Nutrient profile, digestibility, and feeding value of common vetch (Vicia sativa) alone or intercropping with different forages

Öz

The present study was conducted to assess the nutrient profile, digestibility and feeding values of common vetch alone or intercropping combinations with different cereal and legume forages in central district of Burdur, Türkiye. Approximately 2 kg fresh matter of common vetch alone or 9 different intercropping combinations was harvested from different locations. Nutrient composition and in vitro true dry matter digestibility were analyzed whereas feeding values were calculated. The study showed that intercropping largely decreased the crude protein of common vetch while an increase in fiber and carbohydrate fractions was noted except acid detergent fiber and acid detergent lignin that decreased in intercropping mixtures compared to common vetch alone. In addition, there was an increase in digestibility and feeding values in intercropping mixtures in comparison with common vetch alone. In conclusion, intercropping of common vetch with cereal forages improves the nutrient profile, in vitro digestibility, and feeding values despite a reduction in the crude protein content of intercropping mixtures compared to common vetch.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Common vetch
• intercropping
• nutrient composition
• in vitro digestibility
• cereal crops
• forages

Kaynakça

1. Alatürk, F., Gökkuş, A., Baytekin, H., Özaslan Parlak, A., & Birer, S. (2018). Effect of different ratios of Hungarian vetch with cereal crop mixtures on hay nutrient value. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 2(special issue), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.488174
2. ANKOM DaisyII, 2021. DaisyII incubator operator’s manual. https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/document files/D200_D200I_Manual_RevC_05_12_21.pdf Accessed 10/12/2021.
3. Ansar, M., Ahmed, Z. I., Malik, M. A., Nadeem, M., Majeed, A., & Rischkowsky, B. A. (2010). Forage yield and quality potential of winter cereal-vetch mixtures under rainfed conditions. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 22(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.9755/ajfa.v22i1.4904
4. AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
5. Arslan, A., & Erdoğmuş, C. (2012). Ülkemizde hayvancılığa ve kaba yem sorununa genel bir bakış. Zirrat Mühendisliği, 359, 32-37.
6. Bakoğlu, A., & Memiş, A. (2002). Farklı Farklı oranlarda ekilen adi fiğ (Vicia sativa L.) ve Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) karışımlarında tohum verimi ve bazı özelliklerin belirlenmesi. Fırat Üni. Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi., 14(1), 29-35.
7. Balabanlı, C., Albayrak, S., Türk, M., & Yüksel, O. (2010). A research on determination of hay yields and silage qualities of some vetch+cereal mixtures. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15(2), 204-209.
8. Budaklı Carpıcı, E., & Celik, N. (2014). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with triticale and annual ryegrass. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(1), 66-69.

9. Georgieva, N., Nikolova, I., & Naydenova, Y. (2016). Nutritive value of forage of vetch cultivars (Vicia sativa L., Vicia villosa ROTH.). Banat’s Journal of Biotechnology, 7(14), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.7904/2068–4738–VII(14)–5
10. Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Knudsen, M. T., Jorgensen, J. R., & Jensen, E.S. 2006. Intercropping wheat with pea for improved wheat baking quality. Proceedings of the European Joint Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark, 268-269.
11. Horrocks, V., & Valentine, J. F. (1999). Harvested forages. Academic Press.
12. Karslı, M. A., Akdeniz, H., Levendoğlu, T., & Terzioğlu, Ö. (2005). Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. Turkish Journal of Animal Science, 29(6), 1291-1297.
13. Lithourgidis, A. S., Dhima, K. V., Vasilakoglou, I. B., Dordas, C.A., & Yiakoulaki, M.D. (2007) Sustainable production of barley and wheat by intercropping common vetch. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 27, 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2006033
14. Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B., Dhima, K. V., Dordas, C. A., & Yiakoulaki, M. D. (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crop Science, 99, 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008
15. Najera, M. J. F., Gutierrez, R. A. S., Chairez, F. G. E., Nieto, C. A. R., & Gonzalez, H. S. (2016). Forage production and quality of common vetch mixtures with barley, oat and triticale in four phenological stages. Revista Mexiacana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 7(3), 275-291.
16. Pereira, F. C., Filho, L. C. P. M., Kazana, D. C. S., & Junior, R. G. (2020). Black oat grown with common vetch improves the chemical composition and degradability rate of forage. Acta Scientiarum Animal Science, 42, e49951. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v42i1.49951
17. Szumigalski, A., & Rene, V. A. (2005) Weed suppression and crop production in annual intercrops. Weed Science, 53(6), 813-825. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-014R.1
18. TÜİK, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (2022). https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?locale=tr Accessed: 3/8/2022
19. Zhang, F., & Li, L. (2003). Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil, 248, 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022352229863