Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Didem Baran Ergül; Ayşe Berika Varol Malkoçoğlu; Seden Acun Özgünler

doi:10.30785/mbud.1117910

EN TR

Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Etrafımızda gördüğümüz tüm yapılı çevre, bir tasarım ürünüdür. Bu noktadan hareketle, günümüzde, beklentilerin çeşitliliğine bağlı olarak, bilgi ve değer sistemlerinde yaşanan değişimlerin neticesinde yapılı çevrenin oluşturulması, giderek karmaşıklaşan bir tasarım sorunu haline gelmiştir. Mimarların geleneksel tasarım yaklaşımları kimi zaman bu tasarım sorunlarına çözüm bulmada yetersiz kalmakta, yeni tasarım yaklaşımlarına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu sebeple, çalışmada mimari tasarım sürecinde, geleneksel düşünceye ek olarak; veri, belge, bilgi ve iletişim modelleri kullanılarak problemleri tanımlayacak ve karar verme sürecinin tamamlanmasına yardımcı olacak bulanık mantık tabanlı karar destek sistemleri incelenmiştir. Buna ek olarak bulanık mantık tabanlı karar destek sistemlerinin geleneksel yöntemler ile karşılaştırılması, avantajlarının ve dezavantajlarının tartışılması gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Keywords

Mimari tasarım, bulanık mantık, karar destek makinesi

Thanks

Makalede ulusal ve uluslararası araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur. Çalışmada etik kurul izni gerekmemiştir.

References

Altaş, İ. H. (1999). Bulanık mantık: bulanıklılık kavramı. Enerji, Elektrik, Elektromekanik-3e, 62, 80-85. Erişim adresi: https://dijitalbasin.com/Read/387/3e-elektrotech-dergisi
Arabacıoğlu, B. C. (2010). Using fuzzy inference system for architectural space analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 10(3), 926-937. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.10.011
Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Baizhan, Li, B. ve Waskett, P. (1999). Analytical design planning technique: A model of the detailed building design process. Journal of Design Studies, 20(3):279-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00038-6
Ayağ, Z. ve Özdemir, R. G. (2009). A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 368-379, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2008.06.011
Ayağ, Z. (2005). A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE Transactions, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 827-842, doi:10.1080/07408170590969852.
Bansal, S., Biswas S. ve Singh S. (2017). Fuzzy decision approach for selection of most suitable construction method of green buildings. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 6, 122–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.005
Bayazıt, N. (2004). Endüstriyel Tasarımcılar İçin Tasarlama Kuramları ve Metotları, Birsen Yayınevi, İstanbul.
Behesti, M.R. ve Monroy, M. R. (1986). ADIS: Steps towards developing an architecture design ınformation system. Open House International, 11(2):38-45. Erişim adresi: https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/ohi
Beşikçi, E. B., Arslan, O., Turan, O. ve Ölçer, A. I. (2016). An artificial neural network based decision support system for energy efficient ship operations. Computers & Operations Research, 66, 393–401. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2015.04.004
Bozdemır, M. (2017). Yapay zekâ destekli bir tasarım işlem modelinin yapısı. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 1 (1), 1-8. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ij3dptdi/issue/33982/376173

