Öz
Ahşap, mobilya ürünleri bağlamında hem bir malzeme hem de sembolik, estetik ve kimlik şekillendirici bir ortam olarak aynı anda işlev görmektedir. Bu çalışma, algısal ve duygusal faktörlerin, ahşap bazlı mobilya segmentinde malzeme ile ilgili değer oluşumunu ve satın alma niyetini nasıl etkilediğini incelemektedir. Nöroestetik ve kimlik psikolojisi temelli olarak, Dokunsal Etki Modeli (Perceptual Impact Model) geliştirilmiş ve Duygusal Duyusal Yük İndeksi (ESLI), Algılanan Zanaatkârlık Ayırt Ediciliği İndeksi (PCDI), Estetik Bilişsel Aktivasyon İndeksi (ACAI) ve Kimlik Rezonans Katsayısı (IRQ) dahil olmak üzere dokuz psikometrik göstergeyle test edilmiştir. Veriler, çalışmanın tematik ve psikografik hedefleriyle uyumu sağlayacak kriterlere göre seçilen 145 katılımcıdan toplanmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler, estetik tutarlılığın ve sembolik özdeşleşmenin tüketici bağlılığı üzerindeki önemli etkisini doğrulamıştır (örneğin, yüksek hassasiyet grubunda IRQ %41 artış, p < 0,01). Bulgular, çok duyulu etkileşim, zanaatkârlık algısı ve öz imge ile malzeme estetiği arasındaki uyum gibi temel itici faktörleri vurgulamaktadır. Model, öznel deneyimleri nicel göstergelere dönüştürerek stratejik tasarım ve marka kararlarını sağlamlaştırmakta, ahşap bazlı değer zinciri genelinde sürdürülebilir yeniliği desteklemektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Ahşap-temelli malzeme bağlılığı Ahşap-temelli ürün stratejisi Değer entegrasyonu Etki modeli Karar desteği
Teşekkür
The author gratefully acknowledges the members of the design and innovation research network for their methodological feedback and collaborative support throughout the study. Special appreciation is extended for the interdisciplinary and international insights that deepened the research's theoretical and empirical foundations. Sincere thanks are due to Prof. Dr. József Zalavari for his supervision, guidance, and support during the doctoral project.
Kaynakça
- Al Darwish, L., (2023). Green furniture: Sustainability, consumer choice, and market analysis in an evolving landscape, Ontario College of Art and Design University. https://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/4071, Last access: 21.08.2025.
- Bond, J., Parker, M., and Spennemann, D.H.R., (2024). Sensory perception in cultural studies; a review of sensorial and multisensorial heritage, The Senses and Society, 19(2), 233–251, DOI: 10.1080/17458927.2023.2284532
- Bourdieu, P., (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Chatterjee, A., and Vartanian, O., (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 172–194, DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13035
- Clark, A., (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204, DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Rochberg-Halton, E., (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self, Cambridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139167611
- Danielsson, P., (2025). The role of multi-sensory marketing in shaping consumers' brand perceptions, Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/items/6966a6c8-6851-4cbd-b161-31904b08ee69, son erişim tarihi: 09.09.2025.
- De Luca, A., and Termini, S., (1972). A definition of a nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy set theory. Information and Control, 20(4), 301–312, DOI: 10.1016/S0019-9958(72)90199-4
- Dharsono, W.W., (2025). Visual and emotional connections in wooden product design: A comprehensive review of neuro-architecture principles, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture, 4(1), DOI: 10.24002/jarina.v4i1.10160
- Dormer, P., (1997). The culture of craft: Status and future, Manchester University Press.
- Earnshaw, R., (2017). Art, design and technology: Collaboration and implementation, Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58121-7
- Gibson, J.J., (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston (reprint: Psychology Press, 2015). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-00063-000, Last access: 09.09.2025.
- Grayson, K., and Martinec, R., (2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings, Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 296–312, DOI: 10.1086/422109
- Harju, C., and Lähtinen, K., (2021). Perceptions of wooden interior product quality — insights on sustainability views among Finnish consumers, Natural Resources Institute Finland.
- https://jukuri.luke.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/551249/Harju_et_al_2021.pdf, Last access: 20.09.2025.
- Hosey, L., (2012). The shape of green: Aesthetics, ecology, and design, Island Press, Washington, DC.
