Audit Fees and Financial Performance in Capital-Intensive Industries: An Empirical Study on the Basic Metal Industry in Borsa Istanbul

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 76, 273 - 286, 09.09.2025

Meral Gündüz , Murat Gündüz

https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1692982

https://izlik.org/JA36RS98RC

Öz

This study examines the relationship between audit fees and financial performance through the lens of agency theory and signaling theory. Analyzing panel data from 20 companies in the Borsa Istanbul Basic Metal Industry sector between 2020-2024, the research reveals significant findings. Both return on assets and firm size demonstrate a positive and statistically significant impact on audit fees, while net profit margin shows a negative correlation. The effect of return on equity was found to be statistically insignificant. The results indicate that operationally profitable and larger firms incur higher audit costs, whereas financially healthy companies with higher net profit margins pay lower audit fees due to reduced risk profiles. Contributing to emerging market literature, this sector-specific analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers regarding the development of risk-based audit frameworks. The study employs robust econometric methods to address cross-sectional dependence, autocorrelation, and heteroskedasticity issues, enhancing the reliability of its conclusions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Audit Fee , Financial Performance , Panel Data Regression Analysis

SERMAYE YOĞUN SEKTÖRLERDE DENETİM ÜCRETLERİ VE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ: BIST ANA METAL SANAYİ SEKTÖRÜNE YÖNELİK AMPİRİK BİR İNCELEME

https://izlik.org/JA36RS98RC

Öz

Bu çalışma, denetim ücretleri ile finansal performans arasındaki ilişkiyi ajans teorisi ve sinyal teorisi perspektifinden incelemektedir. Borsa İstanbul'da Ana Metal Sanayi sektöründe faaliyet gösteren 20 firmanın 2020-2024 yıllarına ait verileri panel veri regresyon analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, aktif kârlılık oranı ve firma büyüklüğü denetim ücretleri üzerinde pozitif yönde anlamlı bir etkiye sahipken, net kâr marjının negatif yönde etkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Özsermaye kârlılık oranının ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamıştır. Bulgular, operasyonel açıdan kârlı ve büyük firmaların daha yüksek denetim maliyetlerine katlandığını, buna karşılık yüksek net kâr marjına sahip finansal açıdan sağlam firmaların daha düşük denetim ücreti ödediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, gelişmekte olan piyasalarda sektörel düzeyde yapılan analizle literatüre katkı sağlamakta ve risk odaklı denetim süreçlerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik politika önerileri sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Denetim Ücreti , Finansal Performans , Panel Veri Regresyon Analizi

Etik Beyan

Etik kurul izni ve/veya yasal/özel izin alınmasına gerek olmayan bu çalışmada araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur

