Research Article

Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye

Volume: 10 Number: 2 December 27, 2025
TR EN

Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye

Abstract

Unplanned urbanization has hindered the full utilization of Demre district’s tourism potential. This study integrates natural and cultural factors using a systematic, multi-criteria planning approach to identify spatially suitable areas for tourism-oriented accommodation facilities in Demre. Data was obtained from open-access geographic sources. The weights of nine criteria—slope, aspect, elevation, land use, proximity to roads and water resources, ecological value, infrastructure availability, and accessibility—were determined through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on expert judgment. A weighted overlay analysis was performed in ArcGIS to produce suitability maps. The analysis revealed that 0.03% of the total area exhibits high suitability, 71.26% is suitable, 13.65% is moderately suitable, and 0.03% is of low suitability. Southeastern areas of the district were identified as optimal for tourism-oriented accommodation facilities due to favorable topography, accessibility, and minimal ecological constraints. These findings provide a scientifically grounded framework to guide policymakers and urban planners in enhancing tourism potential while conserving ecological and cultural values.

Keywords

Spatial suitability analysis, multi-criteria decision-making, sustainable tourism planning, ecological and cultural conservation

Ethical Statement

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics committee approval was not required for the study.

References

  1. Akten, M. (2013). Possibility to employ AHP as a multi-criteria decision making method in landscape planning initiatives. In Advances in landscape architecture. IntechOpen.
  2. Akten, S. (2025). Evaluation of Demre District Sustainable Tourism Strategies Using SWOT and TOPSIS Analysis. Sustainability, 17(15), 6831.
  3. Antalya Metropolitan Municipality. (2018). Nazım İmar Planı Açıklama Raporu (NİPAR): 1/25,000 Scale Master Zoning Plan Explanatory Report, Demre District, Antalya Province.
  4. Ay, Z., Güngöroğlu, C., Aydin, A. C., & Gül, A. (2010). Determining Demand and Expectations for Ecotourists in Antalya Province. South-West Anatolia Forest Research Institute. Antalya
  5. Ayhan, Ç. K., Taşlı, T. C., Özkök, F., & Tatlı, H. (2020). Land use suitability analysis of rural tourism activities: Yenice, Turkey. Tourism Management, 76, 103949.
  6. Banai-Kashani, R. (1989). A new method for site suitability analysis: The analytic hierarchy process. Environmental management, 13, 685-693.
  7. Çakır, M., Dönmez, Ş., & Tuğluer, M. (2022,). The use of native plant species in the flora of Antalya in landscape architecture. 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Applied Natural Sciences October 15–18 Turkey
  8. Ceylan, Ş., & Yılmaz, I. (2020). Orta ölçekli yerleşime uygunluk planlarının CBS tabanlı analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHS) kullanılarak hazırlanması: Sivas il merkezi örneği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(3), 545-558.
  9. Christaller, W. (1964). Some considerations of tourism location in Europe: the peripheral regions‐ underdeveloped countries‐recreation areas. Papers in Regional Science, 12(1), 95-105.
  10. Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C., & Maginnis, S. (2016). Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 97(2016).
APA
Dinç, G., Özden, G., & Ünal, S. (2025). Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 10(2), 1164-1179. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1818028
AMA
1.Dinç G, Özden G, Ünal S. Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye. JASA. 2025;10(2):1164-1179. doi:10.30785/mbud.1818028
Chicago
Dinç, Gizem, Görkem Özden, and Sılanur Ünal. 2025. “Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10 (2): 1164-79. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1818028.
EndNote
Dinç G, Özden G, Ünal S (December 1, 2025) Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10 2 1164–1179.
IEEE
[1]G. Dinç, G. Özden, and S. Ünal, “Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye”, JASA, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1164–1179, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1818028.
ISNAD
Dinç, Gizem - Özden, Görkem - Ünal, Sılanur. “Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 10/2 (December 1, 2025): 1164-1179. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1818028.
JAMA
1.Dinç G, Özden G, Ünal S. Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye. JASA. 2025;10:1164–1179.
MLA
Dinç, Gizem, et al. “Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 10, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 1164-79, doi:10.30785/mbud.1818028.
Vancouver
1.Gizem Dinç, Görkem Özden, Sılanur Ünal. Assessing Spatial Suitability for Tourism-Oriented Accommodation Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Demre, Türkiye. JASA. 2025 Dec. 1;10(2):1164-79. doi:10.30785/mbud.1818028