The Bio–Theopolitical Governance of Women’s Bodies and the Algorithmic Data Regime in Religion–Integrated FemTech Applications

Öz

This article argues that mobile applications designed within the women’s health–focused FemTech ecosystem, integrated with religion, produce a bio–theopolitical governance architecture that merges with religious authority and articulates with surveillance capitalism by transforming physiological and ritual processes related to the female body into algorithmic practices. In this study, conducted using qualitative descriptive design, the applications Your Home–Mikvah Calendar, FEMM/PeakDay, and MyHayd, selected through purposive sampling, were examined using the walkthrough method and content analysis. The analysis, conducted along three thematic axes—algorithmic religious normativity, the reproduction of religious authority in the digital interface, and the informational religious subject—shows that cycle data are algorithmically converted into religious categories, that structural mechanisms linking decision flows to religious authority references are embedded in the interface, and that the user is positioned as a dual-layered subject who both fulfills religious obligations and produces sensitive data. The study introduces the “DEF” category to the FemTech literature, proposes the concepts of “algorithmic religious normativity” and “informational religious subject,” and aims to reveal the structural conditions that enable DEF applications to be integrated into the bio–theopolitical data regime.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Religion–Integrated FemTech
• Bio-Theopolitical Data Regime
• Algorithmic Religious Normativity
• Informational Religious Subject
• Data Privacy

Din–Entegre FemTech (DEF) Uygulamalarında Kadın Bedeninin Biyo–Teopolitik Yönetişimi ve Algoritmik Veri Rejimi

Öz

Bu makale, kadın sağlığı odaklı FemTech ekosistemi içinde dinle bütünleşik olarak tasarlanan mobil uygulamaların (DEF) kadın bedenine ilişkin fizyolojik ve ritüel süreçleri algoritmik pratiklere dönüştürerek dinî otoriteyle birleşen ve gözetim kapitalizmiyle eklemlenen bir biyo–teopolitik yönetişim mimarisi ürettiğini ileri sürmektedir. Nitel betimleyici tasarımla yürütülen çalışmada amaçlı örnekleme yoluyla seçilen Your Home–Mikvah Calendar, FEMM/PeakDay ve MyHayd uygulamaları walkthrough yöntemi ve içerik analizi aracılığıyla incelenmiştir. Algoritmik dinsel normativite, dijital arayüzde dinî otoritenin yeniden üretimi ve enformasyonel dinsel özne olmak üzere üç tematik eksen üzerinden yürütülen analiz, döngü verilerinin algoritmik olarak dinî kategorilere dönüştürüldüğünü, karar akışlarını dinî otorite referanslarıyla ilişkilendiren yapısal mekanizmaların arayüze gömülü olduğunu ve kullanıcının hem dinî yükümlülüklerini yerine getiren hem de hassas veriler üreten iki katmanlı bir özne olarak konumlandırıldığını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma; “DEF” kategorisini FemTech literatürüne kazandırmakta, “algoritmik dinsel normativite” ve “enformasyonel dinsel özne” kavramlarını önermekte ve DEF uygulamalarının biyo–teopolitik veri rejimiyle eklemlenmesini mümkün kılan yapısal koşulları görünür kılmayı hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Din–Entegre FemTech (DEF)
• Biyo–Teopolitik Veri Rejimi
• Algoritmik Dinsel Normativite
• Enformasyonel Dinsel Özne
• Veri Mahremiyeti

Kaynakça

1. Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509
2. Ariella Sara Lis. (2011). Niddah 2.0: Jewish menstrual purity in the Internet age [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi], Brandeis University.
3. Ask a Rabbi. (t.y.). Geliş tarihi 21 Şubat 2026, gönderen https://www.y-home.us/AskRabi
4. Bilmen, Ö. N. (1986). Büyük İslam ilmihali. Bilmen Basım ve Yayınevi.
5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
6. Campbell, H. A. (2013). Introduction—The rise of the study of digital religion. İçinde Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (ss. 1–21). Routledge.
7. Campbell, H. A. (2024). Looking backwards and forwards at the study of digital religion. Religious Studies Review, 50(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17062
8. Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (2021). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media. Routledge.

