SUSTAINABLE BUILDING RENOVATION PRACTICES: Simple additive weighting

Öz

The concept of sustainability has become a priority in the decisions made by all disciplines today. In the field of architecture, sustainable decisions are incorporated at all stages, such as new construction, life cycle, demolition, and renovation. The reuse of buildings is considered a sustainable approach in this sense. In addition to the reuse of buildings, the renovation of existing buildings to gain sustainable identities also constitutes another step in sustainable architecture. In this study, sample buildings were evaluated based on parameters determined through a literature review within the scope of sustainable building renovation practices. The study included research and case studies on sustainable architecture, sustainable building renovation, and sustainable renovation practices. Sustainable building renovation methods were compiled using research studies conducted on the subject. After determining the parameters of sustainable building renovation through a literature review, structures with sustainable renovation practices were evaluated within the scope of this study. The sustainable renovation qualities of the buildings evaluated in the study were scored using the Simple Additive Weighting method. The aim of this study is to reveal the diversity of renovation processes based on the parameters determined through the studies conducted and to develop new proposals based on the structures examined. As a result of the study, sustainable renovation practices were evaluated based on the characteristics of the structures. In line with the findings obtained, the advantages of sustainable renovation processes in the life cycle of buildings have been emphasized, and recommendations have been developed within the scope of renovation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainability
• architectural design
• reuse of buildings
• sustainable renovation of buildings

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR BİNA YENİLEME UYGULAMALARI: Basit toplamlı ağırlıklandırma

Öz

Sürdürülebilirlik, günümüzde tüm disiplinlerin alacağı kararlarda öncelikli olan bir kavram haline gelmiştir. Mimarlık disiplininde de yeni inşa, yaşam döngüsü, yıkım, yenileme gibi tüm aşamalarda sürdürülebilir kararlara yer verilmektedir. Binaların yeniden kullanılması bu anlamda başlıca sürdürülebilir bir yaklaşım olarak karşılanmaktadır. Binaların yeniden kullanılmalarının yanı sıra mevcut binaların sürdürülebilir kimlikler kazanmak üzere yenilenmesi de bir diğer sürdürülebilir mimarlık adımını oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada sürdürülebilir bina yenileme uygulamaları kapsamında literatür taraması yapılarak belirlenen parametreler doğrultusunda örnek yapılar değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada sürdürülebilir mimarlık, binaların sürdürülebilir yenilenmesi, sürdürülebilir yenileme uygulamaları kapsamında araştırmalar yapılarak örnek çalışmalara yer verilmiştir. Konu kapsamında yapılan araştırma çalışmalarından yararlanılarak sürdürülebilir bina yenileme yöntemleri bir araya getirilmiştir. Literatür taraması ile sürdürülebilir bina yenileme parametrelerinin belirlenmesinin ardından çalışma kapsamında sürdürülebilir yenileme uygulamaları bulunan yapılar değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada değerlendirilen yapıların sürdürülebilir yenileme nitelikleri, Basit Toplamlı Ağırlıklandırma (Simple Additive Weighting) yöntemi kullanılarak puanlandırılmıştır. Çalışmada amaçlanan, yapılan çalışmalar doğrultusunda belirlenen parametreler ile yenileme süreçleri için çeşitliliğin ortaya konması ve irdelenen yapılar üzerinden yeni önerilerin geliştirilmesidir. Çalışmanın sonucunda yapıların özelliklerine göre yapılan sürdürülebilir yenileme uygulamaları değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda binaların yaşam döngüsünde sürdürülebilir yenileme işlemlerinin avantajı vurgulanarak yenileme işlemleri kapsamında öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilirlik
• mimari tasarım
• binaların yeniden kullanımı
• binaların sürdürülebilir yenilenmesi

