Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 71 - 97, 29.12.2024

Öz

Yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin artan yetenekleri ile birlikte öğretmenlik mesleğinin ve öğretimin geleceği tartışılan konular arasına girmiştir. Bu tartışmaların odağında kalabilmek için öğretmenler ve eğitim fakültesi akademisyenleri yapay zekânın olumlu yönlerinden yararlanma sorumluluğuna sahip çıkmalı ve onun eğitim teknolojisi ve uygulamalarıyla bütünleştirilmesi sırasında sebep olacağı riskleri de belirlemelidir. Bu derleme çalışması, eğitimde yapay zekâ alanında üretilen bilimsel içerikleri incelemeyi ve eğitim fakültesi akademisyenlerinin karşısına çıkabilecek fırsatları ve riskleri ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaca ulaşmak için öncelikle eğitimde yapay zekâ alan yazını öğretmenlik mesleği, öğrenme ve öğretimle ilişkisi açısından incelenmiştir. Ardından yapay zekânın eğitim alanında eğitim fakültesi akademisyenleri için sunduğu fırsatlar ve riskler yorumlanmıştır. Alan yazın incelemesi sonucunda yapay zekânın eğitim fakültesi akademisyenleri için sunduğu fırsatlar; araştırma ve akademik yazım, uyarlanabilir öğrenme, otomatik notlandırma ve değerlendirme sistemleri, yapay zekâ destekli asistanlar, profesyonel gelişim ve öğretmen yetiştirme şeklinde sıralanabilir. Eğitim ortamlarında karşılaşmakta olduğumuz ve gelecekte karşılaşılabilecek riskler; akademik kültür ve araştırmadaki yanlılıklar, etik, başarı farkının açılması, yapay zekâ öğretmenlere karşı: denge arayışı başlıkları altında irdelenmiştir. Yapay zekâ sistemleri öğrenme hedefleriyle henüz tam olarak uyumlu olmadığından, eğitimcilerin bu araçları öğretme ve öğrenme için etkili bir şekilde kullanabilecekleri eğitim ortamları tasarlanmalıdır. Yapay zekânın öğrenme ve öğretimin hedefleriyle doğrudan uyumlu hale gelmesi bir zaman meselesidir. Eğitim fakültesi akademisyenleri olarak bu süreçte araştırma, öğretme ve öğrenme süreçlerinin bir parçası olmak istiyorsak yapay zekânın eğitim ve araştırma süreçleriyle bütünleştirilmesine öncelik vermeliyiz.

Kaynakça

  • Arslan, A., & Özdamar, N. (2020). Yükseköğretimde programlama derslerine yönelik bir otomatik ödev notlandırma sistemi önerisi. Ege Eğitim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 3(2), 42-51.
  • Arslan, K. (2017). Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ ve Uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71-88.
  • Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 1052–1092 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9
  • Balla, E. (2023, Mayıs 31). Automated grading systems: How AI is Revolutionizing Exam Evaluation. Data Science Central. https://www.datasciencecentral.com/automated-grading-systems-how-ai-is-revolutionizing-exam-evaluation/
  • Beer, D. (2019) Should we use AI to make us quicker and more efficient researchers. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/10/30/should-we-use-ai-to-make-us-quicker-and-more-efficient-researchers/. Erişim tarihi: 18.11.2023
  • Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068.
  • Brennen, E. (2020, Haziran) AI-powered grading software earns high marks. UMass Lowell. https://www.uml.edu/news/stories/2020/gradescope-software.aspx
  • Bridgeman, B., Trapani, C., & Attali, Y. (2009, Nisan). Considering fairness and validity in evaluating automated scoring. In annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.
  • Bryson, J. (2016). What are academics for? Can we be replaced by AI?. https://joanna-bryson.blogspot.com/2016/01/what-are-academics-for-can-we-be.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 16 .11.2023)
  • Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Ramaswamy, S., Chui, M., Allas, T., Dahlstrom, P., Henke, N., & Trench, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence: the next digital frontier? McKinsey Global Institute. https://apo.org.au/node/210501 (Erişim tarihi: 20.11.2023)
  • Cardona, M. A., Rodríguez, R. J., & Ishmael, K. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations. The Office of Educational Technology. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2023/05/ai-future-of-teaching-and-learning-report.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 03.08.2023)
  • Carnegie, L., (2023). The cognitive tutor: applying cognitive science to education. K-12 Education Solutions Provider. https://www.carnegielearning.com/pages/whitepaper-report/the-cognitive-tutor-applying-cognitive-science-to-education/ (Erişim Tarihi: 23.08.2023)
  • Cerullo, M. (2023, April 5). Here’s how many U.S. workers ChatGPT says it could replace. MoneyWatch. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-jobs/ (Erişim Tarihi: 23.08.2023)
  • Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16-24.
