Teo-Politik Soykırım ve Sivil İnisiyatiflerin Sürece Etkisi: Toplumsal Hareketler ve Sosyal Medyanın Politikaya Etkileri

Öz

7 Ekim sonrasında bütün dünyanın gözleri önünde sistematik ve Teo-politik bir soykırım yaşanmaktadır. İsrail eliyle ve önemli ölçüde Batılı devletlerin desteğiyle hayata geçirilen bu soykırım her yönüyle kayıt altına alınmaktadır. Binlerce bebek ve çocuğun katledilmesine müdahale edemeyen ya da etmekten imtina eden bir uluslararası sistemle karşı karşıyayız. Başından bu yana sistem krizine bir cevap mahiyetinde olan boykotlar, üniversite kampüslerinde görülen protestolar, Gazze ablukasını delmeyi amaçlayan Sumud gibi filo girişimleri, İsrail soykırımını hukuki boyutlarıyla tartışan ve soykırımı dünya gündeminin bir parçası kılmaya çalışan sembolik mahkemeler İsrail’e karşı direnişin farklı formları olmuşlardır. Toplumsal hareketler ve bunların medyadaki etkisi süreç içerisinde İsrail izolasyonuna ne ölçüde katkı sağlamıştır? İsrail karşıtı bloğu güçlendirmeyi ve soykırımı gündem edinen bu tür sivil inisiyatifler, 1960 sonrası ortaya çıkan savaş karşıtlığı eksenli yeni toplumsal hareketler teorisi üzerinden analiz edilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gazze
• Yeni Sosyal Hareketler
• Dijital Aktivizm
• İsrail'in İzolasyonu

The Theopolitic Genocide and the Impact of Civil Initiatives on the Process: The Effects of Social Movement and Social Media on Politics

Abstract

Since October 7, a systematic and theopolitical genocide has been unfolding before the eyes of the entire world. This genocide, perpetrated by Israel with significant support from Western states, is being documented in all its dimensions. The current international system has proven unable or unwilling to intervene in the mass killing of thousands of civilians, including children. Given the failure of diplomatic initiatives and the absence of military intervention, it has become necessary to consider alternative forms of resistance against Israel. This study examines the anti-Israel social movements that have gained prominence in Western societies since October 7, 2023, alongside civil initiatives aiming to publicize the genocide globally. Various forms of resistance are discussed, including boycotts as a response to the systemic crisis, university campus protests, flotilla initiatives such as Sumudu aimed at breaching the Gaza blockade, and symbolic tribunals addressing the legal dimensions of the genocide. These civil initiatives, which seek to strengthen the anti-Israel bloc and maintain the genocide on the global agenda, are analyzed through the theoretical framework of new anti-war social movements that emerged after the 1960s.

Keywords

• Gaza Genocide
• Digital Activism
• New Social Movements
• Israel Isolation

Kaynakça

1. Al-Najjar, A., & Zaid, B. (2025). Western media’s ethical collapse: Silencing Gaza’s voice. Third World Quarterly, 46(1), 1–20.
2. Al Jazeera. (2024, Mart 20). Canada stops arms sales to Israel: Who else has blocked weapons exports? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/15/which-countries-have-stopped-supplying-arms-to-israel
3. Baroud, R. (2025, February 12) Hashtag genocide: Why Gaza fought back. Middle East Eye. https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/hashtag-genocide-why-gaza-fought-back
4. Biçer, A. (2025, August 4). Irish president urges UN to intervene in Gaza, citing “destruction of an entire people”. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/irish-president-urges-un-to-intervene-in-gaza-citing-destruction-of-an-entire-people/3650383
5. Christiansen, J. (2017). Sociology reference guide: Theories of social movements. Salem Press.
6. Düz, Z. N. and Aktaş A. (2023, November 12) Israeli lobby believed to be behind resignation of US university president. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/israeli-lobby-believed-to-be-behind-resignation-of-us-university-president/3078674
7. Greenstein, T. (2024, November 8) Why is Germany supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza? Al Jazeere. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/11/8/why-is-germany-supporting-israels-genocide-in-gaza
8. Ikenberry, J. G. (2018). The end of International Order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.

