Partner Tarafından Önemsenme Algısı Ölçeği: Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Önemsenme, kişinin kendini belirli birileri için önemli olarak algılamasına dönük psikolojik eğilim şeklinde tanımlamaktadır (Marshall, 2001). Ruh sağlığı için kritik olduğu bilinen bu olgu, romantik ilişki bağlamında da önem arz etmektedir. Partnerler tarafından önemsenme hem kişisel refahı hem de ilişkinin seyrini etkilemektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı bireylerin hâlihazırdaki ilişkilerinde, romantik partnerleri tarafından ne derece önemsendiklerine dönük algıyı değerlendiren Partner Tarafından Önemsenme Algısı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanmasıdır. Araştırma grubu 216 bekâr ve 222 evli olmak üzere toplam 438 kişiden (kadın=330, erkek=108, yaş ort.=28.21, ±7.46) oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri kişisel bilgi formu, Partner Tarafından Önemsenme Algısı Ölçeği, İlişki Doyumu Ölçeği (Curun, 2001) ve Romantik Partnere Kendini Açma Ölçeği (Özdemir ve Yazıcı, 2024) ile toplanmıştır. Analizler SPSS 27.0 ve AMOS 20.0 paket programları ile gerçekleştirilmiştir ve tanımlayıcı istatistik, Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısı (PMÇKK), Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA), McDonald’s omega ve Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayıları, testi yarıya bölme ve bağımsız t testi tekniklerinden yararlanılmıştır. DFA sonucunda hem bekâr (χ2/sd =1.55, GFI=.91, CFI=.95, TLI=.95, RMSEA=.05, SRMR=.04) hem de evli (χ2/sd =2.40, GFI=.87, CFI=.93, TLI=.91, RMSEA=.07, SRMR=.05) grupta modelin veriye iyi uyum gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir. Cronbach alfa güvenirlik katsayının bekâr grupta .87, evli grupta ise .93 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, iki hafta ara ile yapılan uygulamalar arasında pozitif yönde yüksek düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir (r=.79, p<.001). Sonuç olarak, Türkçeye uyarlanan Partner Tarafından Önemsenme Algısı Ölçeği’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin gelecek araştırmalar için önemli olduğu, partner tarafından önemsenme algısı ile romantik ilişki dinamikleri arasındaki ilişkilerin ve ruh sağlığı ile ilgili değişkenlerin derinlemesine araştırılmasına olanak sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Önemsenme
• önemlilik
• romantik partner
• romantik ilişki
• ilişki doyumu
• partnere kendini açma
• ölçek uyarlama.

The Mattering to Romantic Others Questionnaire: Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Study

Öz

Mattering is defined as the psychological tendency to evaluate the self as significant to specific others (Marshall, 2001). This phenomenon, which is known to be critical for mental health, is also important in the context of romantic relationships. Mattering to romantic partners affects both individual well-being and the course of the relationship. The main purpose of this study is to adapt the Mattering to Romantic Others Questionnaire, which assesses the perception of mattering to romantic partners in their current relationships, into Turkish. The study group consisted of a total of 438 people (female=330, male=108, mean age =28.21, ±7.46), 216 unmarried and 222 married. The data of the study were collected with personal information form, the Mattering to Romantic Others Questionnaire, the Relationship Assessment Scale (Curun, 2001), and the Self-Disclosure to Romantic Partner Scale (Özdemir & Yazıcı, 2024). The analyses were carried out with SPSS 27.0 and AMOS 20.0 package programmes and descriptive statistics, Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (PMCCC), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), McDonald’s omega and Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficients, split-half, and independent t-test techniques were used. As a result of CFA, it was determined that the model fit the data good in both unmarried (χ2/df =1.55, GFI=.91, CFI=.95, TLI=.95, RMSEA=.05, SRMR=.04) and married (χ2/df =2.40, GFI=.87, CFI=.93, TLI=.91, RMSEA=.07, SRMR=.05) groups. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .87 in the unmarried group and .93 in the married group. In addition, there was a high significant positive relationship between the interventions conducted at two-week intervals (r=.79, p<.001). As a result, it was determined that the Mattering to Romantic Others Questionnaire adapted into Turkish is a valid and reliable measurement tool. The questionnaire is believed to be important for future research and will enable in-depth investigation of the relationships between mattering to romantic partner and romantic relationship dynamics and variables related to mental health.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mattering
• significance
• romantic partner
• romantic relationship
• relationship satisfaction
• self-disclosure in romantic relationship
• scale adaptation.