Bozdemir, M. ve Mendi, F. (2013). Yapay zekâ destekli sistematik tasarım için bilgi yönetim sistem mimarisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (2). Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gazimmfd/issue/6664/88916
Chin, K.-S., Chan A. ve Yang J.-B. (2008). Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 633- 649, doi: 10.1007/s00170-006-0898-3
Chou, Y. C. ve Benjamin, C. O. (1992). An AI-based decision support system for naval ship design. Naval Engineers Journal, 104(3), 156–165. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559- 3584.1992.tb02235.x
Conrads, U. (1991). 20. Yüzyıl Mimarisinde Program ve Manifestolar, Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı
Cooper, R. ve Press, M. (1995). The Design Agenda: A Guide to Successful Design Management, John Wiley&Sons Ltd., Chichester
Cross, N. (2000). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 3. Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Çekmiş, A. (2016). Fuzzy logic in architectural site planning design. Procedia Computer Science. 102– 182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.386
Ciftcioglu, O. (2003). Design enhancement by fuzzy logic in architecture. In The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 79-84. IEEE. Doi: 10.1109/FUZZ.2003.1209341
Çiftçioğlu Ö. ve Sarıyıldız S. (1998). Integrated building design decision support with fuzzy logic. Transactions on Information and Communications Technologies, vol 20. Doi: 10.2495/AI980031
Das, S., Swetapadma, A. ve Panigrahi, C. (2019). A study on the application of artificial intelligence techniques for predicting the heating and cooling loads of buildings. Journal of Green Building, 14(3), 115-128. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.14.3.115
Demirarslan, D. (2006). İç Mekân Tasarımına Giriş. Kocaeli: Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınları
Ding, X. ve Liu, B. (2007). The utility of linguistic rules in opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 811-812). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1277741.1277921
Ediz, F. E. (2006). Mimari Yapısal Öğelerin Tasarımı İçin Bir Yöntem, Doktora Tezi, İTÜ, Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Esen, Ö. (1998). İşletme Yönetiminde Sistem Yaklaşımı, Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım, 56-60.
Fayek, A. (2020). Fuzzy logic and fuzzy hybrid techniques for construction engineering and management. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 146(7): 04020064. doi: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.
Gencel, O., Özel, C., Köksal, F. ve Martinez, G. (2013). Fuzzy logic model for prediction of properties of fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete. Materials Science (Medziagotyra). Vol. 19, No. 2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.19.2.4439
Gero, J. S. (1975). Architectural optimization – A Review, Engineering Optimization, 1(3):189-199. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03052157508960586
Goud, A., Mounika, K. ve Prakash, A. (2020). Fuzzy model development in green building material. selection. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, Volume-9 Issue- 1. DOI:10.35940/ijrte. B2045.059120
Güneş, H., Orta, E. ve Akdaş, D. (2016). Akıllı ev sistemlerinde kullanılan yapay zekâ teknikleri için yapay veri üretici geliştirilmesi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18 (2), 1- 11. DOI: 10.25092/baunfbed.280151
Huang, H.-Z., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Xue, L. ve Wang, Z. (2013). New evaluation methods for conceptual design selection using computational intelligence techniques, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 733-746, doi: 10.1007/s12206-013-0123-x.
Ireland, R. ve Liu, A. (2018). Application of data analytics for product design: Sentiment analysis of online product reviews. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 23, 128-144. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.06.003
İzgi, U. (1999). Mimarlıkta Süreç, Kavramlar-İlişkiler 1. baskı, Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, İstanbul, Cilt 201,199-200
Jaihar, J., Lingayat, N., Vijaybhai, P. S., Venkatesh, G. ve Upla, K. P. (2020). Smart home automation using machine learning algorithms. In 2020 International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. Doi: 10.1109/INCET49848.2020.9154007
Jin, J., Ji, P. ve Gu, R. (2016). Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 49, 61- 73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.12.005
Jones, J. C. (1980). Design Methods, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York
Kang, X. (2020). Aesthetic product design combining with rough set theory and fuzzy quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 39, pp. 1131-1146, doi: 10.3233/JIFS-192032
Kang, X., Yang, M., Wu, Y. ve Ni, B. (2018). Integrating evaluation grid method and fuzzy quality function deployment to new product development. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2451470
Kazanasmaz, Z. T. ve Tayfur, G. (2010). Hasta bakım ünitelerinin tasarım verimliliklerinin bulanık mantık modeli bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Megaron. Erişim adresi: https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TVRFNU56QXdNQT09
