Examining Spiritual Cult on New Media in the Construction of Medans Hadith Enthusiasts

Öz

Between 2022 and 2024, Indonesia was stirred by a spiritual-cult phenomenon involving Gus Samsudin, Panji Gumilang, and Mama Gufran, who were able to generate public opinion reaching approximately five million viewers per video. The subjects extensively construct and reinforce a leader-centered cult image through new media in order to sustain a post-truth agenda, despite the limited role of the Kominfo (also referred to as Komdigi) in categorizing religion- and myth-based hoaxes. As noted by Komdigi, certain categories of hoaxes must first be determined through recommendations from designated experts, particularly the Majelis Ulama Indonesia, before any blocking measures can be implemented. This study verifies religion- and myth-based categories using Fairclough’s Model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). It also incorporates the perspectives of Hadith enthusiasts as part of the “Checking the Meaning by Outliers” process, one of the “Drawing and Verifying Conclusions” techniques proposed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The study concludes that: (1) the subjects function as post-truth originators; (2) the repackaging practices of media companies are driven by profit motives; and (3) the experimental adaptation of Jarh wa Ta'dil indicates that the subjects, as originators, demonstrate weak credibility.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Post-Truth
• Spiritual Cult of Personality
• New Media
• TV One News
• Jarh wa Ta’dil

Yeni Medyada Medanlı Hadis Meraklılarının İnşasında Ruhani Kültün İncelenmesi

Öz

2022 ile 2024 yılları arasında Endonezya, Gus Samsudin, Panji Gumilang ve Mama Gufran’ın yer aldığı bir tür ruhsal-kült fenomeniyle sarsılmıştır. Bu kişiler, her bir video başına yaklaşık beş milyon izleyiciye ulaşarak kamuoyunu etkileyebilmiştir. Söz konusu kişiler, post-truth bir gündemi sürdürmek amacıyla yeni medya üzerinden lider merkezli bir kült imajını yoğun biçimde inşa etmekte ve pekiştirmektedir. Bu durum, din ve mit temelli yanlış bilgileri sınıflandırma konusunda Kominfo’nun (Komdigi olarak da anılmaktadır) sınırlı rolüne rağmen gerçekleşmektedir. Komdigi’nin belirttiği üzere, bazı hoaks kategorilerinin engellenmeden önce, özellikle Endonezya Ulema Konseyi (Majelis Ulama Indonesia) gibi yetkilendirilmiş uzman kurumların önerileri doğrultusunda belirlenmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, din ve mit temelli kategorileri Fairclough’un Eleştirel Söylem Analizi (CDA) modeli kullanarak incelemektedir. Ayrıca, Miles, Huberman ve Saldaña tarafından önerilen “Sonuçların Oluşturulması ve Doğrulanması” tekniklerinden biri olan “Aykırı Görüşlerle Anlamın Doğrulanması” süreci kapsamında hadis alanına ilgi duyan kişilerin görüşlerine de yer verilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları şu şekildedir: (1) incelenen kişiler post-truth üreticileri olarak işlev görmektedir; (2) medya kuruluşlarının içerik yeniden paketleme pratikleri kâr odaklıdır ve (3) jarh ve ta’dil yönteminin deneysel uyarlaması, bu kişilerin bilgi kaynağı olarak zayıf bir güvenilirliğe sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Post-Truth
• Kişilik Manevi Kültü
• Yeni Medya
• TV One News
• Jarh wa Ta'dil

Kaynakça

1. Abitolkha, A. M., & Faiz, M. F. (2022). A cult in tariqa leadership. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 10733–10796.
2. Afandi, A. J. (2023). Islam and local culture: The acculturation formed by Walisongo in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 103–124.
3. Ahmad bin Hanbal. (1981). Kitab al-zuhd. Dar al-Nahdah al-Arabiyyah.
4. Al-Hallaj. (922). Diwan al-Hallaj. Markaz Tahqiqat Kampyutiri Ulum Islami.
5. Alwiyah, S., & Sahrul. (2024). Religion and culture syncretism in the Klenik tradition in the Javanese community of Binjai City. JUSPI (Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam), 8(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.30829/juspi.v8i1.20177
6. Andariati, L. (2020). Hadis dan sejarah perkembangannya. Diroyah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 153–166.
7. Anjani, S. (2024). Masuknya peradaban Islam ke Indonesia dan peran Walisongo dalam proses Islamisasi Nusantara. Tadhkirah, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59841/tadhkirah.v1i3.13
8. Antaranews.com. (2023). SAS Institute imbau masyarakat tak terhasut isu “Mazhab Bung Karno”. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3516066/sas-institute-imbau-masyarakat-tak-terhasut-isu-mazhab-bung-karno

