Emerging Defense Industries and the Growing Espionage Threat: A Case Study of Türkiye

Öz

Defense industries have become one of the most critical pillars of national sovereignty and strategic autonomy in today’s world, where technological developments are accelerating and geopolitical competition is intensifying. The case of Türkiye is particularly noteworthy, as it illustrates how the achievements of emerging powers in the defense sector simultaneously generate growing security vulnerabilities. This study constitutes a single-case analysis grounded in qualitative research methods and draws on multiple sources, including official reports, think-tank publications, academic literature, and media accounts. The article examines six major espionage incidents directly targeting the Turkish defense industry and, through comparative analysis, identifies recurring patterns and threat dimensions. The findings reveal that Türkiye’s rapid advancements in unmanned aerial vehicles, guided missile technologies, and electronic warfare systems have rendered it a priority target for hostile actors. The espionage methods identified include phishing-based cyberattacks, leaks of classified project information, illicit data trade via social media platforms, and covert corporate operations. Turkish intelligence institutions, most notably the National Intelligence Organization (MİT), have developed a range of countermeasures in response, such as preventive briefings, security screenings, and targeted operations. Nevertheless, vulnerabilities in digital infrastructure and insider threats continue to expose critical components of defense projects to external exploitation. In conclusion, espionage activities directed at Türkiye’s defense sector are multifaceted, adaptive, and strategically consequential. These threats undermine not only the security of individual companies but also broader national security strategies and international credibility. The Turkish case underscores a wider reality: the faster an emerging defense industry advances, the greater the incentive for adversaries to penetrate it.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Defense Industry
• Türkiye
• Espionage
• Counter-Espionage
• National Security

Emerging Defense Industries and the Growing Espionage Threat: A Case Study of Türkiye

Öz

Savunma sanayileri, teknolojik gelişmelerin hızlandığı ve jeopolitik rekabetin yoğunlaştığı günümüzde ulusal egemenliğin ve stratejik özerkliğin en kritik unsurlarından biri hâline gelmiştir. Türkiye örneği, yükselen güçlerin savunma alanındaki başarılarının aynı zamanda artan güvenlik açıklarını da beraberinde getirdiğini göstermesi bakımından dikkat çekicidir. Bu inceleme, nitel araştırma yöntemlerine dayalı tekil bir vaka çalışması niteliği taşımakta olup, resmî raporlar, düşünce kuruluşu yayınları, akademik literatür ve medya haberleri gibi farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen verilerden yararlanılmıştır. Bu makalede, Türk savunma sanayisini doğrudan hedef alan altı önemli casusluk olayı ele alınmış, karşılaştırmalı analiz yoluyla tekrar eden kalıplar ve tehdit boyutları ortaya konulmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular, Türkiye’nin özellikle insansız hava araçları, güdümlü füze teknolojileri ve elektronik harp sistemlerindeki hızlı ilerleyişinin onu hasım aktörler açısından öncelikli bir hedef haline getirdiğini göstermektedir. Tespit edilen casusluk yöntemleri arasında oltalama temelli siber saldırılar, gizli projelere ilişkin bilgi sızıntıları, sosyal medya platformları üzerinden yasa dışı veri ticareti ve gizli kurumsal operasyonlar öne çıkmaktadır. Türkiye’nin istihbarat kurumları, özellikle Millî İstihbarat Teşkilatı (MİT), bu tehditlere karşı brifingler, güvenlik taramaları ve hedefe yönelik operasyonlar gibi çeşitli karşı tedbirler geliştirmiştir. Ancak, dijital altyapıdaki zafiyetler ve içeriden gelen tehditler, savunma projelerinin kritik bileşenlerini hâlâ risk altında bırakmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, Türkiye’nin savunma sanayisine yönelik casusluk faaliyetleri çok boyutlu, uyarlanabilir ve stratejik sonuçlar doğuracak niteliktedir. Bu tehditler yalnızca şirketlerin güvenliğini değil, aynı zamanda ulusal güvenlik stratejilerini ve uluslararası güvenilirliği de etkilemektedir. Türkiye örneği, savunma sanayisinde ilerlemenin hızlandıkça casusluk girişimlerinin de artacağına işaret eden daha geniş bir gerçeği ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Savunma Sanayi
• Türkiye
• Casusluk
• Karşı Casusluk
• Ulusal Güvenlik