Keen, P. G. W. (1978). Decision support systems: an organizational perspective. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. ISBN 0-201-03667-3.
Keshteli, R. N. ve Davoodvandi, E. (2017). Using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS in fuzzy QFD: a case study in ceramic and tile industry of Iran. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 20(2), 197-216. Erişim adresi: https://www.inderscienceonline.com /doi/abs/10.1504/IJPQM.2017.081480
Keskenler, M. F. ve Keskenler, E. F. (2017). Bulanık Mantığın Tarihi Gelişimi. Takvim-i Vekayi, 5 (1) , 1-10 . Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/takvim/issue/33455/371973
Koçak, B., Koçak, Y. ve Yücedağ, İ. (2020). Prediction of flexural strength of portland–composite cement mortars substituting metakaolin using fuzzy logic. Düzce University Journal of Science & Technology, 8 2377-2387. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.798315
Larsen, P. M. (1980). Industrial applications of fuzzy logic control. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 12(1), 3-10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(80)80050-2
Lawson, B. (2006). How Designer Think, Fourth Edition, First Published 1980, Architectural Press, Oxford.
Leracitano, C., Mammone, N., Versaci, M., Varone, G., Ali, A. R., Armentano, A., ... ve Morabito, F. C. (2022). A Fuzzy-enhanced deep learning approach for early detection of covid-19 pneumonia from portable chest x-ray ımages. Neurocomputing. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.neucom.2022.01.055
Ma J., Kremer, G. E. O. ve Ray, C. D. (2018). A comprehensive end-of-life strategy decision making approach to handle uncertainty in the product design stage. Research in Engineering Design, vol. 29, pp. 469-487, doi: 10.1007/s00163-017-0277-0
Makropoulos, C. K., Butler, D. ve Maksimovic, C. (2003). Fuzzy logic spatial decision support system for urban water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(1), 69-77. Erişim adresi: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:1(69)
Malekly H., Meysam Mousavi S. ve Hashemi H., (2010). A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 4910- 4920, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.024
Mamdani, E. H. ve Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
Marinos, P. N. (1969). Fuzzy logic and its application to switching systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 100(4), 343-348. Doi: 10.1109/T-C.1969.222662
Megawaty, M. ve Ulfa, M. (2020). Decision support system methods: A review. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 2(1), 192-201. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33557/journalisi.v2i1.63
Mehta, R. (2021). Optimal design and modeling of sustainable buildings based on multivariate fuzzy logic. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 195-206. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160120
Mohebbi, A., Achiche, S. ve Baron, L. (2018). Multicriteria fuzzy decision support for conceptual evaluation in design of mechatronic systems: a quadrotor design case study. Research in Engineering Design, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 329-349, doi: 10.1007/s00163-018-0287-6
Moor, J. (2006). The dartmouth college artificial ıntelligence conference: The next fifty years, AI Magazine, Vol 27, No., 4, Pp. 87-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1911
Mueller, C. T. & Ochsendorf, J. A. (2015). Combining structural performance and designer preferences in evolutionary design space exploration. Automation in Construction, 52, 70-82. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.011
Nimri, R., Battelino, T., Laffel, L. M. …..et al. (2020). Insulin dose optimization using an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system in youths with type 1 diabetes. Nat Med. 26, 1380–1384 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1045-7
Özbey, S., Koluman, A. ve Tokat, S. Estimation of infection risk using symptoms of COVID-19: an approach based on fuzzy expert system. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies, 2(3), 92-102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.51753/flsrt.1010253
Özyılmaz Küçükyağcı, P. ve Ocakçı, M. (2019). Bulanık mantık yönteminin kentsel alan çalışmalarında kullanımı. Kent Akademisi, 12 (2), 299-308. DOI: 10.35674/kent.572209
Palabıyık, S. ve Çolakoğlu, B. (2012). Mimari tasarım sürecinde son ürünün değerlendirilmesi: Bir bulanık karar verme modeli.
Pamucar, D. (2020). Multi-criteria model for the selection of construction materials: an approach based on fuzzy logic. Tehnički vjesnik, 27(5), 1531-1543. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17559/TV- 20190426123437
Parameshwaran, R., Baskar, C. ve Karthik, T. (2015). An ıntegrated framework for mechatronics based product development in a fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.013
Rego, A., Ramírez, P. L. G., Jimenez, J. M. & Lloret, J. (2022). Artificial intelligent system for multimedia services in smart home environments. Cluster Computing, 25(3), 2085-2105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03350-z
Render, B. ve Stair, R. M., (1991). Quantitative Analysis for Management, 4th Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Massachusetts.
Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design Thinking, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Saba, S., Ahsan, F. ve Mohsin, S. (2017). BAT-ANN based earthquake prediction for Pakistan region. Soft Computing, 21:5805-5813. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2158-2
Serin, S., Morova, N., Sargın, Ş., Terzi, S. ve Saltan, M. (2014). The Fuzzy logic model for the prediction of marshall stability of lightweight asphalt concretes fabricated using expanded clay aggregate. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 17 (1), 163-172. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sdufenbed/issue/20800/222059
Shimura, M. (1975). An approach to pattern recognition and associative memories using fuzzy logic. In Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes (pp. 449- 476). Academic Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-775260-0.50024-4
Simoes-Marques, M., Ribeiro, R.A. ve Gameiro-Marques, A. (2000). A fuzzy decision support system for equipment repair under battle conditions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1):141-157. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00023-8
Smith, R. P. ve Jeffrey, A. M. (1999). Product development process modeling. Journal of Design Studies, 20(3):237-261. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00018-0
Sooraj, A. ve Paul, A. (2018). Fuzzy logic ın construction project scheduling: A review. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. Volume: 05 Issue: 11.
Sutono, S. B., Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Aoyama, H. ve Taha, Z. (2016). Fuzzy-based Taguchi method for multiresponse optimization of product form design in Kansei engineering: a case study on car form design. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing. vol. 10, no. 9, doi: 10.1299/jamdsm.2016jamdsm0108.
Suzuki, K. ve Chen, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Artificial intelligence in decision support systems for diagnosis in medical imaging, (Vol. 140). New York: Springer.
Şimşek, S. ve Sev, A. (2021). Yüksek yapılarda strüktürel sanatın bulanık mantık analitik hiyerarşi süreci yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Megaron, 16(3). Doi: 10.14744/MEGARON.2021.65037.
Talašová, Z. (2012). Fuzzy approach to the analysis of architectural composition as applied to villa design by Adolf Loos. Czech Technical University Shape Studies. Doi: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2012.1.425
Tao, Z. (2015). Artificial Neural Network attempts for long-term evaluation of great earthquakes, in Proceeding of 11th International Conference on Natural Computation, 1128-1132. Doi: 10.1109/ICNC.2015.7378150.
Tapan, M. (2004). Mimarlıkta Değerlendirme, İTÜ Yayınevi, Maçka, İstanbul.
Timor, M. (2011). Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi, Türkmen Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1-50.
Tushar, W., Wijerathne, N., Li, W. T., Yuen, C., Poor, H. V., Saha, T. K. ve Wood, K. L. (2018). Internet of things for green building management: Disruptive innovations through low-cost sensor technology and artificial intelligence. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(5), 100-110. Doi: 10.1109/MSP.2018.2842096.
Tyler, N. S., Mosquera-Lopez, C. M., Wilson, L. M., Dodier, R. H., Branigan, D. L., Gabo, V. B., ... & Jacobs, P. G. (2020). An artificial intelligence decision support system for the management of type 1 diabetes. Nature metabolism, 2(7), 612-619. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-020-0212-y
Varol Malkoçoğlu, A. B. ve İşeri, İ. (2020). Akut Lenfoblastik Löseminin Makine Öğrenimi ile Sınıflandırılması. SETSCI Conference Proceedings. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.6.139.
Varol, A. B. ve İşeri, İ. (2019). Lenf kanserine ilişkin patoloji görüntülerinin makine öğrenimi yöntemleri ile sınıflandırılması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 404-410. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.638372
Vasicek, D., Jalowiczor, J., Sevcik, L. ve Voznak, M. (2018). IoT smart home concept. In 2018 26th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. Doi: 10.1109/TELFOR.2018.8612078
Wechsler, H. (1975). Applications of fuzzy logic to medical diagnosis. Erişim adresi: https://escholarship.org/content/qt3vj1r5dw/qt3vj1r5dw.pdf
Wu, C. Y. (1990). Robot selection decision support system: A fuzzy set approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 14, 440-443. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(90)90223-A
Yahyaoui, A., Jamil, A., Rasheed, J. ve Yesiltepe, M. (2019). A decision support system for diabetes prediction using machine learning and deep learning techniques. In 2019 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (UBMYK). (pp. 1-4). IEEE. Doi: 10.1109/UBMYK48245.2019.8965556
Yıldız, B. ve Aktaş, B. (2017). Mimari Tasarım Sürecinde Karar Verme: Bulanık Mantık Tabanlı Cephe Modeli Önerisi. MSTAS 2017, 173.
Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information and Control. 8, 338-353, doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814261302_0021
Zhou, X., Wu, Y. ve Polochova, V. (2019). Product conceptual design method based on ıntuitionistic fuzzy binary semantics group decision making. Journal of Service Science and Management. vol. 12, pp. 742-754, doi: 10.4236/jssm.2019.126050.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Architecture