- Ji, S., and Lin, P., (2022). Aesthetics of sustainability: Research on the design strategies for emotionally durable visual communication design, Sustainability, 14(8), 4649, DOI: 10.3390/su14084649
- Karana, E., Barati, B., Rognoli, V., and van der Laan, A.Z., (2015). Material driven design (MDD): A method to design for material experiences, International Journal of Design, 9(2), 35–54.
- Kim, J., and Heo, W., (2021). Interior design with consumers’ perception about art, brand image, and sustainability, Sustainability, 13(8), 4557, DOI: 10.3390/su13084557
- Kirmani, A., (2009). The self and the brand, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 271–275, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.011
- Ko, K.K.H., (2017). Understanding the role of product attachment with a view to enabling sustainable consumption: A study of household furniture, PhD Dissertation, University of New South Wales (UNSW).
- https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/0bfe834d-0a6f-4161-8b4b-239c0424c5f4/download, Last access: 25.09.2025.
- Krippendorff, K., (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781071878781
- Manna, R., (2025). Do we need “new”?: Rethinking trends through emotional connections, sustainable design, and cultural heritage, Master’s Thesis, OCAD University. https://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/4765, Last access: 22.09.2025.
- Manu, T., Nazmi, A.R., Shahri, B., and Emerson, N., (2022). Biocomposites: A review of materials and perception, Materials Today Communications, 31, 103308, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103308
- Miller, D., (2010). Stuff, Polity Press, Cambridge.
- Pedgley, O., Rognoli, V., and Karana, E., (2016). Materials experience as a foundation for materials and design education, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(4), 613–630, DOI: 10.1007/s10798-015-9327-y
- Pine, B.J., and Gilmore, J.H., (2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston.
- Plassmann, H., Ramsøy, T.Z., and Milosavljevic, M., (2012). Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 18–36, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010
- Schifferstein, H.N.J., and Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E.P.H., (2008). Consumer-product attachment: Measurement and design implications, International Journal of Design, 2(3), 1–13.
- http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/325/205, Last access: 14.09.2025.
- Spence, C., (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 40, DOI:10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
- Stern, T., and Schwarzbauer, P., (2013). Consumer behavior towards eco-friendly products: Wood products certification, consumer behavior and its climate policy potential, International Conference on Resource
- Efficiency in Interorganizational Networks, 13–14 November 2013, Graz, Austria. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.3364.2243
- Sztuka, I.M., Becker, M., and Kühn, S., (2025). Neural representations underlying psychological responses to natural and artificial features in indoor architecture, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 103, 102553, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102553
- Thakral, P.P., Moo, L.R., and Slotnick, S.D., (2012). A neural mechanism for aesthetic experience, NeuroReport, 23(5), 310–313, DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328351759f
- Wang, B., An, S., and Li, K., (2025). Shaping green choices: How sensory cues drive behavior of wood-plastic composites, Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 383, DOI: 10.3390/bs15030383
A perceptual impact model of material, quality, and identity in wood furniture consumers’ value associations
Öz
Wood functions simultaneously as a material and as a symbolic, aesthetic, and identity-shaping medium in the context of furniture products. This study investigates how perceptual and emotional factors influence material-related value formation and purchase intention within the wood-based furniture segment. Based on neuroaesthetics and identity psychology, a novel Perceptual Impact Model was developed and tested using nine psychometric indices, including the Emotional Sensory Load Index (ESLI), Perceived Craft Distinctiveness Index (PCDI), Aesthetic Cognitive Activation Index (ACAI), and Identity Resonance Quotient (IRQ). Data were collected from 145 participants selected according to criteria ensuring thematic and psychographic alignment with the aims of the study. Statistical analyses confirmed the significant influence of aesthetic coherence and symbolic identification on consumer engagement (e.g., IRQ ↑41% in the high-sensitivity group, p < 0.01). The findings highlight key drivers such as multisensory engagement, craftsmanship perception, and the alignment between self-image and material aesthetics. By translating subjective experience into quantifiable metrics, the model strengthens strategic design and branding decisions, supporting sustainable innovation across the wood-based value chain.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Wood-based material attachment Wood-based product strategy Value integration Impact model Decision support
Teşekkür
The author gratefully acknowledges the members of the design and innovation research network for their methodological feedback and collaborative support throughout the study. Special appreciation is extended for the interdisciplinary and international insights that deepened the research's theoretical and empirical foundations. Sincere thanks are due to Prof. Dr. József Zalavari for his supervision, guidance, and support during the doctoral project.
Kaynakça
- Al Darwish, L., (2023). Green furniture: Sustainability, consumer choice, and market analysis in an evolving landscape, Ontario College of Art and Design University. https://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/4071, Last access: 21.08.2025.
