Türk Dış Politikasında Parti Rekabeti: Rakip Partilerin Politika Revizyonlarını Anlamak

Öz

Siyasi partiler politikalarını niçin değiştirirler? Parti rekabeti teorileri bu soruyu analiz ederken, partilerin seçmenlerine, rakiplerine, lobi gruplarına veya bir önceki seçim sonuçlarına nasıl cevap verdiklerine bakmaktadır. Türk dış politikasındaki (TDP) değişimin nedenlerini inceleyen çalışmalar bu tarz ulusal alt sistem düzeyinden faktörlerin etkisine kısmi olarak açıklama getirmektedir. Bu makale parti rekabetinin TDP üzerindeki görece etkisi ile ilgilenmektedir. Bu amaçla, Türkiye’deki ana akım siyasi partilerin birbirini takip eden seçim manifestoları analiz edilecek ve bu manifestolarda sunulan dış politika pozisyonları hem birbiriyle hem de dönemsel olarak karşılaştırılacaktır. Analiz, iktidar partisi olan Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi ile Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi ve Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi’nin 2002-2018 dönemindeki seçim öncesi parti programlarına dayanmaktadır. Makale bu partilerin parti programlarının yalnızca dış politikaya ayrılan kısımlarına odaklanmaktadır. Öncelikle partilerin genel TDP vizyonlarındaki dönüşümler incelenecek, daha sonra partilerin Türkiye’nin Batı, Orta Doğu ve diğer bölgeler ile ilişkileri üzerine geliştirdikleri politikalar ve yeni düzenlemeler analiz edilecektir. Makale ayrıca partilerin seçim manifestolarındaki dış politika önerilerinin rakip partilerin bir önceki seçim döneminde sundukları önerilerle benzeşme boyutunu da inceleyecektir. Makalenin bulgularının partilerin dış politika tercihlerini anlamaya yardımcı olması ve TDP’deki dönüşümün boyutu ve açıklayıcıları ile ilgili mevcut tartışmaya katkı sunması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Türk Dış Politikası,parti rekabeti,parti pozisyonları,Türkiye-AB ilişkileri,Türkiye-ABD İlişkileri,Ortadoğu

Party Competition Over Turkish Foreign Policy: Understanding Policy Revisions of the Rival Parties

Öz

Why do parties change policy positions? Theories of party competition analyze this question by looking at how parties respond to their voters, to their rivals, to the lobbying groups, or to the results of the past elections. The research on the motives of change in Turkish foreign policy (TFP) partially accounts for such factors from the domestic level. This article is interested in the relative impact of party competition over TFP. To this end, it analyses and compares foreign policy positions as presented in the successive election manifestos of the mainstream Turkish political parties. The analysis rests on all the pre-election party programs of the ruling Justice and Development Party, the Republican Peoples Party and the Nationalist Action Party in the period from 2002 to 2018. The article solely concentrates on sections of these parties’ election programs that are devoted to foreign policy. First, it examines transformations regarding parties’ general framings about TFP visions and then analyses party policies and adjustments regarding Turkey’s relations with the West, Middle East, and other regions. The article also examines the level of the resemblance of parties’ foreign policy proposals with their rivals’ proposals from the previous electoral period. The findings of this article are expected to help understand parties’ choices for particular foreign policy positions, as well as, contribute to the existing discussions on the magnitude and determinants of change in TFP.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Turkish Foreign Policy,party competition,party positions,manifestos,Turkey-EU relations,Turkey-US relations

