FARKLI GELİR GRUPLARINDAKİ ÜLKELERİN KÜRESEL REKABET VE İNSANİ KALKINMA BAKIMINDAN VERİ ZARFLAMA ANALİZİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 52, 315 - 339, 24.07.2019

Mevlüdiye Şimşek , Gözde Koca , Nakşıdil Alparslan

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.594961

Öz

Küreselleşme
ve küresel rekabetin ön plana çıktığı çağımızda, küresel rekabet gücünün insani
kalkınma seviyesine yeterince yansıtılıp yansıtılamadığı sorusu sorgulanması
gereken önemli konulardan biridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ülkelerin üç ayrı gelir
grubuna (yüksek gelirli, üst-orta gelirli ve alt-orta gelirli) göre küresel
rekabet güçlerini, insani kalkınma düzeyine yansıtma konusundaki göreli etkinliklerini
Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ile belirlemektir. Bu çerçevede, yüksek gelirli
ülkeler grubunda 50 ülkenin, üst-orta gelirli ülkeler grubunda 33 ülkenin ve
alt-orta gelirli ülkeler grubunda 29 ülkenin verileri kullanılmıştır. Söz
konusu ülkelerin 2016 yıllına ait temel gereklilikler (Girdi 1 - G1), verimlilik artırıcı faktörler (Girdi 2 - G2), inovasyon ve çeşitlilik faktörleri (Girdi 3 - G3)
girdi olarak; kişi başına düşen milli gelir (GNI) (Çıktı 1 - Ç1), doğuşta beklenen yaşam süresi (Çıktı 2
- Ç2), beklenen
okullaşma süresi (Çıktı
3 - Ç3) ve ortalama
okullaşma süresi (Çıktı
4 - Ç4) çıktı olarak kullanılmıştır. Sonuçta ortalama etkinlik değerlerine
bakıldığında yüksek gelir grubunda bulunan ülkelerin diğer gelir gruplarında
yer alan ülkelere göre daha yüksek ortalamaya sahip olduğu ve etkin çıkan
ülkelerin küresel rekabet gücünü insani kalkınma seviyesine yansıtabilme
anlamında performanslarının her etkin ülkenin kendi gelir grubu içerisinde iyi
olduğu saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Veri Zarflama Analizi, Etkinlik, Küresel Rekabet, İnsani Kalkınma

