AN APPROACH TO THE LINK BETWEEN INEQUALITY AND VIOLENCE THROUGH MIGRATION AND SECURITY DEBATE

Öz

In the 21st century, while immigrants strive for better living standards, host societies, in which immigrants arrive, feel the effects of migration in all vessels of society. This study aims to look deeper into the dynamics of the relationship between inequality and violence through the lens of asylum seekers and immigrants. Within this framework, the first part examines the definition and scope of inequality and violence. In the second part, the status of asylum seekers and immigrants is given with the subaltern concept. The tension over the interaction of inequality and violence between asylum seekers and immigrants and the host society has been examined in the discussion part from a security-focused policy perspective. In these circumstances, the pressure on the two groups is analyzed due to the uncertainty of the future, the success of integration policies, and protracted accommodation. Within a three-level framework, this pressure has been studied through levels of individual, social, and national security threats and vulnerabilities. As a result, asylum seekers and irregular migrants have different impacts on the management of repression depending on their location and status. The multi-level migration and security management on the asylum seeker-immigrant and host society issue is not an alternative but a mandatory one.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Inequality
• violence
• asylum-seeker
• migrants
• security

EŞİTSİZLİK VE ŞİDDET İLİŞKİSİNE GÖÇ VE GÜVENLİK TARTIŞMASI ÜZERİNDEN BİR YAKLAŞIM

Öz

21. Yüzyılda göç edenler daha iyi yaşam şartlarını elde etme umudunu taşırken, vardıkları ülkelerdeki ev sahibi toplumlar göç olgusunun etkilerini toplumun tüm alanlarında hissetmektedir. Bu çalışma, eşitsizlik ve şiddet arasındaki ilişkinin dinamiklerinin sığınmacı-göçmenler üzerinden incelenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, ilk olarak eşitsizlik ve şiddet olgusu ele alınmıştır. İkinci kısımda, sığınmacı ve göçmen statülerine madun kavramı üzerinden yaklaşılmıştır. Tartışma kısmında, güvenlik politikaları odaklı bir bakışla sığınmacılar-göçmenler ile ev sahibi toplum arasındaki eşitsizlik ve şiddet ilişkisinde oluşan baskı incelenmiştir. Bu çerçevede akıbetin belirsizliği, uyum politikalarının başarısı ve misafirliğin süresinin uzamasının iki grup üzerindeki baskısı belirleyici olmuştur. Bu baskının analizi üç düzeyli bir çerçevede bireysel, toplumsal ve milli güvenlik tehditleri ve hassasiyetleri bağlamında yapılmıştır. Neticede, sığınmacı ve düzensiz göçmenler mekân ve statülerine bağlı olarak oluşan baskının yönetiminde birbirinden farklı etkiler barındırmaktadır. Sığınmacı-göçmen ile ev sahibi toplum ilişkisi odağında kamu güvenliğinin sürdürülmesindeki çok düzeyli göç ve güvenlik yönetimi ihtiyacı artık bir tercihin ötesinde zorunluluk haline gelmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eşitsizlik
• şiddet
• sığınmacı
• göçmen
• güvenlik

Etik Beyan

Sizi temin ederim ki beyan etmem gereken herhangi bir çıkar çatışması ya da açıklamam gereken herhangi bir karmaşık durum bulunmamaktadır. Araştırmayı kendim yürütme yeteneğine sahip olduğum için herhangi bir finansal fon talebinde bulunmadım. Bu çalışmada etik kurul kararı almayı gerektirecek herhangi bir işlem yapılmadığını da beyan ederim.

Teşekkür

Kıymetli emekleriniz için teşekkür ederim.

