Liderlik Araştırmalarına Bir Bakış: Karşılaştırmalı ve Sistematik Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2023, , 397 - 409, 08.07.2023

Nagihan Tepe

https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1279817

Öz

Bu araştırma liderlik konusu ile ilgili Türkiye’de eğitim yönetimi ve işletme yönetimi alanlarında yapılan doktora tezlerinin karşılaştırmalı ve sistematik olarak incelendiği bir derleme çalışmasıdır. Doktora tezlerinin tercih edilmesinin amacı yüksek lisans tezlerine göre daha üst düzeyde bilgi, beceri ve akademik yetkinlik ile hazırlanarak ele aldıkları konuyu daha geniş ve ayrıntılı inceliyor olmalarıdır. Bu derlemenin asıl amacı her iki alanda da yapılmış liderlik çalışmalarının benzerlik ve farklılıklarını ortaya koymak, çeşitli başlıklar altında nasıl ele alındığını geniş bir bakış açısıyla görebilmek ve sunabilmektir. Bu temel amaç çerçevesinde doktora tezlerinin “eğitim yönetimi” ve “işletme yönetimi” alanlarında karşılaştırmalı olarak yıllara, bilim dallarına, araştırma yöntemine ve örneklem grubuna göre dağılımları, çalışma grubu olarak kimlerin liderlik özelliğinin incelendiği, hangi liderlik türlerinin ele alındığı ve liderlik konusunun başka hangi örgütsel değişkenler ile birlikte araştırıldığı incelenmiştir. Bilimsel olarak eğitim yönetimi ve işletme yönetimi alanları birbirlerinden farklı olsalar da özellikle liderlik konusu ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde birtakım farklılıklar tespit edilse de benzer amaçlar çerçevesinde benzer yöntemler ile konunun ele alındığı görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liderlik, eğitim yönetimi, işletme yönetimi, sistematik derleme.

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen herhangi bir kurum yoktur

A Review of Leadership Research: A Comparative and Systematic Review

Öz

This research is a comparative and systematic review of doctoral dissertations on leadership in the fields of educational administration and business administration in Turkey. Doctoral theses are preferred because they are prepared with a higher level of knowledge, skills and academic competence than master's theses and examine the subject they deal with in a broader and more detailed manner. The main purpose of this review is to reveal the similarities and differences of leadership studies in both fields, to see and present how they are handled under various headings from a broad perspective. Within the framework of this main purpose, the comparative distribution of doctoral dissertations in the fields of "educational administration" and "business administration" according to years, disciplines, research method and sample group, whose leadership characteristics were examined as the study group, which types of leadership were addressed and which other organizational variables were investigated together with the subject of leadership were examined. Although the fields of educational administration and business administration differ from each other scientifically, when the studies abaout leadership are examined, it is seen that the subject is handled with similar methods within the framework of similar purposes, although some differences are detected.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership, educational management, business management, systematic review

