The Process-Oriented Approach in Translation Training

Öz

The present study is a Turkish translation of the book chapter written by Daniel Gile (1994) discussing the process-oriented translation training. The basic differences between the process- and product-oriented approaches, the philosophy and the features of the process-oriented approach, the suggested model and its stages are discussed along with an application example.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• translation model
• translator training
• process-oriented approach

Çeviri Eğitiminde Süreç Odaklı Yaklaşım

Öz

Bu çalışma, Daniel Gile'ın(1994) kaleme aldığı, süreç odaklı çeviri eğitimini anlatan kitap bölümünün İngilizce'den Türkçe'ye çevirisidir. Çalışmada, süreç odaklı ve ürün odaklı çeviri yaklaşımları arasındaki temel farklar, süreç odaklı yaklaşımın özellikleri, felsefesi, önerilen modelin tanıtımı ve aşamaları bir uygulama örneği ile ele alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• çeviri modeli
• çevirmen eğitimi
• süreç odaklı çeviri

Teşekkür

Dr. Daniel Gile'a makalenin çeviri sürecindeki desteğinden ötürü teşekkür ederim.

Kaynakça

1. Delisle, J. (1980). L’analyse du discours comme méthode de traduction. Ottawa: Editions de l’Université d’Ottawa.
2. Delisle, J. (1981). De la théorie à la pédagogie: réflexions méthodologiques. L’Einseignement de l’Interpretation et de la traduction de la theorie a la pedagogie, Ottawa, Editions de l’Université d’Ottawa, 135-151.
3. Gémar, J. (1983). De la pratique à la théorie, l’apport des praticiens à la théorie générale de la traduction. Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators' Journal, 28(4). 323-333.
4. Gentile, A. (1991). The application of theoretical constructs from a number of disciplines for the development of a methodology of teaching in interpreting and translating. Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators' Journal, 36 (2/3). 344-351.
5. Gile, D. (1990a). Basic Concepts and Models for Conference Interpretation Training, Paris: INALCO & CEEI (ISIT).
6. Gile, D. (1992b). Basic Theoretical Components in Interpreter and Translator Training. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddegaard (Eds.) Teaching Translation and Interpreting – Training, Talent and Experience, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 185-93.
7. Komissarov, V. (1985). The practical value of translation theory. Babel: International Journal of translation, 31(4), 208-12.
8. Larose, R. (1985). La théorie de la traduction: à quoi ça sert? Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators' Journal, 30(4). 405-406.

9. Martins, M. A. P. (1992). For a Process-oriented Methodology in Translation Teaching. Paper given at the Translation Studies Congress: “Translation Studies – An Interdicipline,” 9-12 September, 1992, Vienna, Austria.
10. Pöchhacker, F. (1992). The role of theory in simultaneous interpreting. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddegaard (Eds.) Teaching Translation and Interpreting. Training, Talent and Experience. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 211-220.
11. Sager, J. C. (1992). The Translator as Terminologist. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddgaard (Eds.) Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 107-122.
12. Shlesinger, M. (1992). Lexicalization in Translation: An Empirical Study of Students’ Progress. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddegaard (Eds.) Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123-127.
13. Viaggio, S. (1992). Few ad libs on communicative and semantic translation, translators, interpreters, their teachers and their schools. Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators' Journal, 37(2), 278-288