Research Article

Understanding Air Pollution Risk Patterns in Ankara: Influence of Human and Meteorological Factors

Volume: 9 Number: 2 December 26, 2024
TR EN

Understanding Air Pollution Risk Patterns in Ankara: Influence of Human and Meteorological Factors

Abstract

In order to determine the air pollution risk in Ankara city centre, a series of analyses including quantitative measurements of anthropogenic and meteorological parameters were carried out. After the quantitative results were normalised, relevant categorical values were assigned to each parameter. These parameters were overlaid with the overlapping technique by considering their weight scores. According to the research findings, almost all of Çankaya, the south of Yenimahalle and the east of Etimesgut were found to have "Very High (5)" and "High (4)" levels of air pollution, respectively. The results show that 19.78% of the total study area has "very high", 28.92% "high", 30.33% "medium", 16.68% "low" and 4.29% "very low" air pollution risk levels. In future studies, different parameters with different weights can be added to the method based on other environmental factors and requirements in the research area.

Keywords

Air quality , human effects , urban planning , geographic information systems

References

  1. Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C., Moussiopoulos, N. & Banias, G. (2011). Prioritise strategies to confront environmental deterioration in urban areas: multicriteria assessment of public opinion and experts' views. Cities, 28, 414–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.04.003, Access Address (21.04.2024): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275111 000436.
  2. Ahern, J., Cilliers, S. & Niemela, J. (2014). The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: a framework for supporting innovation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 254– 259. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020, Access Address (21.04.2024): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016920461400 0346?via%3Dihub.
  3. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. (1998). Climate, Physiography, and air Pollution Potential, Bay Area and its sub-Regions. Access Address (21.04.2024): https://www.baaqmd.gov/.
  4. Chamber of Environmental Engineers (CEE). (2018). Air Pollution Report. Access Address (18.05.2024): https://www.cmo.org.tr/raporlar.
  5. Clean Air Right Platform (CARP). (2021). Dark Report 2021, Reveals the Health Impacts of Air Pollution in Turkey. Access Address (18.07.2024): https://www.temizhavahakki.org/kararapor2021/.
  6. Clean Air Right Platform (CARP). (2022). Dark Report 2022, Reveals the Health Impacts of Air Pollution in Turkey. Access Address (18.07.2024): https://www.temizhavahakki.org/kararapor2022/.
  7. Copernicus Land Monitoring Services (CLMS). (2022). 2012 Urban Atlas (Land Cover). Access Address (26.07.2022): https://land.copernicus.eu/en/dataset-catalog.
  8. Çelik, B.G. & Kadı, İ. (2010). The relation between meteorological factors and pollutants concentrations in Karabük city. G.U. Journal of Science, 20(4): 87–95. Access Address (20.07.2023): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/83081.
  9. Çiçek, İ. & Ataol, M. (2009). Türkiye’nin Su Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesinde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1501/cogbil_0000000094.
  10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2022). Heat Island Impacts. Access Address (25.07.2023): https://www.epa.gov/heatislands/heat- island-impacts.
APA
Yıldız, N. E., & Şahin, Ş. (2024). Understanding Air Pollution Risk Patterns in Ankara: Influence of Human and Meteorological Factors. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 9(2), 815-830. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1457692