Yapay Zeka Destekli Ders Araştırması: Öğretmenlerin Mesleki Gelişiminin Dönüşümü

Öz

Bu çalışma, Yapay Zeka'nın (YZ) ders araştırması (LS) modeline öğretmen mesleki gelişimine yönelik yenilikçi bir yaklaşım olarak entegrasyonunu incelemektedir. İşbirlikçi bir öğrenme modeli olan ders araştırması, öğretmenlerin öğretim uygulamalarını sistematik olarak planlamalarına, uygulamalarına, gözlemlemelerine ve iyileştirmelerine olanak tanır. Yapay zekadaki gelişmeler, veri odaklı içgörüler, kişiselleştirilmiş geri bildirim ve uyarlanabilir öğrenme stratejileri sağlayarak yeni fırsatlar sunar. Sistematik bir literatür incelemesi yoluyla, bu çalışma YZ destekli ders araştırmasının öğretmen eğitimini ve öğrenci öğrenimini nasıl geliştirdiğini araştırmaktadır. Temel temalar arasında YZ'nin gerçek zamanlı geri bildirimdeki rolü, veri odaklı ders planlaması ve geliştirilmiş öğretmen işbirliği yer almaktadır. Dijital okuryazarlık, etik kaygılar ve yapılandırılmış uygulamaya duyulan ihtiyaç gibi zorluklar da tartışılmaktadır. Bulgular, YZ destekli ders araştırmasının karar almayı optimize ettiğini, yansıtıcı öğretimi teşvik ettiğini ve öğrenci öğrenimini kişiselleştirdiğini göstermektedir. Ancak, etkili uygulama eğitim, kurumsal destek ve mevcut yapılara entegrasyon gerektirir. YZ destekli ders araştırması, modelin işbirlikçi özünü korurken mesleki gelişim için umut vaat etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yapay zeka
• eğitimde YZ
• işbirlikli öğrenme
• ders araştırması
• öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi.

AI-Enhanced Lesson Study: Transforming Teacher Professional Development

Öz

This study examines the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the Lesson Study (LS) model as an innovative approach to teacher professional development. LS, a collaborative learning model, allows teachers to systematically plan, implement, observe, and refine their teaching practices. Advances in AI offer new opportunities by providing data-driven insights, personalized feedback, and adaptive learning strategies. Through a systematic literature review, this study explores how AI-supported LS enhances teacher education and student learning. Key themes include AI’s role in real-time feedback, data-driven lesson planning, and improved teacher collaboration. Challenges such as digital literacy, ethical concerns, and the need for structured implementation are also discussed. Findings indicate that AI-supported LS optimizes decision-making, fosters reflective teaching, and personalizes student learning. However, effective implementation requires training, institutional support, and integration into existing structures. AI-enhanced LS holds promise for professional development while preserving the model’s collaborative essence..

Anahtar Kelimeler

• AI
• AI in education
• collaborative learning
• LS
• teacher professional development

Kaynakça

1. Allen, A., Hancock, S. D., Starker – Glass, T. & Lewis, C. W. (2017). Mapping culturally relevant pedagogy into teacher education programs: A critical framework. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 119(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900107
2. Arevalo, V. M.S., Morales, P.P., Sgreccia, N.F. & Gomez E. S. (2024). Contributions of LS to the reconstruction of teachers’ practical knowledge within a virtual setting context. Case study at Universidad Nacional de Educacion (Ecuador). International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 13(4), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2024-0046
3. Aydın – Yıldız, T. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on improving 21st-century skills for future English Teachers during lesson planning. Computers in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2429534
4. Bayar, A. (2014). The components of effective professional development activities in terms of teachers’ perspective. International Online Journal of Educatioanl Sciences, 6(2), 319-327.
5. Bayrak-Özumutlu, E. (2018). Öğretmenlerin mesleki inançları, mesleki inançlarının kaynakları ve mesleki inançlar temelinde öğretmen tiplerinin belirlenmesi (Tez No.509814) [Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi-Ankara]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
6. Baytak, A. (2024). The content analysis of the lesson plans created by ChatGPT and Google Gemini. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 329-350. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.19
7. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teachers learning: Mapping the terrn. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
8. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.

