ÖZEL EĞİTİM ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÜNİVERSİTE MEZUNİYET BEKLENTİLERİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARININ BELİRLENMESİ

Öz

Üniversiteye başlayan öğrencilerin beklentileri önemlidir; çünkü psikolojik faktörlerin yanı sıra eğitim beklentileri ve hedefleri de üniversite öğrencilerinin başarıları üzerinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının mezuniyet beklentilerini belirlemek, öğretmen yetiştirme programlarını iyileştirmek, özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak ve politika oluşturmaya katkı sağlamak için önemli bir adım olabilir. Bu araştırmada özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının üniversite mezuniyet beklentilerine ilişkin algılarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Özel Eğitim Öğretmenliği bölümünde eğitim alan78’i kadın, 43’i erkek olmak üzere 121 özel eğitim öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Tekil tarama modeli kullanılan bu araştırmada Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Üniversite Mezuniyet Beklentileri Ölçeği ile veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının üniversite mezuniyetine ilişkin olarak mesleki beklentilerinin orta düzeyde, bireysel beklentileri ile genel üniversite mezuniyet beklentilerinin ise yüksek düzeyde olduğu bulunmuştur. Özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının Özel Eğitim Öğretmenliği bölümünü tercih nedenine göre üniversite mezuniyet beklentileri arasında anlamlı fark olduğu; bölümü kendi istediği için seçenlerin üniversite mezuniyet beklentilerinin en yüksek olduğu, bunu sırasıyla puanı uygun olduğu için seçenlerin ve ailesi istediği için seçenlerin izlediği görülmüştür. Özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının Özel Eğitim Öğretmenliği Bölümünü tercih nedeninin üniversite mezuniyet beklentileri üzerinde büyük bir etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Uygulamaya ve ileri araştırmalara yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Özel eğitim öğretmen adayları
• üniversite mezuniyet beklentileri
• mesleki ve bireysel beklentiler
• tercih nedenleri

IDENTIFYING PERCEPTIONS REGARDING UNIVERSITY GRADUATION EXPECTATIONS AMONG SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER CANDIDATES

Abstract

The expectations of students entering university are important because, in addition to psychological factors, educational expectations and goals play an crucial role in the success of university students. Identifying the graduation expectations of teacher candidates can be an important step to improve teacher training programs, meet the needs of special education teacher candidates, and contribute to policy making. In this study, it was aimed to determine the perceptions of special education teacher candidates about their college graduation expectations. A total of 121 teacher candidates, 78 female and 43 male, studying at Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Special Education Teacher Education Department participated in the study. In the study, which was designed with a single survey model, data were collected with Personal Information Form and College Graduation Expectations Scale. As a result of the study, it was found that special education teacher candidates' professional expectations regarding college graduation were at a medium level, while their personal expectations and general university graduation expectations were at a high level. There was a significant difference between the university graduation expectations of special education teacher candidates by the reason for choosing the department of Special Education Teaching. Suggestions for practice and further research were made.

Keywords

• Special education teacher candidates
• college graduation expectations
• professional and personal expectations
• reasons for preference

Kaynakça

1. Abayadeera, N., & Watty, K. (2014). The expectation-performance gap in generic skills in accounting graduates. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-09-2013-0059.
2. Amani, J., & Sima, R. (2015). The status of career counselling services in higher learning institutions in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 2(8), 18-28. 19.09.2023 tarihinde https://web.archive.org/web/20180410141104id_/http://www.ijessnet.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/3.pdf adresind enerişilmiştir.
3. Andrade, C. (2020). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000.
4. Baglama, B., & Uzunboylu, H. (2017). The relationship between career decision-making self-efficacy and vocational outcome expectations of preservice special education teachers. South African Journal of Education, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n4a1520.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986 (23-28).
6. Bank, B. J., Biddle, B. J., & Slavings, R. L. (1992). What do Students Want?: Expectations and Undergraduate Persistence. The Sociological Quarterly, 33(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1992.tb00378.x . Beck, E. D., & Jackson, J. J. (2022). Personalized prediction of behaviors and experiences: an idiographic person–situation test. Psychological Science, 33(10), 1767-1782. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221093307.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2023). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (30. Basım). Ankara::PegemAkademi.
8. Can, A. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi(5. Basım). Ankara:PegemAkademi.

