Analysis of Articles in the Field of Music Technologies

Öz

Technology is advancing day by day, influencing every aspect of human life. Music stands out as one of the primary domains profoundly impacted by this development and change. The interaction between technology and music spans various areas, including the creation and reproduction of music, innovations in enabling listeners to access music, ease of use, and the application of technology in music education. Within this realm of interaction, technology has played a crucial role in the digital transformation of music production, the evolution of recording technologies, and the processing of sound. With the introduction of smartphones into our lives, numerous applications have emerged, contributing to the individual user experience. This interconnection between music and technology provides opportunities for musicians, music educators, and music technologists to engage in academic research in this field. This research, a qualitative study, aims to examine articles scanned in the Web of Science (WoS) database in the field of music technologies. The research model utilized the document analysis method. Thirty-seven articles with the keyword "music technologies" in the WoS database were included in the study. The acquired data is presented and interpreted in the relevant tables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Technology in Music Education
• Music Technologies
• Web of Science

MÜZİK TEKNOLOJİLERİ ALANINDA YAZILMIŞ MAKALELERİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Teknoloji her geçen gün ilerlemekte ve insan hayatının her alanı, bu gelişim ve değişimden etkilenmektedir. Müzik, teknolojiden etkilenen bu alanların başında gelmektedir. Müziğin yaratımı ve çoğaltımı aşamasında, dinleyici olarak insanın müziğe ulaşabilmesindeki getirdiği yenilikler, kolaylıklar ve müzik eğitiminde teknolojinin kullanımı gibi farklı alanlarla teknoloji ile etkileşim içerisindedir. Bu etkileşim kapsamında, müziğin üretimi alanında yaşanan dijital dönüşüm ile gelişen kayıt teknolojileri ve sesin işleniş biçimi, akıllı telefonların hayatımıza girişi ile yaşanan bireysel kullanıcı boyutunda birçok uygulama yardımıyla, müzisyenlerin ve müzik eğitimcilerinin günlük hayatlarına kattıklarıyla, müzik ve teknoloji hep içi içe bulunmuştur. Bu durum müzisyenlerin, müzik eğitimcilerinin ve müzik teknologlarının bu alanda akademik çalışmalar yapmalarına olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu araştırma, müzik teknolojileri alanında Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında taranan makaleleri incelemeyi amaçlayan nitel bir çalışmadır. Araştırma modeli olarak doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya, WoS veri tabanında yer alan “music technologies” anahtar sözcüklü erişime açık 37 makale dahil edilmiş, elde edilen veriler ilgili tablolar altında gösterilmiş ve yorumlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Müzik Eğitiminde Teknoloji
• Müzik Teknolojileri
• Web of Science

Kaynakça

1. Andrew, B., & Steven, D. (2011). eBility: From tool use to partnership. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 4(2-3), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.4.2-3.201_1
2. Arapgirlioğlu, H. (2003). Müzik teknolojisi ve yeni yüzyılda müzik eğitimi. Cumhuriyetimizin 80. Yılında Müzik Sempozyumu. Malatya: İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi GSEB-MEABD.
3. Araujo, V., & Paula, L. (2017). Phonographic industry: summit and decline in the 20th century. Journal of Media Critiques, 133-150.
4. Battier, M. (2007). What thegrm brought to music: from musique concrete to acousmatic music. Organised Sound, 189-202.
5. BBC Turkish. (2008, 03 28). https://www.bbc.co.uk/turkish/news/story/2008/03/080328_oldestsong.shtml adresinden alındı
6. Blanco, A., & Ramirez, R. (2019). Evaluation of a sound quality visual feedback system for bow learning technique in violin beginners. Frontiers in Psychology, 101(65). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00165
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (s. 82). içinde Pegem akademi.
8. Canazza, S., Poli, D. G., & Vidolin, A. G. (2022). Music and computer: The centro di sonologia computazionale at Padova university, a 50-Year history. Sensors, 22(3465). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093465