9. Khamis, S., & Dogbatse, F. S. (2024). The Gaza war coverage: The role of social media vs. mainstream media. European Institute of the Mediterranean (IEMed). https://www.iemed.org/publication/the-gaza-war-coverage-the-role-of-social-media-vs-mainstream-media/
10. Malik, N. (2023, October 30). Labour losing voters over Gaza matters – whether it hurts electorally or not. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/oct/30/keir-starmer-labour-israel-gaza
11. Manor, I., & Crilley, R. (2018). Visually framing the Gaza war of 2014: The Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter. Media, War & Conflict, 11(4), 369–391.
12. Mearsheimer J. J (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order, International Security, 43(4), 7–50.
13. Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2008). The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. Penguin Books.
14. Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H. Johnson & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social Movements and Culture (pp. 85-106). University of Minnesota Press.
15. Melucci, A. (1999) Çağdaş hareketlerin sembolik meydan okuması: Yeni sosyal hareketler-teorik açılımlar. Kaknüs Yayınları.
16. Munayyer, Y. (2024, August 7). US support for Israel is collapsing. And Aipac knows it. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/07/us-support-for-israel-is-collapsing-and-aipac-knows-it
17. Nasereddin, S. (2023). Impact of social media platforms on international public opinion during the Israel war on Gaza. Global Change, Peace; Security, 35(1), 5–31.
18. Nelson, A. P. (1997). New social movements: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology. 23, 411-430.
19. Offe, C. (1985). Yeni sosyal hareketler: Kurumsal politikanın sınırlarının zorlanması. İçinde Yeni Sosyal Hareketler (K. Çayır, Ed.), (ss. 47–73). Kaknüs Yayınları.
20. Pew Research Center. (2025 June 3). Most people across 24 surveyed countries have negative views of Israel and Netanyahu https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/06/03/most-people-across-24-surveyed-countries-have-negative-views-of-israel-and-netanyahu/
21. Republic of Türkiye Ombudsman Institution. (2024). “GAZA” NAKBA OF HUMANITY. https://cdn.tbmm.gov.tr/TbmmWeb/Yayinlar/Dosya/a615c57a-efaf-401b-8627-a233cd53e21f.pdf
22. Silverstein, R. (2025, November 10). Zohran Mamdani’s win breaks the Israel lobby’s spell over New York, but the witch hunt isn’t over. The New Arab. https://www.newarab.com/opinion/mamdani-and-new-york-beat-israel-lobby-now-it-wants-payback
23. Sio, M. (2025, September 26) Israeli opposition leaders slam Netanyahu’s UN speech, Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israeli-opposition-leaders-slam-netanyahu-s-un-speech/3700286#
24. Starcevic, S. (2025, August 13). Dutch foreign minister resigns over Israel policy, rocking caretaker government. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/dutch-foreign-minister-caspar-veldkamp-resigns-over-israel-policy/
25. Tarrow, S. (1994) power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge University Press.
26. The Guardian, (2025, October 16). 'Our genocide': How do Israelis feel about the war in Gaza? | On the Ground (Video). Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMyyVaiY4V8&t=31s
27. Tondo, L. and Kierszenbaum, Q. (2024, April 10) Tens of thousands of Israeli protesters call for Netanyahu’s removal, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/31/israeli-protesters-call-benjamin-netanyahu-removal
28. Touraine, A. (2002). Demokrasi nedir? (O. Kunal, Çev.) Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
29. Yenal, Z., and Kolluoğlu Kırlı, B. (2005). Distopyalar ve ütopyalar arasında karşı küreselleşme hareketleri. Birikim Dergisi, (197), 10–17.
30. Yerlikaya, T. (2025, Eylül). Gazze soykırımı ve sivil inisiyatiflerin sürece etkisi. GENAR Türkiye Raporu. https://genarturkiyeraporu.com/konu/perspektif/gazze-soykirimi-ve-sivil-inisiyatiflerin-surece-etkisi/