Yönetim Literatüründe Postmodernizm: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2023, , 1199 - 1213, 03.01.2024

Yasemin Savaş

https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1383254

Öz

Bu çalışma bibliyometrik analiz kullanarak yönetim alanında postmodernizm kavramının kullanımına genel bir bakış sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Postmodernizm, çeşitli şekillerde bir “dönem”, bir “perspektif” veya yeni bir “düşünce paradigması” olarak değerlendirilir. Düşünce paradigması rolüyle farklı teorileştirme ve araştırma uygulamalarını içeren, belli bir ortak özelliğe sahip birden fazla parçayı, bölümü veya sınıfları birlikte belirten bir kavramdır. Bu doğrultuda Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanı kullanılarak 1988-2022 yılları arasında yönetim alanında, başlıklarında, özetlerinde ve/veya anahtar kelimelerde 'postmodernizm' teriminin kullanıldığı toplam 201 makale incelenmiştir. İncelenen veriler VOSviewer yazılım programı ile haritalandırılmıştır. Çalışmada öncelikle belirli bibliyometrik göstergelere dayalı olarak 201 makaleye genel bir bakış sunulmuştur. Daha sonra makaleler üzerinde atıf ve ortak atıf analizi gibi bibliyometrik yöntemler uygulanarak irdelenmiştir. Böylece alanın dinamizmine ilişkin kapsamlı bir görüş sunarak ve temel çalışmaları, dergileri, yazarları ve bunların ara bağlantılarını belirleyerek yönetim alanında postmodernizm kavramının kullanımının gelişimini görselleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, kapsamlı bir kavramsal çerçevenin sunulmasına destek olmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yönetim, Postmodernizm, Bibliyometrik Analiz

Postmodernism in Management Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis

Öz

Using bibliometric analysis, this study attempts to provide an overview of the application of the term of postmodernism in the field of management. Postmodernism is variously considered a "period," a "perspective," or a new "thought paradigm." It is a concept that encompasses various theorising and research applications with its function as a paradigm of thought, and denotes more than one part, department, or category with a particular shared characteristic. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on a corpus of 201 scholarly publications in the subject of management, whereby the phrase 'postmodernism' was prominently featured in their titles, abstracts, and/or keywords. The investigation spanned the years 1988 to 2022, utilising the Web of Science Core Collection database as the primary source of data. The study begins by providing an overview of 201 papers, focusing on specific bibliometric factors. Subsequently, the publications underwent scrutiny through the application of bibliometric techniques, including citation and co-citation analysis. Thus, we illustrate the evolution of the use of the concept of postmodernism in the field of management, providing a comprehensive view of the field's dynamism and identifying the principal works, journals, authors, and their interconnections. The results collected in the research provide evidence in favour of the development of a comprehensive conceptual framework.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Management, Postmodernism, Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