Kaynakça

1. Apostolopoulos, V., Mamounakis, I., Seitaridis, A., Tagkoulis, N., Kourkoumpas, D. S., Iliadis, P., Angelakoglou, K., & Nikolopoulos, N. (2023). Аn integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach towards sustainable building renovation via a dynamic online tool. Applied Energy, 334, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120710
2. Balçık, S. (2026). Binaların sürdürülebilir yenilenmesi üzerine model önerisi: Sivas tren garları alan çalışması. (Unpublished Doctorate Thesis) Eskişehir Technical University, INS, Eskişehir.
3. Berardinis, P. D., Rotilio, M., & Capannolo, L. (2012). Energy and sustainable strategies in the renovation of existing buildings: An Italian case study. Sustainability, 9(8), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081472
4. Beşiroğlu, Ş., & Özmen, E. (2022). Sürdürülebilir mimarlık kapsamında ekolojik bina ve enerji etkin binanın basit toplamlı ağırlıklandırma yöntemi ilek arşılaştırılması. Tasarım Kuram Dergisi, 18(35), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2022.00378
5. Cansız, A. U. (2023, November 29). İş Bankası Resim Heykel Müzesi. Arkitera: Retrieved 10.10.2024 from https://www.arkitera.com/proje/is-bankasi-resim-heykel-muzesi/
6. Caruso, M., Buttazzoni, M., Passoni, C., Labò, S., Marini , A., & Pinho, R. (2024). An updated multi-criteria decision-making method for the sustainable renovation of buildings including environmental, economic and social life-cycle metrics. Journal of Building Engineering, 98, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110967
7. Churchman, C. W., & Ackoff, R. L. (1954). An approximate measure of value. Operations Research, 2(2), 172-187.
8. Cristina, B., Paolo, C. S., & Spigliantini, G. (2017). Evaluation of refurbishment alternatives for an Italian vernacular building considering architectural heritage, energy efficiency and costs. Energy Procedia, 133, 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.370

