Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DOCTORAL QUALIFICATIONS IN RELATION TO PROFESSIONAL CAREERS

Yıl 2001, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 16, 61 - 67, 13.01.2001
https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.727420

Öz

Doctoral degrees were, for many years, primarily subject specifıc, but this changed following the introduction of the PhD as a research-based qualifıcation early in the 20 th century. For most of the last fıfty years the doctorate degree has been virtually synonymous with the PhD (except for the specifıc case of the MD degree).
Since 1991 there has been a rapid growth in the UK of Professional Doctorates, which have returned to the model of subject specifıc titles, such as Deng, and EdD. These doctorates differ in a number of reşpects from the traditional PhD, and this has led to a number of tensions in UK universities.
The most signifıcant differences are that a greater proportion of the professional doctorate is taught and that the subject matter covered by the professional doctorate includes a considerable emphasis on discipline-related professional practice as well as on the content of the discipline. In some cases professional doctorates serve a dual purpose, acting as a professional qualifıcation as vvell as leading to a doctoral degree.
This paper examines the differences between PhDs and Professional Doctorates, and considers how these are likely to develop över the next few years, reflecting the changing nature of the relationship between universities and employers.
Comparisons are also drawn wıth practice in other European countries, since there is considerable diversity of practice in the area of doctoral degrees.

Kaynakça

  • Boumer T., Bovvden, R. & Laing S. (2000), The Adoption of Professional Doctorates in English Universities:Why Here? Why Now? Professional Doctorates 3 rd International Conference, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia, September 2000.
  • Harris M. (1996) Report of the HEFCE,CVCP,SCOP Review of Postgraduate Education. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol, 1996.
  • EPSRC (1997) Review of the EPSRC Engineering Doctorate Pilot Scheme, EPSRC, Swindon UK October 1997.
  • QAA (2001) The framework for higher education qualifıcations in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - January 2001. Quality Assurance Agerıcy for Higher Education, Gloucester. http://www.qaa.uk/cmtwork/nqf/ewni2001/contents.htm
  • SERC (1991) The Engineering Doctorate: An SERC Working Party Report, SERC Publications, SERC Swindon UK, 1991

DOCTORAL QUALIFICATIONS IN RELATION TO PROFESSIONAL CAREERS

Yıl 2001, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 16, 61 - 67, 13.01.2001
https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.727420

Öz

Doctoral degrees were, for many years, primarily subject specifıc, but this changed following the introduction of the PhD as a research-based qualifıcation early in the 20 th century. For most of the last fıfty years the doctorate degree has been virtually synonymous with the PhD (except for the specifıc case of the MD degree).
Since 1991 there has been a rapid growth in the UK of Professional Doctorates, which have returned to the model of subject specifıc titles, such as Deng, and EdD. These doctorates differ in a number of reşpects from the traditional PhD, and this has led to a number of tensions in UK universities.
The most signifıcant differences are that a greater proportion of the professional doctorate is taught and that the subject matter covered by the professional doctorate includes a considerable emphasis on discipline-related professional practice as well as on the content of the discipline. In some cases professional doctorates serve a dual purpose, acting as a professional qualifıcation as vvell as leading to a doctoral degree.
This paper examines the differences between PhDs and Professional Doctorates, and considers how these are likely to develop över the next few years, reflecting the changing nature of the relationship between universities and employers.
Comparisons are also drawn wıth practice in other European countries, since there is considerable diversity of practice in the area of doctoral degrees.

Kaynakça

  • Boumer T., Bovvden, R. & Laing S. (2000), The Adoption of Professional Doctorates in English Universities:Why Here? Why Now? Professional Doctorates 3 rd International Conference, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia, September 2000.
  • Harris M. (1996) Report of the HEFCE,CVCP,SCOP Review of Postgraduate Education. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol, 1996.
  • EPSRC (1997) Review of the EPSRC Engineering Doctorate Pilot Scheme, EPSRC, Swindon UK October 1997.
  • QAA (2001) The framework for higher education qualifıcations in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - January 2001. Quality Assurance Agerıcy for Higher Education, Gloucester. http://www.qaa.uk/cmtwork/nqf/ewni2001/contents.htm
  • SERC (1991) The Engineering Doctorate: An SERC Working Party Report, SERC Publications, SERC Swindon UK, 1991
Toplam 5 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Eski Sayılar
Yazarlar

Stephen Hoddell Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 13 Ocak 2001
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2001 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 16

Kaynak Göster

APA Hoddell, S. (2001). DOCTORAL QUALIFICATIONS IN RELATION TO PROFESSIONAL CAREERS. Öneri Dergisi, 4(16), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.727420

15795

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Öneri Dergisi

Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü

Göztepe Kampüsü Enstitüler Binası Kat:5 34722  Kadıköy/İstanbul

e-ISSN: 2147-5377