The relationship between writing self-efficacy and writing disposition: The moderating role of gender

Abstract

Writing is a multifaceted and challenging process that involves cognitively complex operations as well as affective and social dimensions. One of the characteristics of students who can overcome the difficulties encountered in this multifaceted process is that they have high writing self-efficacy. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between middle school students' writing self-efficacy and their writing dispositions and to determine whether gender plays a moderating role in this relationship. The study was conducted within the framework of correlational design, one of the quantitative research methods. The research data were collected from a total of 372 secondary school students (196 female, 176 male) determined by cluster sampling method. Writing Self-Efficacy Scale and Writing Disposition Scale were used as data collection tools. The data were analyzed using Process Macro developed by Hayes (2022) and integrated as an add-on to SPSS software. The findings of the study revealed that writing self-efficacy significantly predicted writing disposition; however, gender did not have a moderating effect on this relationship. In line with the results obtained, various suggestions for future studies in the field of writing education were made

Keywords

• Writing disposition
• writing self-efficacy
• gender
• writing education

Yazma öz-yeterliliği ile yazma eğilimi arasindaki ilişki: Cinsiyetin düzenleyici rolü

Öz

Yazma, bilişsel açıdan karmaşık işlemler içermesinin yanı sıra, duyuşsal ve sosyal boyutları da bulunan çok yönlü ve zorlayıcı bir süreçtir. Bu çok yönlü süreçte karşılaşılan zorlukların üstesinden gelebilen öğrencilerin bir özelliği de yüksek yazma öz-yeterliklerine sahip olmalarıdır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, ortaokul öğrencilerinin yazma öz-yeterlikleri ile yazma eğilimleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve bu ilişkide cinsiyetin düzenleyici bir rol oynayıp oynamadığını belirlemektir. Çalışma, nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden korelasyonel desen çerçevesinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırma verileri, küme örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen toplam 372 ortaokul öğrencisinden (196 kız, 176 erkek) toplanmıştır. Veri toplama araçları olarak Yazma Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği ile Yazma Eğilimi Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, SPSS yazılımına eklenti olarak entegre edilen ve Hayes tarafından geliştirilen Process Macro aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, yazma öz-yeterliğinin yazma eğilimini anlamlı düzeyde yordadığını; ancak cinsiyetin bu ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkisinin bulunmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Elde edilen sonuçlar doğrultusunda, yazma eğitimi alanında gerçekleştirilecek çalışmalara yönelik çeşitli önerilere yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yazma eğilimi
• Yazma öz-yeterlik
• cinsiyet
• yazma eğitimi

Kaynakça

1. Adams, A. M., & Simmons, F. R. (2019). Exploring individual and gender differences in early writing performance. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9859-0
2. Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları: Sık kullanılan istatiksel analizler ve açıklamaları SPSS çözümleri (1. Baskı). İdeal Kültür.
3. Arıcı, M. A., & Dölek, O. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yazma özyeterlik algı düzeyleri ile yazma başarımları arasındaki ilişki. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(4), 1204-1217.
4. Atasoy, A. (2021). Yazma öz-yeterliği ile yazma becerisi arasındaki ilişki: Bir meta analiz çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(208), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.10024
5. Bağcı, H. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yazma eğilimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 382-401. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.343098
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
7. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
8. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.