- Bond, J., Parker, M., and Spennemann, D.H.R., (2024). Sensory perception in cultural studies; a review of sensorial and multisensorial heritage, The Senses and Society, 19(2), 233–251, DOI: 10.1080/17458927.2023.2284532
- Bourdieu, P., (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Chatterjee, A., and Vartanian, O., (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 172–194, DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13035
- Clark, A., (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204, DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Rochberg-Halton, E., (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self, Cambridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139167611
- Danielsson, P., (2025). The role of multi-sensory marketing in shaping consumers' brand perceptions, Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/items/6966a6c8-6851-4cbd-b161-31904b08ee69, son erişim tarihi: 09.09.2025.
- De Luca, A., and Termini, S., (1972). A definition of a nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy set theory. Information and Control, 20(4), 301–312, DOI: 10.1016/S0019-9958(72)90199-4
- Dharsono, W.W., (2025). Visual and emotional connections in wooden product design: A comprehensive review of neuro-architecture principles, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture, 4(1), DOI: 10.24002/jarina.v4i1.10160
- Dormer, P., (1997). The culture of craft: Status and future, Manchester University Press.
- Earnshaw, R., (2017). Art, design and technology: Collaboration and implementation, Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58121-7
- Gibson, J.J., (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston (reprint: Psychology Press, 2015). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-00063-000, Last access: 09.09.2025.
- Grayson, K., and Martinec, R., (2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings, Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 296–312, DOI: 10.1086/422109
- Harju, C., and Lähtinen, K., (2021). Perceptions of wooden interior product quality — insights on sustainability views among Finnish consumers, Natural Resources Institute Finland.
- https://jukuri.luke.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/551249/Harju_et_al_2021.pdf, Last access: 20.09.2025.
- Hosey, L., (2012). The shape of green: Aesthetics, ecology, and design, Island Press, Washington, DC.
- Ji, S., and Lin, P., (2022). Aesthetics of sustainability: Research on the design strategies for emotionally durable visual communication design, Sustainability, 14(8), 4649, DOI: 10.3390/su14084649
- Karana, E., Barati, B., Rognoli, V., and van der Laan, A.Z., (2015). Material driven design (MDD): A method to design for material experiences, International Journal of Design, 9(2), 35–54.
- Kim, J., and Heo, W., (2021). Interior design with consumers’ perception about art, brand image, and sustainability, Sustainability, 13(8), 4557, DOI: 10.3390/su13084557
- Kirmani, A., (2009). The self and the brand, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 271–275, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.011
- Ko, K.K.H., (2017). Understanding the role of product attachment with a view to enabling sustainable consumption: A study of household furniture, PhD Dissertation, University of New South Wales (UNSW).
- https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/0bfe834d-0a6f-4161-8b4b-239c0424c5f4/download, Last access: 25.09.2025.
- Krippendorff, K., (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781071878781
- Manna, R., (2025). Do we need “new”?: Rethinking trends through emotional connections, sustainable design, and cultural heritage, Master’s Thesis, OCAD University. https://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/4765, Last access: 22.09.2025.
- Manu, T., Nazmi, A.R., Shahri, B., and Emerson, N., (2022). Biocomposites: A review of materials and perception, Materials Today Communications, 31, 103308, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103308
- Miller, D., (2010). Stuff, Polity Press, Cambridge.
- Pedgley, O., Rognoli, V., and Karana, E., (2016). Materials experience as a foundation for materials and design education, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(4), 613–630, DOI: 10.1007/s10798-015-9327-y
- Pine, B.J., and Gilmore, J.H., (2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston.
- Plassmann, H., Ramsøy, T.Z., and Milosavljevic, M., (2012). Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 18–36, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010
- Schifferstein, H.N.J., and Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E.P.H., (2008). Consumer-product attachment: Measurement and design implications, International Journal of Design, 2(3), 1–13.
- http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/325/205, Last access: 14.09.2025.