Kaynakça

1. Altıntaş-Aktaş, G. (2022). Evliliğin ilk beş yılında bulunan bireylerde yetiştirilme stillerinin ve bağlanma boyutlarının, eşi tarafından önemsenme algısı ve evlilik doyumu üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Üsküdar Üniversitesi.
2. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (24. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
3. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd Edition). Routledge.
4. Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on romantic relationship satisfaction [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
5. Elliott, G. C. (2009a). What does it mean to matter? G. C. Elliott (Ed.), Family matters: The importance of mattering to family in adolescence içinde (ss. 1-32). John Wiley & Sons.
6. Elliott, G. C. (2009b). Mattering matters. G. C. Elliott (Ed.), Family matters: The importance of mattering to family in adolescence içinde (ss. 33-62). John Wiley & Sons.
7. Elliott, G. C., Colangelo, M. F., & Gelles, R. J. (2005). Mattering and suicide ideation: Establishing and elaborating a relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(3), 223-238. Doi: 10.1177/019027250506800303
8. Elliott, G. C., Kao, S., & Grant, A. M. (2004). Mattering: Empirical validation of a social-psychological concept. Self and Identity, 3(4), 339-354. Doi: 10.1080/13576500444000119

9. Etherson, M. E., Smith, M. M., Hill, A. P., & Flett, G. L. (2022). Feelings of not mattering and depressive symptoms from a temporal perspective: A comparison of the cross-lagged panel model and random-intercept cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(1), 60-76. Doi: 10.1177/07342829211049686
10. Flett, G., Khan, A., & Su, C. (2019). Mattering and psychological well-being in college and university students: Review and recommendations for campus-based initiatives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 667-680. Doi: 10.1007/s11469-019-00073-6
11. Flett, G. L. (2018). Mattering: Definitional considerations and historical advances. G. L. Flett (Ed.), The psychology of mattering: Understanding the human need to be significant içinde (ss. 31-49) Academic Press.
12. Flett, G. L. (2022). An introduction, review, and conceptual analysis of mattering as an essential construct and an essential way of life. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(1), 3-36. Doi: 10.1177/07342829211057640
13. Flett, G. L., Nepon, T., Goldberg, J. O., Rose, A. L., Atkey, S. K., & Zaki-Azat, J. (2022). The Anti-Mattering Scale: Development, psychometric properties and associations with well-being and distress measures in adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(1), 37-59. Doi: 10.1177/07342829211050544
14. From, A., Banks, J., & Edelstein, R. S. (2024). Partner support behaviors and relationship quality in interracial and intraracial Black romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 31(3), 796-815. Doi: 10.1111/pere.12562
15. Haktanır, A., Lenz, A. S., Can, N., & Watson, J. C. (2016). Development and evaluation of Turkish language versions of three positive psychology assessments. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 38, 286-297. Doi: 10.1007/s10447-016-9272-9
16. Harrison, V., Kemp, R., Brace, N., & Snelgar, R. (2021). SPSS for psychologists (7. baskı). Red Globe Press.
17. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 93-98. Doi: 10.2307/352430
18. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
19. Kırımer, F. (2014). The role of capitalization and mattering among married couples: An attachment theory perspective [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
20. Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
21. Mak, L., & Marshall, S. K. (2004). Perceived mattering in young adults’ romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(4), 469-486. Doi: 10.1177/026540750404484
22. Marshall, S. (1997). Mattering attitudes: Validating the construct [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. University of Guelph.
23. Marshall, S. K. (2001). Do I matter? Construct validation of adolescents’ perceived mattering to parents and friends. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 473–490. Doi: 10.1006/jado.2001.0384
24. Özdemir, M., & Yazıcı, H. (2024). The development and preliminary validity and reliability of Self-Disclosure to Romantic Partner (SDRP) Scale. Psychological Reports. Doi: 10.1177/00332941241287742
25. Özmeriç, D. (2024). Commitment in long distance romantic relationships: The role of perceived responses to capitalization attempts and perceived mattering [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
26. Paradisi, M., Matera, C., & Nerini, A. (2024). Feeling important, feeling well. The association between mattering and well-being: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(1), 1-27. Doi: 10.1007/s10902-024-00720-3
27. Park, H. G., Suk, H. W., Cheon, J. E., & Kim, Y. H. (2023). Darling, come lay with me or talk with me: Perceived mattering and the complementary association between sex and communication within marital relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(3), 336-348. Doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.2018393
28. Rosenberg, M. (1985). Self-concept and psychological well-being in adolescence. R. L. Leahy (Ed.), The development of self içinde (ss. 205–246). Academic Press.
29. Rosenberg, M., & McCullough, B. C. (1981). Mattering: Inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Research in Community & Mental Health, 2, 163-182.
30. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
31. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (4. baskı). Routledge.
32. Sebastian, P. (2018). Mattering and self-compassion as mediators of the relationship between attachment style and marital satisfaction among young spouses in Kerala: A mixed method study. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 9(3), 387-392.
33. Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857-877. Doi: 1 0.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803
34. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L.S., & Osterlind, S. C. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
35. Şahin, E. S., & Derin, S. (2023). Development, validity and reliability of Significance Quest Scale (SQS). International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(3), 446-458. Doi: 10.24331/ijere.1226598
36. Yeoh, H. C., Poay, S. L. H., Prihadi, K. D., & Purwaningtyas, E. K. (2022). Secure relationship does not mean satisfying relationship during the pandemic: The role of mattering and life satisfaction. International Journal of Public Health Science, 11(4), 1432-1438. Doi: 10.11591/ijphs.v11i4.21691