TR
EN
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and Restructuring Debates
Abstract
The subject of the study is the reform discussions on the management of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). The United Nations (UN) can be defined as the most influential organization in the international arena. In this article, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which is the most influential organization of the UN and equally controversial, a superpower union with worldwide management, control and surveillance powers, is examined, and the rules it adheres to in its structure and while fulfilling its duties are examined, and the recent discussions on reform in this area are examined. The study gains importance because it offers suggestions in shaping the future of a superior organization that concerns many countries and their security. The method of legislative analysis was used in the preparation of the article. As a result of the research conducted, it was concluded that an organization with self-appointed and unchangeable permanent members, and members who can veto any decision they want, cannot be claimed to have a democratic structure and that this institution cannot be expected to be impartial. There are strong suspicions that the political and administrative wills of the governments of countries that have an effective say in world politics and security organizations such as the UN Security Council are not free and are mortgaged.
Keywords
Destekleyen Kurum
Araştırmanın ortaya konulmasında herhangi bir mali destek alınmamıştır.
Etik Beyan
Bu makale Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine uygundur. Beyan edilecek herhangi bir çıkar çatışması yoktur. Araştırmanın ortaya konulmasında herhangi bir mali destek alınmamıştır. Makale yazım ve intihal/benzerlik açısından kontrol edilmiştir. Makale, “en az iki dış hakem” ve “çift taraflı körleme” yöntemi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Yazar, dergiye imzalı “Telif Devir Formu” belgesi göndermişlerdir. Mevcut çalışma için mevzuat gereği etik izni alınmaya ihtiyaç yoktur. Bu konuda yazarlar tarafından dergiye “Etik İznine Gerek Olmadığına Dair Beyan Formu” gönderilmiştir. Yazar, çalışmanın tüm bölümlerine ve aşamalarına tek başına katkıda bulunmuştur.
Kaynakça
- ACDA (2009), International Act of Arms Control and Disarmament, ACDA Publisher, Washington, D.C.
- BAILEY, Stephen D. and DOWS, Susan (1998), The Procedure of the UN Security Council, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3rd Edition.
- BENNIS, Phyllis (1994), “Conference on Reform and Restructuring of the Security Council”, 1994 Conference (E-Text of Speech), Global Policy Forum Corporate Web Page, https://archive.globalpolicy.org/the-dark-side-of-natural-resources-st/water-in-conflict/32786-1994-conference-phyllis-bennis.html (Access Date: 03.08.2024).
- DEMİRKAYA, Yüksel (2006), “Küreselleşmenin Kamu Yönetimi Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, S.14(2), ss.133-150.
- GLENNON, Michael J. (2003), “Why the Security Council failed”, Foreign Affairs, S.82(3), ss.15-22, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2003-05-01/why-security-council-failed (Access Date: 03.08.2024).
- HENMAN, Peter (2005), “Voice of America”, Global Policy Forum Corporate Web Page (E-Document), 9 June 2005, http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/veto/articles.htm (Access Date: 21.10.2005).
- KRISTEN, Hans M. (2005), “U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe: A Review of Post-Cold War Policy, Force Levels and War Planning”, Natural Resources Defence Council, https://www.nrdc.org/ (Access Date: 03.08.2024).
- LAÇİNER, Sadi (2005), “UN Reform: Focus- Turkey Ideal Permanent Security Council Member Says Analyst,” İtalyan Haber Ajansı (E-News), http://www.turkishweekly.net/turkce/yorum.php?id=76 (Access Date: 03.08.2024).
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Uluslararası Kurumlar
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
8 Ocak 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi
19 Kasım 2024
Kabul Tarihi
5 Ocak 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2024 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4
