Araştırma Makalesi

Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper “China: Democracy That Works”

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1 2 Nisan 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper “China: Democracy That Works”

Öz

In this research, the democracy discourse deployed in China’s “China: Democracy That Works” white paper is examined through a post-structuralist lens. This seeks to understand, through discourse analysis, how the white paper dismantles the democracy standards set in the West and constructs a China-oriented “whole-process people’s democracy” model. The analysis is based on three fundamentals: (i) the intertwining of power and knowledge; (ii) the unraveling of meanings; and (iii) the formulation of cultural subjectivity. The analysis is limited to the text of the white paper and, broadly speaking, illustrates the argument that the discourse of democracy in China is a form of resisting Western domination. The new findings suggest that the discourse backs the concept of national democracy, consolidated through the narratives of Xi Jinping, while creating alternative realities about democracy in the world. This shifted focus on the discourse of democracy in China as a defiant act against Western domination also aims to broaden the discourse on normative struggle and post-structuralism. It seeks to address the emerging scholarship on the challenge to the Western model of democracy in the international relations discourse. It aims to analyze the discourse of “Chinese-style democracy” in the white paper along three principal axes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Acharya, A. & Buzan, B. (2010) Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction. In Acharya, A. & Buzan B. (eds.), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia (1–25). Routledge.
  2. Alperen, Ü. & Kodaman, T. (2023) Çin’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Çalışmaları: İdeolojik-Dış Politika Temelli Yaklaşımlardan Bilgi Temelli Yerel Teorileşmeye. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty 10(3), 2072–2092.
  3. Ashley, R. K. (1988) Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium 17(2), 227–262.
  4. Ashley, R. K. & Walker, R. B. J. (1990) Conclusion: Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly 34(3), 367–416. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2600576](https://doi.org/10.2307/2600576)
  5. Cabestan, J. P. (2025) Xi Jinping and China’s Whole-Process Democracy: A New Form of Consultative Leninism. China Information. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X251361713](https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X251361713).
  6. Callahan, W. A. (2015) Identity and Security in China: The Negative Soft Power of the China Dream. Politics 35(3–4), 216–229.
  7. Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  8. Campbell, D. (2013) Poststructuralism. In Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith S. (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (223–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Uluslararası İlişkiler (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

2 Nisan 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Kasım 2025

Kabul Tarihi

2 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erin, Z. Ç. (2026). Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper “China: Democracy That Works”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.1822042
AMA
1.Erin ZÇ. Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper “China: Democracy That Works”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2026;14(1):37-55. doi:10.14782/marmarasbd.1822042
Chicago
Erin, Zeynep Çağla. 2026. “Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper ‘China: Democracy That Works’”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 14 (1): 37-55. https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.1822042.
EndNote
Erin ZÇ (01 Nisan 2026) Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper “China: Democracy That Works”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 14 1 37–55.
IEEE
[1]Z. Ç. Erin, “Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper ‘China: Democracy That Works’”, Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 14, sy 1, ss. 37–55, Nis. 2026, doi: 10.14782/marmarasbd.1822042.
ISNAD
Erin, Zeynep Çağla. “Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper ‘China: Democracy That Works’”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 14/1 (01 Nisan 2026): 37-55. https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.1822042.
JAMA
1.Erin ZÇ. Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper “China: Democracy That Works”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2026;14:37–55.
MLA
Erin, Zeynep Çağla. “Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper ‘China: Democracy That Works’”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 14, sy 1, Nisan 2026, ss. 37-55, doi:10.14782/marmarasbd.1822042.
Vancouver
1.Zeynep Çağla Erin. Rethinking Democracy in Chinese Discourse: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of the White Paper “China: Democracy That Works”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 01 Nisan 2026;14(1):37-55. doi:10.14782/marmarasbd.1822042