TÜRK FİRMALARINDA FİNANSAL KISITLAR VE YATIRIM: DOKUMA, GİYİM EŞYASI VE DERİ SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Yeni borç ya da özkaynak gibi dışsal finansmana erişimde problemler yaşanması durumunda, firmalar yatırımlarını içsel nakit akışları ile finanse etmek zorunda kalabilirler. Bu durum firmaların yatırımlarının kendi nakit akışlarıyla kısıtlı olması anlamına gelir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, firmaların yatırımlarında içsel nakit akışlarına bağımlılıklarının araştırılmasıdır. Veri seti hisse senetleri Borsa İstanbul’da (BİST) işlem gören, Dokuma, Giyim Eşyası ve Deri Sektöründe yer alan 20 firmanın 2005 ve 2017 arasındaki finansal verilerinden oluşmaktadır. Analiz için Gölge Değişkenli En Küçük Kareler yöntemi ve Euler Denklemlerinden faydalanılmıştır. Tahmin edilen modellerin sonuçlarına göre içsel nakit akışlarının firma yatırımlarını pozitif ve anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği gözlenmiştir. Diğer bir ifade ile içsel nakit akışları azaldığında yatırımlar da azlamak zorunda kalmaktadır; bu durum dışsal finansmana erişimde problemlerin yaşanıyor olduğunun göstergesidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Finansal Kısıtlar
• Nakit Akışı
• Yatırım
• Dokuma
• Giyim Eşyası ve Deri Sektörü
• BIST

Kaynakça

1. ANDRES, C. (2011). Family ownership, financing constraints and investment decisions. Applied Financial Economics, 21(22), 1641–1659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.589805
2. ARELLANO, M., ve BOND, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
3. ATAULLAH, A., GOERGEN, M., ve LE, H. (2014). Insider Trading and Financing Constraints. Financial Review, 49(4), 685–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12053
4. BENLİGİRAY, S., ve AYDIN, N. (2017a). Borsa İstanbul Firmalarında Yatırımların Nakit Akışlarına Duyarlılığının İncelenmesi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 8(4), 699–714.
5. BENLİGİRAY, S., ve AYDIN, N. (2017b). Firmalarda Sahiplik Özelliklerinin Yatırım-Nakit Akışı Duyarlılıklarına Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği. International Review of Economics and Management, 5(2), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.18825/iremjournal.319421
6. BERTONI, F., COLOMBO, M. G., ve CROCE, A. (2010). The Effect of Venture Capital Financing on the Sensitivity to Cash Flow of Firm’s Investments. European Financial Management, 16(4), 528–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2008.00463.x
7. BLUNDELL, R., ve BOND, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
8. BOND, S., ve MEGHIR, C. (1994). Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm’s Financial Policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297978

9. BRUNO, G. S. F. (2005). Estimation and inference in dynamic unbalanced panel-data models with a small number of individuals. Stata Journal, 5(4), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0500500401
10. CARPENTER, R. E., ve PETERSEN, B. C. (2002). Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance ? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 298–309.
11. ÇETENAK, E. H., ve VURAL, G. (2015). Business group affiliation and financial constraints: investment-cash flow sensitivity of Turkish business groups. Pressacademia, 2(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2015312958
12. CHEN, Y. S., ve CHEN, I. J. (2013). The impact of labor unions on investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(7), 2408–2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.001
13. CHOWDHURY, J., KUMAR, R., ve SHOME, D. (2016). Investment-cash flow sensitivity under changing information asymmetry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 62, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.003
14. CLEARY, S. (1999). The relationship between firm investment and financial status. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00121
15. CONNOLLY, R. A., ve HIRSCHEY, M. (2005). Firm size and the effect of R&D on Tobin’s q. R and D Management, 35(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00384.x
16. ČRNIGOJ, M., ve VERBIČ, M. (2014). Financial constraints and corporate investments during the current financial and economic crisis: The credit crunch and investment decisions of Slovenian firms. Economic Systems, 38(4), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.03.004
17. DEMİR, F. (2009). Capital Market Imperfections and Financialization of Real Sectors in Emerging Markets: Private Investment and Cash Flow Relationship Revisited. World Development, 37(5), 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.003
18. FAZZARI, S. M., HUBBARD, R. G., ve PETERSEN, B. C. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(1), 141–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534426 FAZZARI, S. M., ve MOTT, T. L. (1986). The Investment Theories of Kalecki and Keynes: An Empirical Study of Firm Data, 1970–1982. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 9(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1986.11489611
19. GANESH-KUMAR, A., SEN, K., ve VAIDYA, R. R. (2001). Outward orientation, investment and finance constraints: A study of Indian firms. Journal of Development Studies, 37(4), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331322071
20. GEORGE, R., KABIR, R., ve QIAN, J. (2011). Investment-cash flow sensitivity and financing constraints: New evidence from Indian business group firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 21(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2010.12.003
21. GEZİCİ, A. (2007). Investment under Financial Liberalization: Channels of Liquidity and Uncertainty. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
22. GEZİCİ, A., Orhangazi, Ö., ve Yalçın, C. (2019). Determinants of Investment in Turkey: A Firm-Level Investigation. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(6), 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1473247
23. GUARIGLIA, A., ve YANG, J. (2016). A balancing act: Managing financial constraints and agency costs to minimize investment inefficiency in the Chinese market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.006
24. HOSHI, T., KASHYAP, A., ve SCHARFSTEIN, D. (1991). Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1), 33–60.
25. KAPLAN, S. N., ve ZINGALES, L. (1997). Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–215. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555163
26. KIVIET, J. F. (1995). On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E
27. KIYAK, N. (2008). Türkiye’de Kamu İç Borçlanmasının Özel Sektörün Fon Kaynaklarını Sınırlandırmasına Etkisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
28. LAEVEN, L. (2003). Does Financial Liberalization Reduce Financing Constraints? Financial Management, 32(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/3666202
29. LIN, H. C. M., ve BO, H. (2012). State-ownership and financial constraints on investment of Chinese-listed firms: New evidence. European Journal of Finance, 18(6), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2011.611523
30. MODIGLIANI, F., ve MILLER, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment: Reply. The American Economic Review, 1(3).
31. RO, Y. J., KIM, I. C., ve KIM, J. W. (2017). Financial Development and Investment in Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(3), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1095562
32. SAEED, A., ve VINCENT, O. (2012). Bank concentration and firm investment: Empirical evidence from India. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 48(3), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X480305
33. SHIN, H. H., ve PARK, Y. S. (1999). Financing constraints and internal capital markets: Evidence from Korean “chaebols.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-1199(99)00002-4
34. UGHETTO, E. (2016). Investments, Financing Constraints and Buyouts: The Effect of Private Equity Investors on the Sensitivity of Investments to Cash Flow. Manchester School, 84(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12085
35. SPK. (2019). Aylik_istatistik_bulteni_2019_08. www.spk.gov.tr. Erişim Tarihi: 07/11/2019.
36. BİLİM, SANAYİ ve TİCARET BAKANLIĞI. Türkiye Tekstil Hazırgiyim ve Deri Ürünleri Sektörleri Strateji Belgesi ve Eylem Planı 2015-2018. www.sp.gov.tr/. Erişim Tarihi: 08/11/2019