The Smart Sea concept and its application for ocean management in a changing climate

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 100 - 113, 30.12.2022

Saleem Mustafa Rossita Shapawi John Hill Anabela Marisa Azul Sitti Raehanah Muhamad Shaleh Abentin Estim Zarinah Waheed Cheng-ann Chen Ejria Saleh Md. Azharul Hoque German P. Bueno Galaz

https://doi.org/10.51756/marlife.1113070

Öz

Global environmental change is a defining issue of our time. The ocean is a key component of the Earth system, and yet, in-depth understanding of its roles in sustaining life has not received the attention which it deserves. Humanity must develop a new relationship with the ocean characterized by protection, sustainable production, and prosperity. Society has too much to gain by implementing sustainability solutions and too much to lose by ignoring them. Our actions or inaction now will have far-reaching implications for future of all life on Earth. Ocean blueprint that calls for enforcing 30% Marine Protected Areas by 2030 requires real transformative action. This paper contains new ideas for combining the efforts of natural and social scientists, and traditional users of sea, and explores the potential of modern technologies to assist in this campaign. ‘Smart Sea’ concept introduced in this paper envisages synergies among the problem-solving approaches including digital tools, and eco-engineering and eco-mimicry solution options. Knowledge gaps have been highlighted and relevance of new knowledge systems emphasized together with enabling conditions to address the uncertainties associated with the ocean ecosystem. The ocean has a central position in actions towards preventing global warming of 1.5oC but measures to achieve it should consider that the ocean carbon sink is dynamic and is adversely affected when excessive carbon dioxide produces acidification. The selected measures are likely to have trade-offs, requiring analysis of multiple dimensions, for ensuring sustainable outcomes. The prevailing ocean health and urgency to mitigate it calls for combining global and local solutions, technologies and actions driven by safe and innovative solutions, and wherever possible, based on proof-of-concept. Deviating from the on-going incremental data collection systems to new forms of data-sharing using modern technological tools will contribute to addressing the glaring vacuum in knowledge of the ocean and facilitating a concerted global action for maintaining its ecosystem services. An attempt has been made in this paper to consolidate different opinions and experiences in moving from generalities to specifics for sustainable solutions that support economies, food security and the society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ocean health, Knowledge systems, Digital technologies, Solution options, Food security, Sustainable management