Kaynakça

1. Adams, J., and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: Spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies, British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 825-846. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000.712.3409000635
2. Adams, J, Clark, M., Ezrow, L., and Glasgow, G. (2004). Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results? British Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 589– 610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000.712.3404000201
3. AKP (2002). 2002 Genel Seçimleri Seçim Beyannamesi. Retrieved from https://acikerisim.tbmm.gov.tr/ xmlui/bitstream/handle/11543/954/200304063.pdf sequence=1,andisAllowed=y
4. AKP (2011). 2011 Genel Seçimleri Seçim Beyannamesi. Retrieved from http://www.akparti.org.tr/ media/272799/secim-beyannamesi-2011.pdf
5. AKP (2015a). 2007 Genel Seçimleri Seçim Beyannamesi, Ak Parti Tanıtım ve Medya Başkanlığı.
6. AKP (2015b). 7 Haziran 2015 Genel Seçimleri Seçim Beyannamesi. Retrieved from https://kutuphane.tbmm.gov.tr:8088/2015/201501393.pdf
7. AKP (2018). Cumhurbaşkanlığı Seçimleri ve Genel Seçimler Seçim Beyannamesi. Retrieved from https://www.trthaber.com/pdf/Beyanname23Mays18_icSayfalar.pdf
8. Aydın-Çakır, A., and Arıkan-Akdağ, G. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of the Change in Turkish Foreign Policy Under the AKP Government, Turkish Studies, 18(2), 334–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683.849.2016.1261021

9. Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2016). De-Europeanisation through Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of AKP’s Election Speeches, South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 45-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608.746.2016.1147717
10. Aygül, C. (2014). Locating Change in Turkish Foreign Policy: Visa Policies of the Justice and Development Party in the 2000s, Turkish Studies, 15(3), 402–418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683.849.2014.95 6424
11. Başer, E. T. (2015). Shift-of-axis in Turkish Foreign Policy: Turkish National role conceptions before and during AKP rule, Turkish Studies, 16 (3), 291-309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683.849.2015.10 50958
12. Budge, I. (1994). A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally, British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 443–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000.712.3400006955
13. Budge, I., Klingemann, H. D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., and Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping policy preferences: estimates for parties, electors, and governments, 1945-1998 (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
14. Budge, I., Ezrow, L., and McDonald, M. (2010). Ideology, Party Factionalism and Policy Change: An Integrated Dynamic Theory, British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 781–804. doi: https://doi. org/10.1017/S000.712.3409990184
15. CHP (2002). 2002 Seçim Bildirgesi. Retrieved from https://chp.azureedge.net/ b6bdceb40e6f4f4d8fe40f11ce4cbd30.pdf
16. CHP (2007). Pusula ’07. Retrieved from https://chp.azureedge.net/a8a787fdd8024b5e8753a33a81fd0a40. pdf
17. CHP (2011). 2011 Seçim Bildirgesi. Retrieved from https://t24.com.tr/media/archive/documents/Se%E7im_ Bildirgesi.pdf
18. CHP (2015). Seçim Bildirgesi 2015. Retrieved from http://dagmedya.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ CHP-SECIM-BILDIRGESI-2015.pdf
19. CHP (2018). Seçim Bildirgesi 2018. Retrieved from http://secim2018.chp.org.tr/files/CHP-SecimBildirgesi- 2018-icerik.pdf
20. Çağaptay, S. (2009). Is Turkey Leaving the West? Foreign Affairs Online. Retrieved from https://www. foreignaffairs.com/articles/turkey/2009-10-26/turkey-leaving-west
21. Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Müller, W. C., Praprotnik, K., and Winkler, A. K. (2018). Beyond salience and position-taking: How political parties communicate through their manifestos, Party Politics, 24(3), 240–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/135.406.8816678893
22. Fagerholm, A. (2016). Why do political parties change their policy positions? A review, Political Studies Review, 14(4), 501-511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12078
23. Harmel, R., and Janda, K. (1994). An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(3), 259–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/095.169.2894006003001
24. İpek, P. (2015). Ideas and change in foreign policy instruments: soft power and the case of the Turkish international cooperation and development agency, Foreign Policy Analysis, 11(2), 173-193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12031
25. Kardaş, Ş. (2013). Turkey: A regional power facing a changing international system, Turkish Studies, 14(4), 637-660. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683.849.2013.861111
26. Kennedy, R., and Dickenson, M. (2013). Turkish foreign policy and public opinion in the AKP era, Foreign Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00179.x
27. Kirişçi, K. (2009). The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State, New Perspectives on Turkey, (40), 29-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S089.663.4600005203
28. Klingemann, H. D., Volkens, A., McDonald, M. D., Budge, I., and Bara, J. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Kuşku-Sönmez, E. (2019). Dynamics of Change in Turkish Foreign Policy: Evidence from High-level Meetings of the AKP Government, Turkish Studies, 20(3), 377-402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1 4683.849.2018.1495078
30. Larrabee, S. F. (2010). Turkey’s New Geopolitics, Survival, 52, 157–180. doi: https://doi. org/10.1080/003.963.31003764686
31. Laver, M. (2005). Policy and the Dynamics of Party Competition, American Political Science Review, 99(2), 263–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000.305.5405051646
32. McLean, W. (2015). Understanding Divergence between Public Discourse and Turkish Foreign Policy Practice: A Neoclassical Realist Analysis, Turkish Studies, 16(4), 449-464. doi: https://doi.org/10.10 80/14683.849.2015.1096205
33. Meral, Z., and Paris, J. (2010). Decoding Turkish Foreign Policy Hyperactivity, The Washington Quarterly, 33(4), 75-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2010.516613
34. Meyer, T. M. (2013). Constraints on Party Policy Change. Colchester: ECPR Press.
35. Merz, N., Regel, S., and Lewandowski, J. (2016). The Manifesto Corpus: A new resource for research on political parties and quantitative text analysis, Research, and Politics, 3(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/205.316.8016643346
36. MHP(2002).3Kasım2002SeçimBeyannamesi:Türkiye’ninOnurluGeleceği.Retrievedfromhttps://acikerisim.tbmm.gov.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11543/938/200300790.pdf ?sequence=1,andisAllowed=y MHP (2007). 22 Temmuz 2007 Seçim Beyannamesi: Milli Duruş ve Kararlılık Belgesi. Retrieved from https://acikerisim.tbmm.gov.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11543/919/200902631_2007.pdf ?sequence=1,andisAllowed=y
37. MHP (2011). 2011 Seçim Beyannamesi: 2023’e Doğru Yükselen Ülke Türkiye Sözleşmesi. Retrieved from https://www.mhp.org.tr/usr_img/_mhp2007/kitaplar/MHP_2011_SecimBeyannamesi.pdf
38. MHP (2015). 1 Kasım 2015 Seçim Beyannamesi: Huzurlu ve Güvenli Gelecek. Retrieved from https://www. mhp.org.tr/usr_img/mhpweb/1kasimsecimleri/beyanname_1kasim2015.pdf
39. MHP (2018). Milli Diriliş, Kutlu Yükseliş. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/uploads/userFiles/c09e217d-a61f-47f8-a355-ddf8004cfef9/MHP_secim_beyannamesi.pdf
40. Oğuzlu, T. (2008). Middle Easternization of Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Disassociate from the West, Turkish Studies, 9(1), 3–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/146.838.40701813960
41. Oğuzlu, T. (2016). Turkish foreign policy at the nexus of changing international and regional dynamics, Turkish Studies, 17(1), 58-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683.849.2015.1136088
42. Öniş, Z. (2011). Multiple faces of the ‘new’ Turkish foreign policy: underlying dynamics and a critique, Insight Turkey, 13(1), 47-65. Retrieved from http://media.library.ku.edu.tr/reserve/respring18/Cshs506_DBarlas/week15.pdf
43. Öniş, Z., and Ş. Yılmaz (2009). Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey During the AKP Era, Turkish Studies, 10(1), 7–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/146.838.40802648562
44. Örmeci, O. (2011). Ismail Cem’s Foreign Policy (1997-2002), Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, (23), 223-245.
45. Tezcür, M. G., and A. Grigorescu (2014). Activism in Turkish Foreign Policy: Balancing European andRegional Interests, International Studies Perspectives, 15(3), 257-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12004
46. Volkens A, Bara J, Budge I, et al. (2013). Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts III: Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Winslett, G. (2012). Party Competition as a Driver of Foreign Policy: Explaining Changes in the British Labour Party’s Immigration Policies and the Turkish AKP’s Approach to Cyprus, Josef Korbel Journal of Advanced International Studies, (4), 127-153. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1013,andcontext=advancedintlstudies