9. Castanheira, J. S. (2022). Introduction to the sociology of music technologies: An ontological review. Methaodos Revistade Ciencias Sociales, 10(2), 419-429. https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v10i2.574
10. Chamberlain, A., Bødker, M., Kallionpää, M., Ramchurn, R., Roure, D. D., Benford, S., . . . Gasselseder, H. P. (2018). The design of future music technologies: ‘sounding out’ AI, immersive experiences & brain controlled interfaces. Audio Mostly. https://doi.org/10.1145/3243274.3243314
11. Creech, A. (2019). Using music technology creatively to enrich later-life: AlLiterature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(117). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00117
12. Ergur, A. (2002). Portedeki hayalet. Bağlam. Gibbs, L. (2018). Synthesizers, virtual orchestras, and ableton live: digitally-rendered music on broadway and musicians’ union resistance. Washington University Open Schoolarship (44).
13. Gorbunova, I. B., & Mezentseva, S. V. (2021). The far-eastern ritual “bear holiday” in the space of computer musical technologies. Horizons of Musicology, 2, 34-42.
14. Gorbunova, I. B., & Mikhutkina, N. V. (2020). Computer musical creative work in the russian initial vocational education system. Propósitos y Representaciones, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n2.523
15. Gorbunova, I. B., & Plotnikov, K. Y. (2020). Computer Music technologies in the system of present-day musical education: an attempt of terminological analysis. Information Technology in Music Education (3), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.33779/2587-6341.2020.3.168-181
16. Gorbunova, I. B., & Zalivadny, M. S. (2020). The complex model of the semantic space of music: structure and features. Horizons of Musicology, 4, 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2021.1984023
17. Günay, E., & Özdemir, M. A. (2006). Müzik öğretimi teknolojisi ve materyal geliştirme (s. 16). içinde Ankara: Bağlam.
18. Harkins, N., & Prior, N. (2022). (Dis)locating democratization: music technologies in practice. Popular Music and Society, 1(45), 84-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2021.1984023
19. Hogg, B. (2012). Music technology, or technologies of music? The Cultural Study of Music (s. 217-226). içinde Routledge.
20. Hotcourses. (2021). https://www.hotcourses-turkey.com/study/training-degrees/england-exc-london/music-technology-production-courses/loc/75/cgory/lk.-4/sin/ct/page/4/programs.html adresinden alındı
21. Işıkhan, C. (2013). Müzikte teknolojik süreç ve süreçteki değişimiyle Türkiye' de müzik teknolojisi eğitimi. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 102-111.
22. James, K. (2020). Genre publics. popular music, technologies, and class in indonesia. Popular Music, 41(1), 116-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143022000198
23. Jensenius, A. R. (2013). An action–sound approach to teaching interactive music. Organised Sound (18), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771813000095
24. Kachur, M. M., Dikun, I. A., Zhyshkovych, M. A., Stepanova, L. P., & Synevych, I. S. (2021). Digital educational space in the professional training of a musical art teacher. Digital Educational Space in the Professional Training of a Music Art, 12(35), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.35.10
25. Karasar, N. (tarih yok). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi kavramlar-ilkeler-teknikler. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
26. Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
27. Kerrigan, F., Larsen, G., Hanratty, S., & Korta, K. (2014). 'Gimme Shelter': experiencing pleasurable escape through the musicalisation of running. Marketing Theory, 14(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114521451
28. Kirk, D., Durrant, A., Wood, G., Leong, T. W., & Wright, P. (2016). Understanding the sociality of experience in mobile music listening with pocketsong. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901874
29. Konovalov, A. A., & Butorina, N. I. (2021). Computer-based music production: specifics of professional training. The Education and Science Journal, 23(8), 84-110. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-8-84-110
30. Krumhansl, C. L. (2017). Listening niches across a century of popular music. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(431). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00431