9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
10. Baş, G., & Şahin, C. (2013). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin yazma eğilimlerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 3(1), 32-42.
11. Baştuğ, M. (2015). İlkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin yazma eğilimi, tutumu ve yazma tutukluğunun yazma başarısı üzerine etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(180), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4279
12. Berk, R. R., & Ünal, E. (2017). Comparison of writing anxiety and writing dispositions of sixth, seventh and eighth grade students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 237-254.
13. Berninger, V., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers. Journal of School Psychology, 34(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(95)00024-0
14. Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692 Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
15. Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.2.105
16. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of gender development and functioning. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 92–119). The Guilford Press.
17. Chen, M. C., & Lin, H. J. (2009). Self-efficacy, foreign language anxiety as predictors of academic performance among professional program students in a general English proficiency writing test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109(2), 420-430.
18. Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1
19. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Araştırma yöntemleri: Desen ve analiz (A. Apay, Çev.). Anı.
20. Çeçen, M. A., & Deniz, E. (2015). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin yazma eğilimi algıları (Diyarbakır ili örneği). Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(2), 35-48.
21. Daly, J. A. (1977). The effects of writing apprehension on message encoding. Journalism Quarterly, 54(3), 566–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907705400317
22. Daly, J. A. (1978). Writing apprehension and writing competency. The Journal of Educational Research, 72(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1978.10885110
23. Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 242–248.
24. Demir, T. (2011). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin yaratıcı yazma becerileri ile yazma öz-yeterlik algısı ve başarı amaç yönelimi türleri ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
25. Demirel, M. V., & Aydin, İ. S. (2019). Examining high school students’ writing self-efficacy perceptions. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(4), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.4p.106
26. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
27. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
28. Eloff, I., & Ebersöhn, L. (2004). Keys to educational psychology. UCT Press.
29. Erden, Z. T., & Eğilmez, N. İ. (2021). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yazma eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.11243/ijhar.06.03.023
30. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
31. Frank Webb, A., Vandiver, B. J., & Jeung, S. (2016). Does completing an enriched writing course improve writing self-efficacy of talented secondary students? Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215605359
32. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134.
33. Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279.
34. Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2012). Are attitudes toward writing and reading separable constructs? A study with primary grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632732
35. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207–241.
36. Gürbüz, S. (2021). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (2. baskı). Seçkin.
37. Hansen, S. (2009). Gender differences and writing: Self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes, preferences and perceptions. Lambert Academic Publishing.
38. https://mro.massey.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/b92ad18c-3cc2-4a42-9409-6ab7542c25c/content Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2019). Visible learning insights. Routledge.
39. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1–28). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
41. Hetthong, R., & Teo, A. (2013). Does writing self-efficacy correlate with and predict writing performance? International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(1), 157–166.
42. Hidi, S., Berndorff, D., & Ainley, M. (2002). Children’s argument writing, interest, and self-efficacy: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 12, 429–446.
43. Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). The multiple meanings of motivation to write. In S. Hidi & P. Boscolo (Eds.), Writing and motivation (pp. 1–14). Elsevier Academic Press.
44. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
45. İşeri, K. (2010). Evaluation of writing dispositions of elementary school sixth grade students. The New Educational Review, 22, 295–305.
46. İşeri, K., & Ünal, E. (2010). Yazma eğilimi ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(155), 104–117. Jose, P. E. (2013). Doing statistical mediation and moderation. The Guilford Press.
47. Katz, L. G. (1993). Dispositions: Definitions and implications for early childhood practices. Perspectives from ERIC/EECE: A Monograph Series, 4. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED360104.pdf
48. Katz, L. G., & Raths, J. D. (1985). Dispositions as goals for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(4), 301–307.
49. Kılıç, A. F. (2022). Aracı ve düzenleyici etki analizleri. In S. G. Şahin & M. Buluş (Eds.), Adım adım uygulamalı istatistik (pp. 457–486). Pegem A Akademi.
50. Li, Q. (1999). Teachers' beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research, 41(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188990410106
51. Li, Q. (2024). A review of research on writing self-efficacy. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 14(3), 60–64.
52. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Peterson, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123–1135.
53. MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 24–40). The Guilford Press.
54. McCarthy, P., Meier, S., & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing. College Composition and Communication, 36(4), 465–471.
55. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
56. MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Integrating mediators and moderators in research design. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(6), 675–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511414148
57. Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–33). Plenum.
58. Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x
59. Malecki, C. K., & Jewell, J. (2003). Developmental, gender, and practical considerations in scoring curriculum-based measurement writing probes. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10096
60. Mcleod, S. (1987). Some thoughts about feelings: The affective domain and the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 426–435.
61. Meece, J. L., & Courtney, D. P. (1992). Gender differences in students' perceptions: Consequences for achievement-related choices. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 209–228). Erlbaum.
62. Meier, S., McCarthy, P. R., & Schmeck, R. R. (1984). Validity of self-efficacy as a predictor of writing performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8(1), 107–120.
63. Ministry of National Education. (2020). Dört beceride Türkçe dil sınavı: Pilot çalışma sonuçları. https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_01/20094146_dort_beceride_turkce_dil_sinavi_ocak_2020.pdf
64. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA’s study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools. Boston College. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2001i/pdf/p1_IR_book.pdf
65. Olinghouse, N. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading and Writing, 21(1–2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1
66. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
67. Pajares, F. (2007). Empirical properties of a scale to assess writing self-efficacy in school contexts. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 39(4), 239–249.
68. Pajares, F., Hartley, J., & Valiante, G. (2001). Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33(4), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2001.12069012
69. Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1996). Self-efficacy belief in writing of high school students: A path analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 33(2), 163–175.
70. Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120.
71. Pajares, F., Miller, M. D., & Johnson, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 50–61.
72. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1996, April 8–12). Predictive utility and causal influence of the writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary students. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
73. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1997.10544593
74. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 390–405.
75. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 366–381.
76. Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 269–293.
77. Piazza, C. L., & Siebert, C. F. (2008). Development and validation of a writing dispositions scale for elementary and middle school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(5), 275–285.
78. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). American Psychologist, 74(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000356
79. Rose, M. (1983). Cognitive dimension of writer's block. Southern Illinois University Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED230932)
80. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 8, pp. 153–179). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
81. Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Pearson.
82. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). Routledge.
83. Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 337–354.
84. Shell, D. F., Colvin, C., & Bruning, R. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, attribution, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.386
85. Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 91–100.
86. Skar, G. B., Graham, S., & Huebner, A. R. (2023). Efficacy for writing self-regulation, attitude toward writing, and quality of second grade students’ writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1265785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265785
87. Smith, E., & Reimer, D. (2024). Understanding gender inequality in children’s reading behavior: New insights from digital behavioral data. Child Development, 95, 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14001
88. Tabak, G., & Topuzkanamış, E. (2014). An analysis of writing dispositions of 6th grade students in terms of different variables. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 4(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.15.4.2
89. Turkish Language Association (2022). Türkçe sözlük. Türk Dil Kurumu Yayını.
90. Tüfekçioğlu, B. (2010). Yazma becerisinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Dil Dergisi, 149, 30–45. Türk Dil Kurumu. (2022). Türkçe sözlük. Türk Dil Kurumu Yayını.
91. Uçgun, D. (2014). Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin yazma eğilimlerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(175), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.1176
92. Ünal, E. (2010). An analysis of the writing dispositions of fourth and fifth grade elementary school pupils. Education, 131, 319–330.
93. Ürün Kahraman, B. (2021). The relationship between secondary school students’ writing attitudes and anxiety and writing disposition. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 9(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.2p.136
94. White, B. (2007). Are girls better readers than boys? Which boys? Which girls? Canadian Journal of Education, 30(2), 554–581. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/2965
95. Williams, J. D., & Takaku, S. (2011). Gender, writing self-efficacy, and help seeking. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(3), 46–54.
96. Yılmaz Soylu, M., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2019). Yazma öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(5), 2233–2242. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3423
97. Zimmerman, B. J., & Reisemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101