- Spence, C., (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 40, DOI:10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
- Stern, T., and Schwarzbauer, P., (2013). Consumer behavior towards eco-friendly products: Wood products certification, consumer behavior and its climate policy potential, International Conference on Resource
- Efficiency in Interorganizational Networks, 13–14 November 2013, Graz, Austria. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.3364.2243
- Sztuka, I.M., Becker, M., and Kühn, S., (2025). Neural representations underlying psychological responses to natural and artificial features in indoor architecture, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 103, 102553, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102553
- Thakral, P.P., Moo, L.R., and Slotnick, S.D., (2012). A neural mechanism for aesthetic experience, NeuroReport, 23(5), 310–313, DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328351759f
- Wang, B., An, S., and Li, K., (2025). Shaping green choices: How sensory cues drive behavior of wood-plastic composites, Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 383, DOI: 10.3390/bs15030383
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Uluslararası İktisat (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 6 Kasım 2025 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 9 Aralık 2025 |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 17 Aralık 2025 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 17 Aralık 2025 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 |
Amaç ve Kapsam
Mobilya ve Ahşap Malzeme Araştırmaları Dergisi (MAMAD), mobilya konusunu ön planda tutarak Dergi Park üzerinde yayın hayatına başlayan ilk akademik dergidir. Bu nedenle, bu alanda çalışma yapan araştırmacılara, mobilya ve ahşap malzeme ile ilgili olan tüm okuyuculara hizmet sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.
Açık erişim ve Uluslararası hakemli dergidir.
Mobilya ve Ahşap Malzeme Araştırmaları Dergisi; mobilya mekaniği, mobilya üst yüzey işlemleri, mobilya üretiminde kalite kontrol, mobilya ithalat ve ihracatı, bilgisayar destekli mobilya tasarımı, bilgisayar destekli mobilya üretimi konularında hazırlanan çalışmalara yer verecektir. Ayrıca, masif ahşap malzeme, ahşap esaslı kompozit malzemeler, odun plastik kompozit malzemeler, ahşap malzemenin işlenmesi, ahşap malzemenin güçlendirilmesi, ahşap malzemenin korunması, ahşap malzemenin modifikasyonu, ahşap malzemenin fiziksel, kimyasal, mekanik ve diğer teknolojik özelliklerini içeren araştırmalarda dergi kapsamındadır. Kâğıt ve kağıt hamuru üzerine yapılan çalışmalar derginin kapsamı dışındadır. Dergi, araştırma ve derleme türündeki olan makaleleri yayınlamaktadır. Diğer türlerde hazırlanan makaleleri kabul etmemektedir.
Yazım Kuralları
Makale,dergi ana sayfasından veya buradan indirilecek MAMAD şablon dosya 2025 'e göre hazırlanmalı ve copyright transfer form 2025 imzalanarak sisteme yüklenmelidir.
Makalenin sorumlu yazarı aşağıdaki kuralları uygulamalıdır.
1. Her yazarın ORCID ID verilmelidir.
2. Makale başlıkları (Türkçe ve İngilizce başlık), sayfada ortalı, 14 punto ve koyu yazılmalıdır (Bold).
3. Yazar İsimleri 12 Punto ve sadece ilk harfler büyük, normal yazılmalıdır (Bold değil).
4. Makale ilk sayfasında “Öz” ve “Abstract” konumu doğru ve bu kelimeler koyu yazılmalıdır (Bold)
5. Öz ve Abstract en az 150 ve en fazla 180 kelime olarak yazılmalıdır.
6. Anahtar kelimeler en az 3 en fazla 5 kelime verilmelidir.
7. Makale maksimum sayfa sayısı 16'dır.
8. Makale ilk sayfasının alt bilgi kısmında yazar bilgileri ve atıf bilgisi verilmelidir.
9. İlk sayfa alt bilgide satırlar alt çizgi ile ayrılmalıdır. (Örnek)
10. Giriş kısmına, makalenin ikinci sayfasından başlanmalıdır. Giriş kısmının son paragrafında çalışmanın amacı net olarak verilmelidir (Bu çalışmanın amacı...........dır).
11. Başlık numaralandırması doğru olarak verilmelidir.
12. Yazı stili "Times new roman" ve büyüklüğü "12 punto" yapılmalıdır (Makale başlıkları hariç). Çizelge içeriği, sığdırmak için 8 puntoya kadar küçültülebilir.
13. İtalik yazılması gereken ifadeler italik yapılmalıdır.
14. Paragraf başı girinti miktarları 0,5 cm ve paragraflar arası 6 nk yapılmalıdır.
15. Makalenin tüm bölümlerinde satır aralığı 1 olmalıdır.
16. Sayfa kenar boşlukları üstten ve alttan 3, diğer kenarlardan 2.5 yapılmalıdır.
17. Metin içinde yapılan atıflar doğru verilmelidir (Ali, Ayşe, Can,..1999 yanlış) (Ali ve ark., 1999 doğru) (Ali vd., 1999 yanlış).
