Dimensional analysis and characteristics of chairs and tables utilized by public healthcare workers in Calabar metropolis, Nigeria

Öz

Furniture is a critical component of healthcare service delivery, directly influencing performance, safety and staff well-being. This study conducted a dimensional analysis of chairs and tables used by public healthcare workers in Calabar Metropolis (CM), Nigeria, comparing measured dimensions with international ergonomic standards. Data collected from tertiary, secondary and primary healthcare facilities (HCFs) revealed substantial dimensional variability and widespread non-conformity in both seating work surfaces. Chair dimensions showed large departures from recommended ranges with seat height: 309 – 640 mm, seat depth: 296 – 670 mm, and backrest-to-seat: 70 – 253 mm. Table heights also exhibited wide variation, with most surfaces deviating from the optimal ergonomic benchmark of 710 – 760 mm, thereby increasing the risk of postural strain and reduced work efficiency. The lack of uniformity and conformity indicates a lack of standardised ergonomic guidelines in procurement and highlights a breach between user anthropometry and the furniture provided. The study underscores the need for context-specific ergonomic investigation and guidelines, establishing a baseline for future ergonomic assessment and evidence-based furniture design interventions in public healthcare facilities in Calabar Metropolis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dimensional Analysis
• Chairs and Tables
• Healthcare Furniture
• Calabar Metropolis.

Nijerya’nın Calabar metropolünde kamu sağlık çalışanları tarafından kullanılan sandalyelerin ve masaların boyutsal analizi ve özellikleri

Öz

Sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda mobilya kritik bir bileşendir ve doğrudan performansı, güvenliği ve personelin refahını etkilemektedir. Bu çalışma, Nijerya’nın Calabar Metropolü’nde (CM) kamu sağlık çalışanları tarafından kullanılan sandalye ve masaların boyutsal analizini gerçekleştirmiş ve ölçülen boyutları uluslararası ergonomi standartlarıyla karşılaştırmıştır. Üçüncü basamak, ikinci basamak ve birinci basamak sağlık kuruluşlarından (HCF’ler) toplanan veriler, hem oturma elemanlarında hem de çalışma yüzeylerinde önemli boyutsal değişkenlik ve yaygın uyumsuzluk olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sandalye boyutları, önerilen aralıklardan büyük sapmalar göstermiş; oturma yüksekliği 309–640 mm, oturma derinliği 296–670 mm ve sırtlık–oturma yüksekliği 70–253 mm arasında değişmiştir. Masa yükseklikleri de geniş bir dağılım sergilemiş ve yüzeylerin çoğu 710–760 mm olan optimal ergonomik referans aralığının dışında kalarak postüral zorlanma ve çalışma veriminde azalma riskini artırmıştır. Gözlenen bu uyumsuzluk ve düzensizlik, tedarik süreçlerinde standartlaştırılmış ergonomik yönergelerin bulunmadığını ve kullanıcı antropometrisi ile sağlanan mobilyalar arasında bir uyumsuzluk olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma, bağlama özgü ergonomik incelemelere ve yönergelere duyulan gereksinimi vurgulamakta ve Calabar Metropolündeki kamu sağlık kuruluşlarında gelecekte yapılacak ergonomik değerlendirmeler ile kanıta dayalı mobilya tasarım müdahaleleri için bir temel oluşturmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Boyutsal Analiz
• Sandalyeler ve Masalar
• Sağlık Mobilyaları

Kaynakça

1. Adewole A. N., and A.O. Olorunnisola B.C., (2010), Characteristics of Classroom Chair and Desk in Use in Senior Secondary Schools, Ibadan, Oyo State, Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS), 1(2), 140-144.
2. Adewole, N. A., Olorunnisola, A. O., and Lucas, E. B., (2022), Estimation of design load and distribution pattern for wooden classroom chairs in use at secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria, International Wood Products Journal, 13(3),186–193 https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2022.2071560
3. Akintoye, O. A., Isip, E., and Obase, K. O., (2022), Spatial analysis of health care facilities in Calabar Metropolis, Cross River State, Nigeria: spatial analysis of health care facilities in Calabar Metropolis, Cross River State, Nigeria. Gombe Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 2(3), 391-413.
4. Altaboli, A., Muttardi, R., Alahmar, H., Aliskandarani, H., and Alshaikhi, A. (2023), Anthropometric evaluation of university classroom furniture, Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, 103 (2023), 100–108, https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003040
5. Antal, M. R., Domljan, D., and Horváth, P. G., (2016), Functionality and aesthetics of furniture-numerical expression of subjective value, Drvna industrija, 67(4), 323-332 https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2016.1544
6. Başbuğ, P. and Biçer, Ü., (2023), Furniture product management system: An evaluation through the case of “chair”, Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8 (4), 35-43, https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1277608
7. CEN EN 1335-1, (2000), Office furniture-office work chair-part 1: dimensions-determination of dimensions. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium.
8. CEN 527-1, (2000), Office furniture—work tables and desks—part 1: Dimensions. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.

