STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF MASONRY BUILDINGS IN TURKEY

Öz

Turkey is located in an active seismic zone. Mid to high rise R/C building and low rise masonry buildings are very common construction type in Turkey. In recent earthquakes, lots of existing buildings got damage including masonry buildings. Masonry building history in Turkey goes long years back. For sure, it is an important structure type for Turkey. Therefore, earthquake behavior and structural vulnerability of masonry buildings are crucial issues for Turkey as a earthquake prone country. In the present study, masonry buildings in Turkey were evaluated. Representative masonry buildings were analytically investigated. For representative masonry buildings, dynamic analysis was carried out by Finite Element Methodology (FEM). The results of the study show that structural behavior of masonry building is critical in earthquake assessment point of view.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Structural vulnerability assessment, masonry buildings, dynamic analysis

Kaynakça

1. [1] MTA (Turkish Mineral Research and Exploration Foundation) http://www.mta.gov.tr/english/index.php accessed in 2008.
2. [2] Celep, Z.: “General Considerations for Determining Resistance of Existing Buildings”, Symposium for Retrofit and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, İstanbul, Turkey (In Turkish) (2001) 125-168.
3. [3] Bayülke, N.: Masonry buildings 2nd Ed., Ankara, Turkey (In Turkish) (1992).
4. [4] Bayülke, N.: Earthquake Resistant Masonry Building Design, Chamber of Civil Engineers, Izmir No:27, 2nd Ed. İzmir (In Turkish) (1998) 245.
5. [5] Altin, S.; Kuran F.; Kara, M. E. and ANIL, Ö.: “A new method for rehabilitation of masonry buildings”, YDGA-2005, Workshop for Increasing Earthquake Resistance of masonry Buildings (In Turkish) (2005).
6. [6] Kanıt, R. and Isik, N. S.: “Experimental Study and Computer Modelling for Brick”, Gazi Unv. Eng Journal, 22(1) (2007) 13–20.
7. [7] Kanıt, R.: “Analytical and experimental Investigation of Masonry Buildings Out the Axial”, Gazi Unv. Eng Journal, 22(2) (2007) 441–449.
8. [8] Wilson E. and Habibullah A.: “Sap 2000 Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures Basic Analysis Refence Manual”, Berkeley (1998).

9. [9] Özcebe, G.: “Structural damages and reasons observed in 3 February 2002 AfyonSultandağı earthquake”, Civil Engineering Dept., Middle East Technical Univ., Structural Engineering Research Unit (2002).
10. [10] Ozcebe, G.; Ramirez, J.; Wasti, S. T.; and Aykut, A.: “1 May 2003 Bingöl earthquake engineering report”, Rep. No. 2004/1, TÜBİTAK SERU Structural Engineering Research Unit, Ankara, Turkey (2004).
11. [11] Sucuoglu, H.: “The 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce-Turkey earthquakes”, METU (2000).
12. [12] Sucuoglu, H. and Yazgan, U.: “Seismic risk assessment survey of urban buildings”, The role of local governments in reducing the risk of disasters, World Bank Institute, Istanbul (2003) 127–147.
13. [13] Donmez, C. and Pujol, S.: “Spatial distribution of damage caused by the 1999 earthquakes in Turkey”, Earthquake Spectra 21 (1) (2005) 53–69.
14. [14] Bathe, K.: “The finite element method Publisher", Journal of the University of Cape Town Engineering Society (1967) 57-61.
15. [15] Mendes, N.; Lourenço, P. B. and Campos-Costa, A.: “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Ancient Masonry Building: An Experimental Method”, Advanced Materials Research, 133 (2010) 635-640.