Revisiting the Debates on the 2010 Constitutional Referendum in Turkey: Democratic Transition or Authoritarian Populism?

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 153 - 174, 05.10.2024

İrem Taşçıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.1410719

Öz

This article revisits the scholarly debates on the AKP’s constitutional amendment package that was put to vote in the 2010 Constitutional Referendum. It takes the democratic theorist Andrew Arato and constitutional scholar Aslı Bali as major representatives of the two opposing views on the political implications of the reform proposal. It compares and contrasts their arguments particularly in light of their different assessments of the amendments which concern the restructuring of the judiciary, especially the Turkish Constitutional Court. It argues that their fundamental controversy with regard to the democratic or authoritarian nature of these amendments is rooted in the contrast between Bali’s predominantly contextual and Arato’s predominantly global approach. While Bali affirms the reform proposal as a democratic step forward in transcending the persistent legacy of the Kemalist authoritarian “tutelary” regime represented by the Constitutional Court, Arato interprets it as a manifestation of the global populist-authoritarian retreat that is expresses itself most visibly through assaults against the independent judiciary. After a critical reading of these two approaches, this paper finalizes by way of introducing a new framework that would counterbalance the contextual with the global and vice versa that would arguably provide a new perspective through which one could unveil the particular characteristics of the AKP’s populist constitutional politics at the time of the Referendum.

Anahtar Kelimeler

2010 Constitutional Referendum, Turkish Constitutional Court, Judiciary, Populism, Liberal Democracy, Kemalism

Türkiye 2010 Anayasa Referendumu Tartışmalarına Yeniden Dönmek: Demokratik Geçiş mi Otoriter Popülizm mi?

Öz

Bu makale 2010 Anayasa Referandumu’nda oylamaya sunulan anayasa değişiklik paketi üzerine yapılan bilimsel tartışmalara geri döner. Demokratik teorisyen Andrew Arato ve anayasa profesörü Aslı Bali’yi bu paketin siyasal içerimlerine dair iki zıt görüşün başlıca temsilcileri olarak ele alır. Onların fikirlerini yargının, özellikle Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin yeniden yapılandırılmasını ilgilendiren anayasa değişikliklerine yaklaşımları ışığında karşılaştırır. Bu makale, bu değişikliklerin demokratik veya otoriter doğasına ilişkin ihtilafın, Bali’nin (ağırlıklı olarak) bağlamsal ve Arato’nun (ağırlıklı olarak) küresel yaklaşım biçimleri arasındaki farktan kaynaklandığını iddia eder. Buna göre, Bali, değişiklikleri Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin temsil ettiği Kemalist otoriter “vesayetçi” rejimin süreklilik teşkil eden mirasının aşılması yönünde önemli bir adım olarak olumlarken, Arato, aynı değişiklikleri en belirgin olarak bağımsız yargıya yönelik saldırılarda ifadesini bulan küresel bir otoriter-popülist “geri çekilme”nin tezahürü olarak değerlendirir. Bu makale, bu iki yaklaşım biçimine yönelik eleştirel bir değerlendirmeden sonra, Referandum döneminde AKP’nin anayasa siyasetinin özgül niteliklerini kavramak için küresel ve bağlamsal yaklaşımları birbirine karşı dengeleyen yeni bir çerçeve sunarak sonlanır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

2010 Anayasa Referandumu, Anayasa Mahkemesi, Yargı, Popülizm, Liberal Demokrasi, Kemalizm

Kaynakça

• Akça, İ. and E. B., Paker. (2013). Beyond Military Tutelage? Turkish Military Politics and the AKP Government. In E. Canan Sokullu (ed.), Debating Security in Turkey: Challenges and Changes in the Twenty-First Century, (pp. 77-92). London: Lexington Books.
• Akça, İ. and E. B., Paker. (2013). Beyond Military Tutelage? Turkish Military Politics and the AKP Government. In E. Canan Sokullu (ed.), Debating Security in Turkey: Challenges and Changes in the Twenty-First Century, (pp. 77-92). London: Lexington Books.
