Türkiye'deki Biyokütle Enerji Yatırımlarının Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Uygun Stratejilerin DEMATEL Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2023, , 32 - 44, 30.06.2023

Hasan Dinçer , Serhat Yüksel , Duygu Yavuz

https://doi.org/10.58686/marufiktisat.1308856

Öz

Biyokütle enerji yatırımları Türkiye için çok önemlidir. Biyokütle enerjisi, Türkiye'nin enerji güvenliği için önemli bir kaynak olabilir. Türkiye'nin enerjide dışa bağımlı bir ülke olduğu düşünüldüğünde, bu yatırımlar ülkenin enerji bağımsızlığına katkı sağlayacaktır. Bu bağlamda Türkiye'nin biyokütle enerji yatırımlarını artırmak için harekete geçmesi uygun olacaktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de biyokütle enerji yatırımlarını artırmak için uygun stratejileri belirlemektir. Bu çerçevede literatür taramasına odaklanılarak dört farklı kriter seçilmiştir. Sonraki aşamada, bu faktörlerin ağırlıkları AHP metodolojisi ile hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular, teknolojinin Türkiye'deki biyokütle enerji yatırımlarını iyileştirmede önemli bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, bu amaca ulaşabilmek için hukuki alt yapının geliştirilmesi de dikkate alınmalıdır. Ancak mali değerlendirme ve müşteri memnuniyeti son sıralarda yer almaktadır. Biyokütle enerji yatırımlarının artması için teknolojik gelişmenin büyük önem taşıdığı anlaşılmaktadır. Teknolojik gelişmeler, biyokütle enerji üretiminde verimliliğin artırılmasına katkı sağlayabilir. Böylece hem projenin verimliliği artırılacak hem de işletme maliyetleri azaltılacaktır. Bu durum, biyokütle enerjisi projelerinin rekabet edebilirliğini artırma fırsatı sunmaktadır. Ayrıca, teknolojik gelişmeler bu projelerin çevresel duyarlılığını artırabilmektedir. Gelişen teknolojiler sayesinde karbon salımına neden olmayan biyokütle enerji projeleri oluşturulabilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik, Biyokütle enerjisi projeleri, Enerji Yatırımları, AHP

Determination of suitable strategies for the development of biomass energy investments in Turkey by AHP method

Öz

Biomass energy investments are very important for Turkey. Biomass energy can be an important resource for Turkey's energy security. Considering that Turkey is a foreign-dependent country for energy, these investments will contribute to the country's energy independence. In this context, it would be appropriate for Turkey to take action to increase biomass energy investments. The purpose of this study is to identify appropriate strategies to increase biomass energy investments in Turkey. Within this framework, four different criteria are selected by focusing on literature review. In the following stage, the weights of these items are calculated by AHP methodology. The findings indicate that technological plays an essential role to improve the biomass energy investments in Turkey. Additionally, legal efficiency should also be taken into consideration in this context. However, financial evaluation and customer satisfaction are on the last ranks. It is understood that technological development is of great importance to increase biomass energy investments. Technological developments can contribute to increase efficiency in biomass energy production. Thus, both efficiency of the project will be increased, and the operating costs will be reduced. This situation provides the opportunity to increase the competitiveness of biomass energy projects. Technological developments can also increase the environmental sensitivity of these projects. Owing to advancing technologies, biomass energy projects that do not cause any carbon emissions will be able to be created.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainability, Biomass energy projects, Energy Investments, AHP