• ALVESSON, Mats (1995), “The Meaning and Meaninglessness of Postmodernism: Some Ironic Remarks”, Organization Studies, S.16(6), ss.1047-1075.
• ALVESSON, Mats ve DEETZ, Stanley (2006), “1.7 Critical Theory and Postmodernism Approaches to Organizational Studies”, The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks - California (US), ss.255-283.
• ANDERSON, Perry (2002), Postmodernitenin Kökenleri (Çev. Elçin Gen), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
• ASLAN, Seyfettin ve YILMAZ, Abdullah (2001), “Modernizme Bir Başkaldırı Projesi Olarak Postmodernizm”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, S.2, ss.93-108.
• ASLANARGUN, Engin (2023), “Modernite ve Postmodernite Arasında Türk Eğitim Yönetiminin Açmazları”, Alanyazın Eğitim Bilimleri Eleştirel İnceleme Dergisi, S.(Özel Sayı), ss.21-27.
• AYDIN, Mustafa (2009), Moderniteye Dışarıdan Bakmak, Açılım Kitap, İstanbul.
• BARRATT, Ed (2002), “Foucault, Foucauldianism and Human Resource Management”, Personnel Review, S.31(2), ss.189-204.
• BASU, Alaka Malwade (2002), “Postmodern Contraception: The Use of Traditional Methods of Birth Control Among Upper Class Women in India”, Discovering Normality in Health and the Reproductive Body (Ed. Caroline Bledsoe), Program of African Studies Northwestern University Publisher, Evanston (US), ss.71-81.
• BAUMAN, Zygmunt (2003), “A Sociological Theory of Postmodernity”, Intimations of Postmodernity (Ed. Zygmunt Bauman), Routledge Publisher, Oxfordshire (UK), ss.215-232.
• BAZRKAR, Ardeshir, HERAVI, Aziz Javanpour ve ABEDZADEH, Mohammad (2014), “The Impact of Postmodernism on Management and Organization Theories”, International Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences, S.3(8), ss.2739-2743.
• BLOCK, Joern ve FISCH, Christian (2020), “Eight Tips and Questions for Your Bibliographic Study in Business and Management Research”, Management Review Quarterly, S.70, ss.307-312.
• BOJE, David ve DENNEHY, Raymond (2000), The Story of Post Modern Management, Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks - California (US).
• CALAS, Marta B. ve SMIRCICH, Linda (1999), “Past postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions”, Academy of Management Review, S.24(4), ss.649-671.
• CANCINO, Christian A., MERIGÓ, Jose M. ve CORONADO, Freddy C. (2017), “A Bibliometric Analysis of Leading Universities in Innovation Research”, Journal of Innovations Knowledge, S.2(3), ss.106-124.
• CHIA, Robert (1995), “From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis”, Organization Studies, S.16(4), ss.579-604.
• CHIA, Robert (2005), “Organizational Theory as a Postmodern Science”, The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Theory (Eds. Haridimos Tsoukas, Christian Knudsen), Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), ss.39-62.
• CLEGG, Stewart (1990), Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World, Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks – California (US),
• CLEGG, Stewart (2003), “Managing Organization Futures in a Changing World”, The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Theory (Eds. Haridimos Tsoukas, Christian Knudsen), Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), ss.536-567.
• CLEGG, Stewart ve KORNBERGER, Martin (2003), “Modernism, Postmodernism, Management and Organization Theory”, Emerald, S.21, ss.57-88.
• COOPER, Robert ve BURRELL, Gibson (1988), “Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Introduction”, Organization Studies, S.9(1), ss.91-112.
• ERASLAN, Hasan ve ŞENGÜN, İbrahim (2018), “Postmodernizm Akımı ve İşletme Yönetimine Etkileri”, Uluslararası Batı Karadeniz Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, S.2(2), ss.178-193.
• ERDEMİR, Erkan (2013), “Postmodern Örgüt Kuramı”, Örgüt Kuramı (Ed. Deniz Taşcı, Erkan Erdemir), Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, ss.162-185.
• ERDEMİR, Erkan ve KOÇ, Umut (2010), “Postmodernizm ve Komplekslik: Örgüt Kuramı Bağlamında Paradigmatik Bir Tartışma”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, S.5(1), ss.25-48.
• FEATHERSTONE, Mike (1988), “In Pursuit of the Postmodern: An Introduction”, Theory, Culture and Society, S.5(2-3), ss.195-215.
• FETSCHERIN, Marc ve HEINRICH, Daniel (2015), “Consumer Brand Relationships Research: A Bibliometric Citation Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Business Research, S.68(2), ss.380-390.
• GEPHARD, Robert, BOJE, David M. ve THATCHENKERY, Tojo (1996), “Postmodern Management and the Coming Crisis of Organizational Analysis”, Postmodern Management and Organization Theory (Eds. David Boje, Robert Gephard, Tojo Thatchenkery), Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks – California (US).
• GERGEN, Kenneth (1990), “Toward a Postmodern Psychology”, The Humanistic Psychologist, S.18(1), ss.23-34.
• GIDDENS, Anthony (1998), Modernliğin Sonuçları (Çev. Ersin Kuşdil), Ayrıntı Yayınları, Ankara.
• GIDDENS, Anthony ve PIERSON, Christopher (2001), Modernliği Anlamlandırmak (Çev. Murat Sağlam, Serhat Uyurkulak), Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul.