9. Chakkalackal, L., Rosan, C., Corfield, F., Stavrou, S., Kennedy, H. A., Bou, C., & Breedvelt, J. (2021). A mixed-method evaluation of video interaction guidance (vig) delivered by early-years workers in a socially disadvantaged urban community. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 16(5), 396-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-08-2020-0053.
10. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661-703. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. Basım). Erlbaum. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Shattered images: Understanding expectations and realities of field experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5-6), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051x(93)90030-k. Couper, M. P., Traugott, M. W.,& Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2), 230-253. https://doi.org/10.1086/322199.
12. Eccles (Parsons), J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midley, G. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. J. T. Spence (Ed.). Achievement and achievement motivation içinde (ss. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman. Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect size, statistical power, meta-analysis and interpretation research results. Cambridge University Press.
13. Eren, A. (2009). Examining the teacher efficacy and achievement goals as predictors of Turkish student teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 69-87. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.174283.
14. Etikan, I. Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1),1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
15. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll). Sage.
16. Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2014). Why do student teachers enrol for a teaching degree? A study of teacher recruitment in Portugal and Sweden. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(4), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.929883.
17. Fraser, W. J., & Killen, R. (2003). Factors influencing academic success or failure of first-year and senior university students: do education students and lecturers perceive things differently?. South African journal of education, 23(4), 254-263. 19.09.2023 tarihindehttps://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=90412fa25b490578d53eaa5bd177fd0228bf5a69 adresinden erişilmiştir.
18. Hatem, G., Zeidan, J., Goossens, H., & Moreira, C. (2022). Normality testing methods and the importance of skewness and kurtosis in statistical analysis. BAU Journal - Science and Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.54729/ktpe9512.
19. Holland, J. L., Whitney, D. R., Cole, N. S.,& Richards, M. (1969). An empirical occupational classification derived from a theory of personality and intended for practice and research(ACT Research Rep. No. 29). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.12.08.2023 tarihinde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED031194.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
20. Hogan, R.,& Blake, R. (1999). John Holland’s Vocational Typology and Personality Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1696.
21. Karadağ, C. A. (2024). Choosing teaching as a career: examination of motivational sources of special education teacher candidates. Base for Electronic Educational Sciences, 5(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.29329/bedu.2024.651.2.
22. Karasar, N. (2002). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (11. Basım). Ankara:Nobel.
23. Khurshid, F. (2014). Factors affecting higher education students’ success. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 1(5), 40-47. 13.08.2023 tarihinde http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&volume=5&publication_year=2014&pages=39-47&journal=Asia+Pacific+Journal+of+Education%2C+Arts+and+Sciences&issue=1&author=F.+Khurshid&title=Factors+affecting+higher+education+students%E2%80%99+success adresinden erişilmiştir.
24. Killen, R. (1994). Differences between students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of factors influencing students’ academic success at university. Higher Education Research & Development, 13(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436940130210.
25. Kim, E., Newton, F. B., Downey, R. G., & Benton, S. L. (2010). Personal factors impacting college student success: Constructing college learning effectiveness inventory (CLEI). College Student Journal, 44(1), 112-126. 18.09.2023 tarihinde https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260124913_Personal_Factors_Impacting_College_Student_Success_Constructing_College_Learning_Effectiveness_Inventory_CLEI adresinden erişilmiştir.
26. Lent, R. W., Lopez Jr, A. M., Lopez, F. G., & Sheu, H. B. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.002.
27. Niles, S. G. (1993). The relationship between Holland types preferences for career counseling. Journal of Career Development, 19(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/089484539301900306.
28. Oppenheimer, A. J., Pannucci, C. J., Kasten, S. J,. & Haase, S. C. (2011). Survey says? A primer on web-based survey design and distribution. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 128(1), 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182174413.
29. Orçan, F., & Çelik, R. (2021). Adaptation of college outcome expectation questionnaire to Turkısh. International Journal of Turkish Literature, Culture, Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.5326.
30. Özçomak, M. S., & Çebi, K. (2017). İstatistiksel güç analizi: Atatürk Üniversitesi iktisadi ve idari bilimler dergisi üzerine bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi,31(2), 413-431. 18.09.2023 tarihinde https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/atauniiibd/issue/28998/291187 adresinden erişilmiştir.
31. Pike, G. R. (2006). Students’ personality types, intended majors, and college expectations: Further evidence concerning psychological and sociological interpretations of Holland’s theory. Research in Higher Education, 47, 801-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9016-5.
32. Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., & Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: a practical or research-based profession? teacher candidates' approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.004.
33. Renner, K., Klee, S., & Oertzen, T. v. (2020). Bringing back the person into behavioural personality science using big data. European Journal of Personality, 34(5), 670-686. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2303.
34. Yavuz Tabak, B., Yenel, K., Tabak, H., & Şahin, F. (2021). Prospective teachers’ expectations and concerns about the future: using possible selves theory. Journal of Education, 201(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420903260.