ALGILANAN KİŞİ-ÇEVRE UYUM ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN (PPEFS-TR) TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI

Yıl 2023, , 265 - 290, 31.01.2023

Fatma Çam Kahraman , Evrim Funda İnkaya Horoz , İlknur Özalp Türetgen

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.1082641

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı Algılanan Kişi-Çevre Uyum Ölçeği’ni (Chuang, Shen & Judge, 2016; PPEFS) Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Ölçek dört ölçümden oluşmaktadır: Kişi-İş Uyumu Ölçeği, Kişi-Örgüt Uyumu Ölçeği, Kişi-Grup Uyumu Ölçeği ve Kişi-Süpervizör Uyumu Ölçeği. Araştırma kapsamında iki farklı çalışma yürütülmüş ve araştırmada farklı sektör ve mesleklerde çalışan toplam 643 katılımcı yer almıştır. Çalışma 1’de (n= 325) yürütülen DFA, PPEFS’nin Türkçe formunun (PPEFS-TR) beklenen faktör yapısını doğrulamıştır. PPEFS-TR’nin, yaklaşan geçerliği için başka bir uyum ölçeğiyle (Cable ve DeRue, 2002), uzaklaşan geçerliği için ise teorik olarak ilişkisiz yapılarla (yaş ve cinsiyet) olan korelasyonları incelenmiş, beklendiği gibi ortadan düşük düzeye değişen ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Ek olarak, PPEFS-TR örgütsel sonuçları (örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı, iş doyumu ve ayrılma eğilimi) diğer uyum ölçeğinin üzerinde ve ötesinde yordayarak artışlı geçerliğe sahip olmuştur. Çalışma 2’de (n= 308), PPEFS-TR’nin her bir ölçeği teorik olarak ilişkili yapıları (işe bağlılık, örgütsel özdeşleşme, grup uyumu ve lider-üye etkileşimi) anlamlı olarak yordamıştır. PPEFS-TR’nin her iki çalışmadaki içtutarlılık güvenirlik katsıları .77 ile .94 arasında değişmiştir. Aynı zamanda, test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayıları .90 ile .94 arasında değişmiştir (n= 55).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kişi-Çevre Uyumu, Algılanan Kişi-Çevre Uyumu Ölçeği, PPEFS, PPEFS-TR, Güvenirlik, Geçerlik

TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE PERCEIVED PERSON-ENVIRONMENT FIT SCALE (PPEFS)

Öz

The aim of this research was to adopt Perceived Person-Environment Fit Scale (PPEFS; Chuang, Shen & Judge, 2016) into Turkish. The PPEFS consists of four measures: Person-Job Fit Scale, Person-Organization Fit Scale, Person-Group Fit Scale and Person-Supervisor Fit Scale. The research was conducted with 643 employees from various sectors and professions, and consisted of two different studies. In Study 1 (n= 325) the CFI confirmed the hypothesized factor structure of the Turkish version of the PPEFS (PPEFS-TR). For convergent validity the relationships of the PPEFS-TR’ scales with another fit scale (Cable & DeRue, 2002; PFS), and for divergent validity the relations between the PPEFS-TR and theoretically unrelated constructs (i.e., age and gender) were examined, and as expected, moderate to low level correlations were found. Moreover, the PPEFS-TR has incremental validity above and beyond the PFS on organizational outcomes (i.e., organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction and intention to leave). In Study 2 (n= 308), each scales of the PPEFS-TR predicted the theoretically related construct (i.e., work engagement, organizational identification, group fit, and leader-member exchange) significantly. Internal consistency reliability coefficients were found between .77 and .94 in both studies. Additionally, test-retest reliability coefficients were found between .90 and .94 (n= 55).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Person-Environment Fit, Perceived Person-Environment Fit Scale, PPEFS, PPEFS-TR, Reliability, Validity

