Assessment of Reputational Risk Management Maturity Levels of Banks

Abstract

Due to the nature of their activities, reputational risk is one of the main risks that should be managed for banks. Since corporate reputation is an intangible asset, it is extremely difficult to measure reputational risk. On the other hand, the maturity level of banks for the management of reputational risk is extremely important in terms of reducing the effects of reputational losses that may be exposed. The aim of this study is to develop a framework for evaluating the maturity level of reputational risk management in banks. For this purpose, based on the COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework, the attributes that can be used in the evaluation of the reputational risk maturity level, the values related to these qualifications and the evaluation criteria for each attribute are defined. In addition, 5 different maturity levels were created for banks according to the total score obtained by combining the values calculated for each attribute, taking into account Bak and Jedynak (2023). This proposed framework can be used as a framework in which banks can evaluate themselves and legal authorities can evaluate banks in terms of determining the maturity level of reputational risk management.

Keywords

• Risk Management
• Reputational Risk Management
• Reputational Risk Management Maturity Level

Bankaların İtibar Riski Yönetimi Olgunluk Seviyelerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Faaliyetlerinin doğası gereği itibar riski bankalar açısından yönetilmesi gereken temel risklerin başında gelmektedir. Kurumsal itibarın maddi olmayan bir varlık olması sebebiyle itibar riskinin ölçümü son derece zordur. Buna karşın bankaların itibar riskinin yönetimine yönelik olgunluk seviyeleri maruz kalınabilecek itibari kayıpların etkilerinin azaltılması yönünden son derece önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bankalarda itibar riski yönetimi olgunluk seviyesinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir çerçeve geliştirmektir. Bu amaçla COSO Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi Çerçevesi baz alınarak itibar riski olgunluk seviyesinin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılabilecek nitelikler, bu niteliklere ilişkin değerler ve her bir niteliğe yönelik değerlendirme kriterleri tanımlanmıştır. Ayrıca, Bak and Jedynak (2023) dikkate alınarak her bir nitelik için hesaplanan değerlerin birleştirilmesiyle elde edilen toplam puana göre bankalar için 5 farklı olgunluk seviyesi oluşturulmuştur. Önerilen bu çerçeve, itibar riski yönetiminin olgunluk seviyesinin belirlenmesi açısından bankaların kendilerini ve yasal otoritelerin bankaları değerlendirebilecekleri bir çerçeve olarak kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Risk Yönetimi
• İtibar Riski Yönetimi
• İtibar Riski Yönetimi Olgunluk Seviyesi

Kaynakça

1. BAK, Sylwia and JEDYNAK, Piotr (2023), Risk Management Maturity: A Multidimensional Model, Routledge Publisher, New York (US).
2. BALKAN, Bülent (2018), “İtibar Riski ve Etik”, Denetişim, S.18, ss.23-34.
3. BANKING REGULATION AND SUPERVISION AGENCY - BRSA (2016), “İtibar Riskinin Yönetimine İlişkin Rehber”, BRSA Web Page (E-Source), https://www.bddk.org.tr/Mevzuat/DokumanGetir/952 (Access Date: 01.06.2023).
4. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION - BCBS (1997), “Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision”, Consultative Document, http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs30a.pdf (Access Date: 03.06.2023).
5. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION - BCBS (2001), “Customer Due Diligence for Banks”, Consultative Document, http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs85.pdf (Access Date: 03.06.2023).
6. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION - BCBS (2009), “Proposed Enhancements to the Basel II Framework”, Consultative Document, https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs157.pdf (Access Date: 04.06.2023).
7. BURIAK, Anna and ARTEMENKO, Aleksandr (2018), “Reputational Risk in Banking: Application for Ukraine”, Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, S.2(2), ss.100-110.
8. CHERNOBAI, Anna S., RACHEV, Svetlozar T. and FABOZZI, Frank J. (2007), Operational Risk: A Guide to Basel II Capital Requirements, Models and Analysis, John Wiley & Sons Publisher, New Jersey.