• Akça, İ. (2014). Hegemonic Projects in Post-1980 Turkey and the Changing Forms of Authoritarianism. In İsmet Akça etc. (eds.), Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony, (pp. 13-46) London: Pluto Press.
• Akça, İ. (2014). Hegemonic Projects in Post-1980 Turkey and the Changing Forms of Authoritarianism. In İsmet Akça etc. (eds.), Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony, (pp. 13-46) London: Pluto Press.
• Arato, A. (2000). Civil Society, Constitution and Legitimacy. London and New York: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.
• Arato, A. (2000). Civil Society, Constitution and Legitimacy. London and New York: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.
• Arato, A. (2010a). The Constitutional Reform proposal of the Turkish Government: The return of majority imposition. Constellations 10(2), 345-350. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00599.x
• Arato, A. (2010a). The Constitutional Reform proposal of the Turkish Government: The return of majority imposition. Constellations 10(2), 345-350. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00599.x
• Arato, A. (2010b). Democratic constitution-making and unfreezing the Turkish process. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(3-4), 473-487. Doi: doi.org/10.1177/0191453709358543
• Arato, A. (2010b). Democratic constitution-making and unfreezing the Turkish process. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(3-4), 473-487. Doi: doi.org/10.1177/0191453709358543
• Arato, A. (2013). Political theology and populism. Social Research, 80(1), 143–72.
• Arato, A. (2013). Political theology and populism. Social Research, 80(1), 143–72.
• Arato, A. and E. Tombuş. (2013). Learning from success, Learning from failure: South Africa, Hungary, Turkey and Egypt. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 39(4-5), 427-441. Doi: doi.org/10.1177/0191453713477601
• Arato, A. and E. Tombuş. (2013). Learning from success, Learning from failure: South Africa, Hungary, Turkey and Egypt. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 39(4-5), 427-441. Doi: doi.org/10.1177/0191453713477601
• Arato, A. (2016). Post Sovereign Constitutional Making: Learning and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Arato, A. (2016). Post Sovereign Constitutional Making: Learning and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Arato, A. (2017). How We Got Here: Transition Failures, Their Causes, and the Populist Interests in the Constitution. Public Seminar. http://www.publicseminar.org/2017/10/how-we-got-here/
• Arato, A. (2017). How We Got Here: Transition Failures, Their Causes, and the Populist Interests in the Constitution. Public Seminar. http://www.publicseminar.org/2017/10/how-we-got-here/
• Arato, A. (2019). Populism, CCs and civil society. In Christine Landfried (ed.), Judicial Power: How CCs Affect Political Transformations, (pp. 318-341) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Arato, A. (2019). Populism, CCs and civil society. In Christine Landfried (ed.), Judicial Power: How CCs Affect Political Transformations, (pp. 318-341) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Arato, A. and J. L. Cohen (2022). Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Arato, A. and J. L. Cohen (2022). Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Ateş, Kazım. (2017). AKP, Dinsel Popülizm ve Halk-olmayan. Mülkiye Dergisi, 41(1), 105-129.
• Ateş, Kazım. (2017). AKP, Dinsel Popülizm ve Halk-olmayan. Mülkiye Dergisi, 41(1), 105-129.
• Aydın, S. (2006). Paradigmada Tarihsel Yorumun Sınırları: Merkez-Çevre Temellendirmeleri Üzerinden Düşünceler. Toplum ve Bilim, (105), 96-128.
• Aydın, S. (2006). Paradigmada Tarihsel Yorumun Sınırları: Merkez-Çevre Temellendirmeleri Üzerinden Düşünceler. Toplum ve Bilim, (105), 96-128.
• Aydın-Çakır, Aylin. (2023). Court-curbing through legal reforms or coercion?. In Robert M. Howard, Kirk A. Randazzo and Rebecca A. Reid (eds.), Research Handbook on Law and Political Systems, (pp. 8-24) Cheltenham and Northampton: Edgar Elwar Publishing.