Kaynakça

• Abdalla, A., Elsetouhi, A., Negm, A., & Abdou, H. (2018). Perceived person-organization fit and turnover intention in medical centers: The mediating roles of person-group fit and person-job fit perceptions. Personnel Review. 47(4), 863-881.
• Afsar, B., & Badir, Y. F. (2016). Person–organization fit, perceived organizational support, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of job embeddedness. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(3), 252-278.
• Alsancak, D. (2010). Bilgisayar destekli işbirlikli öğrenme ortamlarında geçişken bellek ile grup uyumu, grup atmosferi ve performansı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Andela, M., & van der Doef, M. (2019). A comprehensive assessment of the person–environment fit dimensions and their relationships with work-related outcomes. Journal of Career Development, 46(5), 567-582.
• Andela, M., van der Doef, M., & Lheureux, F. (2019). Transcultural validation of the perceived person-environment fit scale in a French context. LeTravail Humain, 83(4), 271-291.
• Ballout, H. I. (2007). Career success: The effects of human capital, person-environment fit and organizational support. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(8), 741-765.
• Bayazit, M., Aycan, Z., Aksoy, E., Goncu, A., & Oztekin, T. (2006, June). Contextual performance: Antecedents and motivational processes operating among blue-collar employees [Paper presentation]. 10th ISSWOV International Conference on Work Values and Behavior, Tallinn, Estonia.
• Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
• Bednarska, M. A. (2017). Does the effect of person-environment fit on work attitudes vary with generations? Insights from the tourism industry. International Journal of Management and Economics, 53(1), 65-83.
• Behram, N. K., & Dinc, E. (2014). Algılanan kişi-örgüt uyumunun kişilerarası çatışma ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerine etkisi. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 115-124.
• Bennis, W. G. & Townsend, R. (1989). On becoming a leader (Vol. 36). Addison-Wesley. Brkich, M., Jeffs, D., & Carless, S. A. (2002). A global self-report measure of person- job fit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 43-51.
• Cable, D. M. & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884. Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822-834.
• Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311
• Cai, D., Cai, Y., Sun, Y., & Ma, J. (2018). Linking empowering leadership and employee work engagement: The effects of person-job fit, person-group fit, and proactive personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1304.
• Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333-349.
• Chen, C. Y., Yen, C. H., & Tsai, F. C. (2014). Job crafting and job engagement: The mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 21-28.
• Chen, P., Sparrow, P., & Cooper, C. (2016). The relationship between person-organization fit and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(5), 946-959.
• Chi, N. W., & Pan, S. Y. (2012). A multilevel investigation of missing links between transformational leadership and task performance: The mediating roles of perceived person-job fit and person-organization fit. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 43-56.
• Chuang, A., & Sackett, P. R. (2005). The perceived importance of person-job fit and person-organization fit between and within interview stages. Social Behavior and Personality:An International Journal, 33(3), 209-226.
• Chuang, A., Shen, C. T., & Judge, T. A. (2016). Development of a multidimensional instrument of person–environment fit: The Perceived Person–Environment Fit Scale (PPEFS). Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65(1), 66-98.
• Demir, M., Demir, S. S., & Nield, K. (2015). The relationship between person-organization fit, organizational identification and work outcomes. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(2), 369-386.
• DeRue, D.S., & Hollenbeck, J.R. (2007). The search for internal and external fit in teams. In C. Ostroff, & T.A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 259–285). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28-67). Oxford University Press
• Edwards, J. R., & Shipp, A. J. (2007). The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 209-258). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. John Wiley & Sons.
• Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 1026- 1048.
• Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 988-1010.
• Eryilmaz, A., & Dogan, T. (2012). Subjective well-being at work: Investigating of psychometric properties of Utrecht work engagement scale. Turkish Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 15(1), 49-55.