9. Çiğan, A., & Yamaçlı, R. (2020). Doğal enerji, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve mimarlık politikaları. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 8(1), 554-571.
10. Dayaratne, R. (2018). Toward sustainable development: Lessons from vernacular settlements of Sri Lanka. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(3), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.04.002
11. Elefante, C. (2012). The greenest building is... one that is already built. Forum Journal National Trust for Historic Preservation, 27(1), 62-72.
12. European Commission. (2024). Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Retrieved 02.03.2025 from https://commission.europa.eu/: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficientbuildings/energy-performance-buildings-directive_en
13. Fahlstedt, O., Rasmussen, F. N., Temeljotov-Salaj, A., Huang, L., & Bohne, R. A. (2024). Building renovations and life cycle assessment - A scoping literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 203, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114774
14. Jensen, P. A., Maslesa, E., Berg, J. B., & Thuesen, C. (2018). 10 questions concerning sustainable building renovation. Building and Environment, 143, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.051
15. Jiménez-Pulido, C., Jiménez-Rivero, A., & García-Navarro, J. (2022). Improved sustainability certification systems to respond to building renovation challenges based on a literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 95, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103575
16. Leichter, M., & Piccardo, C. (2024). Assessing life cycle sustainability of building renovation and reconstruction: A comprehensive review of case studies and methods. Building and Environment, 262, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111817
17. Lidelöw, S., Örn, T., Luciani, A., & Rizzo, A. (2019). Energy-efficiency measures for heritage buildings: A literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 45, 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.029
18. Othman, A. A., & Elsaay, H. (2018). Adaptive reuse: An innovative approach for generating sustainable values for historic buildings in developing countries. Organization Technology and Management in Construction An International Journal, 10(1), 1704-1718. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0002
19. Özmehmet, E. (2007). Avrupa ve Türkiye’deki sürdürülebilir mimarlık anlayışına eleştirel bir bakış. Journal of Yasar University, 2(7), 809-826.
20. Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., & Daneshkhah, A. (2021). Predicting the technical reusability of load-bearing building components: A probabilistic approach towards developing a Circular Economy framework. Journal of Building Engineering, 42, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102791
21. Riuttala, M., Harala, L., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Huuhka, S. (2024). How building component reuse creates economic value – Identifying value capture determinants from a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141112
22. Serbest Yenidünya, S., & Limoncu, S. (2020). Bina yenileme uygulamaları için sürdürülebilirlik ölçütlerinin belirlenmesi: Sistematik literatür taraması ve meta analizi. Megaron, 15(2), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.14744/megaron.2020.92499
23. Sonebi, M., Ammar, Y., & Diederich, P. (2016). Sustainability of cement, concrete and cement replacement materials in construction. J. M. Hatib içinde, Sustainability of Construction Materials (Second Edition), Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering. 371-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100370-1.00015-9
24. Souza, E. (2021, September 7). Will refurbishment be the architectural specialization of the future? Retrieved 18.02.2025 from https://www.archdaily.com/965900/will-refurbishment-be-the-architectural-specializationof- the-future
25. TDK. (2024). Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri. Retrieved 18.10.2024 from https://sozluk.gov.tr/
26. URL-1. Retrieved 20.10.2024 from http://www.surdurulebilirkalkinma.gov.tr/temel-tanimar/
27. URL-2. Retrieved 13.06.2024 from https://www.gbig.org/buildings/971349
28. URL-3. Retrieved 10.09.2024 from https://www.benthemcrouwel.com/projects/dutch-charity-lotteries-officebuilding
29. URL-4. Retrieved 13.06.2024 from https://www.archdaily.com/913966/benthem-crouwel-designs-the-netherlandsmost-sustainable-office-renovation
30. URL-5. Retrieved 09.10.2024 from https://giampolini.com/restoration-projects/adobe-building-sf/
31. URL-6. Retrieved 11.10.2024 from https://www.archdaily.com/986333/valtorta-52-offices-parkassociati? ad_source=search&ad_medium= projects_tab
32. URL-7. Retrieved 11.10.2024 from https://dcarchcenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/2023- 05/Resources_130%20-%20U.S.Green BuildingCouncil-HQRenovation.pdf
33. URL-8. Retrieved 10.10.2024 from https://www.bolidt.com/en/tu-delft-bk-city
34. URL-9. Retrieved 10.10.2024 from https://except.eco/projects/bkcity-slim-refurbishment/
35. URL-10. Retrieved 13.06.2024 from https://www.archdaily.com/1009355/international-institute-for-geoinformation-sciences-civic-architects-plus-vdndp?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab
36. URL-11. Retrieved 11.10.2024 from https://www.archdaily.com/995371/schoenenkwartier-shoe-museum-civicarchitects?ad_source=search& ad_medium=projects_tab
37. URL-12. Retrieved 09.10.2024 from https://teget.com/project/is-bankasi-painting-sculpture-museum/
38. URL-13. Retrieved 09.10.2024 from https://www.isbank.com.tr/bankamizi-taniyin/turkiye-is-bankasi- resimheykel-muzesini-sanatseverlerle-bulusturuyor
39. USGBC. (2012). Adobe SF 601 Townsend. Retrieved 11.12.2024 from https://www.usgbc.org/projects/recertification-adobe-sf-601-townsend?view=overview
40. USGBC. (2023). USGBC HQ Renovation. Retrieved 11.12.2024 from https://www.usgbc.org/projects/ usgbc-hqrenovation-0
41. USGBC. (2023). Zala Ofis Binası. Retrieved 11.12.2024 from https://www.usgbc.org/search?Search+Library=% 22Zala%201%20Office%20 Building%22
42. Ürük, Z. F. (2020). Mekânların sürdürülebilirlik anlamında yeniden işlevlendirilmesi. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences (IJSHS), 4(2), 165- 186.
43. Vardopoulos, I. (2019). Critical sustainable development factors in the adaptive reuse of urban industrial buildings. A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101684
44. WCED. (1987). “Our Common Future”. The World Commision on Environment and Development. Retrieved 20.01.2025 from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
45. Zhang, X., Nie, S., He, M., & Wang, J. (2021). Energy-saving renovation of old urban buildings: A case study of Beijing. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 28, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSITE.2021.101632