Relationship between Marital Adjustment and Wellbeing of Married Individuals

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between marital adjus tment levels and psychological well-being levels. Another aim of the study is to examine these variables from various perspectives. This study used a relational survey model to determine the marital adjustment predictor variables of married individuals. In relational studies, correlation and causal comparisons are commonly preferred. Convenience sampling method was used to determine study group. In this method, researchers start to create the sample by starting from participants that are easily accessed until desired sample size is achieved. For this purpose, 324 participants were reached and measurement tools were employed. The data were collected using Marital Adjustment Scale, Psychological Well-Being Scale and a personal information form. Participants of this study were married individuals with children in Samsun city of Turkey. Among 324 voluntary participants of this study, 158 (48.8%) were female and 166 (51.2%) were male. Age of participants ranged between 21-65. The findings showed that marital adjustment significantly predicts psychological well-being. Marital adjustment levels and psychological well-being levels did not differ significantly according to gender. According to the results, a psycho-education plan can be proposed to increase the psychological well-being of married individuals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Marriage,married individuals,marital adjustment,wellbeing

Evli Bireylerin Evlilik Uyumu ile İyilik Hali Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, evlilik uyum düzeyleri ile psikolojik iyi oluş düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmanın bir diğer amacı evli bireylerin evlilik uyum düzeyleri ile psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerini çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelemektir. Bu araştırmada çocuk sahibi olan evli bireylerin evlilik uyum düzeyleri ile psikolojik iyi oluş düzeyleri çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelemeyi ve evlilik uyum düzeyleri ile psikolojik iyi oluşları arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemeyi amaçlayan ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. İlişkisel araştırmalarda korelasyonel ve nedensel karşılaştırmalar sıklıkla tercih edilmektedir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunun belirlenmesinde uygun örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu yöntemde araştırmacı, ihtiyaç duyduğu büyüklükteki katılımcı sayısına ulaşıncaya kadar en ulaşılabilir olan katılımcılardan başlayarak örneklemini oluşturmaya başlar. Bu araştırmanın katılımcılarını Türkiye’nin Samsun ilinde yaşayan ve çocuk sahibi olan evli bireyler oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada yer alan 324 gönüllü katılımcının 158’i (%48.8) kadın, 166’sı (%51.2) erkektir. Katılımcıların yaşları 21-65 arasındadır. Araştırma bulguları evlilik uyumunun psikolojik iyi oluşun önemli ölçüde yordayıcısı olduğunu göstermiştir. Yine araştırmada evlilik uyum düzeyleri ve psikolojik iyilik hali düzeyleri evli bireylerin cinsiyetine göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılaşmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre evli bireylerin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeylerini artırmak için psiko-eğitim planı önerilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Evlilik,evli bireyler,evlilik uyumu,iyi oluş.

Kaynakça

1. Akça-Koca, D., & Yukay-Yuksel, M. (2017). The effect of a family education program on marital satisfaction of married mothers, marital problem-solving skill and psychological well-being. International Journal of Field Education, 3(1), 1-19.
2. Akdag, F. G., & Çankaya, C. Z. (2015). Predicting of psychological well-being in married individuals. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(3), 646-661.
3. Arshad, M., Mohsin, M. N., & Mahmood, K. (2014). Marital adjustment and life satisfaction among early and late marriages. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17), 83-90.
4. Aydınlı, E., & Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş. (2009). Investigation of factors affecting marital adjustment. V. National Family and Marriage Therapies Congress, 13-15 March, Istanbul.
5. Bir-Aktürk, E. (2006). Marital satisfaction in Turkish remarried families: Comparison among marital status, effect of stepchildren, and contributing factors. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, E.Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
7. Can, A. (2013). Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process with SPSS. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
8. Canel, A. N. (2007). Problem solving in family, marital satisfaction and evaluation of a group work case. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Marmara University, Istanbul.