18. Metin içinde aynı parantez içinde verilen atıflar arası noktalı virgül “;” kullanılmalıdır.
19. Formüller ve numaraları doğru verilmelidir. Formüller resim formatında verilmemelidir.
20. Şekil ve çizelge numaraları sırası doğru verilmelidir.
21. Şekil ve Çizelge başlıklarında Şekil 1 ve Çizelge 1 kelimeleri koyu (bold) verilmelidir.
22. Şekil ve Çizelge başlıkları soldan içerde verilmemelidir (paragraf girintisi 0).
23. Her şekil ve çizelgeye atıf yapılmalıdır.
24. Şekil ve çizelgeler ortalı konumda olmalıdır.
25. Şekillerde başlık alta ve çizelgelerde başlık üste yazılmalıdır.
26. Sonuçlar kısmı maddeler halinde verilmelidir.
27. Gerekli ise, teşekkür kısmı ve varsa proje numarası verilmelidir.
28. Metin içerisinde ve çizelge içeriğindeki rakamlarda ondalık ayırıcı nokta olarak verilmelidir.
29. Kaynaklarda “and” ifadesi ve “ve” ifadesi kullanılmalıdır (Örnek: Babiak, M., and Kúdela, J. Bal B.C., ve Efe F.T.)
30. Kaynaklar listesinde, yazar isimleri nokta ve virgül ile (Bal B.C.,), yıl parantez içinde (1999). parantezden sonra “.” ifadesi ile, sayı numarasından sonra parantezi takiben virgül “2(3), 25-35” sayfa numaraları arası tire (-) ifadesi ile, her bir kaynak satırı arasında 6 nk boşluk ile yazılmalıdır. Dergi, kitap ve tez isimleri italik yazılmalıdır. Kaynak bildiri ise tamamı dik yazılmalıdır. Kaynak çalışmanın ilk harfi hariç küçük harf olarak verilmelidir. Dergi isimleri tam veya kıda adı verilebilir. Atıf yapılan makalenin varsa DOI numarası verilmelidir.
31. Metin ve çizelgeler içindeki rakamların ayıracı nokta olmalıdır. (12.23 doğru, 12,23 yanlış)
Örnek kaynak gösterimi:
Bal, B. C., (2012). Genç odun ve olgun odunun lif morfolojisindeki farklılıklar üzerine bir araştırma, Düzce Üniversitesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 8(2), 29-35, DOI:....
Çavuş, V., ve Ayata, Ü., (2018). Manolya ağacı, akçaağaç ve tespih ağacı odunlarında vida tutma direnci üzerine bir araştırma. MAMAD, 1(2), 94-102, DOI:.... 10.33725/mamad.496615.
Bal, B.C., ve Kaba, O., (2019). Kahramanmaraş ilindeki ahşap oyma atölyelerinin üretim miktarları üzerine bir araştırma. III. International Mediterranean Forest and Environment Symposium (IMFES2019), 3-5.Ekim.2019, Bildiriler kitabı S:520-524, Kahramanmaraş/ Türkiye.
Omatça, İ., (2006). Ahşabın, oyuncak üretiminde kullanımı ve önemi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Simav Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi, Mobilya ve Dekorasyon Eğitimi Bölümü, Lisans tezi.
ASTM 1761, (2012). Standart test methods for mechanical fasteners in wood,. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Philadelphia.
Bal, B.C., and Bektaş, İ., (2012). The physical properties of heartwood and sapwood of Eucalyptus grandis, ProLigno, 8 (4), 35-43.
Bal, B.C., ve Altuntaş, E., (2013). Masif ağaç malzeme ve tabakalı kaplama kerestenin vida tutma direnci üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma, Düzce University journal of forestry, 9(2),14-22.
Bozkurt, Y., Göker, Y., ve Erdin, N., (1993). Emprenye tekniği, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Yayınları, No 425, İstanbul,1993.
Çolak, S., Aydın, İ., ve Çolakoǧlu, G., (2003). Okaliptüs (E. camaldulensis) ağacının farklı yüksekliklerinden alınan tomruklardan üretilmiş kontrplakların bazı mekanik özellikleri, Doğu Akdeniz Ormancılık Araştırma Dergisi, 9, 95–111.
Çolak, G., (2024). Ahşap-plastik kompozitlerin endüstriyel üretim sürecine ilişkin yaşam döngüsü çevresel sürdürülebilirlik analizi, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bilecik, Türkiye.