• Aydın-Çakır, Aylin. (2023). Court-curbing through legal reforms or coercion?. In Robert M. Howard, Kirk A. Randazzo and Rebecca A. Reid (eds.), Research Handbook on Law and Political Systems, (pp. 8-24) Cheltenham and Northampton: Edgar Elwar Publishing.
• Bakıner, O. (2013). Is Turkey coming to terms with its past? Politics of memory and majoritarian conservatism. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 41(5), 691-708. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.770732
• Bakıner, O. (2013). Is Turkey coming to terms with its past? Politics of memory and majoritarian conservatism. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 41(5), 691-708. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.770732
• Bakıner, O. (2016). Judges Discover Politics: Sources of Judges’ Off-Bench Mobilization in Turkey. Journal of Law and Courts, 4(1), 131-157. Doi: doi.org/10.1086/684574
• Bakıner, O. (2016). Judges Discover Politics: Sources of Judges’ Off-Bench Mobilization in Turkey. Journal of Law and Courts, 4(1), 131-157. Doi: doi.org/10.1086/684574
• Bakıner, O. (2018). A Key to Turkish Politics? The Center-Periphery Framework Revisited. Turkish Studies, 19(4), 503–552. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1438846
• Bakıner, O. (2018). A Key to Turkish Politics? The Center-Periphery Framework Revisited. Turkish Studies, 19(4), 503–552. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1438846
• Bali, A. (2010). Unpacking Turkey’s Court-Packing Referendum. Middle East Report Online, https://merip.org/2010/11/unpacking-turkeys-court-packing-referendum/
• Bali, A. (2010). Unpacking Turkey’s Court-Packing Referendum. Middle East Report Online, https://merip.org/2010/11/unpacking-turkeys-court-packing-referendum/
• Bali, A. (2012). Perils of Judicial Independence: Constitutional Transition and the Turkish Example. Virginia Journal of International Law, 52(2), 235-320.
• Bali, A. (2012). Perils of Judicial Independence: Constitutional Transition and the Turkish Example. Virginia Journal of International Law, 52(2), 235-320.
• Belge, C. (2006). Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey. Law and Society Review, 40(3), 653–692. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00276.x
• Belge, C. (2006). Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey. Law and Society Review, 40(3), 653–692. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00276.x
• Bilgin, F. (June 2010). Turkey’s ‘Constitutional Moment’. The Washington Review of Turkish & Eurasian Affairs.
• Bilgin, F. (June 2010). Turkey’s ‘Constitutional Moment’. The Washington Review of Turkish & Eurasian Affairs.
• Blokker, P. (2019). In Carlos de la Torre (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, (pp.113-128) London and New York: Routledge.
• Blokker, P. (2019). In Carlos de la Torre (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, (pp.113-128) London and New York: Routledge.
• Can, O. (July 12, 2010). Referendum Results According to Osman Can. ilkehaber.com. Available at: https://www.ilkehaber.com/haber/osman-cana-gore-referandum-sonucu-10288.htm
• Can, O. (July 12, 2010). Referendum Results According to Osman Can. ilkehaber.com. Available at: https://www.ilkehaber.com/haber/osman-cana-gore-referandum-sonucu-10288.htm
• Dinçşahin, Ş. (2012). A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party’s Populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Government and Opposition, 47(4), 618–640. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01377.x
• Dinçşahin, Ş. (2012). A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party’s Populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Government and Opposition, 47(4), 618–640. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01377.x
• Dinler, D. (2003). Türkiye’de Güçlü Devlet Geleneği Tezinin Eleştirisi. Praksis (9), 17-54.
• Dinler, D. (2003). Türkiye’de Güçlü Devlet Geleneği Tezinin Eleştirisi. Praksis (9), 17-54.