Kaynakça

• Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M. et al. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93: 335-354.
• Ames, C.L., Ohdera, A.H., Colstron, S.M. et al. (2021). Fieldable environmental DNA sequencing to assess jellyfish biodiversity in nearshore waters of Florida Keys, United States. Frontiers in Marine Science, doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.640527.
• Arsin, N.E., Estim, A. & Mustafa, S. (2018). Behavior and response of Japanese catfish (Silurus asotus) in captivity provided with an artificial microhabitat. Aquatic Research, 1: 136-139.
• Atlas, W., Ban, N.C., Moore, J.W., et at. (2021). Indigenous Systems of Management for Culturally and Ecologically Resilient Pacific Salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) Fisheries. BioScience, 71: 186–204.
• Bean, T.P., Greenwood, N., Beckett, R. et al. (2017). A Review of the tools used for marine monitoring in the UK: combining historic and contemporary methods with modelling and socioeconomics to fulfil legislative needs and scientific ambitions. Frontiers in Marine Science, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00263
• Benyus, J. (2009). Biomimicry in action. Technology, Entertainment and Design, New York, USA.
• BI (2021). Solution to Global Challenges are Around Us. The Biomimicry Institute, Montana, USA.
• Borja, A., White, M.P., Berdalet, E. et al. (2020). Moving toward an agenda on ocean health and human health issues in Europe. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00037.
• Bradford, T.E., Astudillo, J.C., Lau, E.T.C., et al. (2020). Provision of refugia and seeding with native bivalves can enhance biodiversity on vertical seawalls. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160: 111578, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111578.
• Chen, S., De Bruyne, C. & Bollempalli, M. (2020). Blue economy: community case studies addressing the poverty-environment nexus in ocean and coastal management. Sustainability, 12: 4654, doi: 10.3390/su12114654
• Chopin, T. & Tacon, A.G.J. (2021). Importance of seaweeds and extractive species in global aquaculture production. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture, 29, 139 – 148.
• Coll, M., Steenbeek, J., Pennino, M.G. et al. (2020). Advancing global ecological modelling capabilities to simulate future trajectories of change in marine ecosystems. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.567877
• Cooney, M., Goldstein, M. & Shapiro, E. (2019). How marine protected areas help fisheries and ocean ecosystems. Centre for American Progress, Washington, D.C.
• COS (2021). Canada’s Ocean Supercluster, STN C, St. John’s , NL, Canada.
• Cusack, C., Manglami, O., Jud, S. et al. (2021). New and emerging technologies for sustainable fisheries. Environmental Defence Fund, Park Avenue, New York.
• de Groot, R. S., Blignaut, J., Van Der Ploeg, S. et al. (2013). Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration. Conservation Biology, 27: 1286–1293
• de Jonge, V. N., Elliott, M. & Brauer, V. S. (2006). Marine monitoring: its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 53, 5–19.
• de Jonge, V.N., Elliott, M. and Brauer, V.S. (2006). Marine monitoring: its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive’s Objectives. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 53: 5 – 19.
• Depledge, M. H., White, M. P., Maycock, B. et al. (2019). Time and tide: our future health and well-being depend on the oceans. BMJ, 366: l4671. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4671
• Doukas, H. & Nikas, A. (2020). Decision support models in climate policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 280: 1-24.
• EASAC (2005). A User’s Guide to Biodiversity Indicators. European Academies Science Advisory Council. The Royal Society, London, UK.
• EF (2018). Benefits of marine protected areas. Environmental Foundation, Auckland, New Zealand.
• FAO (2017). Port State Measures. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
• FAO (2018). Effort and catch per unit effort. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
• Friedlander, A.M., Shackeroff, J.M. and Kittinger, J.N. (2013). Traditional marine resources and their use in contemporary Hawaii. Pacific Science, 67: 441 – 460.
• Green, S.J., White, A.T., Christie, P. et al. (2011). Emerging marine protected area networks in the Coral Triangle: lessons and way forward. Conservation Society, 9: 173-188.
• Halpern, B.S., Frazier, M., Potapenko, J. et al. (2015) Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nature Communications, 6: 7615, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8615
• Hickey, F. (2006). Traditional marine resource management in Vanuatu: Acknowledging, supporting and strengthening indigenous management systems. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin, 20: 11-23.
• Hutchings, J.A.,, Minto, C., Ricard, D. et al. (2010). Trends in the abundance of marine fishes. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 67: 1205–1210.
• Hyder, K., Rossberg, A. G., Allen, J. I. et al. (2015). Making modelling count - increasing the contribution of shelf-seas community and ecosystem models to policy development and management. Marine Policy, 61: 291–302.
• IOC (2017). Facts and figures on marine biodiversity. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, UNESCO, Paris, France.
• IPBES (2019). Nature’s dangerous decline unprecedented- species extinction rates accelerating. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Paris, France.
• Watanabe, J.I., Shao, Y. & Miura, N. (2019). Underwater and airborne monitoring of marine ecosystem and debris. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 13 (4): 044509, doi: 10.1117/1.JRS.13.044509.
• IPCC (2021). Climate change 2001. Synthesis report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• IUEP (2018). The economic benefits of marine protected areas in Europe. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels, Belgium.
• Jones, J.S. (2019). To solve climate change, remember the ocean. Nature, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038 /d41586-019-02832-w
