Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THOMAS MÜNTZER: A HISTORICAL CATALYST IN GERMAN PEASANTS WAR

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 35, 151 - 161, 29.05.2022
https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.997792

Öz

In this article, Thomas Müntzer, the leading historical figure in the German Peasants War, is scrutinized in a different context within the perspective of the social history of political thought. By choosing the mainstream literature, this study has used some of the important pamphlets, letters, and secondary qualitative texts on Müntzer’s manuscripts about both the German Peasants War and his theological assertations toward the Reformation process which began with Martin Luther’s contributions to Catholic Church in 16th century. Examining social, political, and theological dynamics in the 16th century German Reformation process, this article has tried to find the potential answers to the basic question, which is how contradicted theological conflict between prominent Protestant doctrines led to revolutionary tendencies among exploited groups in German Reformation Process. In this respect, Müntzer is described as a historical catalyst who combines the revolutionary dynamics with the theological assumptions under the identity of a reformist cleric.

Kaynakça

  • Arnal, O. (1980). Luther and the peasants: A Lutheran reassessment. Science & Society, 44(4), 443-465.
  • Baylor, M. G. (1986). Thomas Müntzer's first publication. Sixteen Century Journal, 17(4), 451-458.
  • Blickle, P. and Cathleen Catt. (1979). Peasant revolts in the German Empire in the late Middle Ages. Social History, 4(2), 223-239.
  • Dipple, G. (2009). The radical reformation will not be televised. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 40(1), 242-245.
  • Engels, F. (2018). Alman Köylü Savaşı. (O. Gönensin, Çev.). Yordam Kitap.
  • Friesen, A. (1965). Thomas Müntzer in marxist thought. Church History, 34(3), 306-327.
  • Friesen, A. (1970). The marxist interpretation of anabaptism. Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 34(3), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003683
  • Hsia, R. (1987). The myth of the commune: recent historiography on city and reformation in Germany. Central European History, 20(3/4), 203-215.
  • Kniss, F. (1988). Toward a theory of ideological change: The case of the radical reformation. Sociological Analysis, 49(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711101
  • Kuenning, P. P. (1987). Luther and Müntzer: Contrasting theologies in regard to secular authority within the context of German peasant revolt. Journal of Church and State, 29(2), 305-321.
  • Laube, A. (1987). Social arguments in early reformation pamphlets, and their significance for the German Peasants' War. Social History, 12(3), 361-378.
  • Lindberg, C. (2010). The European reformations. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Matheson, P. (1989). Thomas Müntzer's vindicitaion and refutation: A language for common people. Sixteen Century Journal, 20(4) 603-615.
  • Ozment, S. (1980). The age of reform. Yale University Press.
  • Packull, O. W. (1977). Thomas Müntzer between marxist-Christian diatribe and dialogue. Historical Reflections, 4(1), 67-90.
  • Walinski-Kiehl, R. (2006). History, politics, and East German film: The Thomas Müntzer (1956) socialist epic. Central European History, 39(1), 30-55.
  • Wood, E. M. (2012). Liberty and property. Verso Books.
  • Zumkeller, A. (1959). Thomas Müntzer — Augustiner? Augustiniana, 9(4), 380-385.

THOMAS MÜNTZER: ALMAN KÖYLÜLER SAVAŞI’NDA TARİHSEL BİR KATALİZÖR

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 35, 151 - 161, 29.05.2022
https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.997792

Öz

Bu makalede, Alman Köylüler Savaşı’nda öne çıkan tarihi bir aktör olarak Thomas Müntzer, siyasal düşüncenin toplumsal tarihi perspektifinde farklı bir bağlamda irdelenmektedir. Bu çalışmada, ana akım literatür seçilerek, Müntzer’in hem Alman Köylüler Savaşı’na hem de Martin Luther’in 16. Yüzyıldaki Katolik kilisesine yönelik katkılarıyla başlayan Reformasyon sürecine yönelik el yazmaları, broşürleri, mektupları ve ikincil nitel metinleri kullanılmıştır. 16. yüzyıl Alman Reformu sürecindeki sosyal, politik ve teolojik dinamikleri inceleyen makale, Alman Reform sürecinde önde gelen protestan doktrinleri arasındaki çelişkili teolojik çatışmanın sömürülen gruplar arasında nasıl devrimci eğilimlere yol açtığı temel sorusuna makul cevaplar bulmaya çalışmıştır. Bu açıdan Müntzer, reformist din adamı kimliği altında, dinsel varsayımlar ile devrimci dinamikleri birleştiren bir tarihsel katalizör olarak tanımlanmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Arnal, O. (1980). Luther and the peasants: A Lutheran reassessment. Science & Society, 44(4), 443-465.
  • Baylor, M. G. (1986). Thomas Müntzer's first publication. Sixteen Century Journal, 17(4), 451-458.
  • Blickle, P. and Cathleen Catt. (1979). Peasant revolts in the German Empire in the late Middle Ages. Social History, 4(2), 223-239.
  • Dipple, G. (2009). The radical reformation will not be televised. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 40(1), 242-245.
  • Engels, F. (2018). Alman Köylü Savaşı. (O. Gönensin, Çev.). Yordam Kitap.
  • Friesen, A. (1965). Thomas Müntzer in marxist thought. Church History, 34(3), 306-327.
  • Friesen, A. (1970). The marxist interpretation of anabaptism. Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 34(3), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003683
  • Hsia, R. (1987). The myth of the commune: recent historiography on city and reformation in Germany. Central European History, 20(3/4), 203-215.
  • Kniss, F. (1988). Toward a theory of ideological change: The case of the radical reformation. Sociological Analysis, 49(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711101
  • Kuenning, P. P. (1987). Luther and Müntzer: Contrasting theologies in regard to secular authority within the context of German peasant revolt. Journal of Church and State, 29(2), 305-321.
  • Laube, A. (1987). Social arguments in early reformation pamphlets, and their significance for the German Peasants' War. Social History, 12(3), 361-378.
  • Lindberg, C. (2010). The European reformations. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Matheson, P. (1989). Thomas Müntzer's vindicitaion and refutation: A language for common people. Sixteen Century Journal, 20(4) 603-615.
  • Ozment, S. (1980). The age of reform. Yale University Press.
  • Packull, O. W. (1977). Thomas Müntzer between marxist-Christian diatribe and dialogue. Historical Reflections, 4(1), 67-90.
  • Walinski-Kiehl, R. (2006). History, politics, and East German film: The Thomas Müntzer (1956) socialist epic. Central European History, 39(1), 30-55.
  • Wood, E. M. (2012). Liberty and property. Verso Books.
  • Zumkeller, A. (1959). Thomas Müntzer — Augustiner? Augustiniana, 9(4), 380-385.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Siyaset Bilimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Emre Taşkıran 0000-0002-9396-0259

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Mayıs 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Eylül 2021
Kabul Tarihi 13 Kasım 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Sayı: 35

Kaynak Göster

APA Taşkıran, E. (2022). THOMAS MÜNTZER: A HISTORICAL CATALYST IN GERMAN PEASANTS WAR. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute(35), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.997792