• Ekim, S. and K. Kirişçi. (2017). “The Turkish Constitutional Referendum Explained.” Available at: https:// www .brookings .edu/ blog/ order -from -chaos/ 2017/ 04/ 13/ the -turkish -constitutional -referendum-explained
• Ekim, S. and K. Kirişçi. (2017). “The Turkish Constitutional Referendum Explained.” Available at: https:// www .brookings .edu/ blog/ order -from -chaos/ 2017/ 04/ 13/ the -turkish -constitutional -referendum-explained
• Erdoğan, R. T. (July 20, 2010). Hurriyet.com.tr. Retrieved from https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/idam-edilen-genclerin-mektuplarini-okudu-15360936
• Erdoğan, R. T. (July 20, 2010). Hurriyet.com.tr. Retrieved from https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/idam-edilen-genclerin-mektuplarini-okudu-15360936
• Erdoğan, R. T. (September 12, 2010). The Washington Times. Retrieved from https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/12/constitution-reform-moves-turkey-more-toward-islam/
• Erdoğan, R. T. (September 12, 2010). The Washington Times. Retrieved from https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/12/constitution-reform-moves-turkey-more-toward-islam/
• Finchelstein, F. (2017). What is Populism in History? From Fascism to Populism in History. California: University of California Press.
• Finchelstein, F. (2017). What is Populism in History? From Fascism to Populism in History. California: University of California Press.
• Finchelstein, F. and N. Urbinati. (2018). On Populism and Democracy. Populism, 1(1), 15-37. Doi: doi. org/10.1163/25888072-01011001
• Finchelstein, F. and N. Urbinati. (2018). On Populism and Democracy. Populism, 1(1), 15-37. Doi: doi. org/10.1163/25888072-01011001
• Gülalp, H. (September 2010). The battle for Turkey’s constitution. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/sep/04/turkey-constitution-undemocratic
• Gülalp, H. (September 2010). The battle for Turkey’s constitution. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/sep/04/turkey-constitution-undemocratic
• Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, W. Rehg (trans.) Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, W. Rehg (trans.) Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Hale, W. and E. Özbudun (2010). Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey. London and New York: Routledge.
• Hale, W. and E. Özbudun (2010). Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey. London and New York: Routledge.
• Heper, Metin. (1992) The ‘Strong State’ and Democracy: The Turkish Case in Comparative and Historical Perspective. In Shmuel Eisenstadt (ed.), Democracy and Modernity, (pp. 142-163) Leiden: Brill.
• Heper, Metin. (1992) The ‘Strong State’ and Democracy: The Turkish Case in Comparative and Historical Perspective. In Shmuel Eisenstadt (ed.), Democracy and Modernity, (pp. 142-163) Leiden: Brill.
• Holgado, B.G and R.S. Urribarri. (2023). Court-Packing and Democratic Decay: A Necessary Relationship?. Global Constitutionalism 12(2), 350-377. Doi: doi.10.1017/S2045381723000011
• Holgado, B.G and R.S. Urribarri. (2023). Court-Packing and Democratic Decay: A Necessary Relationship?. Global Constitutionalism 12(2), 350-377. Doi: doi.10.1017/S2045381723000011
• Işıksel, T. (2003). Between Text and Context: Turkey’s Tradition of Authoritarian Constitutionalism. I-CON 11(3), 702-726. Doi: doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot024
• Işıksel, T. (2003). Between Text and Context: Turkey’s Tradition of Authoritarian Constitutionalism. I-CON 11(3), 702-726. Doi: doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot024
• İnsel, Ahmet. (October 19, 2010). HSYK Seçimi Şaibeli Değil mi?. Radikal Newspaper
• İnsel, Ahmet. (October 19, 2010). HSYK Seçimi Şaibeli Değil mi?. Radikal Newspaper
• Kaboğlu, İ. (March 25, 2010). Anayasa Neden Değiştirilir?. Birgün. Retrieved from https://www.birgun.net/makale/anayasa-neden-degistirilir-12293
• Kaboğlu, İ. (March 25, 2010). Anayasa Neden Değiştirilir?. Birgün. Retrieved from https://www.birgun.net/makale/anayasa-neden-degistirilir-12293
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2010). Kulturkampf in Turkey: The Constitutional Referendum of 12 September 2010. South European Society and Politics, 17(1), 1-22. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.600555