Kaynakça

• Altun, D. (2006). Türk Telekomünikasyon A.Ş. İl Telekom Müdürlüklerinin Etkinlik Ölçümü. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Anand, S. & Sen, A. (1994). Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper, 12, 1-19.
• Arslan, N. & Tatlıdil, H. (2012). Defining and measuring competitiveness: A comparative analysis of Turkey with 11 potential rivals. International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 12(2), 31-43.
• Banker, R. D. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
• Barro, R. J. (2002). Quantity and quality of economic growth. Central Bank of Chile Working Papers, 168,135-162.
• Behdioğlu, S. & Özcan, G. (2009). Veri zarflama analizi ve bankacılık sektöründe bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 301-326.
• Amar, M. B. & Hamdi, M. T. (2012). Global competitiveness and economic growth: Empirical verification for African countries. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(6), 125-131.
• Bendeliani, N. (2012). Beyond the human development index: Assessing the human development in Georgia through international indices and rankings. Center for Social Sciences Education and Development Programme, 1-15.
• Benzaquen, J., del Carpio, L.A., Zegarra, L. A. &Valdivia, C. A. (2010). A Competitiveness Index for the regions of a country. Cepal Review, 102(December), 67-84.
• Chansarn, S. (2014). The evaluation of the sustainable human development: A cross-country analysis employing slack-based DEA. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 3-11.
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
• Çağlar, A. & Keten, N. D. (2018). İllerin insani gelişme endeksinin veri zarflama analizi ile ölçülmesi. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 18(4), 565-578.
• Dash, B. B. & Mukherjee, S. (2013). Does political competition influence human development? Evidence from the Indian states. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy New Delhi, 118, 1-25.
• DFID. (2008). Growth building jobs and prosperity in developing countries. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/growth-policy-paper.pdf..
• Haque, I. U. (1995). Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness (EDI Development Studies). World Bank, Washington.
• Human Development Data. (2017). http://hdr.undp.org/en/data/ sitesinden alındı. Erişim Tarihi: 23.03.2019.
• Khodabakhshi, A. (2011). Relationship between GDP and human development indices in India. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2(3), 251-253.
• Lazar, M. & Lazar, C. (2011). Human development in Romania in the context of the new methodological approaches. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, I, 41-150.
• Majerová, I. (2012). Comparison of old and new methodology in human development and poverty indexes: A case of the least developed countries. Journal of Economics Studies and Research, 1-25.
• Marginean, S. (2006). Competitiveness: From microeconomic foundations to national determinants. Studies in Business and Economics, 1(1), 29-35.
• Miningou, E.W. & Vierstraete, V.(2010). Efficiency of human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. GREDI Working Paper, 1-39.
• Mukherjee, S. & Chakraborty,D. (2010). Is there any relationship between economic growth and human development? Evidence from Indian States, MPRA Working Paper, 22997, 1-29.
• Ogrean, C. & Herciu, M. (2009). Globalization and the dynamics of competitiveness - A multilevel bibliographical study, Studies in Business and Economics, 5(1), 126-138.
• Oral, M. & Chabchoub, H. (1996). On the methodology of the world competitiveness report. European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), 514-535.
• Popkova, E.G, Shakhovskaya, L.S. & Mirtakhovich, T. N. (2010). New quality of economic growth. The International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 5(1), 75-88.
• Porter, M.E. (2004). Building the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index. The Global Competitiveness Report (2002-2003), 51-81.
• Ranis, G. (2004). Human development and economic growth. Yale University: Economic Growth Center, 887, 13.
• Ranis, G., Stewart, F. & Ramirez, A. (2000). Economic growth and human development. World Development, 28(2), 97-219.
• Razmi, M.J. & Yavari, Z. (2012). Reviewing the effect of trade openness on human development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(5), 970-978.
• Sabi, M. (2007). Globalization and human development. International Conference on Globalization and Its Discontents, Cortland, 102-119.
• Sala-ı-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M.D., Geiger, T., Mia, I. & Paua, F. (2007). The global competitiveness index: Measuring the productive potential of nations. The Global Competitiveness Report (2007-2008), 3-50.
• Salvatore, D. (2010). Globalisation, international competitiveness and growth: Advanced and emerging markets large and small countries. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 1(1), 21-31.
• Smit, A. J. (2010). The competitive advantage of nations: Is Porter’s diamond framework a new theory that explains the international competitiveness of countries?. Southern African Business Review, 14(1), 105-130.
• Şener, S. & Sarıdoğan, E. (2011). The effects of science-technology-innovation on competitiveness and economic growth. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 815–828.
• Tarım, A. (2001). Veri Zarflama Analizi: Matematiksel Programlama Tabanlı Göreli Etkinlik Ölçümü Yaklaşımı. Sayıştay Yayın İşleri Müdürlüğü, Araştırma/İnceleme/Çeviri Dizisi, 15, 5-40
• Todaro, Michael P. (1992). Human development report. Population and Development Review, 18(2), 359-363.
• Tokuyama, C. & Pillarisetti, J. R. (2006). Measuring human wellbeing and advancing sustainable development: How credible are the UNDP's human development reports?
• Monash University Dpartment of Economics Discussion Paper, 1-17
• Ulucan, A. (2000). Şirket performanslarının ölçülmesinde veri zarflama analizi yaklaşımı: Genel ve sektörel bazda değerlendirmeler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 405-418.
• Ülengin, F., Kabak, Ö., Önsel, S. & Parker, B.R. (2011). The competitiveness of nations and Implications for human development. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(1), 16-27.
• Schwab, K. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report (2016-2017). WEF/2018, 1-393.
• Vakhal, P. (2013). The development of Hungarian competitiveness on the basis of the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index: Cause-and-effect relationships. 1-4.
• Vierstraete, V. (2010). Efficiency in human development: Adata envelopment analysis. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 9(3), 425-443.
• Wysokińska, Z. (2003). Competitiveness and its relationships with productivity and sustainable development. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe, 11(3), 11-14.
• World Competitiveness Indicators. (2017). World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR20162017/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport20162017_FINAL.pdf / Erişim Tarihi: 23.03.2019.