Kaynakça

• AbbasZadeh, R. (2017). An Empirical study: The effect of audit fees and risk on the quality of financial reporting. QUID: Investigación, Ciencia y Tecnología, (1), 2888-2893.
• Acar, M. (2022). Bağımsız denetim ücretlerini etkileyen faktörlere yönelik bir araştırma: şeffaflık raporlarında yer alan denetim gelirleri çerçevesinde BIST 100 örneği. Sosyoekonomi, 30 (51), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.01.18
• Ado, A. B., Rashid, N., Mustapha, U. A., & Ademola, L. S. (2020). The impact of audit quality on the financial performance of listed companies Nigeria. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(9), 37-42.
• Alkas, E., & Keskin, D. A. (2022). Bağımsız denetim ücretlerine etki eden finansal ve beşerî faktörlere ilişkin sektör etkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 32, 39-54.
• Awinbugri, A. E., & Prince, G. (2019). The impact of audit committees’ meetings and audit fees on the financial performance of listed banks in Ghana. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 3(5), 341-346.
• Bakr, D. J., Ali, S. H., & Jameel, S. A. (2023). The role of audit fees in improving financial performance: a case study of eight selected commercial banks of Iraqi stock exchange over the period (2006–2020). Journal of Duhok University, 26(1), 634-645.
• Baltagi, B. H., & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR (1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(6), 814-823.
• Bhargava, A., Franzini, L., & Narendranathan, W. (1982). Serial correlation and the fixed effects model. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(4), 533-549.
• Butterworth, S., & Houghton, K. A. (1995). Auditor switching: The pricing of audit services. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(3), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00877.x
• Büyükuysal, M. Ç., & Öz, İ. İ. (2016). Çoklu doğrusal bağıntı varlığında en küçük karelere alternatif yaklaşım: Ridge regresyon. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 110-114.
• Cengiz, S., & Öksüz, S. (2023). Bağımsız Denetim Ücretlerinin Belirleyicileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Ekonomi İşletme Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 9(2), 190-204.
• Chersan, I. C., Robu, I. B., Carp, M., & Mironiuc, M. (2012). A circular causality analysis on the determinants of the audit fees within the NYSE-quoted companies. Communications of the IBIMA, 2012, 1.
• Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality?. Auditing: a journal of practice & theory, 29(2), 115-140. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.115
• Çemrek, F., & Burhan, E. (2014). Petrol tüketiminin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin panel veri analizi ile incelenmesi: Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Türkiye örneği. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(3). 47-58.
• DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of accounting and economics, 58(2-3), 275-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
• Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.
• Francis, J. R., & Wilson, E. R. (1988). Auditor changes: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. The Accounting Review, 63(4), 663–682.
• Greene, W.H. (2000). Econometric Analysis, Fourth Edition. New York: Prentice Hall.
• Gul, F. A., Chen, C. J., & Tsui, J. S. (2003). Discretionary accounting accruals, managers' incentives, and audit fees. Contemporary accounting research, 20(3), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1506/686E-NF2J-73X6-G540
• Güven, D., Şimşek, T., & Güven, A. (2018). Sağlık yönetimi kapsamında sağlık harcamalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: MENA ülkeleri üzerine bir panel regresyon analizi, Sosyoekonomi, 26(37), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2018.03.02
• Hariri, H., Abdul Rahman, N., & Che Ahmad, A. (2007). An empirical evidence of audit firm merger and audit pricing in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 5(1), 1-19.
• Hasan, A., Aly, D. and Hussainey, K. (2022), Corporate governance and financial reporting quality: a comparative study, Corporate Governance, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 1308-1326. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0298
• Hay, D. (2013). Further evidence from meta‐analysis of audit fee research. International Journal of Auditing, 17(2), 162-176.
• Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141-191.
• Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312.
• Iliemena, R. O., & Okolocha, C. B. (2019). Effect of audit quality on financial performance: Evidence from a developing capital market. International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management (IJRRCEM), 6(3), 191-198.
• KAP, Kamuyu Aydınlatma Platformu, (https://www.kap.org.tr/tr, Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2025)
• KGK, T.C. Kamu Gözetimi, Muhasebe ve Denetim Standartları Kurumu (https://www.kgk.gov.tr/ Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2025).
• Kanakriyah, R. (2020). Model to determine main factors used to measure audit fees. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 24(2), 1-13.
• Kikhia, H. Y. (2015). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from Jordan. Accounting and finance Research, 4(1), 42-53.
• King, H., & McKennie, N. (2023). Assessing the impact of audit quality on accountability and transparency among financial institutions in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(2), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4130
• Malhotra, D. K., Poteau, R., & Russel, P. (2015). An empirical examinatıon of the relationship between audit fee and firm performance. International Journal of Business, Accounting & Finance, 9(2), 112-123.
• Mitra, S., Deis, D. R., & Hossain, M. (2009). The association between audit fees and reported earnings quality in pre‐and post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley regimes. Review of Accounting and Finance, 8(3), 232-252.
• Moutinho, Vânia and Cerqueira, António and Brandão, Elísio Fernando Moreira, “Audit Fees and Firm Performance (November 23, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2180020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180020
• Narcisa, C. L. A. (2016). The influence of the corporate governance mechanisms and audit fees on the financial performance measured with ROA. Annals of'Constantin Brancusi'University of Targu-Jiu. Economy Series/Analele Universităţii'Constantin Brâncuşi'din Târgu-Jiu Seria Economie, (5), 20-32.
• Naser, K., & Hassan, Y. M. (2016). Factors influencing external audit fees of companies listed on Dubai Financial Market. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(3), 346-363.
• Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913610
• Palmrose, Z. V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 97-110.
• Rewczuk, K., & Modzelewski, P. (2019). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from Poland. Central European Economic Journal, 6(53), 323-336.
• Sayyar, H., Basiruddin, R., Rasid, S. Z., & Elhabib, M. A. (2015). The impact of audit quality on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Review on Scientific Research, 10(1), 1-19.
• Serem, D., Fwamba, R., & Benedict, A. (2020). Audit fees and financial performance of deposit taking Saccos in North Rift, Kenya. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 6(5), 15-27.
• Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal Of Accounting Research, 161-190.
• Song, Y., Wu, H., & Ma, Y. (2023). Does ESG performance affect audit pricing? Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102890
• Şen, İ. K., & Terzi, S. (2023). Denetçi cinsiyeti ile denetim ücreti arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye örneği. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1133750
• Tasios, S., & Bekiaris, M. (2012). Auditor's perceptions of financial reporting quality: the case of Greece. International Journal Of Accounting And Financial Reporting, 2(1), 57. Taylor, M. E., & Simon, D. T. (1999). Determinants of audit fee: The importance of litigation, disclosure and regulatory burdens in audit engagements in 20 countries. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(99)00016-4
• Türel, A., Yılmaz, F. ve Özveren, C. (2022). Türkiye’de bağımsız denetim ücretlerinin analizi. Mali Analiz/Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 32 (172).
• Uysal, İ., & Kılıç, A. (2022). Normal dağılım ikilemi. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12(1), 220-248. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.962653