• Goncu, A. (2006). Motivational processes involved in the relationship between leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Koç Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389-399.
• House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321-339.
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Leadership, culture and organizations: The Globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Huang, M. P., Cheng, B. S., & Chou, L. F. (2005). Fitting in organizational values: The mediating role of person‐organization fit between CEO charismatic leadership and employee outcomes. International Journal of Manpower, 26(1), 35-49.
• Je, M. J., & Kim, Y. G. (2010). Effects of person-organization fit and person-job fit on occupational commitment, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions of cooks. Culinary Science and Hospitality Research, 16(5), 50-63.
• Jui-Chen, P., Yin-Ling, L., & Mei-Man, T. (2014). Person–organization fit and turnover intention: Exploring the mediating effect of work engagement and the moderating effect of demand–ability fit. Journal of Nursing Research, 22(1), 1-11.
• Kim, M.S., Kim, S.Y., & Shin, Y. (2010). Effects of gender similarity on relationships between person–group value fit and work attitudes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14(1), 1–14.
• Krishnan, D. S. G., Wesley, D. J., & Bhaskaran, R. (2017). Perceived person-environment fit and employees’ turnover intention. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 6(8), 5218–5224.
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person–organization, person-group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., Seong, J. Y., Degeest, D. S., Park, W. W., & Hong, D. S. (2014). Retracted: Collective fit perceptions: A multilevel investigation of person–group fit with individual-level and team-level outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 969-989.
• Lamm, M. S., Shaw, G. E., Kuyumcu, D., & Dahling, J. (2010). The effect of person-organization fit on the display of organizational-citizenship behaviors. TCNJ Journal of Student Scholarship, 12, 1-8.
• Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454-470.
• Lee, Y. T., & Ramaswami, A. (2013). Fitting person-environment fit theories into a national cultural context. In A.L. Kristof-Brown & J. Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: key issues and new directions (pp. 222-240). JohnWiley & Sons.
• Leng, G. E., & Chin, M. L. C. (2016). Person-job fit, personality, organizational commitment and intention to stay among employees in marketing departments. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 30(1), 80-89.
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.). Harper & Brothers.
• Li, C. K., & Hung, C. H. (2010). An examination of the mediating role of person-job fit in relations between information literacy and work outcomes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(5), 306-318.
• Li, C. S., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Nielsen, J. D. (2019). Fitting in a group: Theoretical development and validation of the Multidimensional Perceived Person–Group Fit scale. Personnel Psychology, 72(1), 139-171.
• Liao, R., & Chuang, A. (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41–58.
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
• Liu, B., Liu, J., & Hu, J. (2010). Person-organization fit, job satisfaction, and turnover intention: An empirical study in the Chinese public sector. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(5), 615-625.
• Lu, C. Q., Wang, H. J., Lu, J. J., Du, D. Y., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Does work engagement increase person–job fit? The role of job crafting and job insecurity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(2), 142-152.
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
• Marstand, A. F., Martin, R., & Epitropaki, O. (2017). Complementary person-supervisor fit: An investigation of supplies-values (SV) fit, leader-member exchange (LMX) and work outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 418-437.
• Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268-277.
• Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., McKee, D. O., & McMurrian, R. (1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. The Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 85-98.
• Nyarko-Sampson, E., Amponsah, M. O., & Asamani, L. (2019). Person-environment fit and turnover intentions of senior high school teachers in Ghana. International Journal of Education & Psychology in the Community, 9(1&2), 149-172.
• Ostroff, C., Shin, Y., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Multiple perspectives of congruence: Relationships between value congruence and employee attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 591-623.
• O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
