Akademik iyimserlik kavramına yönelik fenomenolojik bir çalışma

Öz

Akademik iyimserlik kavramı, birçok gelişmiş ülkede yapılan araştırmalarda sosyoekonomik durum kontrol edildiğinde öğrenci başarısıyla ilişkilendirilmiştir. Mevcut çalışma, gelişmekte olan bir ülkede öğretmenlerin akademik iyimserliği sürdürme ve geliştirme deneyimlerine ilişkin nitel veriler sağlayarak mevcut literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, fenomenolojik yaklaşımı benimseyen mevcut çalışma, düşük sosyoekonomik (SES) ilçelerde yer alan okullarda öğretmenlerin akademik iyimserliği sürdürme ve geliştirme konusunda yaşadıkları deneyimlerini keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma grubu kartopu örnekleme yoluyla belirlenmiştir. 2015-2016 akademik yılı Güz döneminde İstanbul ve Tekirdağ'daki devlet okullarında görev yapan 20 öğretmenle yapılan derinlemesine görüşmelerden toplanan veriler, Braun ve Clarke (2006) tarafından geliştirilen tümdengelimli tematik analiz kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Hoy ve diğerlerinin (2006) ortaya koyduğu akademik iyimserlik kavramının teorik çerçevesinde yer alan ve buna göre kolektif yeterlilik, akademik başarıya vurgu ve güvenden oluşan temalar katılımcıların yanıtlarına göre betimlenmiştir. Katılımcıların yanıtları, akademik açıdan iyimser bir yaklaşım için kolektif yeterlik geliştirmenin, öğrencilerin okullarıyla olan bağ duygularında olumlu bir değişikliğe odaklanmayı gerektirdiğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca katılımcılar, toplu uygulamalarında kişisel hedeflerin ülkenin makro düzeydeki kalkınma hedefleri ile uyumlu hale getirilmesinin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Akademik başarıya vurgu açısından akademik olarak iyimser bir okul, mevcut çalışmada kolektif sorumluluğun bir okul normu olarak kabulü ile karakterize edilmektedir. Öğretmenlerin proaktif çalışma programlarına ilişkin girişimleri, öğretmen zümre toplantıları, akademik başarıya olan vurguyu artırmak için okullarda deneyimlenen uygulamalardır. Meslektaşlara güven, bu çalışmada öğretmenler tarafından okuldaki samimiyet ve dostluk atmosferi aracılığıyla geliştirilmektedir. Akademik iyimserliğin bileşenleri ile dış paydaşlarla işbirlikçi uygulamalar arasındaki bağlantıları keşfetmek için daha fazla araştırma yapılması önerilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• akademik iyimserlik
• kolektif yeterlilik
• akademik başarıya vurgu

Academic Optimism: A Phenomenological Study

Öz

Academic optimism is linked with student achievement, controlling for the influence of socioeconomic (SES), in many developed countries. The current study adds to the existing literature by providing insightful qualitative data regarding teachers experiences of maintaining and enhancing academic optimism in a developing country. Thus, this phenomenological study aims to explore the lived experiences of teachers with regard to maintaining and enhancing academic optimism in schools situated within low socioeconomic (SES) districts. Snowball sampling is used to collect data. Data collected from in-depth interviews conducted with 20 teachers working in states schools in Istanbul and Tekirdag in Fall 2015 were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis as coined by Braun and Clarke (2006). The preselected themes which consist of collective efficacy, academic press and trust were situated within the theoretical framework of Hoy et al’s (2006) academic optimism. Participants’ responses show that developing collective efficacy for academically optimistic approach requires an initial focus on a positive change in students’ sense of connection to their school. Moreover, participants highlight the significance of alignment of personal goals with macro level developmental goals of the country in their collective practices. An academically optimistic school in terms of academic press is characterized by an acceptance of collective responsibility as a school norm in the current study. Teachers’ proactive initiatives of study programs, teacher team meetings are practices that are enacted in schools to enhance academic press. Trust in colleagues is also fostered through a school atmosphere of sincerity and friendship by teachers in the current study. Further research is recommended to explore links between the components of academic optimism and collaborative work with external stakeholders.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• academic optimism
• collective efficacy
• academic emphasis

Kaynakça

1. Adams, C. M. (2020). Teacher trust in district administration: An overlooked relational support for teachers. Journal of School leadership, 30(2), 127-145.
2. Alazmi, A. A., & Hammad, W. (2021). Modeling the relationship between principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Kuwait: The mediating effects of Trust and Teacher Agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432211038007.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman Company
5. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current directions in psychological science, 9(3), 75-78.
6. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 87.
7. Bevel, R. K., & Mitchell, R. M. (2012). The effects of academic optimism on elementary reading achievement. Journal of Educational Administration.
8. Boonen, T., Pinxten, M., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2014). Should schools be optimistic? An investigation of the association between academic optimism of schools and student achievement in primary education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(1), 3-24.