• Jones, K.R., Klein, C.J., Halpern, B.S. et al. (2018) The location and protection status of Earth’s diminishing marine wilderness. Current Biology, 28: 2506–2512.
• Klinges, D. (2018). A New Dimension to Marine Restoration: 3D Printing Coral Reefs. Mongabay News and Inspiration from Nature’s Frontline, California, USA.
• Lester, S.E., Halpern, B.S., Grorud-Colvert, K. et al. (2009). Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 384: 33 – 46.
• Levine, A.S., Richmond, L. & Lopez-Carr, D. (2015). Marine resources management: culture, livelihoods and governance. Applied Geography, 59: 56-59.
• Lynam, C. P., Uusitalo, L., Patrício, J. et al. (2016). Uses of innovative modelling tools within the implementation of the marine strategy framework directive. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, doi: 10.3389/FMARS.2016.00182
• Mascia, M.B., Claus, C.A. & Naidoo, R. (2010). Impacts of marine protected areas on fishing communities. Conservation Biology, 24: 1424-1429.
• McCay, B.J. & Jones, P.J.S. (2011). Marine protected areas and the governance of marine ecosystems and fisheries. Conservation Biology, 25: 1130-1133.
• Metcalf, S. J., Van Putten, E.I., Frusher, S. et al. (2015). Measuring the vulnerability of marine social-ecological systems: a prerequisite for the identification of climate change adaptations. Ecology and Society, 20: 35, doi.org/10.5751/ES-07509-200235
• Mustafa, S. & Saad, S. (2021). Coral Triangle: Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Sustainability. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A.M., Brandli L., Lange Salvia A., Wall T. (eds) Life Below Water. Encyclopaedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
• Mustafa, S. (2021). How to prevent mass extinction in the ocean using AI, robots and 3D printers. The Conversation, 20 December, 20-21, Paris, France.
• Mustafa, S., Cheng-Ann, C. & Kawi, S.D. (2021). Mainstreaming sustainable seafood systems for harmonizing the use of marine natural capital and needs of the indigenous coastal communities. Proceedings of the International Sustainable Development Research Society Conference, 13-15 July 2021, Mid-Sweden University, Sweden.
• Mustafa, S., Estim, A. & Shaleh, S.R.M. (2019). A call for open access for marine bioprospecting. Environmental Policy and Law, 49 (4-5): 232-236. DOI: 10.3233/EPL-190168.
• Mustafa, S., Estim, A., Tuzan, A.D. et al. (2019). Nature-based and technology-based solutions for sustainable blue growth and climate change mitigation in marine biodiversity hotspots. Environmental Biotechnology, 15 (1), 1-7, doi: 10.14799/ebms302.
• Mustafa, S., Hill, J., Shapawi, R. et al. (2020). Oceans and COVID-19: Perspectives, Reflections, Recovery and Regulatory Frameworks. Sustainable Marine Structures, 2 (1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v2i1.238.
• NASEM (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
• NOAA (2020). How Much of the Ocean Have We Explored? National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.
• NOS (2021). What is a living shoreline? National Ocean Service, Washington, D.C., USA. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/living-shoreline.html, 26/2/2021
• OECD (2020). Building Back Better: A Sustainable, Resilient Recovery after COVID-19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
• OF (2020). The Ocean Foundation, Washington, DC.
• Orr, J.C., Fabry, V.J., Aumont, O. et al. (2005). Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature, 437: 681-686.
• Pecl, G. T., Araújo, M. B., Bell, J. D. et al. (2017). Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science, 355:eaai9214.
• Pouso, S., Borja, Á., Martín, J. et al. (2019). The capacity of estuary restoration to enhance ecosystem services: system dynamics modelling to simulate recreational fishing benefits. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 217: 226–236.
• Pueyo-Ros, J., Garcia, X., Ribas, A. et al. (2018). Ecological restoration of a coastal wetland at a mass tourism destination. will the recreational value increase or decrease? Ecological Economics, 148: 1–14.
• Ryabinin, V., Barbiere, J., Haugan, P. et al. (2019). The UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. Frontiers in Marine Science, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00470
• Sala, E., Mayorga, J., Bradley, D. et al. (2021). Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature, 592, 397– 402.
• Sendra, S., Parra, L., Lloret, J. & Jimenez, J.M. (2015). Oceanographic multisensory buoy based on low-cost sensors for Posidonia meadows monitoring in Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Sensors, 2015, doi.org/10.1155/2015/920168
• SOFIA (2020). The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
• Strain, E.M.A., Steinberg, P.D., Vozzo, M. et al. (2020). A global analysis of complexity-biodiversity relationships on marine artificial structures. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 30, 140 – 157.
• Stuchtey, M.R., Vincent, A., Merkl, A. et al. (2020). Ocean solutions that benefit people, nature and the economy. High Level Panel for Sustainable Ocean Economy. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
• UNESCO-IOC (2021). Ocean biodiversity. One Shared Ocean. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, Paris, France.
• Vander Zwaag, D.L. (2018). The precautionary approach in coastal/ocean governance: beacon of hope, sea of confusion and challenges. Dalhousie University and China-ASEAN Academy on Ocean Law and Governance, Haikou, China.
• WEF (2017). Harnessing the fourth industrial revolution for oceans. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.
• Worm, B. & Lotze, H. (2016). Climate Change: Observed Impacts on Planet Earth, Chapter 13 – Marine Biodiversity and Climate Change. Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
• Worm, B., Barbier, E.B., Beaumont, N. et al. (2006). Impact of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science, 314: 787 – 790.
• Xu, G., Shi, Y., Sun, X. et al. (2019). Internet of Things in marine monitoring: a review. Sensors, 19: 1711, doi: 10.3390/s19071711.