Kaynakça

• Ai, R., Zheng, Y., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2023). Investigating the components of fintech ecosystem for distributed energy investments with an integrated quantum spherical decision support system. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 27.
• Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021). Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 139, 110691.
• Carayannis, E., Kostis, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2023). Quality Function Deployment-Oriented Strategic Outlook to Sustainable Energy Policies Based on Quintuple Innovation Helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-19.
• Cheng, Y., & Pan, Z. (2020). Reservoir properties of Chinese tectonic coal: A review. Fuel, 260, 116350.
• Dai, S., Bechtel, A., Eble, C. F., Flores, R. M., French, D., Graham, I. T., ... & O'Keefe, J. M. (2020). Recognition of peat depositional environments in coal: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology, 219, 103383.
• Dalla Longa, F., Nogueira, L. P., Limberger, J., van Wees, J. D., & van der Zwaan, B. (2020). Scenarios for geothermal energy deployment in Europe. Energy, 206, 118060.
• Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2018). Comparative evaluation of BSC-based new service development competencies in Turkish banking sector with the integrated fuzzy hybrid MCDM using content analysis. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20, 2497-2516.
• Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2019). Multidimensional evaluation of global investments on the renewable energy with the integrated fuzzy decision‐making model under the hesitancy. International Journal of Energy Research, 43(5), 1775-1784.
• Dinçer, H., Gökalp, Y., Eti, S., & Yüksel, S. (2023). Strategy Generation for Minimizing Health Risks to Obtain Economic Development with Pedroni Panel Cointegration Analysis and AHP Model. Social Sector Development and Governance: Empirical Investigations for Countries and Groups, 161.
• Dinçer, H., Yavuz, D., & Sokolinskaya, N. (2023). How to Increase the Efficiency of Biomass Energy Investments. In Economic Development and the Environmental Ecosystem: The Role of Energy Policy in Economic Growth (pp. 61-70). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
• Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Yavuz, D.(2022). Determination of Optimal Security Measures in Nuclear Energy Investments: Strategy Recommendations for Emerging Markets. FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES IN EMERGING MARKETS, 255.
• Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Çağlayan, Ç., Yavuz, D., & Kararoğlu, D. (2023). Can Renewable Energy Investments Be a Solution to the Energy-Sourced High Inflation Problem?. In Managing inflation and supply chain disruptions in the global economy (pp. 220-238). IGI Global.
• Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Yavuz, D., Mikhaylov, A., & Prosekov, S. (2023). Can Digitalized Financial Products Increase Thorium-Based Nuclear Energy Investments. In Multidimensional and Strategic Outlook in Digital Business Transformation: Human Resource and Management Recommendations for Performance Improvement (pp. 141-150). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Dong, K., Ren, X., & Zhao, J. (2021). How does low-carbon energy transition alleviate energy poverty in China? A nonparametric panel causality analysis. Energy Economics, 103, 105620.
• Dong, W., Zhao, G., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2022). A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects. Renewable Energy, 185, 321-337.
• Eti, S., Dinçer, H., Gökalp, Y., Yüksel, S., & Kararoğlu, D. (2023). Identifying Key Issues to Handle the Inflation Problem in the Healthcare Industry Caused by Energy Prices: An Evaluation With Decision-Making Models. Managing Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions in the Global Economy, 162-178.
• Fan, J., Xie, H., Chen, J., Jiang, D., Li, C., Tiedeu, W. N., & Ambre, J. (2020). Preliminary feasibility analysis of a hybrid pumped-hydro energy storage system using abandoned coal mine goafs. Applied Energy, 258, 114007.
• Gao, Y., Zhang, X., Xu, X., Liu, L., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, S. (2021). Application and research progress of phase change energy storage in new energy utilization. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 343, 117554.
• Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M. D., Wagner, N., & Gorini, R. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy strategy reviews, 24, 38-50.
• Güney, T. (2019). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(5), 389-397.
• Güney, T. (2019). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(5), 389-397.
• Gyamfi, B. A., Bein, M. A., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Investigating the nexus between hydroelectricity energy, renewable energy, nonrenewable energy consumption on output: evidence from E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 25327-25339.
• Hu, X., & Gholizadeh, M. (2020). Progress of the applications of bio-oil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134, 110124.
• Jiang, P., Van Fan, Y., & Klemeš, J. J. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 on energy demand and consumption: Challenges, lessons and emerging opportunities. Applied energy, 285, 116441.
• Kober, T., Schiffer, H. W., Densing, M., & Panos, E. (2020). Global energy perspectives to 2060–WEC's World Energy Scenarios 2019. Energy Strategy Reviews, 31, 100523.
• Kong, D., Xiong, Y., Cheng, Z., Wang, N., Wu, G., & Liu, Y. (2021). Stability analysis of coal face based on coal face-support-roof system in steeply inclined coal seam. Geomechanics and Engineering, 25(3), 233.
• Kou, G., Olgu Akdeniz, Ö., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 39.
• Kou, G., Pamucar, D., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2023). From risks to rewards: A comprehensive guide to sustainable investment decisions in renewable energy using a hybrid facial expression-based fuzzy decision-making approach. Applied Soft Computing, 110365.
• Lebbihiat, N., Atia, A., Arıcı, M., & Meneceur, N. (2021). Geothermal energy use in Algeria: A review on the current status compared to the worldwide, utilization opportunities and countermeasures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, 126950.
• Lepage, T., Kammoun, M., Schmetz, Q., & Richel, A. (2021). Biomass-to-hydrogen: A review of main routes production, processes evaluation and techno-economical assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 144, 105920.
• Levenda, A. M., Behrsin, I., & Disano, F. (2021). Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101837.