• Özalp Türetgen, I. (2020). Örgütsel psikoloji bakiş açisiyla iş stresi: İş Stresi Bataryası - örgütsel değişken ölçüm araçlari. Ankara: Nobel.
• Parkes, L., Bochner, S., & Schneider, S. (2001). Person–organisation fit across cultures: An empirical investigation of individualism and collectivism. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 81-108.
• Peng, J. C., & Chiu, S. F. (2010). An integrative model linking feedback environment and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(6), 582-607.
• Peng, Y., & Mao, C. (2015). The impact of person–job fit on job satisfaction: the mediator role of self efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 805-813.
• Piasentin, K. A., & Chapman, D. S. (2006). Subjective person–organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 202-221.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
• Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. JAI Press.
• Rietveld, L. (2015). Exploring the future development in employee involvement: Person-environment fit and the future of job crafting [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Twente.
• Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. (2002). How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1120-1136.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
• Sekiguchi, T. (2004). Person-organization fit and person-job fit in employee selection: A review of the literature. Osaka Keidai Ronshu, 54(6), 179-196.
• Seong, J. Y., Kristof-Brown, A. L., Park, W. W., Hong, D. S., & Shin, Y. (2015). Person-group fit: Diversity antecedents, proximal outcomes, and performance at the group level. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1184-1213.
• Sertel Berk, H. O., Özalp Türetgen, I ., Unsal, P., & Basbug, G. (2010, March 29-31). Job Stress Battery: Scales of job control and occupational outcome variables [Poster presentation]. 9th Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, Rome, Italy.
• Sigri, U. & Gurbuz, S. (2014). Örgütsel davranış. İstanbul: Beta. Simsek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
• Stone, R. P., Leuty, M. E., Rayburn, R., & Wu, B. H. (2019). Person–environment fit at work: Relationships with workplace behaviours. Australian Journal of Career Development, 28(3), 234-244.
• Strauss, J. P., Barrick, M. R., & Connerley, M. L. (2001). An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 637-657.
• Sung, S. H., Seong, J. Y., & Kim, Y. G. (2020). Seeking sustainable development in teams: Towards improving team commitment through person-group fit. Sustainability, 12(15), 6033.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33– 47). Brooks/Cole.
• Tak, J. (2011). Relationships between various person–environment fit types and employee withdrawal behavior: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 315-320.
• Tatli, M., & Cakmak, A. F. (2019). Kişi-çevre uyumunun farklı kavramsal yaklaşımlar açısından çok düzeyli ölçümü; hemşirelerin uyum algıları ile çalışma tutum ve davranışları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(5), 2464-2488.
• Thomson, R., & Thomson, A. (2002). Managing people (3th ed.). Routledge.
• Ucler, C. (2018). Investigating the relations of psychological contract, organizational transparency and leader member exchange with employee performance behaviors [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Marmara University.
• Unsal, P., Özalp Türetgen, I., Sertel Berk, O., & Basbug, G. (2008, September 3-5). İşte stres! [Stress in the job] [Paper presentation]. 15th National Psychology Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473-489.
• Vondey, M. (2010). The relationships among servant leadership, organizational citizenship behavior, person-organization fit, and organizational identification. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1), 3-27.
• Werbel, J. D., & Johnson, D. J. (2001). The use of person–group fit for employment selection: A missing link in person–environment fit. Human Resources Management, 40(3), 227-240.
• Yang, J. F., Feng, C. C., & Feng, P. H. (2020). Linking ethical leadership to work engagement: the effects of person–group fit and person–job fit. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 17 (66), 682-691.
• Yilmaz, H. & Özalp Türetgen, İ. (2014, April 9-12). İş Stresi Bataryası'nın Genel İş Doyumu Ölçeği’nin revize edilmesi [The revision of General Job Satisfaction Questionnaire of the Job Stress Battery] [Paper presentation]. 18th National Psychology Congress, Bursa, Turkey.
• Yu, K. Y. T. (2016). Inter-relationships among different types of person–environment fit and job satisfaction. Applied Psychology, 65(1), 38-65.
• Zhang, J. C., Ling, W. Q., Zhang, Z. Y., & Xie, J. (2015). Organizational commitment, work engagement, person–supervisor fit, and turnover intention: A total effect moderation model. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(10), 1657-1666.