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Didem Baran Ergül ^*
0000-0001-5705-8885
Türkiye

Ayşe Berika Varol Malkoçoğlu
0000-0003-1856-9636
Türkiye

Seden Acun Özgünler
0000-0001-5975-5115
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2022

Submission Date

May 18, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 13, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 7 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1117910

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA42UK94UJ

APA

Baran Ergül, D., Varol Malkoçoğlu, A. B., & Acun Özgünler, S. (2022). Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(2), 878-899. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1117910

AMA

1.Baran Ergül D, Varol Malkoçoğlu AB, Acun Özgünler S. Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi. JASA. 2022;7(2):878-899. doi:10.30785/mbud.1117910

Chicago

Baran Ergül, Didem, Ayşe Berika Varol Malkoçoğlu, and Seden Acun Özgünler. 2022. “Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7 (2): 878-99. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1117910.

EndNote

Baran Ergül D, Varol Malkoçoğlu AB, Acun Özgünler S (December 1, 2022) Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7 2 878–899.

IEEE

[1]D. Baran Ergül, A. B. Varol Malkoçoğlu, and S. Acun Özgünler, “Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi”, JASA, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 878–899, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1117910.

ISNAD

Baran Ergül, Didem - Varol Malkoçoğlu, Ayşe Berika - Acun Özgünler, Seden. “Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7/2 (December 1, 2022): 878-899. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1117910.

JAMA

1.Baran Ergül D, Varol Malkoçoğlu AB, Acun Özgünler S. Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi. JASA. 2022;7:878–899.

MLA

Baran Ergül, Didem, et al. “Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 7, no. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 878-99, doi:10.30785/mbud.1117910.

Vancouver

1.Didem Baran Ergül, Ayşe Berika Varol Malkoçoğlu, Seden Acun Özgünler. Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi. JASA. 2022 Dec. 1;7(2):878-99. doi:10.30785/mbud.1117910

Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Use of Artificial Intelligence Based Fuzzy Logic Systems in Architectural Design Decision Making Processes

Abstract

Keywords

Mimari Tasarım Karar Verme Süreçlerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Bulanık Mantık Sistemerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Keywords

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Using Fuzzy Logic Based Decision Support Systems for New Function Selection In Structures

Enriching Empirical Thermal Comfort Assessment Methods with Fuzzy Logic

A Review of Using Deep Learning Technology in the Built Environment of Disaster Management Phases

Deprem Sonrası Çocuk Özel Eğitim Yerleşkesi Mimari Tasarım Deneyimi

Visualization of Mythological Places Using Today's Technologies and Examining the Understanding of Culture-Place

The Use and Development of Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Design Processes

Betimsel İfadenin Mekâna Dönüştürülmesi: Yapay Zekâ ve Öğrenci Projelerinin Analitik İncelenmesi

Diagramming the Topology of Technology and Architecture in the 21st Century

Architecture Students and AI: Exploring Applications and Perceptions in the Class

JASA JOURNAL TAG / MBUD DERGİ KÜNYESİ