9. Aptika Komdigi. (2022). Mekanisme pemblokiran konten negatif. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2022/09/mekanisme-pemblokiran-konten-negatif/
10. Balconi, M., Brusoni, S., & Orsenigo, L. (2010). In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy, 39(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.013
11. Basri, H. (2023). Berinteraksi dengan hadis antar realita dan idealita: Menyingkap penyimpangan kelompok liberal, Syi’ah, sufi, dan aliran kalam dalam memahami hadis (1st ed.). Prenadamedia Group.
12. BPS. (2010). Kewarganegaraan, suku bangsa, agama, dan bahasa sehari-hari penduduk Indonesia: Hasil sensus penduduk 2010. BPS.
13. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6(3), 203–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x
14. Crabtree, C., Kern, H. L., & Siegel, D. A. (2020). Cults of personality, preference falsification, and the dictator’s dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 32(3), 409-434.
15. detik.com. (2022). Padepokan Gus Samsudin di Blitar digeruduk warga. https://www.detik.com/jatim/berita/d-6209038/padepokan-gus-samsudin-di-blitar-digeruduk-warga
16. Dewan Pers. (2025). Data perusahaan pers. https://dewanpers.or.id/data/perusahaanpers
17. Fletcher, N. N., Robertson, C. T., Arguedas, A. R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Reuters Institute digital news report 2024. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-vy6n-4v57
18. Fuller, S. (2018). Post-truth: Knowledge as a power game. Anthem Press.
19. Geertz, C. (2014). Agama Jawa: Abangan, santri, priyayi dalam kebudayaan Jawa (M. Zaki, Ed., 2. bs.). Komunitas Bambu.
20. Haryatmoko. (2016). Critical discourse analysis (analisis wacana kritis): Landasan teori, metodologi, dan penerapan. Rajagrafindo Persada.
21. Herdiansyah, H. (2015). Wawancara, observasi, dan focus groups: Sebagai instrumen penggalian data kualitatif (1st ed.). Rajagrafindo Persada.
22. Hurgronje, C. S. (1894). De Atjehers (1st ed.). E. J. Brill.
23. Ibnu Hajar. (2019). Nuzhah al-nazar fi tawdih nukhbah al-fikr (1st ed.). Dar al-Minhaj al-Qawim.
24. Idri. (2020). Problematika autentisitas hadis Nabi dari klasik hingga kontemporer (1st ed.). Prenadamedia Group.
25. Janatun Naim, S. (2015). Sejarah masuknya Islam di Malaysia. Wartasejarah, 4(1), 398–408.
26. Kemendagri. (2024). E-database. https://e-database.kemendagri.go.id/dataset/1335/tabel-data?page=3664
27. Komdigi. (2024). Hingga akhir tahun 2023, Kominfo tangani 12.547 isu hoaks. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/pengumuman/detail/siaran-pers-no-02-hm-kominfo-01-2024-tentang-hingga-akhir-tahun-2023-kominfo-tangani-12-547-isu-hoaks
28. Komdigi. (2025). Komdigi identifikasi 1.923 konten hoaks sepanjang tahun 2024. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/detail/komdigi-identifikasi-1923-konten-hoaks-sepanjang-tahun-2024
29. Kuckreja, R., & Segara, I. N. Y. (2025). Mencari definisi Hindu Nusantara. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v9i1.3606
30. KUHP. (2021). Kitab undang-undang hukum pidana. Indonesia, 5(8), 1–143.
31. Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916
32. Mahbubul, S., & Al, A. (2023). Bait al-Hikmah (House of Wisdom) of Baghdad: A name of the beautiful management. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2), 85–92.
33. Mahmudah, S. (2018). Islam and local traditions: The study of the thinkings of Abdurrahman Wahid (1940–2009) and Khalil Abdul Karim (1930–2002): An Indonesian and an Egyptian perspective. Sunan Kalijaga: International Journal of Islamic Civilization, 1(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.14421/skijic.v1i2.1365
34. Márquez, X. (2020). The mechanisms of cult production. İçinde Ruler personality cults from empires to nation-states and beyond (ss. 21–45). Routledge.
35. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
36. Mogot-Prahoro, Y. (2022). Manajemen surat kabar: Panduan ilmu, pengetahuan, seni, nurani, dan institusi (1st ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
37. Morissan. (2021). Teori komunikasi individu hingga massa. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
38. MUI.or.id. (2024). Ketua MUI bidang fatwa sampaikan 10 kriteria aliran sesat. https://www.mui.or.id/baca/berita/ketua-mui-bidang-fatwa-sampaikan-10-kriteria-alirat-sesat