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2010). Kulturkampf in Turkey: The Constitutional Referendum of 12 September 2010. South European Society and Politics, 17(1), 1-22. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.600555
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2011). The Turkish–EU Odyssey and Political Regime Change in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 16(2), 265-278. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.577943
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2011). The Turkish–EU Odyssey and Political Regime Change in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 16(2), 265-278. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.577943
• Köker, L. (2010). Turkey’s Political-Constitutional Crisis: An Assessment of the Role of the Constitutional Court. Constellations, 17(2), 328-344. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00594.x
• Köker, L. (2010). Turkey’s Political-Constitutional Crisis: An Assessment of the Role of the Constitutional Court. Constellations, 17(2), 328-344. Doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00594.x
• Köse, M. (2014). The Evolution of the Separation of Powers in the Turkish Republic: The Case of the 2010 Constitutional Referendum. MA Thesis Submitted to the Atatürk Institute for Modern Turkish History, Boğaziçi University.
• Köse, M. (2014). The Evolution of the Separation of Powers in the Turkish Republic: The Case of the 2010 Constitutional Referendum. MA Thesis Submitted to the Atatürk Institute for Modern Turkish History, Boğaziçi University.
• Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.
• Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.
• Landau, David. (2013). Abusive Constitutionalism. U.C. Davis Law Review, 47(1), 189-260.
• Landau, David. (2013). Abusive Constitutionalism. U.C. Davis Law Review, 47(1), 189-260.
• Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and Political Theory. David Macey (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and Political Theory. David Macey (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Mouffe, C. (2018). For a Left Populism. London and New Tork: Verso.
• Mouffe, C. (2018). For a Left Populism. London and New Tork: Verso.
• Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is Populism?. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is Populism?. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Müller, J.-W. (2017). Populism and Constitutionalism. In C.R. Kaltwasser etc. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, (pp. 590-606) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Müller, J.-W. (2017). Populism and Constitutionalism. In C.R. Kaltwasser etc. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, (pp. 590-606) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Öder, B.E. (May 2, 2017). Populism and the Turkish Constitutional Court: the Game Broker, the Populist and the Popular. Verfassungblog. Retrieved from https://verfassungsblog.de/populism-and-the-turkish-constitutional-court-the-game-broker-the-populist-and-the-popular/
• Öder, B.E. (May 2, 2017). Populism and the Turkish Constitutional Court: the Game Broker, the Populist and the Popular. Verfassungblog. Retrieved from https://verfassungsblog.de/populism-and-the-turkish-constitutional-court-the-game-broker-the-populist-and-the-popular/
• Özbudun, E. (1996) The Continuing Ottoman Legacy and the State Tradition in the Middle East. In L. Carl Brown (ed.), Imperial Legacy: The Ottoman Imprint on the Balkans and the Middle East, (pp. 133-157), New York: Columbia University Press.
• Özbudun, E. (1996) The Continuing Ottoman Legacy and the State Tradition in the Middle East. In L. Carl Brown (ed.), Imperial Legacy: The Ottoman Imprint on the Balkans and the Middle East, (pp. 133-157), New York: Columbia University Press.
• Özbudun, E. (2010). Interviewed by Hamit Emrah Beriş. Liberal Düşünce, 15(57-58), 17-26.
• Özbudun, E. (2010). Interviewed by Hamit Emrah Beriş. Liberal Düşünce, 15(57-58), 17-26.
• Özbudun, E. (2011). Turkey’s Constitutional Reform and the 2010 Constitutional Referendum. IEMed Mediterranean Yearbook 2011:Mediterranean Politics, 191-194.