DeCristoforo, R.J., (1988). The complete book of stationary power tool techniques. Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. Two Park Avenue, New York, N. Y. 388p
Gaff, M., Vokaty, V., Babiak, M., and Bal. B.C., (2016). Coefficient of wood bendability as a function of selected factors, Construction and Building Materials, 126 (2016), 630-640, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.085
Rammer, D. R., (2010). Fastenings,wood handbook: wood as an engineering material, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Madison, WI (ss. 1–2).
TS 2478, (1976). Odunun statik eğilmede elastiklik modülünün tayini. türk standartları enstitüsü, Ankara.
URL-1, (2020). George III period satinwood work table, 1stDIBS, http://www.onlinegalleries.com/art-and-antiques (last access: 19.02.2020)
Yıldırım, M. N, Karaman, A., and Akınay, A., (2016). Finite element method application of wooden furniture, International conference on research in education science, 19 - 22 Mayıs 2016, ss.1258-1270, Muğla/Türkiye,
Etik İlkeler ve Yayın Politikası
• strive to meet the needs of readers and authors.
• strive to improve their journal constantly;
• have processes in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish;
• champion freedom of expression;
• maintain the integrity of the academic record;
• preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards;
• be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed.
• Editors of the Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal are accountable for everything published in the journal. This means the editors should
strive to meet the needs of readers and authors.
• strive to improve their journal constantly;
• have processes in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish;
• champion freedom of expression;
• maintain the integrity of the academic record;
• preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards;
• be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted paper will not be used by the editor or the editorial board members for research purposes without the author's explicit written consent.
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, the author must notify the journal editor or publisher promptly and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper in the form of an erratum.
PUBLICATION POLICY
1. Copyright Transfer principles: All authors must sign the form. It is mandatory to have the signature of the corresponding author on the form. In case the signatures of the other author/authors cannot be reached due to inaccessibility, the correspondence author accepts the responsibility of the related author/authors. The submitted article must not be published elsewhere or under review in any journal for publication. All authors mentioned in the article have seen and approved the submitted article. The journal is not responsible for problems such as the order of names that may occur between authors. The article has been prepared in accordance with the spelling rules specified by the journal. As the author(s) of the article, we accept that we have waived the article's copyright, transferred this right to the Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal, and authorized Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal to publish the article. Article author(s) accept that all texts, figures, graphics, photographs, and charts given in the article belong to the authors of the article and that any information received from other researchers is made by citing the source within the framework of ethical rules, and that the author(s) of the article is responsible for any issue that constitutes an ethical crime.
2. Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal has agreed to comply with the COPE Code of Conduct provisions for Journal Editors. All journal-related activities are to be carried out according to these rules.
3. The journal publishes two annual issues and does not publish special issues or additional issues.
4. Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal is an international, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal that does not charge an article processing fee, evaluation fee, printing fee, or any other fee for articles.
6. Personal information such as names, e-mail addresses, and telephone numbers entered in the management system of Furniture and Wood Materials Research Journal will only be used for the scientific purposes of this journal, in accordance with the Privacy Statement.
7. All articles published in Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal are archived and stored in pdf format through TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM, Life Sciences Database.
8. Furniture and Wooden Materials Research Journal does not accept advertisements.
9. Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal evaluates with a double-blind peer review process.
10. The articles sent to the Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal are first evaluated by the editor-in-chief. Articles not suitable for the scope of the journal are rejected at this stage.
11. If the articles suit the journal's scope, a referee review is started if there is no significant deficiency. The refereeing invitation period is 1 week, and the referee evaluation period is 2 weeks. The authors are given a minimum of 1 week and a maximum of 4 weeks to make the necessary corrections to the article in line with the opinions of the referees. A minimum of 1 day and a maximum of 7 days is given for the final control phase.
12. If the articles sent to the Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal have passed the preliminary evaluation stage and have been sent to the referees, they cannot withdraw the article.
13. Each article sent to the journal is reviewed by two referees. If both referees give a positive opinion, the article is accepted. If both referees agree on the negative opinion, the article is rejected. If one of the referees gives a positive opinion and the other a negative opinion, the opinion of a third referee is sought. A decision is made about the articles sent to the journal at the end of three months at the latest.
14. The articles sent to the journal are examined with the iThenticate program for plagiarism.
Ücret Politikası
Dergi hiç bir işlem için ücret talep etmemektedir.
Dizinler
Atıf Dizinleri
Diğer Dizinler
Dergi Kurulları
Baş editör
Editör Kurulu Üyeleri
I am a senior researcher at Department of Wood Industry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang Branch.
