Mevcut Ulusal Güvenlik Sınamaları Üzerine

Yıl 2022, , 340 - 351, 31.08.2022

Murat Şengöz

https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1116141

Öz

Küreselleşme, iletişim ve bilgi teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler, ülkeler arasında giderek belirginleşen ekonomik ve sosyal eşitsizlikler gibi konular, çatışmaların bölgesel sınırların ötesinde küreselleşmesine neden olmaktadır. Bu nedenle milli güvenlik yönetimi sürecinde ön mutlak denklemler oluşturmaktan ziyade gelişmelerin gidişatına ve yönüne bakılması gerekmektedir. Bu bağlamda, mevcut güvenlik ortamı, hem insan hayatını ve birlikte yaşamayı tehdit eden askeri çatışmaların, hem de insan kaynaklı diğer sorunların sayısında bir artış ile karakterizedir. Bu zorluklar, temel görevleri güvenliğin tesisi olan ulusal güvenlik profesyonellerini, vazifelerini yerine getirebilmeleri için güvenlik konularına çok boyutlu bir biçimde odaklanmaya zorlamaktadır. Bu nedenle benimsenen ulusal güvenlik anlayışının kalitesi, günümüzün hem güvenlik hem de barış ortamının tesisi için kritik öneme sahiptir. Bu kapsamda mevcut ulusal güvenlik sınamaları üzerine gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada temelde mevcut güvenlik ortamının ve zorluklarının ayrıntılı bir şekilde ortaya koyulması amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, ulusal güvenliğin algılanmasını ve yürütülmesini etkileyen oldukça geniş alanlara odaklanmakta ve mevcut güvenlik ortamının boyutları hakkında kapsamlı bir bilgi sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stratejik Akıl, Güvenlik Ortamı, Savaşın Değişen Doğası

Regarding the Current National Security Challenges

Öz

Issues such as globalization, developments in communication and information technologies, and economic and social inequalities that are becoming more evident between countries, cause conflicts to become globalized beyond regional borders. Therefore, in the process of national security administration, it is needed to be referred to the process and direction of developments, rather than creating pre-absolute equations. In this context, the current security environment is characterized by an increase both in the number of military conflicts and other human-induced problems that threaten human life and co-existence. These challenges force national security professionals, whose primary mission is to establish security, to focus on security issues in a multidimensional way in order to fulfill their duties. Therefore, the quality of the adopted national security conception is critical to the establishment of today's security and peaceful environment. In this study, which is carried out on current national security challenges; it is aimed to present the current security environment and its challenges in detail. This study focuses on wider areas affecting the perception and execution of national security and so provides a comprehensive overview of information about the dimensions of the current security environment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Strategic Mindset, Security Environment, Changing Nature of War

Kaynakça

• AIDIS, Anne and HERD, Graeme (2004), “Managing Soft Security Threats: Current Progress and Future Prospects’’, European Security, S.13, ss.169-186.
• BEERS, Robert, DE WARD, Erik and BOLEN, Margaret (2010), “Ambitions and Opportunities for Assessing Military Performance in Crisis Response Operations”, Financial Accountability & Management, S.26(3), ss.344-366.
• BOOTH, Ken (2012), World Security Theory (Trans. Çağdaş Üngör), Küre Publications, İstanbul.
• COOPER, Robin (2014), “Peace and Conflict Studies”, Peace Review, S.26(4), ss.514-516.
• CRELINSTEN, Ronald D. (1998), "The Discourse and Practice of Counter-Terrorism in Liberal Democracies", Australian Journal of Politics & History, S.44(3), ss.389-413.
• FEINSTEIN, Jonathan S. and KAPLAN, Edward (2011), “Counterterror Intelligence Operations, and Terror Attacks”, Public Choice, S.149(3-4), ss.281-295.
• FIELDING, David and SHORTLAND, Anja (2010), “An Eye for an Eye, a Tooth for a Tooth’: Political Violence and Counter-Insurgency in Egypt”, Journal of Peace Research, S.47(4), ss.433-447.
• FISCHER, Davis (2006), “On the Relative Cost of Mediation and Military Intervention”, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, S.2(1), ss.13-16.
• FUKUYAMA, Francis (1992), New World Order (Trans. Kadir Cağlayan), Agac Publications, Istanbul.
• FUKUYAMA, Francis (1995), The End of History?, Vadi Publications, Ankara.
• GOTZ, Alexander G., JOHANNES, Breimeier and CONSTANZE, Müller (2013), Coherent Time Difference of Arrival Estimation Techniques for Frequency Hopping Gsm Mobile Radio Signals, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Oldenbourg.
• HASHIM, Ahmed (2006), Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
• KEMP, Walter and LEOPOLD, Schmertzing (2014), “Threats and Challenges to the OSCE Area”, Security and Human Rights, S.25(2), ss.242-258.
• KILTZ, Linda (2011), “The Challenges of Developing a Homeland Security Discipline to Meet Future Threats to the Homeland”, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, S.8(2), ss.(Article 1)1-20.
• KIMHI, Shaul and YOHANAN, Eshel (2012), “Determinants of Students’ Perceptions of Conventional and Unconventional War Threats”, Democracy and Security, S.8(3), ss.228-246.
• MARKOV, Anton (2016), “Hybrid Pedagogies for Hybrid War”, AFASES, S.18(2), ss.509-516.
• RAUCHHAUS, Robert W. (2000), “Marching NATO Eastward: Can International Relations Theory Keep Pace?”, Contemporary Security Policy, S.21(2), ss.3-20.
• RAUTA, Vladimir (2014), “War, Clausewitz and the Trinity’’ Political Studies Review, S.12(2), ss.284-284.
• ROTHSCHILD, Emma (2007), “What is Security?”, International Security (Eds. Barry Buzan, Lene Hansen), Sage Publications, London, S.3, ss.1-34.
• RYAKHOVSKAYA, Antonina N. (2014), "Transformation of Crisis Management in Crisis", Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, S.2, ss.102-107.
• SANDHU, Swran (2009), "Strategic Communication: An Institutional Perspective", International Journal of Strategic Communication, S.3(2), ss.72-92.
• STERN, Eric K and SAATHOFF, Gregory (2012), "Crisis Leadership and Military Community Resilience", Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, S.9(2), ss.1547-7355.1957.
• ŞAHİN CEYLAN, Şule (2006), “Francis Fukuyama and the End of History Thesis”, Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Social Sciences, S.5(10), ss.233-252.
• VAN, Dyk G. A. J., and NIEKERK, N. J. Van (2004), "Military Leadership: A Challenge Beyond Full Range Leadership", Journal of Public Administration, S.39(2), s.322-340.
• WAEWER, Ole (2008), "The Changing Agenda of Social Security", International Relations, S.5(18), ss.151-178.