Kaynakça

• ARSLAN, Rumiye, ORBAY, Keziban and ORBAY, Metin (2022), “Bibliometric Profile of an Emerging Journal: Participatory Educational Research”, Participatory Educational Research (PER), S.9(4), ss.153-171.
• BURNS, MacGregor James (1979), Leadership, Harper Torchbooks Publisher, New York (US), https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=lhrPS_s7EawC&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (Date of Access: 03.08.2022).
• BUSH, Tony and GLOVER, Derek (2003), School Leadership: Concepts and Evidence (A Review of Literature Carried out for National College for School Leadership), National College for School Leadership Publisher, Nottingham.
• CHEN, Junjun (2020), “Understanding Teacher Leaders’ Behaviours: Development and Validation of the Teacher Leadership Inventory”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, S.50(4), ss.630-648.
• CLUTTERBUCK, David and HIRST, Sheila (2002), “Leadership Communication: A Status Report”, Journal of Communication Management, S.6(4), ss.351-354.
• ESEN, Murat, BELLİBAŞ, Mehmet Şükrü and GÜMÜŞ, Sedat (2018), “The Evolution of Leadership Research in Higher Education for Two Decades (1995-2014): A Bibliometric and Content Analysis”, International Journal of Leadership in Education, S.23(3), ss.259-273.
• GOUGH, David, OLIVER, Sandy and THOMAS, James (2012), “Introducing Systematic Reviews”, An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (Ed. David Gough, Sandy Oliver, James Thomas), Sage, London (UK), ss.1-16.
• GÜMÜŞ, Sedat, BELLİBAŞ, Mehmet Şükrü, ESEN, Murat and GÜMÜŞ, Emine (2016), “A Systematic Review of Studies on Leadership Models in Educational Research From 1980 to 2014”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, S.46(1), ss.1–24.
• GÜMÜŞ, Sedat, BELLİBAŞ, Mehmet Şükrü, GÜMÜŞ, Emine and HALLINGER, Philip (2019), “Science Mapping Research on Educational Leadership and Management in Turkey: A Bibliometric Review of International Publications”, School Leadership & Management, S.40(1), ss.23-44.
• HALLINGER, Philip (2021), “A Meta-Synthesis of Bibliometric Reviews of Research on Managing for Sustainability, 1982–2019”, Sustainability, S.13(6), ss.1-22.
• HALLINGER, Philip, GÜMÜŞ, Sedat and BELLİBAŞ, Mehmet Şükrü (2020), “Are Principals Instructional Leaders Yet? A Science Map of the Knowledge Base on Instructional Leadership, 1940–2018”, Scientometrics, S.122(3), ss.1629-1650.
• HANLEY, Terry and CUTTS, Laura (2013), “What is a Systematic Review?”, Counselling Psychological Society, S.28(4), ss.3-6.
• HILLER, Nathan J., DECHURCH, Leslie, MURASE, Toshie and DOTY, Daniel (2011), “Searching for Outcomes of Leadership: A 25-Year Review”, Journal of Management, S.37(4), ss.1137-1177.
• HODGKINSON, Christopher (2008), Management Philosophy, Values and Motivation in Organizational Life (Translate Ed.: İbrahim Anıl, Binali Doğan), Beta Publisher, İstanbul.
• HOLBECHE, L (2013), “Leadership, Communication and Organizational Efficiency”, In Organizational Behaviour - People, Process, Work and Human Resource Management (Eds. Raisa Arvinen-Muondo, Stephen Perkins), Kogan Page Publisher, New York (US), ss.127-153.
• KILINÇ, Ali Çağatay, POLATCAN, Mahmut and YALDIZ, Tuba (2020), “Developments in Transformational School Leadership Research: A Systematic Review”, Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, S.8(3), ss.814-830.
• KOŞAR, Didem (2020), “Analysis of Organizational Trust Studies Conducted İn Turkey: A Content Analysis”, Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, S.10(2), ss.355-372.
• KOŞAR, Didem, ER, Emre, KILINÇ, Ali Çağatay and KOŞAR, Serkan (2017), “Analysis of Teacher Leadership Studies: A Content Analysis Study”, Inonu University Journal of the Graduate School of Education, S.4(7), ss.29-46.
• LEITHWOOD, Kenneth (2005), Educational Leadership – A Review of the Research, Temple University Publisher, Philadelphia (US).
• LINCOLN, Yvonna S. and GUBA, Egon G. (2000), Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publisher, Thousand Oaks – California (US).
• LUEDI, Markus M. (2022), “Leadership in 2022: A Perspective”, Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, S.36(2), ss.229-235.
• MERRIAM, Sharan B. (2013), Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (Translate Ed.: Selahattin Turan), Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
• MOHER, David, SHAMSEER, Larissa, CLARKE, Mike, GHERSI, Davina, LIBERATI, Alessandro, PETTICREW, Mark, SHEKELLE, Paul, STEWART, Lesley A. and PRISMA-P GROUP (2015), “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement”, Systematic Reviews, S.4(1), ss.1-9.
• ÖZDEMİR, Nedim, GÜMÜŞ, Sedat, KILINÇ, Ali Çağatay and BELLİBAŞ, Mehmet Şükrü (2022), “A Systematic Review of Research on the Relationship between School Leadership and Student Achievement: An Updated Framework and Future Direction”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, S.50(1), ss.1–27.
• SIANGCHOKYOO, Nathapon, KLINGER, R.L. and CAMPION, Emily D. (2020), “Follower Transformation as the Linchpin of Transformational Leadership Theory: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda”, The Leadership Quarterly, S.31, ss.1048-9843.
• STEWART, Greg L., COURTRIGHT, Stephen H. and MANZ, Charles C. (2011), “Self-Leadership: A Multilevel Review”, Journal of Management, S.37(1), ss.185-222.
• STOGDILL, Ralph Melvin (1974). Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research. The Free Press, New York.
• VANCE, Connie and LARSON, Elaine (2002), “Leadership Research in Business and Health Care”, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, S.34(2), ss.165-171.
• WONG, Gabi (2017), “Leadership and Leadership Development in Academic Libraries: A Review”, Library Management, S.38(2/3), ss.153-166.