TÜRKİYE VE KKTC TÜKETİCİLERİNİN DEMOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLER AÇISINDAN ETNOSENTRİZM DÜZEYLERİNİN İNCELENMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR KARŞILAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29, 147 - 157, 10.01.2008

Ceyda Aysuna , Oylum Korkut Altuna

Öz

Tüketici davranışları, pazarlama literatüründe daima ilgi çeken ve araştırılan bir alandır. Pazarlamanın dinamik yapısının bir sonucu olarak bu geniş alanda da, sürekli yeni kavramlar gelişmekte ve araştırmacıların dikkatlerini çekmektedir. Son zamanlarda özellikle Avrupa ve Amerika’da ilgi gören bu yeni kavramlardan biri de “tüketici etnosentrizmi”dir. 90’lı yılların başlarında literatüre girmesine rağmen çok kısa bir zamanda tüketici etnosentrizmi farklı açılardan pek çok araştırmaya konu olmayı başarmıştır. Ancak Türkiye’de bu kavramın yurt dışındaki kadar çabuk beııimsenemediği ve yapılan çalışmaların sınırlı sayıda olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, literatüre bu bağlamda katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.
Çalışmada ilk olarak etnosentrizmi, tüketici etnosentrizmi ve tüketici etnosentrizminin ölçülmesi kavramları İncelenmektedir. Metodoloji bölümünde ise Türkiye, daha önce bu konuda hiçbir çalışma yapılmamış olan Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti ile tüketici etnosentrizmi düzeyleri ve demografik değişkenlerin bu düzeyler üzerindeki etkilerinin benzer olup olmaması açısından karşılaştırılmaktadır. Tüketici etnosentrizm düzeyinin ölçülmesinde ise pek çok araştırmada geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği ispat edilmiş olan CETSCALE kullanılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tüketici Davranışı, CETSCALE, Etnosentrizm, Tüketici Etnosentrizmi

Kaynakça

• [1] Klopf, D.W. (1995). Intercuİtural Encounters: The Furıdamentals of Intercultural Communications Third Edition. Englewood, CO: Morton.
• [2] Sumner, W.G. (1906). Folkways: A Study of The Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores and Morals. Boston: Ginn and Company.
• [3] Adomo, T.W. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
• [4] Shimp, T.A. (1984). Counsumer Ethnocentrism: The Concept and Preliminary Emprical Test. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1)285-290.
• [5] Cateora, P. (2000). International Marketing. Burr Ridge Richard D. Irwin,
• [6] Shimp, T.A. & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the Cetscale. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280-289.
• [7] Netemeyer, R.G.; Durvasula, S. & Lichtenstein, D.R. (1991). A-Cross National Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the Cetscale. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 320-327.
• [8] Caruana, A. (1996). The Effects of Dogmatism and Social Class Variables on Consumer Ethnocentrism in Malta Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14(4), 39—44.
• [9] Durvasula, S. & Andrevvs, J.C. & Netemeyer, R.G. (1997). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Consumer Ethnocentrism in the United States and Russia. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 73-91.
• [10] Steenkamp, J.B. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assesing Measurement Invariance In Cross - National Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-90.
• [11] Klein, J.G.; Ettenson, R. & Morris, M.D. (1998). The Animosity Model of Foreign Products Purchase: An Emprical Test in the People’s Republic of China Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89-100.
• [12] Martinez, T.L.; Zapata, J.I. & Garcio, S.B. (2000). Consumer Ethnocentrism Measurement: An Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the Cetscale in Spain. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1353-1373.
• [13] Lindquist, J.D.; Vida, I.; Plank, R.E. & Fairhurst, A. (2001). The Modified Cetscale: Validity Tests in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. International Business Review, 10(5), 505-516.
• [14] Douglas, S.P. & Nijssen, E.J. (2003). On The Use of “Borrovved” Scales in Cross-National Research, A Cautionary Note. International Marketing Review, 20(6), 621-643.
• [15] Saffu, K. & Walker, J.H. (2005). An Assesment of the Consumer Ethnocentric Scale (Cetscale) in An Advanced and Transitional Country: The Case of Canada and Russia. International Journal of Management, 22(4), 556-571.
• [16] Kaynak, E. & Kara, A. (2002). Consumer Perceptions of Foreign Products: An Analysis of Product Country Images and Ethnocentrism. European Journal of Marketing, 36(7- 8), 928-949.
• [17] Sharma, S.; Shimp, T.A. & Shin, J. (1995). Consumer Ethnocentrism: A Test of Antecedents and Moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1) 26-37
• [18] Javalgi, R.G.; Khare, V.P.; Gross, A.C. & Scherer, R.p. (2005). An Application of the Consumer Ethnocentrism Model to French Consumers. International Business Review, 14(3), 325-344.
• [19] Conrad, C.; Chakrabarty, S. & Brown, G. (1997). Social Desirability and Consumer Ethnocentric Tendencies. Southwestern Marketing Association Proceedings, March 182-185.
• [20] Granzin, K.L. & Painter, J.J. (2001). Motivational Influences on “Buy Domestic” Purchasing: Marketing Implications from A Study of Two Nations. Journal of International Marketing, 9(2), 73-94.
• [21] Balabanis, G. & Diamantopoulos, A. (2004). Domestic Country Bias, COO Effects and Consumer Ethnocentrism: A Multidimensional Unfolding Approach. Journal of The Academy of The Marketing Science, 32(1), 80-95.
• [22] Yu, J.H. & Albaum, G. (2002). Sovereigty Change Influences on Consumer Ethnocentrism and Product Preferences: Hong Kong Revisited One Year Later. Journal of Business Research, 55(11), 891-899.
• [23] Reardon, I; Miller, C.; Vida, I. & Kim, I. (2005). The Effects of Ethnocentrism and Economic Development on the Formation of Brand and Ad Attitudes in Transitional Economies. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7-8), 737- 754.
• [24] Good, L.K. & Huddleston, P. (1995). Ethnocentrism of Polish and Russian Consumers: Are Feelings and Intentions Related. International Marketing Review, 12(5), 35-48.
• [25] Witkowski, T.H. (1998). Consumer Ethnocentrism in Two Emerging Markets: Determinants and Predictive Validity. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1) 258-263.
• [26] Vida, I. & Fairhurst, A. (1999). Factors Inderlying the Phenomenon of Consumer Ethnocentricity: Evidence From Four European Countries. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 9(4), 321-337.
• [27] Lindquist, J.D.; Vida, I.; Plank, R.E. & Fairhurst, A. (2001). The Modified Cetscale: Validity Tests in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. International Business Review, 10(5), 505-516.
• [28] Shimp, T.A. & Sharma, .S. (1987). Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the Cetscale. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (3), 280-289.
• [29] Shimp, T.A. & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the Cetscale. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280-289.
• [30] Douglas, S.P. & Nijssen, E.J. (2003). On The Use of “Borrowed” Scales in Cross-National Research, A Cautionary Note. International Marketing Review, 20(6), 621-643.
• [31] Netemeyer, R.G. & Durvasula, S. & Lichtenstein, D.R. (1991). A Cross-national Assessment of the Reliability and Validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 320-328.
• [32] Nielsen, J.A. & Spence, M.T. (1997). A Test of The Stability of the Cetscale, A Measure of Consumers’ Ethnocentric Tendencies. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5(4), 68-77.
• [33] Durvasula, S.; Andrevvs, J.C. & Netemeyer, R.G. (1997). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Consumer Ethnocentrism in the United States and Russia. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 73—91.