31. Magnusson, T. (2021). The migration of musical instruments: On the socio-technological conditions of musical evolution. Journal of New Music Research, 50(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2021.1907420
32. McAlpine, K. (2016). BitBox!: A case study interface for teaching real-time adaptive music composition for video games. Journal of Music Technology and Education, 9(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.9.2.191_1
33. Mckinlay, M., Brown, A., & Elmholdt, K. T. (2022). Anything but Sony! Meshworking, identity multiplicity and the emergence of portable music players. Industrial Marketing Management (107), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.09.014
34. Merrick, B., & Joseph, D. (2023). ICT and music technology during COVID-19: Australian music educator perspectives. Research Studies in Music Education, 45(1), 189-201.
35. Nakamura, E., & Kaneko, K. (2019). Statistical evolutionary laws in music styles. Scientific Reports (9). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52380-6
36. Nowak, R. (2016). Music listening activities in the digital age: An act of cultural participation through adequate music. Leonardo Music Journal (26), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/LMJ_a_00961
37. Özen, Y., & Gül, A. (2007). Sosyal ve eğitim bilimleri araştırmalarında evren-örneklem sorunu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, s. 394-422.
38. Palamara, J., & Deal, V. S. (2020). A dynamic representation solution for machine learning-aided performance technology. Technology and Code, 3(29). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00029
39. Parolini, G. (2017). Music without musicians ... but with scientists, technicians and computer companies. Organised Sound, 22(2), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577181700019X
40. Pascula-Vallejo, C. D., Casillas-Martin, S., & Cabezas-Gonzalez, M. (2022). Creative assessment approaches to human interactions and music interfaces technology. A systematic literature review. Revista Electrónica Complutense de Investigación en Educación Musical (19), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.5209/reciem.77242
41. Ramsey, F., & Mccormick, T. (1994). Sound and Recording.
42. Reehl, D. (2021). Musicalizing the heart sutra: Buddhism, sound, and media in contemporary Japan. Religions, 12(759). https://doi.org/10.3390/ rel12090759
43. Say, A. (2008). Müzik nedir, nasıl bir sanattır? (s. 19). içinde İstanbul: Evrensel.
44. Shipkova, K. M. (2020). The use of music enriched environment in cognitive impairment in adults (A theoretical review). Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 9(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2020090104
45. Slama, M. (2021). Genre publics: Popular music, technologies, and class in indonesia. Bijdragen Tot De Taal – Land – En Volkenkunde, 177(2-3), 407-410. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17702004
46. Solmaz, P. B. (2021). Teknolojik gelişmelerin müzik alanında oluşturduğu yeniliklerle ilgili bir değerlendirme. Motif Akademi Halk Bilim Dergisi, 666-678.
47. Stowell, D., & Dixon, S. (2014). Integration of informal music technologies in secondary school music lessons. British Journal of Music Education, 31(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505171300020X
48. V. Araujo, L. P. (2017). Phonographic industry: summit and decline in the 20th century. Journal of Media Critiques, s. 133-150.
49. Washburn, A., Wright, M. J., Chafe, C., & Fujioka, T. (2021). Temporal coordination in piano duet networked music performance (NMP): Interactions between acoustic transmission latency and musical role asymmetries. Frontiers in Psychology (12). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707090
50. Werner, A., & Johansson, S. (2016). Experts, dads and technology gendered talk about online music. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877914555463
51. Werner, A., Gadir, T., & Boise, S. D. (2021). Broadening research in gender and music practice. Popular Music, 39(3-4), 636-651. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143020000495
52. Woods, P. J. (2023). The pedagogy of gear touchers: Unearthing modes of teaching within and through DIY venues. Teachers College Record, 125(6), 85-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231190498
53. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (s. 39). İçinde, Seçkin.
54. Zhang, P., & Sui, X. (2017). Application of digital music technology in music pedagogy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(12), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i12.7966