9. Çakırlar, A. (2012). Investigation of some variables on affecting police officers marital adjustment. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sakarya University, Sakarya.
10. Çankır, B., & Yener, S. (2017). Positive behavior at work. İstanbul: Çizgi Bookstore.
11. Celik, M. (2018). The study of marriage adjustment of teachers in terms of life satisfaction and the level of burnout. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 40-52.
12. Çelik, M., & Tümkaya, S. (2012). The Relationship between job variables of life satisfaction and marital satisfaction of lecturers. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(1), 223-238.
13. Dehle, C., & Weiss, R. L. (2002). Associations between anxiety and marital adjustment. The Journal of Psychology, 136 (3), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604160
14. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.
15. Ekşi, H., Güneş, F., & Yaman, N. (2018). The investigation of marital adjustment of teachers in terms of psychological well-being and gender roles. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 8(50), 203-233.
16. Erbek, E., Beştepe, E., Akar, H., Eradamlar, N., & Alpkan, R. L. (2005). Marital adjustment. Düşünen Adam, 18 (1), 39-47.
17. Ersanlı, K. (1990). Aile içi ilişkilerin dayandığı psikolojik temeller. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 5(1), 51-54.
18. Ersanlı, K., & Kalkan, M. (2008). Evlilik ilişkilerini geliştirme kuram ve uygulama. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
19. Ertan, Ö. (2002). The Role of attachment styles in partner pairing and satisfaction within marriage in critical and non-critical stages. (Unpublished master's thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
20. Eryılmaz, A. (2013). Using of positive psychology on psychological counseling and guidance context on character strength and preventive services. The Journal of Happiness and Well-Being, 1(1), 1-22.
21. Fidan, M., & Usta, F. (2013). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the flourishing scale. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(3), 265-269.
22. Fidanoğlu, O. (2007). The relationship of marital adjustment with somatization level and comparison of the study variables with other socio-demographic factors. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul.
23. Fidanoğlu, O. (2006). The relationship among marital adjustment, humor style and anxiety. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul.
24. Gökmen, A. (2001). Dimensions of perception control and dependency effect on marital satisfaction. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
25. Günay, S. (2007). Marital conflict, casual-responsibility attributions, opinions of spouses about general satisfaction provided by marital relationship and the relationship between evaluation about marriage. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
26. Malkoç, G., & Güren, A. S. (2018). The relation between the levels of marital adjustment marital conflict affiliation and loneliness of married couples having children and their attitude in child rearing. İstanbul Ticaret University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(33), 225-239.
27. Hamamcı, Z. (2005). Dysfunctional relationship beliefs in marital satisfaction and adjustment. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(4), 313-328.
28. Hawkins, D. N., & Booth, A. (2005). Unhappily ever after: effects of long-term, low-quality marriages on well-being. Social Forces, 84, 451-471.
29. Heene, E., Buysse, A., & Van, O. P. (2007). An interpersonal perspective on depression: The role of marital adjustment, conflict communication, attributions, and attachment within a clinical sample. Oxford Journals Social Sciences, 84 (1), 451-471.
30. Kamp Dush, C. M., Taylor, M. G., & Kroeger, R. A. (2008). Marital happiness and psychological well-being across the life course. Family Relations, 57, 211-226. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00495.x.
31. Kaplan, H., & Benjamin, S. (2001). A summary of Kaplan psychology. Tehran: Arjmand.
32. Karadag, Ş. (2015). Evlilik uyumu ilişkisinde aile içi iletişimin rolü: Konya örneği (Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
33. Karadag, Ş., & Koçak, A. (2017). The role of inter family communication in marital adjustment: Case of Konya. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(2), 1093-1104.
34. Kışlak, Ş. (1996). Cinsiyet, evlilik uyumu, depresyon ile nedensel ve sorumluluk yüklemeleri arasındaki ilişkiler (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
35. Kublay, D., & Oktan, V. (2015). Marital adjustment: The examination in terms of value preferences and subjective. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5 (44), 25-35.
36. Kumcagiz, H., & Güner, Z. (2017). Analysis of various variables including social support and marital adjustment as predictors of job satisfaction for nurses. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 225-249. doi:10.14687/jhs.v14i1.4092
37. Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251-255.
38. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855.
39. Makvana, S. M. (2014). Marital adjustment among serving and non-serving married couples. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 1(3), 6-14.
40. Özgüven, İ. E. (1997). Cinsellik ve cinsel yaşam. Ankara: PDREM Yayınları.
41. Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marrige and Family, 69, 576-593. doi.org/10.1111/j.1741- 3737.2007.00393.x
42. Rıza, Ö. S. (2016) The relationshi̇p between cognitive emotion regulation strategies, psychological wellbeing and marital satisfaction on married individual. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Işık University, Istanbul.
43. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13-39.
44. Scorsolini, C. F., & Santos, M. A. (2012). Correlations between subjective well-being, dyadic adjustment and marital satisfaction in Brazilian married people. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 166-176.
45. Scott, R. L., & Cordova, J. V. (2002). The influence of adult attachment styles on the association between marital adjustment and depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 16 (2), 199-208.
46. Shek, D. T. L. (2001). Marital quality and psikological well-being of married adults in a Chinese context. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156(1), 45-56. doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1995.9914805
47. Süataç Ö. A. (2010). Marital adjustment research in terms of interpersonal style and anger. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ege University, Izmir.
48. Şendil, G., & Korkut, Y. (2008). An investigation of the dyadic adjustment and marital conflict scores of married couples in terms of their demographical characteristics. Studies in Psychology, 28, 15-34.
49. Timur, M. S. (2008). The examination of factors that affect married individuals? Psychological well-being levels who are in divorce process and not in divorce process. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
50. Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş. (1999). Reliability and validity of the marital adjustment test (TAT). Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji, 7(1), 50-57.
51. Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş., & Çabukça, F. (2002). The relationship among empathy, demographic variables and marital adjustment. Aile ve Toplum, 2(5), 35-42.
52. Uluyol, F. M. (2014). The relationship between attachment style, interpersonal schemas for partner and the ability to cope with marital problems. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
53. Walton, E., & Takeuchi, D. T. (2010). Family structure, family processes and well-being among Asian Americans: Considering gender and nativity. Journal of Family Issues 31(3), 301-332.
54. Whisman, M. A., Uebelacker, L. A., & Weinstock, L. M. (2004). Psychopathology and marital satisfaction: The importance of evaluating both partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 830-838.
55. Whisman, M. A., Uebelacker, L. A., Tolejko, N., Chatav, Y., & McKelvie, M. (2006). Marital discord and well-being in older adults: Is the association confounded by personality? Psychology and Aging, 21, 626-631.
56. Whitton, S. W., & Kuryluk, A. D. (2012) Relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms in emerging adults: sectional associations and moderating effects of relationship characteristics. Journal of Family Psychology 26, 226-35.
57. Yalçın, H. (2014). Relationship between adaptation of the marriage and demographic characteristics. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3(1), 250-261.
58. Yeşiltepe, S. S., & Çelik, M. (2014). Evaluation of marital adjustment of teachers in terms of psychological well-being and some variables. Elementary Education Online, 13(3), 992-1013
59. Yüksel, Ö. (2013). Kadınlarda evlilik uyumu ve psikolojik belirtiler arasındaki ilişki: Stresle baş etme biçimleri ve toplumsal cinsiyet rolü tutumlarının aracı rolleri (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.