9. Bostancı, A. B., & Bülbül, S. (2018). Do the teachers' organizational trust levels predict their academic optimism?. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(4), 2626-2634.
10. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input (Vol. 2). Watertown, MA: Pathfinder international.
11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26.
13. Braun, V.,& Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37-47.
14. Brenner M. (2006). Interviewing in educational research. In Green J., Camilli G., Elmore P., Skukauskaiti A., GraceLawrence E. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Erlbaum Associates.
15. Cheung, G. W. (2008). Teacher efficacy: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Shanghai primary in-
16. Eriksson, K., Lindvall, J., Helenius, O., & Ryve, A. (2021, November). Socioeconomic status as a multidimensional predictor of student achievement in 77 societies. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 464). Frontiers.
17. Farrell, T. S., & Ives, J. (2015). Exploring teacher beliefs and classroom practices through reflective practice: A case study. Language teaching research, 19(5), 594-610.
18. Feng, F. I., & Chen, W. L. (2019). The effect of principals’ social justice leadership on teachers’ academic optimism in Taiwan. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1245-1264.
19. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Impact on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507. doi:10.3102/00028312037002479
20. Güngör, S., Aydın, İ., Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Oğuz, E. (2013). Respect in principal–teacher relations at primary schools in Turkey. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(10), 1349-1372.
21. Hendawy Al-Mahdy, Y. F., Hallinger, P., Emam, M., Hammad, W., Alabri, K. M., & Al-Harthi, K. (2021). Supporting teacher professional learning in Oman: The effects of principal leadership, teacher trust, and teacher agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432211064428.
22. Hong, F. Y. (2017). Antecedent and consequence of school academic optimism and teachers’ academic optimism model. Educational Studies, 43(2), 165-185.
23. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School leadership, 9(3), 184-208.
24. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American educational research journal, 43(3), 425-446.
25. Kirby, M. M., & DiPaola, M. F. (2011). Academic optimism and community engagement in urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 542-562.
26. Lavy, S., & Ayuob, W. (2019). Teachers’ sense of meaning associations with teacher performance and graduates’ resilience: A study of schools serving students of low socio-economic status. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 823.
27. Licata, J. W., & Harper, G. W. (1999). Healthy schools, robust schools and academic emphasis as an organizational theme. Journal of Educational Administration.
28. Madigan, K., Cross, R. W., Smolkowski, K., & Strycker, L. A. (2016). Association between schoolwide positive behavioural interventions and supports and academic achievement: A 9-year evaluation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(7-8), 402-421.
29. Maxwell, S., Reynolds, K. J., Lee, E., Subasic, E., & Bromhead, D. (2017). The impact of school climate and school identification on academic achievement: Multilevel modeling with student and teacher data. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2069.
30. McGuigan, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2006). Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and policy in schools, 5(3), 203-229.
31. Morgan, D. (2008). Probability sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 681). SAGE Publications.
32. Neuenschwander, M. P. (2020). Information and trust in parent-teacher-cooperation: Connections with educational inequality. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 19–28.
33. Ngidi, D. P. (2012). Academic optimism: An individual teacher belief. Educational Studies, 38(2), 139-150.
34. Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2014). School emphasis on academic success: exploring changes in science performance in Norway between 2007 and 2011 employing two-level SEM. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(4), 308-327.
35. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
36. Price, H. E. (2012). Principal–teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39-85.
37. Räty, H., & Kasanen, K. (2016). Educational optimism among parents: A pilot study. Educational Studies, 42(5), 446-449.service teachers. In The Australian Educational Researcher, 35, pp. 103-123.
38. Simpson, T. A. (1976). Teacher-principal interaction leading to feelings of concern or pleasure. Australian Journal of Education, 20(2), 160-168.
39. Smith, P. A., & Hoy, W. K. (2007). Academic optimism and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of educational administration, 45(5), 556-568.
40. Song, K. (2022). Well-being of teachers: The role of efficacy of teachers and academic optimism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 831972.
41. Straková, J., Simonová, J., & Greger, D. (2018). Improving mathematics results: does teachers’ academic optimism matter? A study of lower secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(3), 446-463.
42. Szczesiul, S. A., & Huizenga, J. L. (2015). Bridging structure and agency: Exploring the role of teacher leadership in teacher collaboration. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 368-410.
43. Tam, A. C. F. (2015). Exploring teachers’ beliefs about teacher learning in professional learning communities and their influence on collegial activities in two departments. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(3), 422-444.
44. Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (1988). The context of trust: Teachers and the principal. The High School Journal, 72(1), 17-24.
45. Thien, L. M., & Chan, S. Y. (2022). One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 43-63.
46. Voelkel Jr, R. H., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School effectiveness and school improvement, 28(4), 505-526.
47. Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2012). Academic optimism and teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 47(2), 91-100.
48. Zhou, Y. (2019). Collective teacher efficacy: An introduction to its theoretical constructs, impact, and formation. International Dialogues on Education Journal, 6(2).