıştır. Buna göre, su sıcaklığı ve elektriksel iletkenlik türlerin oluşu üzerinde en etkili faktörlerdir (p<0,05). Türlerin ekolojik optimum ve tolerans değerlerine göre, Herpetocypris chevreuxi ve Cypridopsis vidua su sıcaklığı için sırasıyla en düşük ve en yüksek tolerans değerlerini göstermiştir. TWINSPAN sonuçları, ostrakod türlerinin habitat koşullarının özelliklerini belirlemek için kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir. Özellikle H. chevreuxi'nin bir veya daha fazla kozmopolit türle birlikte bulunması, tuzluluk ve sıcaklık değerlerinde bir artışın göstergesidir. Sonuçlar, özellikle sığ su kütlelerinde kritik değişikliğe neden olabilen sıcaklık değişiklikleri nedeniyle düşük ekolojik toleranslı türlerin olumsuz etkileneceğini düşündürmektedir. Bu nedenle, “yerel yok olma için potansiyel aday türler” olarak adlandırılabilecek bu türler ya kısa dönemde habitatlardan elenecek ya da uzun dönemde nesli tükenme tehlikesiyle karşı karşıya kalacaktır.      

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekoloji
• Ostracoda
• gösterge tür
• yerel yok olma
• Türkiye

Effects of Temperature Changes on the Spatial Distribution and Ecology of Ostracod (Crustacea) Species

Öz

To understand the possible effects of changes in ambient temperature on spatial distribution and ecology of ostracods, samples were randomly collected from 70 aquatic sites with 12 different habitat types from Hatay (Turkey) province during the summer season of 2012. 14 of 19 ostracod species were newly reported for the province. The first two axes of CCA explained 79.7% of the cumulative variance of the relationship between the 12 most common species and five environmental variables. Accordingly, water temperature and electrical conductivity were the most effective factors on species occurrences (p<0.05). Estimating ecological optimum and tolerance values of species revealed that Herpetocypris chevreuxi and Cypridopsis vidua displayed the lowest and highest tolerance values for water temperature, respectively. TWINSPAN results illustrated that ostracod species can be used to determine characteristics of habitat conditions. Indeed, the co-occurrence of H. chevreuxi with one or more cosmopolitan species is the indication of an increase in salinity and temperature values. Results suggested that temperature changes can cause critical alteration in shallow water bodies where species with lower ecological tolerances will eventually be negatively affected. Therefore, such species, which may be called “potential candidate species for local extinction” will either be eliminated from the habitats in short term or become extinct in long term.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecology
• Ostracoda
• indicator species
• local extinction
• Turkey

Kaynakça

1. An S, Tian Z, Cai Y, Wen T, Xu D, Jiang H, Yao Z, Guan B, Sheng S, Ouyang Y, Cheng, X. 2013. Wetlands of Northeast Asia and high Asia: an overview. Aquat Sci. 75(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s00027-012-0281-4
2. Benateau S, Gaudard A, Stamm C, Altermatt F. 2019. Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: Impacts on water quality and ecological status. Bern, Switzerland: Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN). Project No.: Hydro-CH2018.
3. Black SH, Shepard M, Allen MM. 2001. Endangered Invertebrates: the case for greater attention to invertebrate conservation. Endangered Species Update. 18(2):41-49.
4. Broodbakker NW, Danielopol DL. 1982. The chaetotaxy of Cypridacea (Crustacea, Ostrocoda) limbs: proposals for a descriptive model. Bijdr Dierkd. 52(2):103-120. doi: 10.1163/26660644-05202003
5. Connor EF, McCoy ED. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat. 113(6): 791-833.
6. Demircan M, Gürkan H, Eskioğlu O, Arabacı H, Coşkun M. 2017. Climate change projections for Turkey: three models and two scenarios. Tr J Water Sci & Manag. 1(1):22-43.
7. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Staissny MLJ, Sullivan CA. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev. 81(2): 163-182. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950
8. Eisenhauer N, Bonn A, Guerra CA. 2019. Recognizing the quiet extinction of invertebrates. Nat. Commun. 10:1-3.

