ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK VE LİDER ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI İLE İLİŞKİSİ VE GÜVENİN ROLÜ

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 25, 43 - 58, 10.01.2006

Deniz Börü Begüm Güneşer

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.677328

Cited By: 3

Öz

Çalışan ile işveren arasında bir alış-veriş ilişkisinin bulunduğunu ve bireylerin daha fazla kar elde etmek için diğer bireylerle ilişki kurduğunu vurgulayan sosyal etkileşim teorisinden hareketle, son yıllarda özellikle iki tür etkileşim üzerinde durulmaktadır. Bunlar çalışanın organizasyonu ve lideri ile yaşadığı etkileşimlerdir. Bu noktadan hareketle, bu çalışmada da algılanan örgütsel destek ve lider-üye etkileşimi ele alınarak örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiş ve bu ilişki içerisinde örgütsel güvenin rolü araştırılmıştır. Araştırmaya 141 çalışan katılmıştır. Sonuçlar, hem lider-üye etkileşiminin hem de algılanan örgütsel desteğinin örgütsel güven faktörlerinden çalışan katılımına destek ve örgüt politikalarında adalet faktörlerini bu faktörlerin de örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı faktörlerinden katılım ve sadakat faktörlerini etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algılanan Örgütsel Destek, Lider-Üye Etkileşimi, Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı

Kaynakça

• [1] Gould, S. (1979). An equity-exchange model of organizational involvement. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 53-62.
• [2] Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(4), 370-390.
• [3] Meyer, J.P. & Ailen, N.J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• [4] Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
• [5] Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 165-167.
• [6] Foa, E.B. & Foa, U.G. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfıeld, İL: Charles C. Thomas.
• [7] Orpen, Christopher. (1994). The effects of exchange ıdeology on the relationship between perceıved organizational support and job performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 134 (3), 407-408.
• [8] Eisenberger, R.; Huntington, R.; Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71,500-507.
• [9] Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literatüre. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
• [10] Graen, G.B. & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208. 11
• [11] Dansereau, F.; Graen, G. & Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14,46-78.
• [12] Graen, G. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. (Ed.: Dunnette, M. D.). The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. 1201-1245. Chicago: Rand McNally.
• [13] Schriesheim, C.A.; Castro, S. L. & Cogliser, C.C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data- analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 63-114.
• [14] Allinson, C.W.; Armstrong, S.J. & Hayes, J. (2001). The effects of cognitive style on leader-member exchange: A study of manager-subordınate dyads. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 74(2), 201 - 220.
• [15] Liden, R.C. & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad İinkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465.
• [16] Wayne, S.J.; Shore, L.M., & Liden, R.C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
• [17] Gerstner, C.R. & Day, D.V. (1997). Meta-analytic reviews of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 827- 844.
• [18] Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
• [19] Deluga, R.J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader- member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 67(4), 315-327.
• [20] Organ, D.W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. (Eds.: Staw, B.M. & Cummings, L.L.). Research in organizational behavior, 12, 43-72.
• [21] Konovsky, M.A. & Pugh, S.D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656- 669.
• [22] Morrison, E.W. (1996), Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Critical Link Betvveen HRM Practices and Service Quality. Human Resources Management, 35(4), 493-512.
• [23] Shore, L.M. & Wayne, S.J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 774-780.
• [24] Eisenberger, R.; Fasolo, P. & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
• [25] Manogran, P.; Stauffer, J. & Conlon, E. J. (1994). Leader- member exchange as a key mediating variable between employees perception of fairness and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 249-267.
• [26] Hackett, R.D.; Farh, J.L.; Song, L.J. & Lapierre, L.M. (2003). LMX and organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the links within and across Western and Chinese samples. (Ed.: Graen, G.). Dealing with diversity: LMX leadership—The series, 1: 219-263. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
• [27] Lewicki, R.J. & Bunker, B.B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. (Eds.: Kramer, R. & Tyler, T.). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. 114-135. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• [28] Hosmer, L.T. (1995). Trust: The Connecting Link Betvveen Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
• [29] Misztal, B.M. (1996). Trust in modern societies. United Kingdom: Polity Press.
• [30] Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
• [31] Brower, H.H.; Schoorman, F.D. & Tan, H.H.. (2000). A model of relational leadership: the integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 227-250.
• [32] Rousseau, D. M., & McLean Parks, J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. (Eds.: Cummings, L. & Staw, B.). Research in organizational behavior, 15, 1-43.
• [33] Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Moorman, R.H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
• [34] Whitener, E.M. (2001). Do "high commitment" human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross- level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515-535.
• [35] Daboval, J.; Comish, R.; Swindle, B. & Gaster, W. A Trust Inventory For Small Businesses. http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/ssbia/1994/pdf/04.pdf. [09.08.2005].
• [36] Kamer, M. (2001). Örgüte Güven, Örgüte Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışlarına Etkileri. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Örgütsel Davranış Bilim Dalı, Yüksek lisans Tezi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi.
• [37] Liden R.C. & Maslyn J.M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange. An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
• [37] Erdoğan, B.; Kraimer, M.L. & Liden, R.C. (2004). Work value congruence and intrinsic career success: The compensatory roles of leader-member Exchange and perceived organizational support. Personel Psychology, 57(2), 305-332.
• [38] Van Dyne, L.; Graham, J.W. & Dienesch, R.M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefînition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765-802.