  • Chatterjee J., & Dethlefs N. (2023). This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide ... and even your worst enemy. Patterns 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022. 100676
  • Checco, A., Bracciale, L., Loreti, P., Pinfield, S., & Bianchi, G. (2021). AI-assisted peer review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00703-8
  • Chen, G., Clarke, S., & Resnick, L.B. (2015). Classroom Discourse Analyzer (CDA): A discourse analytic tool for teachers. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 10(2), 85-105.
  • Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278.
  • Panigrahi, C. M. A. (2020). Use of Artificial Intelligence in education. Management Accountant, 55, 64-67. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
  • Christie, S. T., Jarratt, D. C., Olson, L. A., & Taijala, T. T. (2019). Machine-learned school dropout early warning at scale. Proceedings of The 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2019), 726–731.
  • Chubb, J., Cowling, P., & Reed, D. (2022). Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process. AI & society, 37(4), 1439-1457.
  • Currie, G. M. (2023). Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: Is chatgpt hype, hero or heresy? Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008 (Erişim Tarihi 08.08.2023)
  • Dalinger, T., Thomas, K. B., Stansberry, S., & Xiu, Y. (2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 144, 103696.
  • Dhar, P. (2020) Peer review of scholarly research gets an AI boost. https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/robotics/artificial-intelligence/peer-review-of-scholarly-research-gets-an-ai-boost. (Erişim Tarihi:16.11.2023)
  • Dilhac, M.A., Abrassart, C., & Voarino, N. (2018, Aralık). Report of the montréal declaration for a responsible development of artificial intelligence. Papyrus. https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/27795 (Erişim tarihi: 16.08.2023)
  • du Boulay, B. (2016). Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 76-81, doi:10.1109/MIS.2016.93.
  • Edubirdie. (2022). Essay on Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://edubirdie.com/examples/essay-on-artificial-intelligence-in-education/ (Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2023)
  • Ersozlu, Z., Ledger, S., Ersozlu, A., Mayne, F., & Wildy, H. (2021). Mixed-reality learning environments in teacher education: An analysis of TeachLivETM Research. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032155.
  • Fiok, K., Farahani, F. V., Karwowski, W., & Ahram, T. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence for education and training. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 19(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129211028651
  • Flogie, A., & Aberšek, B. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education. IntechOpen.
  • Gardner, J., Brooks, C., & Baker, R. (2019). Evaluating the fairness of predictive student models through slicing analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics &; knowledge (ss. 225–234). New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303791.
  • Gibson, R. (2023). 10 Ways Artificial Intelligence IS Transforming Instructional Design. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/8/10-ways-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-instructional-design
  • Goksel-Canbek, N., & Mutlu, M.E.(2016). On the track of Artificial Intelligence: Learning with Intelligent Personal Assistants. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 592-601. doi:10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3549
  • Goksel, N., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Current insights and future perspectives. In Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (ss. 224-236). IGI Global.
  • Goli, S. (2023). Unleashing the next chapter of personalized and interactive online learning with generative AI, machine learning, and virtual reality. Coursera Blog. https://blog.coursera.org/new-products-tools-and-features-2023/ Erişim Tarihi: 7 Eylül 2023.
  • Guo, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2019, Ekim). Artificial Intelligence in Education. In 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) (pp. 175-179). Atlantis Press.
  • Haldeman, G., Babeş-Vroman, M., Tjang, A., & Nguyen, T. D. (2021). Formative feedback in autograding. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(3), 1-30.
  • Gordon, C. L., & Lysecky, R., & Vahid, F. (2021, Temmuz). The Rise of Program Auto-grading in Introductory CS Courses: A Case Study of zyLabs 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference toplantısında sunulan bildiri. https://peer.asee.org/37887
  • Hauswald, J., Laurenzano, M. A., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Rovinski, A., Khurana, A.,Dreslinski, R. G., Mudge, T., Petrucci, V., Tang, L. & Mars, J. (2015). Sirius: An open end-to-end voice and vision personal assistant and its implications for future warehouse scale computers. InProceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. ss.223-238. ACM.
  • Heaven, D. (2018) AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07245-9. Erişim Tarihi: 27 Ağustos 2023
  • Hill-Yardin, E. L., Hutchinson, M. R., Laycock, R., & Spencer, S. J. (2023). A Chat (GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain Behav Immun, 110, 152-154.
  • Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., ... & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
  • Horn, M. B. (2018). "Hey Alexa, Can You Help Kids Learn More?": The next technology that could disrupt the classroom. Education Next 18, 2, 82-84.
  • Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 206-206.
  • Humble, N., & Mozelius, P. (2019, Ekim). Artificial intelligence in education - A promise, a threat or a hype. In Proceedings of the European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (ss. 149-156).
  • Hutt, S., Gardner, M., Duckworth, A. L., & D’Mello, S. K. (2019). Evaluating fairness and generalizability in models predicting on-time graduation from college applications. International Educational Data Mining Society.
  • Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001.
  • Ilhan, K., Mušić, D., Junuz, E., & Mirza, S. (2017, Mayıs). Scarlet-Artificial teaching assistant. In 2017 International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & Optimization (ICCAIRO) (ss. 11-14). IEEE.
  • Jensen, E., Dale, M., Donnelly, P.J., Stone, C., Kelly, S., Godley, A. & D'Mello, S.K. (2020). Toward automated feedback on teacher discourse to enhance teacher learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376418
  • Joshi, S., Rambola, R. K., & Churi, P. (2021). Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Education for Next Generation. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1714, No. 1, s. 012039). IOP Publishing.
  • Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100017.
  • Kengam, Jagadeesh. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education. Research Gate, 18, 1-4.10.13140/RG.2.2.16375.65445.
  • Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). To Advance AI Use in Education, Focus on Understanding Educators. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), 12-19. doi: 10.1007/s40593-023-00351-4
  • Kizilcec, R. F., & Lee, H. (2022). Algorithmic fairness in education. W. Holmes & K. Porayska-Pomsta (ed) The ethics of artificial intelligence in education (ss. 174-202) içinde. Routledge.
  • Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8(1), 30-43.
  • Krstić, L., Aleksić, V., & Krstić, M. (2022). 9th International scientific conference Technics and Informatics in Education – TIE 2022. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/bitstream/123456789/14841/1/S401_13.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 23.09.2023)
  • Lakshman, K. (2023). ChatGPT—Its Role in Medical Writing. Indian Journal of Surgery, 1-2.
  • Lee, A. V. Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education (AIED). In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
  • Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e105-e106.
  • Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Brynjolfsson E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Ngo, H., Niebles, J.C., Parli, V., Shoham, Y., Wald, R., Clark, J. and Perrault, R., (2023). The AI index 2023 annual report. Stanford University: AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI.
  • Merriam, S. B. & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: a guide to design and implementation. Jossey and Bass.
  • Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D’Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2021). Algorithmic fairness: Choices, assumptions, and definitions. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 8. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-125902.
  • Mulyana, E., & Hakimi, R. (2018, Temmuz). Bringing automation to the classroom: A chatOps-based approach. 4th International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT) sunulan bildiri (ss. 1-6). IEEE.
  • Okur, E., Aslan, S., Alyuz, N., Arslan Esme, A., & Baker, R. S. (2018). Role of socio-cultural differences in labeling students’ affective states. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: 19th International Conference, AIED 2018, London, UK, June 27–30, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 19 (ss. 367-380). Springer International Publishing.
  • OpenAI. ChatGPT. OpenAI. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ Erişim Tarihi: 13 Haziran, 2023.
  • Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020.
  • Özhan, Ş. Ç., & Altun, A. (2022). AI-Based Virtual Classroom Simulator With a Recommendation System in Preservice Teacher Training During COVID-19. S.Ç. Özhan & A. Altun (eds.) Redefining Teacher Education and Teacher Preparation Programs in the Post-COVID-19 Era içinde (ss. 33-45). IGI Global.
  • Powell, K. (2016). Does it take too long to publish research?. Nature, 530(7589), 148-151.
  • Ramineni, C., & Williamson, D. M. (2013). Automated essay scoring: Psychometric guidelines and practices. Assessing Writing, 18(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.004
  • Rauf, D. (2020, Kasım). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 education: Unintended consequences lurk, report warns. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/artificial-intelligence-in-k-12-education-unintended-consequences-lurk-report-warns/2020/05
  • Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., & Li, R. Y. (2022). Opportunities and adoption challenges of AI in the construction industry: A Prisma Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045
  • Ritter, S., Yudelson, M., Fancsali, S. E., & Berman, S. R. (2016). How Mastery Learning Works at Scale. Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2876039.
  • Waters, A., & Miikkulainen, R. (2014). GRADE: Machine learning support for graduate admissions. AI Magazine, 35(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v35i1.2504
  • Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Publications.