• Özbudun, E. (2011). Turkey’s Constitutional Reform and the 2010 Constitutional Referendum. IEMed Mediterranean Yearbook 2011:Mediterranean Politics, 191-194.
• Özbudun, E. (2012). Turkey’s Search for a New Constitution. Insight Turkey 14(1), 39–50.
• Özbudun, E. (2012). Turkey’s Search for a New Constitution. Insight Turkey 14(1), 39–50.
• Parla T. and A. Davison. (2004). Corporatist Ideology in Turkey: Progress or Order? New York: Syracuse University Press.
• Parla T. and A. Davison. (2004). Corporatist Ideology in Turkey: Progress or Order? New York: Syracuse University Press.
• Peruzotti, E. (2017). Populism as Democratization’s Nemesis: The Politics of Regime Hybridization. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. (2), 314–327.
• Peruzotti, E. (2017). Populism as Democratization’s Nemesis: The Politics of Regime Hybridization. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. (2), 314–327.
• Shambayati, H. (2008). The Guardian of the Regime: The Turkish CC in Comparative Perspective. In Said Amir Arjomand (ed.), Constitutional Politics in the Middle East, (pp. 99-121) Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.
• Shambayati, H. (2008). The Guardian of the Regime: The Turkish CC in Comparative Perspective. In Said Amir Arjomand (ed.), Constitutional Politics in the Middle East, (pp. 99-121) Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.
• Somer, M. (2016). Understanding Turkey’s democratic breakdown: old vs. new and indigenous vs. global authoritarianism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16(4), 481-503. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1246548
• Somer, M. (2016). Understanding Turkey’s democratic breakdown: old vs. new and indigenous vs. global authoritarianism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16(4), 481-503. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1246548
• Sözen, Y. (2008). Turkey between Tutelary Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism. Private View, (13), 78-84.
• Sözen, Y. (2008). Turkey between Tutelary Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism. Private View, (13), 78-84.
• Sözen, Y. (2017). Populist Peril to Democracy: The Sacralization and Singularization of Competitive Elections. Political Studies Review, 17(3), 268-283. Doi: doi.org/10.1177/1478929918814613
• Sözen, Y. (2017). Populist Peril to Democracy: The Sacralization and Singularization of Competitive Elections. Political Studies Review, 17(3), 268-283. Doi: doi.org/10.1177/1478929918814613
• Sözen, Y. (2020). Popular Will against Democracy: Populist Autocratization in Turkey. Reflektif: Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 9-29. Doi: doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2020.3
• Sözen, Y. (2020). Popular Will against Democracy: Populist Autocratization in Turkey. Reflektif: Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 9-29. Doi: doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2020.3
• Tarhan, E.Ü. (July 30, 2010). YARSAV: "Darbe anayasasına kaçak kat". Cnnturk.com. Retrieved from https://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/yarsav-darbe-anayasasina-kacak-kat.
• Tarhan, E.Ü. (July 30, 2010). YARSAV: "Darbe anayasasına kaçak kat". Cnnturk.com. Retrieved from https://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/yarsav-darbe-anayasasina-kacak-kat.
• Taşkın, Y. (2008). AKP’s Move to “Conquer” the Center-Right: Its Prospects and Possible Impacts on the Democratization Process. Turkish Studies, 9(1), 53-72. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/14683840701814000
• Taşkın, Y. (2008). AKP’s Move to “Conquer” the Center-Right: Its Prospects and Possible Impacts on the Democratization Process. Turkish Studies, 9(1), 53-72. Doi: doi.org/10.1080/14683840701814000
• Tezcür, M.G. (2009). Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case. Law & Society Review, 43 (2), 305-336.
• Tezcür, M.G. (2009). Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case. Law & Society Review, 43 (2), 305-336.