9. COMMITTEE OF SPONSORING ORGANISATIONS (COSO) (2017), Enterprise Risk Management - Integrated Framework, AICPA Publisher, New York (US).
10. CROUHY, Michel, GALAI, Dan and MARK, Robert (2014), The Essentials of risk Management, McGraw-Hill Publisher, New York (US).
11. DELOITTE (2015), “Global Survey on Reputational Risk”, Deloitte Web Page (E-Source), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/za/Documents/risk/NEWReputationRiskSurveyReport_25FEB.pdf (Access Date: 06.06.2023).
12. ECCLES, Robert G., NEWQUIST, Scott C. and SCHATZ, Roland (2007), “Reputation and its Risks”, Harvard Business Review, S.85(2), ss.104-114.
13. ECKERT Christian and GATZERT, Nadine (2017), “Modeling Operational Risk Incorporating Reputational Risk: An Integrated Analysis for Financial Firms”, Insurance Mathematics and Economics, S.72, ss.122-137.
14. FIORDELISI, Franco, SOANA, Maria-Gaia and SCHWIZER, Paola (2013), “The Determinants of Reputational Risk in the Banking Sector”, Journal of Banking & Finance, S.37(5), ss.1359-1371.
15. FOMBRUN, Charles J., GARDBERG, Naomi A. and BARNETT, Michael L. (2000), “Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk”, Business and Society Review, S.105(1), ss.85-106.
16. GÜMÜŞ, Murat and ÖKSÜZ, Burcu (2010), “İtibarın Temel Taşı Olarak Kurumsal İletişim: Kurumsal İtibar Sürecinde İletişimin Rolü ve Önemi”, Marmara İletişim Dergisi, S.16, ss.112–124.
17. GÜNDOĞDU, Aysel (2016), “Repuation Risk of Banks and Cases related to Reputation Risk in Turkish Banking System”, International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, S.5(2), ss.37-45.
18. INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS (IIA) (2020), “The IIA’s Three Lines Model: An Update of the Three Lines of Defense”, IIA Web Page (E-Source), https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/site/about-us/advocacy/three-lines-model -updated.pdf (Access Date: 10.06.2023).
19. HONEY, Garry (2009), A Short Guide to Reputation Risk, Gower Publishing Limited, England.
20. KEDARYA, Tomer, COHEN, Rafael S. and ELALOUF, Amir (2021), “Calculating Entrepreneurial the Reputational Risk in Financial Institutions”, Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, S.27(1), ss.1–11.
21. KIZILBOĞA ÖZASLAN, Rüveyda and ÖZŞAHİN KOÇ, Filiz (2016), “Kurumun Sürdürülebilirliğinde İtibar Riski Yönetiminin Yeri ve Önemi”, Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, S.9(1), ss.273-283.
22. LARKIN, Judy (2003), Strategic the Reputational Risk Management, Palgrave McMillan Publisher, New York (US).
23. LAURENS, Francois (2012), “Reputational Risk: A Crisis of Confidence in Banking”, SSRN Electronic Journal, S.(Special Issues), ss.(1-15).
24. MIKLASZEWSKA, Ewa and KIL, Krzysztof (2016), “Reputational Risk: Problems with Understanding the Concept and Managing its Impact”, Bankowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny, S.4(65), ss.96-115.
25. MUKHERJEE, Niketa, ZAMBON, Stefano and LUCIUS, Hakan (2015), “Do Banks Manage Reputational Risk? – A Case Study of European Investment Bank”, Working Paper (E-source) https://web.actuaries.ie/ sites/default/files/erm-resources/do_banks_manage_reputational_risk_a_case_study_of_european_ investment_bank.pdf (Access Date: 11.06.2023).
26. RAYNER, Jenny (2003), Managing Reputational Risk, John Wiley Publisher, UK.
27. SAKARYA, Şakir and ÇALIŞ, Nevzat (2020), “İtibar Riski ve Firma Değeri İlişkisi: BİST’te Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, S.23(43), ss.283-309.
28. SAVRAM, Merve and KARAKOÇ, Ali (2012), “Bankacılık Sektöründe İtibar Riskinin Önemi”, International Conference on Eurasian Economies Proceedings Book, Almaata, ss.328-332.
29. SCOTT, Susan V. and WALSHAM, Geoff (2005), “Reconceptualizing and Managing the Reputational Risk in the Knowledge Economy: Toward Reputable Action”, Organization Science, S.16(3), ss.308-322.
30. STURM, Philipp (2013), “Operational and the Reputational Risk in the European Banking Industry: The Market Reaction to Operational Risk Events”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, S.85(1), ss.191-206.
31. SWEETING, Paul (2011), Financial Enterprise Risk Management, Cambridge University Press, New York.
32. TACHICIU, Laurentiu, FULOP, Melinda T., MARIN-PANTELESCU, Andreea, ONCIOIU, Ionica and TOPOR, Dan I. (2020), “Non-financial Reporting and the Reputational Risk in the Romanian Financial Sector”, Amfiteatru Economic, S.22(55), ss.668-691.
33. TAKAN, Mehmet (2002), Bankacılık: Teori, Uygulama ve Yönetim, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
34. TROSTIANSKA, Karyna and SEMENCHA, Ilona (2020), “Reputational Risk Management in Conditions of Credibility Gap in the Banking System”, Journal of Financial Economic Policy, S.12(3), ss.327-343.
35. WALTER, Ingo (2014), “Reputational Risk in Banking and Finance: An Issue of Individual Responsibility?”, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, S.7(3), ss.299-305.
36. XIANG, Li and LINA, Yang (2014), “Research on the Reputational Risk Management of Commercial Banks in China”, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, S.6(5), ss.1795-1800.
37. ZABY, Simon and POHL, Michael (2019), “The Management of Reputational Risks in Banks: Findings from Germany and Switzerland”, SAGE Open, S.9(3), ss.1-15.