9. Cheng, L. P., & Yee, L. P. (2012). A Singapore case of LS. The Mathematics Educator, 21(2), 34-57.
10. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researchers, 23(7), 13-19.
11. Collet, V. S. & Penaflorida, j. (2020). LS as transformative learning for international graduate teaching assistants: “It’s like we have a second life”. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 10(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2020-0024
12. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
13. Efendi, M.A., Panglipur, I.R. & Murtinasari, F. (2024). Identifying the use of AI in math learning based on learning outcomes. At-Ta’lim:Jurnal Pendidikani, 10(2), 227-233. https://doi.org/10.55210/attalim.v10i2.1689
14. Fernández, C., Cannon, J., & Choksi, S. (2003). A Us-Japan LS collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171-185.
15. Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teachers education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119-136.
16. Govender, N. & Juggernath, A.C(2024). An analysis of Guskey’s framework of teachers’ perceptions and experiences in integrating ICTs for LS. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2024-0092
17. Hofman, R. H., & Dijkstra, B. J. (2010). Effective teacher professionalization innetworks? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1031-1040.
18. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). AI in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf
19. İşler, B., & Kılıç, G. (2021). Eğitimde yapay zeka kullanımı ve gelişimi. E-Journal of New Media, 5(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i1001
20. Lammert, C., Dejulio, S., Grote-Garcia, S. & Fraga, L.M. (2024). Better than nothing? An analysis of AI-generated lesson plans using the universal design for learning & transition frameworks. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 97(5), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2024.2427332
21. Lee, J. F. K. (2008). A Hong Kong case of LSebenefits and concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1115-1124.
22. Lee, S. & Jeon, J. (2024). Enhancing pre-service EFL teachers’ TPACK through chatbot-integrated lesson planning projects. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1-20. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73598
23. Little, J. W. (1987) Teachers as colleagues. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 491-518). Longman.
24. Meylani, R. (2024). AI in the education of teachers: A qualitative synthesis of the cutting-edge research literature. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(24), 600-637. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1477709
25. Nuruddaroini, M.A.S., Abdullah, M., Abdurrahim, Muhammad, F., Fitriani, E. & Fadlillah, N. (2024). Learning transformation: Teachers and the Dynamics of AI. Proceedings of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 2(1), 725-733.
26. Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget and his school: A reader in developmental psychology. Springer.
27. Price, J. (2001). Action research pedagogy and change: The transformative potential of action research in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 43-74.
28. Ramphele, M. (2015). Meaning and mission. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 10-13.
29. Rodriguez-Robles, C., Rodriguez, L.P., Trapero, N. P., Servan-Nunez, M.J. & Gomez, E.S. (2024). LS and the challenges of initial teacher education in Europe: Keys to sustainability. A literature review. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2024-0102
30. Sales, A., Traver, J. A., & Garcia, R. (2011). Action research as a school-based strategy in intercultural professional development for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 911-919.
31. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://www.wcu.edu/webfiles/pdfs/shulman.pdf
32. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. The Free Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1056609
33. Vock, M., Bucher, J. & Kager, K. (2024). Challenges and solutions when implementing LS from the perspective of German primary schools. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2024-0101
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
35. Wang, A., Yu, S. Wang, M. & Chen, L. (2024). Effetcs of the visual analytics of peer feedback on teachers’ TPACK development in a LS. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4632-4651. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2204354
36. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., & Bond, M. (2019). Systematic review of research on AI applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
37. Zhang, Y. (2023). A LS on a MOOC-based and AI-powered flipped teaching and assessment of EFL writing model: Teachers’ and student growth. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 13(1), 8-40.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-07-2023-0085