Research Article

Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon

Volume: 10 Number: 1 July 28, 2025
TR EN

Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon

Abstract

The determination of approaches to conservation on historical sites is based on the principles that have been accepted on an international level. While these principles define the tangible and intangible values of the cultural heritage to be protected as a whole, they have also brought conservation actions to a holistic, participatory and continuous dimension. The initial and most delicate phase of the conservation process, which commences with registration and identification, is the documentation stage. Over time, techniques related to documentation have evolved, with traditional measurement methods being superseded by digital methods. These methods, which provide rapid, precise data in original coordinates, constitute a crucial foundation for research conducted in protected areas. Ortahisar, currently the central district of Trabzon, is one of the oldest settlements in the city. The area was designated as two protected zones, designated I and II, in 1985, and a conservation plan was prepared in 1986. In this study, the documentation work carried out in the Trabzon Ortahisar Protected Area in 2012 is examined, and the techniques, equipment and work processes used, and the final products obtained, are shared.

Keywords

Cultural heritage, digital documentation, conservation, laser scanning, modelling

References

  1. Akçam Ergin, I. D. (2023). Digital Approach in Conservation of Heritage: 3D Virtual Reconstruction Applications in Ancient Cities. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8(2), 969-987. doi: https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1312738
  2. Aysu, M. E. (1977). Eski Kent Mekanlarını Düzenleme İlkeleri. İstanbul:İstanbul Devlet Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Yayınevi.
  3. Benli, G. & Kan T. (2023). Trabzon Ortahisar traditional houses exemplifying urban identity components,
  4. Proceedings Of The 3rd International Civil Engineering & Architecture Conference, 12–14 October, pp. 311-325, DOI 10.31462/icearc.2023.ccch363, ISBN: 978-605-81854-8-7, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye.
  5. Bimtaş, (2013). Trabzon Yenileme Alanı Dahilinde I ve II No’lu Sit Alanının irdelenmesi, Mevcut Halihazır Haritanın Güncellenmesi, Yenileme Alanı Bütününde Kentsel Tasarım Avan Projelerin Hazırlanması, 3‐Boyutlu Mevcut Durum ve Tasarıma Yönelik Kent Modelinin Üretimi, Bir (1) Adet Kültür Varlığı Yapı ile Cumhuriyet Dönemi Eski Valilik Binasının Rölöve, Restitüsyon ve Restorasyon Projesi ve Raporları”, I.B.B., Istanbul.
  6. Duran, Z. & Toz, G. (2003). Tarihi Eserlerin Fotogrametrik Olarak Belgelenmesi ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemine Aktarılması, İTU dergisi, 2 (6), 19-30.
  7. Düzova, M. A. (2007). Kentsel Tasarım Projelerinin Bilgisayar Ortamında Sunum Tekniklerinin Bağdat Caddesi Örneğinde İncelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
  8. Fortenberry, B. (2019). Digital Documentation in Historic Preservation Education and Research, UMP067_Preservation_ff.indd 81, Access Address (12.12.2024): Digital-Documentation-in-Preservation- Education-and-Research-Prospects-and-Perils.pdf (researchgate.net)
  9. Hassani, F. (2015). Documentatıon of cultural heritage techniques, potentials and constraints The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-5/W7, 2015 25th International CIPA Symposium, 31 August– 04 September 2015, Taipei, Taiwan.
  10. ICOMOS. (1964). Venice Charter. Access Address (05.09.2024): https://www.icomos.org/en/participer/179- articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/157-thevenice-charter
APA
Kan, T., & Benli, G. (2025). Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 10(1), 394-416. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1604365
AMA
1.Kan T, Benli G. Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon. JASA. 2025;10(1):394-416. doi:10.30785/mbud.1604365
Chicago
Kan, Tuna, and Gülhan Benli. 2025. “Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10 (1): 394-416. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1604365.
EndNote
Kan T, Benli G (July 1, 2025) Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10 1 394–416.
IEEE
[1]T. Kan and G. Benli, “Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon”, JASA, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 394–416, July 2025, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1604365.
ISNAD
Kan, Tuna - Benli, Gülhan. “Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10/1 (July 1, 2025): 394-416. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1604365.
JAMA
1.Kan T, Benli G. Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon. JASA. 2025;10:394–416.
MLA
Kan, Tuna, and Gülhan Benli. “Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 10, no. 1, July 2025, pp. 394-16, doi:10.30785/mbud.1604365.
Vancouver
1.Tuna Kan, Gülhan Benli. Digital Documentation in Cultural Heritage Sites; A Case Study in Ortahisar Trabzon. JASA. 2025 Jul. 1;10(1):394-416. doi:10.30785/mbud.1604365