THE IMPACT OF FAMILY OWNERSHIP ON COST STICKINESS: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA ISTANBUL

Öz

Cost stickiness, which has been recently discussed in academic research from various perspectives, is examined in the context of family firms in this study. Data from 202 Borsa Istanbul companies are analyzed for the period 2014 - 2023. The results indicate that although cost stickiness is present in the full sample, it is less pronounced in family firms. This can be attributed to less severe agency problems and lower likelihood of managers engaging in opportunistic behavior in family firms. The findings contribute to several strands of literature and provide implications for managers, investors and other stakeholders.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cost Stickiness
• Family Firms
• Borsa Istanbul

AİLE ŞİRKETİ OLMANIN MALİYET YAPIŞKANLIĞI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: BORSA İSTANBUL’DA BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

Son yıllarda akademik araştırmalara farklı açılardan konu olan maliyet yapışkanlığı, bu çalışma kapsamında sahiplik yapısının bir türü olan aile şirketi olup olmamak bağlamında ele alınmıştır. Borsa İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren 202 şirketin verileri 2014-2023 dönemi için incelenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında tüm şirketlerin dahil olduğu örneklem için maliyet yapışkanlığının var olduğunun bulgularla desteklenmesinin ardından, aile şirketlerinin maliyet yapışkanlığı düzeyinin daha az olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Bu durum aile şirketlerinde vekalet sorunun daha az yaşanması ve yöneticilerinin kendilerine menfaat sağlayacak davranışlarda daha az bulunmaları ile ilişkilendirilmektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları hem literatüre katkı sağlamakta hem de yöneticiler, yatırımcılar ve birçok taraf için anlamlı çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Maliyet Yapışkanlığı
• Aile Şirketleri
• Borsa İstanbul

Kaynakça

1. Abudy, M. M., & Shust, E. (2025). Cost behavior and profitability of family firms. Finance Research Letters, 108006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108006.
2. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095Digital Object Identifier (DOI) .
3. Atasel, O. Y., Şeker, Y., & Yıldırım, F. (2021). Sticky cost behavior: evidence from BRICS+ T countries. Ege Academic Review, 21(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.907413.
4. Balakrishnan, R., Petersen, M. J., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2004). Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of cost? Journal of Accounting, Auditing ve Finance, 19(3), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0401900303.
5. Balakrishnan, R. & Gruca, T.S. (2008), Cost Stickiness and Core Competency: A Note*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 993-1006. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.4.2
6. Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50846.
7. Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2011). Sticky cost behavior: theory and evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1659493.
8. Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001

9. Chen, S., Chen, X. I. A., & Cheng, Q. (2008). Do family firms provide more or less voluntary disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 499-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00288.
10. Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.
11. Costa, M. D., & Habib, A. (2023). Cost stickiness and firm value. Journal of Management Control, 34(2), 235-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-023-00356-z.
12. Dierynck, B., Landsman, W. R., & Renders, A. (2012). Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1219-1246. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50153.
13. European Commission (2025). Family business. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/smes/sme-fundamentals/family-business_en.
14. Franks, J., Mayer, C., Volpin, P., & Wagner, H. F. (2012). The life cycle of family ownership: International evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(6), 1675-1712. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr135.
15. Gnoth, C., Rapp, M. S., & Udoieva, J. (2025). Listed founding family firms and labor cost stickiness. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 64(2), 268-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12373.
16. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 653-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.593320.
17. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069338.
18. Guenther, T. W., Riehl, A., & Rößler, R. (2014). Cost stickiness: state of the art of research and implications. Journal of Management Control, 24(4), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0176-0.
19. Günay, F., & Koşan, L. (2020). Maliyet Yapışkanlığının Pay Getirisine Etkisi: Turizm Alt Sektörlerinde Bir Uygulama. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 13(3), 667-707. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.656764.
20. Horasan, E., Ağ, A., & Yılmaz, T. (2020). BİST İmalat sektöründe yer alan işletmelerde maliyet yapışkanlığının incelenmesi. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, (113), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.602728.
21. Ibrahim, A. E. A., Ali, H., & Aboelkheir, H. (2022). Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a future research agenda. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100439.
22. Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, M., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
23. Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of accounting research, 51(1), 201-224.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x.
24. Karabayır, M. E. (2019). Maliyet Yapışkanlığının Yeniden Gözden Geçirilmesi: Borsa İstanbul İmalat Sanayi Örneği. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 12(2), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.512534.
25. Kuang, Y. F., Mohan, A. & Qin, B., (2015). CEO Overconfidence and Cost Stickiness Management Control ve Accounting, (2), 26-32, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2603249.
26. Ma, L., Wang, X., & Zhang, C. (2021). Does religion shape corporate cost behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 835-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04377-4.
27. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2016). Family firms and practices of sustainability: A contingency view. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.09.001.
28. Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1997). The accuracy of proportional cost models: evidence from hospital service departments. Review of Accounting Studies, 2(1), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018325711417.
29. Örgün, G. S., & Aygün, M. (2024). Maliyet Yapışkanlığı ile Kâr Yönetimi ve Firma Karakteristikleri Arasındaki İlişki: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Sosyoekonomi, 32(60), 339-363. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.02.16.
30. Paksoy, Ö. B., & Şentürk, H. (2024). Maliyet Yapışkanlığının Panel Veri Analizi ile Test Edilmesi: BİST Taş ve Toprak Endeksi Örneği. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 700-722. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1464889.
31. Prabowo, R., Hooghiemstra, R., & Van Veen-Dirks, P. (2018). State ownership, socio-political factors, and labor cost stickiness. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 771-796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1329659.
32. Restuti, M. D., Gani, L., Shauki, E. R., & Leo, L. (2022). Does managerial ability lead to different cost stickiness behavior? Evidence from ASEAN countries. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10030048.
33. Schmid, T., Ampenberger, M., Kaserer, C., & Achleitner, A. (2008). Family firms, agency costs and risk aversion. Empirical evidence from diversification and hedging decisions. CEFS WP No. 2008-13. http://ssrn.com/abstract =1314823.
34. Siciliano, G., & Weiss, D. (2025). Family ownership influence on cost elasticity. European Accounting Review, 34(1), 307-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2023.2244016.
35. Weidenmier, M., & Subramaniam, C. (2003). Additional Evidence on the Sticky Behavior of Costs. Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=369941.
36. Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441.
37. Yükçü, S. & Özkaya, H. (2011). Cost behavior in Turkish firms: Are selling, general and administrative costs and total operating costs “sticky”? Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 13(3), 1-27.