9. CEN 527-1, (2002), Office furniture—work tables and desks—part 1: dimensions. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
10. Gao, M., (2024), Analyze the physical interaction between the user and the furniture design to optimize comfort and functionality, Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 457-468.
11. Icha, A. A.; Adewole, N. A.; Ededet M. O., (2022), Design, analysis and performance evaluation of a standing wooden shelf using glued laminated panel, Journal of Contemporary Research (JOCRES) 1: 215–225. ISSN: 2814-2241.
12. Ismaila, S. O., Musa, A. I., Adejuyigbe, S. B., and Akinyemi, O. D., (2013), Anthropometric design of furniture for use in tertiary institutions in Abeokuta, South-western Nigeria. Engineering Review, 33(3), 179–192. https://hrcak.srce.hr/111107
13. ISO, (1998). ISO 9241-4 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—part 4, Keyboard requirements. International Standards Organization, Geneva.
14. ISO, (1999). ISO 9241-5 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—part 5. Workstation layout and postural requirements. International Standards Organization, Geneva.
15. Ivelić, Ž., Grbac, I., Ljuljka, B., and Tkalec, S., (2002), Office furniture design according to a human anthropometric data. 791–796. In Proceedings of the Design Conference (pp. 791–796). Design Society.
16. Jasińska, A., Sydor, M., and Hitka, M., (2024), Optimizing dimensions in furniture design: A literature review, BioResources, 19(3), 4727. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.3.4727-4748
17. Kahraman, M. U., Şekerci, Y., Bal, H., and Bakır, K. E., (2024), Human-centered approach for furniture design studio course in interior design education: A case study, Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal, 7(1), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.33725/mamad. 1485323
18. Kartika, H., Kholil, M., and Bakti, C. S., (2020), Service quality and customer satisfaction in furniture sector installation services, Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 1(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v1i2.44
19. Lange J., and Lis P., (2025), Dimensional analysis of seating furniture from the 1960s and 1970s intended for redesign, Drewno, 68 (215): 00053. https://doi.org/10.53502/wood-200900
20. Liu, Y. Q., Hu, W., Kasal, A., and Erdil, Y. Z., (2023), The state of the art of biomechanics applied in ergonomic furniture design. Applied Sciences. CEN EN 1335-1; Office Furniture-Office Work Chair-Part 1: Dimensions-Determination of Dimensions. European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
21. Malone, E. B., and Dellinger, B. A., (2011), Furniture design features and outcomes. Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design.
22. Nigeria Health Facility Registry website (2024). https://dataportal.ncdc.gov.ng/dataset/ national-health-facility-registry
23. Okon, I., and Njoku, C. G., (2017), Evaluation of Domestic Access to Pipe-Borne Water in Calabar Metropolis, Southern Nigeria. OALib, 04(12), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103924
24. Owoyemi J.M., Aliyu D.I., Akinnuoye A.J., (2023), Design and development of appropriate desk and chair for secondary schools in Ondo state, Nigerıa using anthropometric variables, Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal, 6 (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/ 10.33725/mamad.1297861
25. Silviana, S., Hardianto, A., and Hermawan, D., (2022), The implementation of anthropometric measurement in designing the ergonomics work furniture, Eureka: Physics and Engineering, 3, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2022.001967
26. Smardzewski, J. (2015). Furniture Design, Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19533-9_1. ISBN 978-3-319-19532-2 ISBN 978-3-319-19533-9 (eBook)
27. Sulistyono, If. B. (2018). Plywood Furniture Designs (A Study on Shapes, Functions, Materials, Construction Techniques, and Production Processes), 4, 273–276. https:// doi.org/10.2991/BCM-17.2018.52
28. Szökeová, S., Fictum, L., Šimek, M., Sobotkova, A., Hrabec, M., and Domljan, D., (2021), First and second phase of human centered design method in design of exterior seating furniture, Drvna industrija, 72(3), 291-298, https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2021.2101
29. Toomingas, A., and Gavhed, D., (2008), Workstation layout and work postures at call centres in Sweden in relation to national law, EU-directives and ISO-standards, and to operators’ comfort and symptoms, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(11–12), 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.010