9. Ertürk A. 2012. Managing the effects of the climate change on water resources and watershed ecology. In: Kumarasamy M, editor. Studies on water management issues, Chapter 11. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Open Access Publisher. p. 259-274.
10. Finlayson CM, Davis A, Gell PA, Kingsford RT, Parton KA. 2013. The status of wetlands and the predicted effects of global climate change: the situation in Australia. Aquat Sci. 75(1):73-93. doi: 10.1007/s00027-011-0232-5
11. Gülen D. 1985. The species and distribution of the group Podocopa (Ostracoda-Crustacea) in the fresh waters of western Anatolia. İstanbul Üniv Fen Fak Mecm. Seri B. 50: 65-80.
12. Gülen D. 1988. Türkiye tatlısu ostracod faunasına katkılar II. İstanbul Üniv Su Ürün Derg. 2:199-202.
13. Hartmann G. 1964. Asiatische ostracoden: systematische und zoogeographische untersuchungen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag GmbH 155 p.
14. IPCC 2007: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 976 p.
15. Jourdan J, O'Harab RB, Bottarin R, Huttunen KL, Kuemmerlen M, Monteith D, Muotko T, Ozolins D, Paavola R, Pilotto F, Springe G, Skuja A, Sundermann A, Tonkin JD, Haase P. 2018. Effects of changing climate on European stream invertebrate communities: A long-term data analysis. Sci Total Environ. 621:588–599. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.242
16. Juggins S. 2003. Software for Ecological and Palaeoecological Data Analysis and Visualization, C2 User Guide. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: University of Newcastle 77 p.
17. Karabulut M. 2009. Precipitation Trends in Kahramanmaraş along with Gaziantep and Adıyaman during the period of 1963-2005. Ekoloji. 18:15-24.
18. Karanovic I. 2006. Recent Candoninae (Crustacea, Ostracoda) of North America. Rec West Aust Mus. 71:1-75.
19. Karanovic I. 2012. Recent freshwater ostracods of the world: Crustacea, Ostracoda, Podocopida. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media 608 p.
20. Kempf EK. 1980. Index and Bibliography of Nonmarine Ostracoda. Parts 1–4. Sonderveröff. geol. Inst. Köln 35 (Index A): 1–188; 36 (Index B): 1–180; 37 (Index C): 1–204; 38 (Bibliography A): 1–186.
21. Kempf EK. 1997. Index and Bibliography of Nonmarine Ostracoda. Parts 6 and 7. Sonderveröff. geol. Inst. Köln 109 (Part 6: Index A Supplement 1): 1–142; 110 (Part 7: Index B Supplement 1): 1–134; 111 (Part 8: Index C Supplement 1): 1–152; 112 (Part 9: Bibliography C): 1–144.
22. Kiss A. 2007. Factors affecting spatial and temporal distribution of Ostracoda assemblages in different macrophyte habitats of a shallow lake (Lake Fehér, Hungary). Hydrobiologia. 585:89-98. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-0631-8
23. Külköylüoğlu O. 2013. Diversity, distribution, and ecology of nonmarine Ostracoda (Crustacea) in Turkey: application of pseudorichness and cosmoecious species concepts. Recent Res Devel Ecol. 4:1-18.
24. Külköylüoğlu O, Sarı N. 2012. Ecological characteristics of the freshwater Ostracoda in Bolu Region (Turkey). Hydrobiologia. 688:37-46.
25. Leigh C. 2013. Dry-season changes in macroinvertebrate assemblages of highly seasonal rivers: responses to low flow, no flow and antecedent hydrology. Hydrobiologia. 703(1):95-112. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1347-y
26. Meisch C. 1984. Revision of the recent Western Europe species of genus Potamocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Part I. Species with short swimming setae on the second antennae. Mus Hist Nat Lux. 3(3):1-55.
27. Meisch C. 1985. Revision of the recent west European species of the genus Potamocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda) Part II. Species withlong swimming setae on the second antennae. Mus Hist Nat Lux. 4(3):1-95.
28. Meisch C. 2000. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe. Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa 8/3. Heidelberg, Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag 522 p. Meisch K, Smith RJ, Martens K. 2019. A subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). Eur J Taxon. 492:1–135. doi: 10.5852/ejt.2019.492
29. Mesquita-Joanes, F, Smith, AJ, Viehberg, FA. 2012. The ecology of Ostracoda across levels of biological organisation from individual to ecosystem: a review of recent developments and future potential. Dev Quat Sci. 17:15-35. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53636-5.00002-0
30. Morrill JC, Bales RC, Conklin MH. 2005. Estimating stream temperature from air temperature: implications for future water quality. J Environ Eng. 131:139-146. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:1(139)
31. Odum EP, Barrett GW. 2005. Fundamentals of Ecology. Thomson Learning Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, USA, 624 p. [Turkish translation: Ekoloji'nin Temel İlkeleri, 2008, Işık K (ed). Palme, 5th ed. Ankara].
32. Özuluğ O, Kılıç M. 2002. Anadolu Ostracoda (Crustacea) faunasına katkılar. İstanbul Üniv Su Ürün Derg. 14:71-79. [in Turkish]
33. Preud’homme EB, Stefan HG. 1992. Relationship between water temperatures and air temperatures for Central U.S. streams. Duluth: Environmental Research Laboratory U.S., Environmental Protection Agency. Project Report No.: 333.
34. Ragab R, Prudhomme C. 2002. Climate change and water resources management in arid and semi-arid regions: prospective and challenges for the 21st century. Biosyst Eng. 81(1):3-34. doi: 10.1006/bioe.2001.0013
35. Ruiz F, Abad M, Bodergat AM, Carbonel P, Rodríguez-Lázaro J, González-Regalado ML, Toscano A, Garcia EX, Prenda J. 2013. Freshwater ostracods as environmental tracers. Int J Environ Sci Te. 10(5):1115-1128.
36. Sarı N, Külköylüoğlu O, Akdemir D. 2012. First record and detailed description of the male of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Turk J Zool. 36(4):484-495. doi: 10.3906/zoo-1012-78
37. Seaby RM, Henderson PA. 2006. Species diversity and richness, Version 4. Lymington, UK: Pisces Conservation Ltd. 132 p.
38. Stevens GC. 1992. The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport's latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat. 140(6):893-911. doi: 10.1086/285447
39. ter Braak CJ. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology. 67(5):1167-1179.
40. ter Braak CJ, Verdonschot PF. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci. 57(3): 255-289. doi: 10.1007/bf00877430
41. Williams CB. 1943. Area and number of species. Nature. 152:264-267.
42. Zhang C, Wen L, Wang Y, Liu C, Zhou Y, Lei G. 2020. Can constructed wetlands be wildlife refuges? A review of their potential biodiversity conservation value. Sustainability. 12(4):144