INVESTIGATION OF THE LIFE SATISFACTIONS OF FIRST AND FOURTH GRADE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 210 - 223, 01.09.2017

Sevda Polat

Öz

The purpose of the research is to analyse the
differences between the life satisfactions of first and fourth grade university
students and factors that affecting their life satisfactions. The studied group
consists of 90 first-year students and 67 fourth-year students. The research
has descriptive model and it is a cross-sectional study. The datas were
collected by ‘‘Student Information Form‘‘ and “Satisfaction with Life Scale’’.
In analysis of the datas; average, number, percentage, etc. were used in the
descriptive statistics and it has benefited from T Test, Mann Whitney U Test
and Chi Square Test in other the analyzes. The SWLS (Satisfaction with Life
Scale) average score of the students was found as 22,27 ± 6,22 in the first
classes and 21,14 ± 6,5 in the fourth class students and it was determined that
differences were not meaningful in statistical analysis between the two
averages. ( t=1.093 p>0.05). According to the parents’ attitudes of the
students who continue to first class, students who defined as ‘have democratic
attitudes’ have been seen to be obtain more higher averages when looking to the
SWLS score averages (p<0,05). According to the SWLS average scores of first
and fourth grade students, it was found that the students who do not feel lonely
themselves had a significantly higher SWLS score averages.

Anahtar Kelimeler

University Student; Life Satisfaction, Subjective Well-Being, Positive Psychology

ÜNİVERSİTE 1. VE 4. SINIFA DEVAM EDEN ÖĞRENCİLERİN YAŞAM DOYUMLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı, üniversite birinci ve dördüncü
sınıf öğrencilerinin yaşam doyumları arasındaki farklılığı ve yaşam doyumlarına
etki eden faktörleri incelemektir. Çalışma grubunu; 90 birinci sınıf öğrencisi
ve 67 dördüncü sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma, betimleyici desende
olup kesitsel bir araştırmadır. Veriler, “Öğrenci Bilgi Formu” ve “Yaşam Doyumu
Ölçeği (YDÖ)” ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı
istatistiklerde; ortalama, sayı, yüzde vb. ve diğer analizlerde t testi, Mann
Whitney U Testi ve Ki kare Testi kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin YDÖ puan
ortalaması 1. Sınıflarda 22,27±6,22, 4. Sınıflarda 21,14±6,5 olarak bulunmuştur
ve istatistiksel analizde iki ortalama arasındaki farkın anlamlı olmadığı belirlenmiştir
( t=1.093 p>0.05). 1. Sınıfa devam eden öğrencilerin anne baba tutumlarına
göre YDÖ puan ortalamalarına bakıldığında demokratik tutum olarak değerlendiren
öğrencilerin daha yüksek ortalamaya sahip olduğu görülmüştür (p<0,05) .
1.sınıf ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin YDÖ puan ortalamalarına göre kendini
yalnız hissetmeyen öğrencilerin YDÖ puan ortalamasının anlamlı düzeyde daha
yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Üniversite Öğrencisi; Yaşam Doyumu, Öznel İyi Oluş, Pozitif Psikoloji