Kaynakça

1. Arctic Wolf. (2025) Dropping Elephant APT Group Targets Turkish Defense Industry with New Campaign and Capabilities: LOLBAS, VLC Player, and Encrypted Shellcode. Arctic Wolf, July 23. [https://arcticwolf.com/resources/blog/dropping-elephant-apt-group-targets-turkish-defense-industry/](https://arcticwolf.com/resources/blog/dropping-elephant-apt-group-targets-turkish-defense-industry/) (Accessed: 03.09.2025).
2. Aslan, D. (2021) Turkish Counterespionage Ops Shield Dissidents. Daily Sabah, October 26. [https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/news-analysis/turkish-counterespionage-ops-shield-dissidents](https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/news-analysis/turkish-counterespionage-ops-shield-dissidents) (Accessed: 05.09.2025).
3. Bastian, J. (2024) Turkey: An Emerging Global Arms Exporter. Growing Competitiveness and Strategic Recalibration of the Turkish Defence Industry. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) SWP Comment No. 6/2024. Berlin. [https://doi.org/10.18449/2024C06](https://doi.org/10.18449/2024C06)
4. Baysal, B. (2025) Evaluating the Advances and Challenges in Turkey’s Defence Industry: A Comparative Analysis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 25(1), 31–52.
5. Bekdil, B. E. (2021) Turkey Detains 26 Suspects Over Defense Industry Espionage Charges. Defense News, March 30. [https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2021/03/30/turkey-detains-26-suspects-overdefense-espionage-charges/](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2021/03/30/turkey-detains-26-suspects-overdefense-espionage-charges/) (Accessed: 05.09.2025).
6. Benny, D. J. (2014) Industrial Espionage: Developing a Counterespionage Program. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
7. Donelli, F. (2022) UAVs and Beyond: Security and Defence Sector at the Core of Turkey’s Strategy in Africa. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). [https://doi.org/10.18449/2022MTA-PB02](https://doi.org/10.18449/2022MTA-PB02) (Accessed: 05.09.2025).
8. Dyami Analysts (2024) Risks of Chinese Espionage in Europe’s Defense Industry. Dyami Security Intelligence, June 28. [https://www.dyami.services/post/risks-of-chinese-espionage-in-europe-sdefense-industry](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.dyami.services/post/risks-of-chinese-espionage-in-europe-sdefense-industry) (Accessed: 05.09.2025).

9. Egeli, S. et al. (2024) From Client to Competitor: The Rise of Turkiye’s Defence Industry. International Institute for Strategic Studies. [http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15922.00962](http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15922.00962).
10. Farley, R. (2016) Intellectual Property, Cyber Espionage, and Military Diffusion. Global Security and Intelligence Studies 1(2), 2–20.
11. Hamilton, P. (1967) Espionage and Subversion in an Industrial Society: An Examination and Philosophy of Defence for Management. London: Routledge.
12. Hou, T. & Wang, V. (2020) Industrial Espionage: A Systematic Literature Review. Computers & Security, no. 98, 1–12.
13. Hürriyet Daily News (2022) MİT Eyes ‘Counterespionage Briefings’ on Turkish Defense Industry. May 9. [https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/mit-eyes-counterespionage-briefings-on-turkish-defenseindustry-173651](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/mit-eyes-counterespionage-briefings-on-turkish-defenseindustry-173651) (Accessed: 06.09.2025).
14. ISI Defense (2024) Spotting Corporate Espionage. November 8. [https://isidefense.com/blog/spottingcorporate-espionage](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://isidefense.com/blog/spottingcorporate-espionage) (Accessed: 06.09.2025).
15. Ivezic, M. (2025) Quantum Tech and Espionage: What Every Researcher Must Know. Postquantum, August 1. [https://postquantum.com/post-quantum/espionage-quantum/](https://postquantum.com/post-quantum/espionage-quantum/) (Accessed: 08.09.2025).
16. Newsroom (2025) Türkiye Arrests 7 in Defense Industry Espionage Case Linked to Telegram. Türkiye Today, September 23. [https://www.turkiyetoday.com/nation/turkiye-arrests-7-in-defense-industryespionage-case-linked-to-telegram-3207368](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.turkiyetoday.com/nation/turkiye-arrests-7-in-defense-industryespionage-case-linked-to-telegram-3207368) (Accessed: 08.09.2025).
17. Özer, A. İ. A. (2019) The Rise of the Turkish Defense Industry. Ankara: SETA Publications.
18. Philips, P. J. & Pohl, G. (2025) Industrial Espionage: Window of Opportunity. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective 34(2), 143–155.
19. Sibley, K. A. S. (1999) Soviet Industrial Espionage Against American Military Technology and the US Response. Intelligence and National Security 14(2), 94–123.
20. Taşdan, C. (2021) Savunma Sanayi Projelerini Yabancı Firmalara Aktaranlara Operasyon: 6 Gözaltı. Anadolu Ajansı, April 27. [https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/savunma-sanayi-projelerini-yabancifirmalara-aktaranlara-operasyon-6-gozalti/2221930\#](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/savunma-sanayi-projelerini-yabancifirmalara-aktaranlara-operasyon-6-gozalti/2221930%23) (Accessed: 10.09.2025).
21. Tromblay, D. E. (2017) Protecting Partners or Preserving Fiefdoms? How to Reform Counterintelligence Outreach to Industry. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. [https://itif.org/publications/2017/10/16/protecting-partners-or-preserving-fiefdoms-how-reformcounterintelligence/](https://www.google.com/search?q=https://itif.org/publications/2017/10/16/protecting-partners-or-preserving-fiefdoms-how-reformcounterintelligence/) (Accessed: 09.09.2025).
22. Unaran, I. (2025) Turkish Defense Industry Faces Cyber Espionage Threat. Data Flow X, August 5. [https://www.dataflowx.com/post/turkish-defense-industry-faces-cyber-espionage-threat](https://www.dataflowx.com/post/turkish-defense-industry-faces-cyber-espionage-threat) (Accessed: 08.09.2025).
23. Weissbrodt, D. (2013) Cyber-Conflict, Cyber-Crime, and Cyber-Espionage. Minnesota Journal of International Law 22(2), 347–387.
24. Yeşiltaş, M. (2020) Deciphering Turkey’s Assertive Military and Defense Strategy: Objectives, Pillars, and Implications. Insight Turkey 22(3), 89–114.
25. Zatlin, J. R. (2008) Out of Sight: Industrial Espionage, Ocular Authority and East German Communism, 1965–1989. Contemporary European History 17(1), 45–71.