9. Carroll, M. P. (2004). Give me that ol’ time hormonal religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43, 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00232.x
10. Cohen, I. (2020). Menstruation and religion: Developing a critical menstrual studies approach. İçinde The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (ss. 115–129). Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
12. Couple to Couple League. (2024). PeakDay: The Catholic NFP app. Natural Family Planning | Fertility Awareness | NFP Classes Couple to Couple League. https://ccli.org/2024/04/peakday-the-catholic-nfp-app/
13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
14. Dinleyici, M. F. (2025). Kilise’de eşcinsellik meselesi ve Petrus Damianus’un eleştirisi. Darulfunun İlahiyat, 36(3), 749–774. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2025.36.3.1767419
15. Erlenbusch-Anderson, V. (2020). The beginning of a study of biopower: Foucault’s 1978 lectures at the Collège de France. Foucault Lectures, 3(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.22439/fsl.vi0.6151
16. Evans, J., Lesage, K., Miner, W., Starr, K. J., & Corichi, M. (2025). Religious importance and religious affiliation. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/05/06/religious-importance-and-religious-affiliation/
17. Felsberger, S. (2025). The high stakes of tracking menstruation. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.118325
18. FEMM Health. (t.y.-a). Privacy policy. Geliş tarihi 2 Mart 2026, gönderen https://femmhealth.org/privacy-policy-2/
19. FEMM Health. (t.y.-b). Telehealth—Telemed. Geliş tarihi 19 Eylül 2025, gönderen https://femmhealth.org/telehealth/
20. FEMM Health and Period Tracker - Google Play. (2024a). FEMM Health and Period Tracker. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en_US&id=org.femmhealth.femm
21. FEMM Health and Period Tracker - Google Play. (2024b). FEMM Health and Period Tracker. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.femmhealth.femm&hl=en_US
22. FemTech Analytics. (2021). FemTech market overview. Deep Knowledge Group. https://www.femtech.health/femtech-market-overview
23. Fertility Science Institute. (t.y.). Welcome to Couple to Couple League. Couple to Couple League. Geliş tarihi 6 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://ccli.org/
24. Flo Health. (2025). Flo for perimenopause is launching to empower the 1 billion+ women who experience perimenopause without the support they deserve. PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/flo-for-perimenopause-is-launching-to-empower-the-1-billion-women-who-experience-perimenopause-without-the-support-they-deserve-302507311.html
25. Frost, C. F. (2025). An Orthodox Christian theological ethic of childbearing: An analysis of continuity and change. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 60(1), 218–227.
26. Gonzalez, G. (2022). Dobbs v. Jackson: The overturning of Roe v. Wade and its implications on substantive due process. https://lawreview.syr.edu/dobbs-v-jackson-the-overturning-of-roe-v-wade-and-its-implications-on-substantive-due-process/
27. Grand View Research Inc. (2025). FemTech market size, share, & trends analysis report by type (devices, software, services), by application (pregnancy and nursing care), by end-use (direct to consumer), by region, and segment forecasts, 2025–2030. Grand View Research Inc. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/femtech-market-report
28. Greene, J. (2025). As class action trial looms, Meta and Flo could face “mind-boggling” damages. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/class-action-trial-looms-meta-flo-could-face-mind-boggling-damages-2025-07-15/
29. Helland, C. (2005). Online religion as lived religion: Methodological issues in the study of religious participation on the Internet. Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00005823
30. Hofmann, D. (2024). FemTech: Empowering reproductive rights or FEM-TRAP for surveillance? Medical Law Review, 32(4), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae035
31. Humanae Vitae. (1968). https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.html
32. Husein, F., & Slama, M. (2018). Online piety and its discontent: Revisiting Islamic anxieties on Indonesian social media. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1415056
33. Ibrahim, Z., Panchpor, P., Nurain, N., & Clawson, J. (2024). “Islamically, I am not on my period”: A study of menstrual tracking in Muslim women in the US. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642006
34. Ipsos. (2023). Global religion 2023—Global advisor survey religious beliefs across the world. Ipsos.
35. Karim, J. L., Wan, R., Tabet, R. S., Chiu, D. S., & Talhouk, A. (2024). Person-generated health data in women’s health: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.2196/53327
36. Kazakoff, A., Doroshuk, M. L., Ganshorn, H., & Doyle-Baker, P. K. (2025). Motivations for use, user experience and quality of reproductive health mobile applications in a pre-menopausal user base: A scoping review. Healthcare, 13(877), 1–24.
37. Koopman, C. (2018). Infopolitics, biopolitics, anatomopolitics: Toward a genealogy of the power of data. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 39(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj20183914
38. Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
39. Levy, J., & Romo-Avilés, N. (2019). “A good little tool to get to know yourself a bit better”: A qualitative study on users’ experiences of app-supported menstrual tracking in Europe. BMC Public Health, 19(1213), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7549-8
40. Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
41. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
42. Mehrnezhad, M., Van Der Merwe, T., & Catt, M. (2024). Mind the FemTech gap: Regulation failings and exploitative systems. Frontiers in the Internet of Things, 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/friot.2024.1296599
43. Mikvah Calendar App - Google Play. (2024). Mikvah Calendar App - Your Home. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nebrasky.your_home&hl=en_US
44. Mikvah Calendar—Your Home—APK Download for Android. (t.y.). Geliş tarihi 14 Ocak 2026, gönderen https://rabbi-itzchak-steinberg.en.aptoide.com/app
