Research Article

Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır

Volume: 8 Number: 2 December 16, 2023
TR EN

Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır

Abstract

Urban agriculture encompasses all agricultural activities within or near urban areas. Due to its complex interactions within environmental, social, and economic contexts, urban agriculture faces various challenges. Therefore, various stakeholders are involved in the process of developing urban agriculture. This study aims to determine the place and importance of urban agriculture in the eyes of stakeholders in Iğdır City and its surrounding areas. This will provide an understanding of what can be done in the region within the scope of urban agriculture. Semi-structured interview forms were used in the study. Five questions were asked to the stakeholders, and descriptive analysis, one of the qualitative data analysis methods, was used to analyze the data. According to the findings, it was concluded that Iğdır city holds significant potential in terms of urban agricultural activities. Based on the stakeholder opinions, opportunities for urban agriculture in Iğdır City were discussed.

Keywords

Agricultural activities, local authorities, stakeholders, urban, urban agriculture

Thanks

This article is based on the master’s thesis titled "Investigation of Urban Agriculture and Agrotourism Potential in Iğdır City and its Surroundings" completed in the Department of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Science, Iğdır University. The article adheres to national and international research and publication ethics. Ethical committee approval for the study was obtained through the decision numbered 2022/5, dated 24/03/2022, from the Ethics Committee of Iğdır University.

References

  1. Aksoy, Y., Savaş, D. & Dursun, S. (2012). Iğdır İlinin Mekânsal Analiz Raporu. Iğdır Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü. Access Address (23.05.2023): https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/kentges/editordosya/kiu_igdir_mekansal_analiz.pdf/
  2. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2012). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı. Adapazarı/Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
  3. Clinton, N., Stuhlmacher, M., Miles, A., Uludere Aragon, N., Wagner, M., Georgescu, M., Herwig, C. & Gong, P. (2018). A global geospatial ecosystem services estimate of urban agriculture. Earth’s Future, 6(1), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000536.
  4. Cohen, N. & Reynolds, K. (2014). Urban agriculture policy making in New York’s “New Political Spaces” Strategizing for a Participatory and Representative System. J Plan Educ Res. 34(2), 221–234. doi:10.1177/0739456X14526453.
  5. Cook, J., Oviatt, K., Main, D. S., Kaur, H. & Brett, J. (2015). Reconceptualizing urban agriculture: an exploration of farming along the banks of the Yamuna River in Delhi, India. Agric Human Values, 32(2), 265–279. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9545-z.
  6. Delgado,. C. (2018). Contrasting practices and perceptions of urban agriculture in Portugal. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 10(2), 170–185. doi:10.1080/19463138.2018.1481069.
  7. Diehl, J. A. (2020). Growing for Sydney: exploring the urban food system through farmers’ social networks. Sustainability. 12(8), 3346. doi:10.3390/su12083346.
  8. Gianluca, F., Kathrin, S. & Cesare, Z. (2021). Assessing motivations and perceptions of stakeholders in urban agriculture: a review and analytical framework. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(2), 351-367, DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2021.1904247.
  9. Gül, A. (2022). Urban Agroforestry Systems in Urban Agriculture. In H. B. Türker, & A. Gül. (Eds.) Architectural Sciences and Urban Agriculture (26-68). ISBN:978-625-8213-84-3. Ankara: Iksad Publications. https://iksadyayinevi.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Architectural-Sciences-and-Urban-Agriculture.pdf
  10. Hara, Y., Murakami, A., Tsuchiya, K., Palijon, A. M. & Yokohari, M. (2013). A quantitative assessment of vegetable farming on vacant lots in an urban fringe area in Metro Manila: can it sustain long-term local vegetable demand? Appl Geogr. (41), 195–206. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.04.003.
APA
Akdeniz, E., Bingül Bulut, M. B., Hosaflıoğlu, İ., & Demirel, Ö. (2023). Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(2), 530-540. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1318068
AMA
1.Akdeniz E, Bingül Bulut MB, Hosaflıoğlu İ, Demirel Ö. Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır. JASA. 2023;8(2):530-540. doi:10.30785/mbud.1318068
Chicago
Akdeniz, Enes, M. Bihter Bingül Bulut, İbrahim Hosaflıoğlu, and Öner Demirel. 2023. “Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 8 (2): 530-40. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1318068.
EndNote
Akdeniz E, Bingül Bulut MB, Hosaflıoğlu İ, Demirel Ö (December 1, 2023) Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 8 2 530–540.
IEEE
[1]E. Akdeniz, M. B. Bingül Bulut, İ. Hosaflıoğlu, and Ö. Demirel, “Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır”, JASA, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 530–540, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1318068.
ISNAD
Akdeniz, Enes - Bingül Bulut, M. Bihter - Hosaflıoğlu, İbrahim - Demirel, Öner. “Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 8/2 (December 1, 2023): 530-540. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1318068.
JAMA
1.Akdeniz E, Bingül Bulut MB, Hosaflıoğlu İ, Demirel Ö. Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır. JASA. 2023;8:530–540.
MLA
Akdeniz, Enes, et al. “Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 8, no. 2, Dec. 2023, pp. 530-4, doi:10.30785/mbud.1318068.
Vancouver
1.Enes Akdeniz, M. Bihter Bingül Bulut, İbrahim Hosaflıoğlu, Öner Demirel. Stakeholder Opinions on Urban Agriculture: The Case of Iğdır. JASA. 2023 Dec. 1;8(2):530-4. doi:10.30785/mbud.1318068