• Tombuş, Ertuğ. (2020). The People and Its Embodiment: Authoritarian Foundations of Constitutions in Turkey. In F. Petersen and Z. Yanaşmayan (eds.) The Failure of Popular Constitution Making in Turkey: Regressing towards Constitutional Autocracy, (pp. 59-83) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Tombuş, Ertuğ. (2020). The People and Its Embodiment: Authoritarian Foundations of Constitutions in Turkey. In F. Petersen and Z. Yanaşmayan (eds.) The Failure of Popular Constitution Making in Turkey: Regressing towards Constitutional Autocracy, (pp. 59-83) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Tuğal, C. (2009). Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. California: Stanford University Press.
• Tuğal, C. (2009). Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. California: Stanford University Press.
• Turam, B. (2006). Between Islam and the State: The Politics of Engagement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Turam, B. (2006). Between Islam and the State: The Politics of Engagement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Uran, P. and P. Pasquino. (2015). The Guardian of the Turkish Constitution: A Special Court. Journal of Politics and Law, 8(2), 88-97. Doi: doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v8n2p88
• Uran, P. and P. Pasquino. (2015). The Guardian of the Turkish Constitution: A Special Court. Journal of Politics and Law, 8(2), 88-97. Doi: doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v8n2p88
• Urbinati, N. (2017). Populism and the Principle of Majority. In C.R. Kaltwasser etc. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Populism, (pp. 554-570) New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Urbinati, N. (2017). Populism and the Principle of Majority. In C.R. Kaltwasser etc. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Populism, (pp. 554-570) New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Urbinati, N. and F. Finchelstein. (2018). On Populism and Democracy. Populism, 1(1), 15-37. Doi: doi.org/10.1163/25888072-01011001
• Urbinati, N. and F. Finchelstein. (2018). On Populism and Democracy. Populism, 1(1), 15-37. Doi: doi.org/10.1163/25888072-01011001
• Varol, O. and L. D. Pellegrina & N. Garoupa. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Transformation in Turkey. The American Journal of Comparative Law 65(1), 187-216. Doi: doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx013
• Varol, O. and L. D. Pellegrina & N. Garoupa. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Transformation in Turkey. The American Journal of Comparative Law 65(1), 187-216. Doi: doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx013
• Varol, O. (2018). Stealth Authoritarianism in Turkey. In M. A. Graber etc. (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?, (pp. 339-354) New York: Oxford University Press.
• Varol, O. (2018). Stealth Authoritarianism in Turkey. In M. A. Graber etc. (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?, (pp. 339-354) New York: Oxford University Press.
• Yalvaç, F. and J. Joseph. (2019). Understanding populist politics in Turkey: a hegemonic depth approach. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 786–804. Doi: doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000238
• Yalvaç, F. and J. Joseph. (2019). Understanding populist politics in Turkey: a hegemonic depth approach. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 786–804. Doi: doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000238
• Yavuz, M.H. (2009) Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Yavuz, M.H. (2009) Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Yeğen, O. (2017). Constitutional Changes under the AKP Government in Turkey. BIJ DE BUREN (January), 70-84.
• Yeğen, O. (2017). Constitutional Changes under the AKP Government in Turkey. BIJ DE BUREN (January), 70-84.
• Yeğinsu, C. (September 22, 2010). Turkey Packs the Court. The New York Review. Retrieved from https://www.nybooks.com/online/2010/09/22/turkey-packs-court/
• Yeğinsu, C. (September 22, 2010). Turkey Packs the Court. The New York Review. Retrieved from https://www.nybooks.com/online/2010/09/22/turkey-packs-court/
• Yolcu, S. and Y. Roznai. (2012). An unconstitutional constitutional amendment- The Turkish Perspective: A Comment on the Turkish CC’s Headscarf Decision. I-CON, 1(1) 2012, 175-207.
• Yolcu, S. and Y. Roznai. (2012). An unconstitutional constitutional amendment- The Turkish Perspective: A Comment on the Turkish CC’s Headscarf Decision. I-CON, 1(1) 2012, 175-207.