39. Muvid, M. B. (2022). Kuliah tasawuf di tengah arus disrupsi (1st ed.). Pustaka Diniyah.
40. Novita, Y. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Y. Novita, Ed.). Global Eksekutif Teknologi.
41. Nurfadillah, H., Ma’arif, B. S., & Nasir, M. A. (2023). Strategi pencegahan reproduksi berita hoax di media sosial dengan pendekatan studi ilmu jarh wa ta’dil. Bandung Conference Series: Islamic Broadcast Communication, 3(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsibc.v3i2.7691
42. OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT. https://chatgpt.com
43. Orhan, A. (2023). Fake news detection on social media: The predictive role of university students’ critical thinking dispositions and new media literacy. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00248-8
44. Patel, C. (2021). Conceptualizing the cult classification: The structural impacts of mainstream anti-cult ideology. Honors Program Theses, 133.
45. Pisch, A. (2016). The phenomenon of the personality cult: A historical perspective. İçinde Personality cults in dictatorships: Their origins and functions in the twentieth century (ss. 49–85). ANU Press.
46. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.
47. Rautela, S., & Sharma, A. (2019). Spirituality and social media: Connecting the dots. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(9), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.8863
48. Rianto, P. (2020). When lying becomes an ordinary thing: Ethics in the post-truth era. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v9i1.11986
49. Rivers, W. L., Jensen, J. W., & Peterson, T. (2015). Media massa dan masyarakat modern (2. bs.). Prenadamedia Group.
50. Rofiqoh, Y. I., Alvino, A. T., Chusae, A., & Nizar, Y. A. (2021). Islam and syncretism in Java: Reflections on the thought of Geertz and Woodward. Muharrik: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial, 4(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.37680/muharrik.v4i01.634
51. Santiko, H. (2012). Agama dan pendidikan agama pada masa Majapahit. Amerta, 30(2), 123–133.
52. SCImago. (2025). Indonesia media web reputation ranking. https://www.scimagomedia.com/rankings.php?country=Indonesia
53. Schacht, J. (1967). The origins of Muhammadan jurisprudence. Oxford University Press.
54. Shihab, A. (2009). Antara tasawuf Sunni dan tasawuf falsafi: Akar tasawuf di Indonesia (T. A. I. S. Ibrahim, Ed.). Pustaka Iman.
55. Sholikhah, N., & Roselani, N. G. A. (2024). Perluasan makna kata “viral” dalam teks berbasis korpus LCC Indonesia 2023 di CQPWEB. Mabasan: Masyarakat Bahasa & Sastra Nusantara, 18(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.62107/mab.v18i2.934
56. Socialblade.com. (2025). YouTube country rank. https://socialblade.com
57. Sudaryono. (2019). Metode penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan mix method (2. bs.). Rajagrafindo Persada.
58. Syam, N. W. (2015). Komunikasi transendental (1st ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
59. Tabroni, R., Muhtadi, A. S., & Mukarom, Z. (2023). Komodifikasi filantropi keagamaan di Harian Umum Republika. Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 6(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v6i1.25081
60. Taimiyyah, I. (1995). Majmū‘ al-fatāwā. Dār al-Wafā’.
61. Tretyakov, I. (2021). Destructive nature of manipulative content created by leaders of totalitarian pseudo-religious cults. E3S Web of Conferences, 244. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124411036
62. Tvonenews.com. (2024). Semprot Abuya Mama Ghufron pembohong, pria ini ragukan 500 kitabnya hingga bukan seorang wali: Siap-siap kafir!. https://www.tvonenews.com/religi/217702-semprot-abuya-mama-ghufron-pembohong-pria-ini-ragukan-500-kitabnya-hingga-bukan-seorang-wali-siap-siap-kafir
63. Widodo, H., & Irfanudin, F. (2020). Al jarh wa at-ta’dil in researching sanad. Journal of Hadith Studies, 3(1), 23–33.
64. Woodward, M. R. (2004). Islam Jawa: Kesalehan normatif versus kebatinan (Amirudin & Nurudin, Eds., 2. bs.). LKiS Printing Cemerlang.
65. Zein, M. (2016). Ilmu memahami hadits Nabi (1st ed.). Pustaka Pesantren.
66. Zuchdi, D. (2019). Analisis konten, etnografi, grounded theory ve hermeneutika dalam penelitian (R. Damayanti, Ed., 1. bs.). Bumi Aksara.