Defining the Adaptive Reuse of Traditional Houses for Tourism Purposes Through Multi-Choice Process: Türkiye-Konya/Sille Example
Abstract
“Architecture” is one of the tools that define sustainable cultural tourism. The sustainability of architecture which is an important source of culture is possible by conversation and restoration studies. It is observed that the most worn-out building group is residential buildings due to the lack of strict rules for historical settlements with this potential. A process based on the existence of traditional houses in historical settlements with their current function has been defined to be a tool, not a goal; particularly in cases where this becomes difficult. The Sille quarter which contains various cultural richness of Turkey and provides an adequate touristic axis for the province of Konya has been discussed. Fundamental decisions have been made to determine new functions that will define the model where functions other than residences will not cause transport capacity problems, social and cultural pressures; and prevent protected areas to become the decor of commercial activities.
Keywords
Housing, adaptive reuse, cultural tourism, multiple choice method, interior
Supporting Institution
TUBİTAK
Project Number
114K599
Thanks
This study was supported by TUBITAK 3001 Beginning R&D Program (the Scientific and Technological Research and Council of Turkey, Grant Number: 114K599). We would like to express our gratitude to the TUBITAK project team. Ethics Committee approval in the study, Ethics Committee of the University of Karadeniz Technical University dated 21.04.2014 with the decision no.24237859-242 was taken.
References
- Abdullah F., Basha, B. & Soomro, A. R. (2017). Sustainable heritage: analytical study on the viability of adaptive reuse with social approach, case study of asia heritage row, Kuala Lumpur. Advanced Science Letters, 23(7), 6179-6183.
- Adiwibowo, R. S., Widodo, P. & Santosa, I. J. P. S. (2015). Correlations between public appreciation of historical building and intention to visit heritage building reused as retail store. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 357-364.
- Ahunbay, Z. (2013). 2013’ün tartışmalı yeniden kullanım ve ihyaları. TMMOB Mimarlık Dergisi, 374, 49-53.
- Aigwi, I. E., Ingham, J., Phipps, R. & Filippova, O. (2020). Identifying parameters for a performance-based framework: Towards prioritising underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse in New Zealand. CITIES, 102.
- Ariffin, A. B., Zahari, M. S. M. & Hanafiah, M. H. (2020). Adaptive reuse of historic buildings: connecting the links between tourist appreciation and visitation, Property Management.
- Atash, F. (1993). Fragmentation of the urban fabric: the experience of middle Eastern and North African cities. CITIES, 10(4), 313-325.
- Ball, R. (1999). Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant buildings. Building Research and Information, 27(3), 140‐148.
- Bentley, I. & Butina-Watson, G. (2007). Identity by design. Elsevier.
- Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. D. (2009). Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: learning from the experiences of Los Angeles. Structural Survey, 27(5), 351‐60.
- Caterina, G., Pinto, R. M., Fabricatti, K., Oppido, S., Bianchi, A., Medici, S. & Torro, P. (2004). Reusing and Managing the Real Albergo De Poveri of Naples; Evaluation and Re-Design for Improved Efficiency, Facilities Management Maintenence Human Elements in Facilities Management Understanding Need of Our Customer Proceeding the CIBW70, 129-139, Hong Kong.