• GÜL, Ertan Cem (2016), “Postmodern Sanrı ve Yabancılaşma Gerçeği”, Toros Üniversitesi İİBSF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, S.3(6), ss.75-107.
• HABERMAS, Jurgen (1994), “Modernlik: Tamamlanmamış Bir Proje”, Postmodernizm (Çev. Gülengül Naliş, Dumrul Sabuncuoğlu, Deniz Erksan – Ed. Necmi Zeka), Kıyı Yayınları, İstanbul, ss.31-44.
• HALLINGER, Philip ve KOVAČEVIĆ, Jasna (2019), “A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018”, Review of Educational Research, S.89(3), ss.335-369.
• HARIHARA, Sudan A., PANDEESWARI, Dhanuskodi ve HASSAN, Ahdi (2022), “Research Trends in Postmodernism: A Bibliometirc Analysis”, World Journal of English Language, S.12(2), ss.148-158.
• HARVEY, David (2010), Postmodernliğin Durumu Kültürel Değişimin Kökenleri (Çev: Sungur Savran), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul, 5. Baskı.
• HASSARD, John (1999), “Postmodernism, Philosophy and Management: Concepts and Controversies”, International Journal of Management Reviews, S.1(2), ss.171-195.
• HATİPLER, Mustafa (2023), “Modernizmden Postmodernizme Aile”, Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, S.6(4), ss.574-590.
• HELLER, Agnes, FEHER, Ference, ARGIN, Şükrü ve AKINHAY, Osman (1993), Postmodern Politik Durum, Öteki Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• HOLLINGER, Robert (1994), Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach, Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks – California (US).
• KESKİN, Halit, AKGÜN, Ali Ekber ve KOÇOĞLU, İpek (2016), Örgüt Teorisi, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
• LINSTEAD, Stephen Andrew ve SMALL, Robert Grafton (1991), “Nice Jumper, Jim! Dissonance and Emotional Labour in A Management Development Programme”, 5th European Congress on the Psychology of Work and Organisations, 24-27 March 1991 – Rouen, University of Rouen Publisher, Rouen (France).
• LYOTARD, Jean François (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge [La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir] (Çev. G. Bennington, B. Massumi), Manchester University Press, Manchester (UK).
• LYOTARD, Jean François (1997), Postmodern Durum (Çev. Ahmet Çiğdem), Vadi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2.Baskı.
• LYOTARD, Jean François (2014), Postmodern Durum (Çev. İsmet Birkan), Bilgesu Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• MAS-TUR, Alicia, KRAUS, Sascha, BRANDTNER, Mario, EWERT, Ralf ve KÜRSTEN, Wolfgang (2020), “Advances in Management Research: A Bibliometric Overview of the Review of Managerial Science”, Review of Managerial Science, S.14, ss.933-958.
• MCAULEY, John, DUBERLY, Joanne ve JOHNSON, Phil (2007), Organization Theory: Challenges and Perspectives, Peorson Education Press, London (UK).
• MURPHY, John W. (1995), Postmodern Toplumsal Analiz ve Eleştiri (Çev. Hüsamettin Arslan), Eti Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• MUTLU, Mehmet Seçkin (2022), “Postmodern Yönetim Anlayışı ve Kurum İçi İletişim Sivil Havacılıkta Yer Hizmetleri Alanında Kuşaklar Arasında Bir Araştırma”, FSM Mesleki Bilimler Dergisi, S.1(1), ss.58-92.
• PARKER, Martin (1992), “Post-Modern Organizations or Postmodern Organization Theory”, Organization Studies, S.13(1), ss.1-17.
• PFEFFER, Jeffrey (1993), “Barriers to the Advancement of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable”, Academy of Management Review, S.18(4), ss.599-620.
• PINKNEY, Thomas (1993), “Modernism and Post Modernism”, The Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth Century Social Thought (Ed. William Outwhite, Tom Bottomore), Blackwell Publisher, New Jersey.
• POWER, Michael (1990), “Modernism, Postmodernism and Organization”, The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations (Ed. John Hassard, Denis Pym), Routledge Publisher, Oxfordshire (UK), ss.109‐124.
• SHARIFI, Ayyoob, SIMANGAN, Dahlia ve KANEKO, Shinji (2021), “Three Decades of Research on Climate Change and Peace: A Bibliometrics Analysis”, Sustainability Science, S.16, ss.1079-1095.
• ŞİŞMAN, Mehmet (1996), “Postmodernizm Tartışmaları ve Örgüt Kuramındaki Yansımaları”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, S.7(7), ss.451-464.
• THOMPSON, Jon (1993), Fiction, Crime, and Empire: Clues to Modernity and Postmodernism, University of Illinois Press, Champaign (US).
• TOWNSELL, Rhodena (2008), “A National Look: Epistemology Applied to Postmodernism for the Improvement and Development of Public Education”, National Forum of Educational Administration Aand Supervision Journal, S.25(4), ss.1-10.
• VAN ECK, Nees Jan ve WALTMAN, Ludo (2014), “Visualizing Bibliometric Networks”, Measuring Scholarly Impact (Ed. Ying Ding, Ronald Rousseu, Dietmar Wolfram), Springer Publisher, Cham, ss.285-320.
• ZEYNEL, Şeyda ve KAYIKÇI, Sabrina (2022), “Karşılaştırmalı Eleştirel Bir Analiz: Postmodernizm, Modernizmin Devamı Mıdır, Yoksa Ondan Bir Kopuşu Mu Temsil Eder”, Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimlerde Güncel Araştırmalar I (Ed. Erdil Durukan, Burak Alkan, Sema Sağlık), Gece Kitaplığı Yayınevi, Ankara, ss.105-128.
• ZUPIC, Ivan ve ČATER, Tomaz (2015), “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization”, Organ Res Methods, S.18, ss.429-472.