  • Rose, J. (2022). OpenAI’s new chatbot will tell you how to shoplift and make explosives. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgyp9j/openais-new-chatbot-will-tell-you-how-to-shoplift-andmake-explosives. (Erişim Tarihi: 22 Temmuz 2023)
  • Sadiku, M. N., Ashaolu, T. J., Ajayi-Majebi, A., & Musa, S. M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Scientific Advances (IJSCIA), 2(1), 5-11.
  • Sahu, A. (2023, March 24). 8 applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education. West Agile Labs Blog. https://www.westagilelabs.com/blog/8-applications-of-artificial-intelligence-in-education/
  • Sha, L., Rakovi´c, M., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Carroll, D., Yew, V. M., Gasevic, D., et al. (2021). Assessing algorithmic fairness in automatic classifiers of educational forum posts. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education (ss. 381–394). Springer.
  • Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.10063
  • Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. D. (2012, Nisan). Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge konferans kitabında (ss. 252-254).
  • Srivastava, M. (2023) ‘A day in the life of ChatGPT as an academic reviewer: Investigating the potential of large language model for scientific literature review’. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wydct
  • Subrahmanyam, V. V., & Swathi, K. (2018, Ağustos). Artificial intelligence and its implications in education. In Int. Conf. Improv. Access to Distance High. Educ. Focus Underserved Communities Uncovered Reg. Kakatiya University (ss. 1-11).
  • Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. V. (2020). A framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning. ArXiv E-Prints, arXiv:1901.10002. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10002 Erişim Tarihi: 31 Ağustos 2023
  • Tate, H. (2020, May 12). NAU researchers develop online simulation. Research. https://nau.edu/nau-research/online-simulation/
  • Terzopoulos, G. & Satratzemi, M. (2019, Eylül). Voice Assistants and Artificial Intelligence in Education. In Proceedings of 9th Balkan Conference on Informatics (BCI’19). ACM,Ss.1-6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351556.3351588
  • Trivedi, N. (2018). ProblemPal: Generating Autonomous Practice Content in Real-Time with Voice Commands and Amazon Alexa. In Proceedings of ELearn: World Conference on E-Learning. Las Vegas, ss. 80-82.
  • UKRI. (2021) Transforming our world with AI. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/UKRI-120221-TransformingOurWorldWithAI.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 27 Haziran 2023
  • UNESCO. (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in higher education: Quick Start Guide. UNESCO
  • van Belkom, R. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on the activities of a futurist. World Futures Review, 12(2), 156-168.
  • Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98-110.
  • Wadi Africa. (2023). Unlocking the potential of AI in research: How ai tools can streamline your project. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/unlocking-potential-ai-research-how-tools-can-revolutionize (Erişim Tarihi: 27.08.2023)
  • Wiggers, K. (2023, March 24). OpenAI connects Chatgpt to the internet. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/23/openai-connects-chatgpt-to-the-internet/ (Erişim Tarihi: 4 Ağustos 2023).
  • Wogu, I. A. P., Misra, S., Olu-Owolabi, E. F., Assibong, P. A. & Udoh, O. D. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Teachers and the Fate of Learners in the 21st Century Education Sector: Implications for Theory and Practice. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics,119(16), 2245-2259.
  • Woolf, B. (2022) Introduction to IJAIED Special Issue, FATE in AIED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(501–503). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00299-x
  • Zatsarenko, R., Bruce-Gardyne, O., & Koo, T. (2021, Kasım). Autograding in education using Artificial Intelligence. OxJournal. https://www.oxjournal.org/autograding-in-education-using-artificial-intelligence/ (Erişim Tarihi: 4 Ağustos 2023).
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Toplam 96 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Eğitim Teknolojisi ve Bilgi İşlem
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Feride Öksüz Gül

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi 29 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Öksüz Gül, F. (2024). EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 71-97.
AMA Öksüz Gül F. EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER. MEAD. Aralık 2024;8(2):71-97.
Chicago Öksüz Gül, Feride. “EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER”. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 8, sy. 2 (Aralık 2024): 71-97.
EndNote Öksüz Gül F (01 Aralık 2024) EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 8 2 71–97.
IEEE F. Öksüz Gül, “EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER”, MEAD, c. 8, sy. 2, ss. 71–97, 2024.
ISNAD Öksüz Gül, Feride. “EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER”. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 8/2 (Aralık 2024), 71-97.
JAMA Öksüz Gül F. EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER. MEAD. 2024;8:71–97.
MLA Öksüz Gül, Feride. “EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER”. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 8, sy. 2, 2024, ss. 71-97.
Vancouver Öksüz Gül F. EĞİTİMDE YAPAY ZEKÂ: EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİSYENLERİ İÇİN FIRSATLAR VE RİSKLER. MEAD. 2024;8(2):71-97.