45. Mínguez-Blasco, R. (2021). Between virgins and priests: The feminisation of Catholicism and priestly masculinity in nineteenth-century Spain. Gender & History, 33(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12493
46. Morgan, D. (2010). Religion and material culture: The matter of belief. Routledge.
47. My Catholic Doctor. (t.y.). Faithful healthcare you can trust. Geliş tarihi 6 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://mycatholicdoctor.com/
48. MyHayd App. (2025, January 1). Privacy policy. https://www.myhayd.app/
49. MyHayd App - Google Play. (2026, March 2). MyHayd App. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.myhaydapp&hl=en_US
50. Myhayd.app. (t.y.). MyHayd app. Geliş tarihi 19 Eylül 2025, gönderen https://www.myhayd.app/
51. Natural Family Planning. (t.y.). The Roman Catholic Diocese of Tulsa. Geliş tarihi 5 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://dioceseoftulsa.org/natural-family-planning
52. Natural Family Planning (NFP). (t.y.-a). Catholic Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee. Geliş tarihi 6 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://ptdiocese.org/nfp
53. Natural Family Planning (NFP). (t.y.-b). Catholic Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee. Geliş tarihi 6 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://ptdiocese.org/nfp
54. NFP National Providers | USCCB. (t.y.). United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Geliş tarihi 6 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://www.usccb.org/topics/natural-family-planning/nfp-national-providers
55. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
56. Ott, M. F. (2018). Impure blood: The menstrual taboo in the Christian church during the thirteenth century.
57. Öğüt, S. (2010). Taharet. İçinde Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam ansiklopedisi (Cilt 39, ss. 382–385). Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları.
58. Pater, R. (2016). The politics of design: A (not so) global manual for visual communication. BIS Publishers.
59. PeakDay. (t.y.). Discover PeakDay app: Fertility awareness FABM ovulation calculator. Geliş tarihi 19 Eylül 2025, gönderen https://peakday.com/discover/
60. PeakDay Fertility Tracker - Google Play. (2025). PeakDay Fertility Tracker. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.peakday&hl=en_US
61. Pew Research Center. (2024). Women: Religious landscape study. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/?post_type=rls
62. Pew Research Center. (2025). Religious attendance and congregational involvement. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/02/26/religious-attendance-and-congregational-involvement/
63. Regulation (EU) 2016/679, General Data Protection Regulation, art. 9 (2016).
64. Roche, D. (2022). Should you delete your period tracking app after Roe v. Wade ruling? Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/why-delete-period-tracking-app-roe-v-wade-ruling-sparks-panic-data-1719167
65. Scheunchen, T. (2025). From body to substance: Islamic menstruation laws in the shadow of late antiquity? Islamic Law and Society, 32, 1–42.
66. Science Writers at Clue. (2025). Clue celebrates 1M paid members. Clue. https://helloclue.com/articles/about-clue/clue-reaches-1-million-paid-subscribers-cementing-position-as-leading-data-driven-women-s-health-intelligence-platform
67. Slama, M. (2021). Tracing digital divides in Indonesian Islam: Ambivalences of media and class. CyberOrient, 15(1), 290–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyo2.15
68. Stahl, B. C., Schroeder, D., & Rodrigues, R. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence: Case studies and options for addressing ethical challenges. Springer.
69. Standing, G. (1999). Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development, 27(3), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00151-X
70. Şener, M. (1996). Gusül. İçinde Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam ansiklopedisi (Cilt 14, ss. 213–214). Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları.
71. The Golda Koschitzky Center. (2025). Bedikot. Nishmat Yoatzot Halacha. https://www.yoatzot.org/603/
72. The Holy See. (t.y.). Part three section two the ten commandments chapter two you shall love your neighbor as yourself article 6 the sixth commandment III: The love of husband and wife. Geliş tarihi 5 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://www.vatican.va/content/catechism/en/part_three/section_two/chapter_two/article_6/iii_the_love_of_husband_and_wife.index.html
73. Tsuria, R., & Yadlin-Segal, A. (2021). Digital religion and global media: Flows, communities, and radicalizations. İçinde Handbook of global media ethics (ss. 157–175). Springer.
74. Uludağ, H. (2024). Bir dönüşüm pratiği olarak dijital öz-takip: Kadın, beden ve sağlık [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi], Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi.
75. Uludağ, H., & Gün, S. (2023). Beden odağında COVID-19 salgını: Dijitalleşme, gözetim ve öz-takip. Yeni Medya Dergisi, 14, 155-177. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1215523
76. Vincent, S. (2008). Speaking youth to power. NCR. https://www.ncregister.com/features/speaking-youth-to-power
77. We Are Social. (2025). Digital 2025 global overview report. Meltwater. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2025/02/digital-2025/
78. World Youth Alliance. (2022). FEMM ambassadors program. https://wya.net/femm-ambassadors-program/
79. XII. Problems of bioethics | The Russian Orthodox Church. (t.y.). İçinde XII. Problems of bioethics. Geliş tarihi 5 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://old.mospat.ru/en/documents/social-concepts/xii/
80. Yavuz, Y. V. (1998). Hayız. İçinde Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam ansiklopedisi (Cilt 17, ss. 51–53). Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları.
81. Your Home. (t.y.-a). Eishet Chayil family purity for family happiness. Geliş tarihi 19 Eylül 2025, gönderen https://www.y-home.us/
82. Your Home. (t.y.-b). Halachot. Geliş tarihi 4 Ağustos 2025, gönderen https://www.y-home.us/Halahot
83. Your Home. (t.y.-c). Privacy policy. Geliş tarihi 20 Eylül 2025, gönderen https://www.y-home.us/PrivacyPolicy
84. Zokaityte, A. (2025). FemTech markets: Building financialised consumer access to healthcare technologies. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2191
85. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.