Kaynakça

• Akyol A. (1993). Yaşam kalitesi ve yaklaşımları. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 9,75-7.
• Binay, B.A. (2005). Sosyal Destek, Sosyal Ağ, Yaşam Kalitesi ve Yaşam Doyumu: Duygu-Durum ve Anksiyete Bozukluğu Tanısı Alan Kişiler ve Düzenli Hemodiyaliz Tedavisi Gören Hastalar Açısından Bir Karşılaştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Mersin.
• Bradley, R. H. ve Corwyn, R. F. (2004). Life Satisfaction Among European American, African American, Chinese American, Mexican American, And Dominican American Adolescents. International Journal Of Behavioral Development, 28(5), 385-400.
• Chappel, A. M., Suldo, S. M., & Ogg, J. A. (2014). Associations between adolescents’ family stressors and life satisfaction. Journal of child and family Studies, 23(1), 76-84.
• Deniz, M. E. ve Yılmaz, E. (2004). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Duygusal Zekâ Yetenekleri ve Yaşam Doyumları Arasındaki İlişki, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Malatya.
• Dew, T. ve Huebner, E. S. (1994). Adolescents’ Perceived Quality Of Life: An Exploratory İnvestigation. Journal Of School Psychology, 32, 185–199.
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
• Diener, E. ve Suh, M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Diener, E., Suh, E, ve Oishi, M. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24,25-41.
• Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49,71-75.
• Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. Assessing well-being, 213-231.
• Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E. ve Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of Life-Satisfaction Over Time: Analysis of Change in Ranks in a National Population. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 177-205.
• Eid, M. ve Diener, E. (2004). Global Judgements of Subjective Well-Being: Situational Varibility and Long-Term Stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245-277.
• Gable, S. L. and Haidt, J. (2005). What (and Why) is Positive Psychology?. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 103-110.
• Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 293-301.
• Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. In Quality-of-Life Research on Children and Adolescents (pp. 3-33). Springer Netherlands.
• Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yaşam doyumu düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Leung, J. P. ve Leung, K. (1992). Life satisfaction, self-concept, and relationship with parents in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 653– 665.
• Lewinsohn, P., J. Redner ve J. Seeley. (1991). The Relationship Between Life Satisfaction Psychosocial Variables: New Perspectives F. Strack, M. Argyle ve N. Schwartz (ed.), Subjective Well-being (s. 141– 169). New York: Plenum Press.
• Luthans, F. and Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, Social, and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in People for Competitive Advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.
• Martin, K. M., Huebner, E. S. ve Valois, R. F. (2008). Does Life Satisfaction Predict Victimization Experiences in Adolescence?. Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), 705-714.
• Mcknight, C. Huebner, E. S. ve Suldo, S. M. (2002). Relationships Among Stressful Life Events, Temperament, Problem Behavior, And Global Life Satisfaction İn Adolescents. Psychol. Sch, 39, 677–687.
• Moller, V. (1996). Life satisfaction and expectations for the future in sample of university students: A research note. South African Journal of Sociology, 27 (1), 109-125.
• Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(5), 1333.
• Myers, D. G. ve Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy?, Psychological Science.6, 10-19.
• Neugarten, B. L., Havighurst, R. J. ve Tobin, S. S. (1961). The Measurement of Life Satisfaction. Journal of Gerentology, 16, 134-143.
• Ohkay, S. M. (2006). Sinir Dili Eğitimlerinin İstatistiksel Analizi-Örnek Olay Çalışması. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü,
• Özkul, A. S. (2007). Yaşam ve çalışma değerlerini etkileyen faktörler SDÜ öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma (Doctoral dissertation, Sosyal Bilimler).
• Özgür, G., Gümüş, A. B., & Durdu, B. (2010). Evde ve yurtta kalan üniversite öğrencilerinde yaşam doyumu. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 1(1), 25-32.
• Paolini, L., Yanez, A. P. ve Kelly, W. E. (2006). An examination of worry and life satisfaction among college students. Individual Differences Research, 4 (5), 331-339.
• Pavot, W. ve Diener, E. (1993). The Affective And Cognitive Context Of Self Reported Measures Of Subjective Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1-20.
• Peterson, C., Park, N. ve Seligman, M. E. P. (2005), Orientations to Happiness and Life Satisfaction: The Full Life Versus the Empaty Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25-41.
• Proctor, C., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2010). Very happy youths: Benefits of very high life satisfaction among adolescents. Social indicators research, 98(3), 519-532.
• Rojas, M. (2006). Life Satisfaction and Satisfaction in Domains of Life: Is It a Simple Relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467-497.
• Seligman, M. E. P. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology, American Psychologist. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
• Shek, D. T. L. (1999). Parenting characteristics and adolescent psychological well-being: A longitudinal study in a Chinese context. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 125 (1), 27-55.
• Staudinger, U. M., Fleeson, W. ve Baltes, P. B. (1999). Predictors of subjective physical health and global well-being: Similarities and differences between the United States and Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (2), 305-319.
• Suldo, S. M. ve Huebner, E. S. (2006). Is Extremely High Life Satisfaction During Adolescence Advantageous? Social Indicators Research, 78, 179-203.
• Suldo, S. M. ve Huebner, E. S. (2004). Does Life Satisfaction Moderate The Effects Of Stressful Life Events On Psychopathological Behavior During Adolescence? School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 93–105.
• Suldo, S., Thalji, A., & Ferron, J. (2011). Longitudinal academic outcomes predicted by early adolescents’ subjective well-being, psychopathology, and mental health status yielded from a dual factor model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 17-30.
• Tuzgöl Dost, M. (2006). Subjective well-being among university students. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 188-197.