• Li, J., & Wang, J. (2019). Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 117946.
• Li, Y. X., Wu, Z. X., Dinçer, H., Kalkavan, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Analyzing TRIZ-based strategic priorities of customer expectations for renewable energy investments with interval type-2 fuzzy modeling. Energy Reports, 7, 95-108.
• Liang, Y., Tan, Y., Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, B. (2020). Progress and challenges on gas production from natural gas hydrate-bearing sediment. Journal of cleaner production, 261, 121061.
• Liu, T., & Liu, S. (2020). The impacts of coal dust on miners’ health: A review. Environmental Research, 190, 109849.
• Lund, H., Thellufsen, J. Z., Østergaard, P. A., Sorknæs, P., Skov, I. R., & Mathiesen, B. V. (2021). EnergyPLAN–Advanced analysis of smart energy systems. Smart Energy, 1, 100007.
• Mikhaylov, A., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Pinter, G., & Shaikh, Z. A. (2023). Bitcoin mempool growth and trading volumes: Integrated approach based on QROF Multi-SWARA and aggregation operators. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), 100378.
• Moiseev, N., Mikhaylov, A., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2023). Market capitalization shock effects on open innovation models in e-commerce: golden cut q-rung orthopair fuzzy multicriteria decision-making analysis. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 55.
• Mujtaba, A., Jena, P. K., Bekun, F. V., & Sahu, P. K. (2022). Symmetric and asymmetric impact of economic growth, capital formation, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on environment in OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 160, 112300.
• Niu, X., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2023). Emission strategy selection for the circular economy-based production investments with the enhanced decision support system. Energy, 274, 127446.
• Olabi, A. G., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2022). Renewable energy and climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112111.
• Onifade, M., & Genc, B. (2020). A review of research on spontaneous combustion of coal. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 30(3), 303-311.
• Paramati, S. R., Shahzad, U., & Doğan, B. (2022). The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111735.
• Pickl, M. J. (2019). The renewable energy strategies of oil majors–From oil to energy?. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100370.
• Popp, J., Kovács, S., Oláh, J., Divéki, Z., & Balázs, E. (2021). Bioeconomy: Biomass and biomass-based energy supply and demand. New Biotechnology, 60, 76-84.c
• Qiu, D., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Ubay, G. G. (2020). Multi-faceted analysis of systematic risk-based wind energy investment decisions in E7 economies using modified hybrid modeling with IT2 fuzzy sets. Energies, 13(6), 1423.
• Rahman, M. M., & Velayutham, E. (2020). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus: new evidence from South Asia. Renewable Energy, 147, 399-408.
• Ruan, X., Li, X. S., & Xu, C. G. (2021). A review of numerical research on gas production from natural gas hydrates in China. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 85, 103713.
• Sayed, E. T., Olabi, A. G., Alami, A. H., Radwan, A., Mdallal, A., Rezk, A., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2023). Renewable energy and energy storage systems. Energies, 16(3), 1415.
• Shahbaz, M., Raghutla, C., Chittedi, K. R., Jiao, Z., & Vo, X. V. (2020). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index. Energy, 207, 118162.
• Silahtaroğlu, G., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Defining the significant factors of currency exchange rate risk by considering text mining and fuzzy AHP. In Data Science and Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approaches in Finance: Applications and Methods (pp. 145-168). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Soltani, M., Kashkooli, F. M., Souri, M., Rafiei, B., Jabarifar, M., Gharali, K., & Nathwani, J. S. (2021). Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 140, 110750.
• Stocks, M., Stocks, R., Lu, B., Cheng, C., & Blakers, A. (2021). Global atlas of closed-loop pumped hydro energy storage. Joule, 5(1), 270-284.
• Su, C. W., Khan, K., Umar, M., & Zhang, W. (2021). Does renewable energy redefine geopolitical risks?. Energy Policy, 158, 112566.
• Thellufsen, J. Z., Lund, H., Sorknæs, P., Østergaard, P. A., Chang, M., Drysdale, D., ... & Sperling, K. (2020). Smart energy cities in a 100% renewable energy context. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 129, 109922.
• Vakulchuk, R., Overland, I., & Scholten, D. (2020). Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 122, 109547.
• Wan, Q., Miao, X., Wang, C., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2023). A hybrid decision support system with golden cut and bipolar q-ROFSs for evaluating the risk-based strategic priorities of fintech lending for clean energy projects. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 1-25.
• Wang, C., & Cheng, Y. (2023). Role of coal deformation energy in coal and gas outburst: A review. Fuel, 332, 126019.
• Wang, S., Liu, Q., Yuksel, S., & Dincer, H. (2019). Hesitant linguistic term sets-based hybrid analysis for renewable energy investments. IEEE Access, 7, 114223-114235.
• Wenzhi, Z., Suyun, H., Lianhua, H., Tao, Y., Xin, L., Bincheng, G., & Zhi, Y. (2020). Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(1), 1-11.
• Xiong, Q., Altnji, S., Tayebi, T., Izadi, M., Hajjar, A., Sundén, B., & Li, L. K. (2021). A comprehensive review on the application of hybrid nanofluids in solar energy collectors. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101341.
• Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2023). Sustainability analysis of digital transformation and circular industrialization with quantum spherical fuzzy modeling and golden cuts. Applied Soft Computing, 138, 110192.
• Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Çağlayan, Ç., Mikhaylov, A., & Yavuz, D. (2023). Evaluating the Advantages and Disadvantages of Thorium-Based Nuclear Power Plants. In Renewable Energy Investments for Sustainable Business Projects (pp. 165-175). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Yüksel, S., Eti, S., Prosekov, S., & Uluer, G. S. (2021). A study on the energy problem in the eastern mediterranean: Text mining and AHP-based strategy recommendations. Strategic Approaches to Energy Management: Current Trends in Energy Economics and Green Investment, 27-38.
• Zafar, M. W., Sinha, A., Ahmed, Z., Qin, Q., & Zaidi, S. A. H. (2021). Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, 110868.