Kaynakça

1. Aboim, S. ve Vasconcelos, P. (2021). Migration after empire: Postcolonial masculinities and the transnational dynamics of subalternity. Postcolonial Studies, 24(3), 323-344.
2. Açıkgöz, S. (2019). Metropol Kentlerde Düzensiz Göçmenlerin Mekânsal Kümelenme Dinamikleri: Beykoz-Yenimahalle Afganistanlılar Örneği. Middle East Journal of Refugee Studies, 4(1), 47-61.
3. Adalet Bakanlığı (2023). Adalet İstatistikleri (Justice Statistics). Mayıs 20, 2024 tarihinde https://adlisicil.adalet.gov.tr/Resimler/SayfaDokuman/22042024115644ADalet_ist-2023CALISMALARI59.pdf adresinden alındı.
4. Alamyar, R. ve Boz, I. (2022). Agricultural Background of Afghan Immigrants and Employment Opportunities in the Agricultural Sector in Turkey. MAS journal of applied sciences, 7(4), 1091-1106.
5. Aldoghmi, H. S. (2019). R2P and Refugee Protection: Framing the responsibility to protect prima facie refugees fleeing mass atrocity crimes. Global Responsibility to Protect, 11(1), 104-134.
6. Amnesty International. (2024, Nisan 4). Pakistan: Government must stop ignoring global calls to halt unlawful deportation of Afghan refugees. Mayıs 15, 2014 tarihinde https://www. amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/04/pakistan-government-must-halt-deportation-of-afghan-refugees/ adresinden alındı.
7. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (2020). AİHS Ek 4 No.lu Protokol’ün 4. Maddesine İlişkin Rehber. Mart 25, 2023 tarihinde https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/ adresinden alındı.
8. Baldwin-Edwards, M. (2005). Migration in the Middle East and Mediterranean. Şubat 5, 2023 tarihinde https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/2018-07/RS5.pdf adresinden alındı.

9. Bauder, H. (2021). Urban migrant and refugee solidarity beyond city limits. Urban Studies, 58(16), 3213-3229.
10. Bell, B., Fasani, F. ve Machin, S. (2013). Crime and Immigration: Evidence from Large Immigrant Waves. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1278-1290.
11. Bernat, F. (2017). Immigration and Crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice. Mayıs 15, 2023 tarihinde https://oxfordre.com/criminology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/ acrefore-9780190264079-e-93 adresinden alındı.
12. Borthakur, A. (2017). Afghan refugees: The impact on Pakistan. Asian Affairs, 48(3), 488- 509.
13. Brinkman, H., Attree, L. ve Hezir, S. (2013). Addressing horizontal inequalities as drivers of conflict in the post-2015 development agenda. Eylül 12, 2023 tarihinde https://www.saferworld-global.org/resources/publications/725-addressing-horizontal-inequalities-as-drivers-of-conflict-in-the-post-2015-development-agenda adresinden alındı.
14. Butcher, K. F. ve Piehl, A. M. (2007). Why are immigrants’ incarceration rates so low? Evidence on selective immigration, deterrence, and deportation. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Working Paper: 13229.
15. Buzan, B., Wæver, O. ve De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
16. Canefe, N. (2016). Management of irregular migration: Syrians in Turkey as paradigm shifters for forced migration studies. New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 9-32.
17. Castles, S., Miller, M. J. ve Ammendola, G. (2005). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. New York: The Guilford Press.
18. Crawley, H. ve Kaytaz, E. S. (2022). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Afghan Migration to Europe from Iran. Social Inclusion, 10(3), 4-14.
19. Davies, T., Isakjee, A. ve Dhesi, S. (2017). Violent inaction: The necropolitical experience of refugees in Europe. Antipode, 49(5), 1263-1284.
20. de Haas, H., Czaika, M., Flahaux, M. L., Mahendra, E., Natter, K., Vezzoli, S. ve Villares-Varela, M. (2019). International Migration: Trends, Determinants, and Policy Effects. Population and Development Review, 45(4), 885-922.
21. Decker, S. H., Van Gemert, F. ve Pyrooz, D. C. (2009). Gangs, Migration, and Crime: The Changing Landscape in Europe and the USA, Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l’integration et de la migration internationale, 10(4), 393-408.
22. Díaz, S. P. (2019). Undocumented migration from the other perspective: Coloniality, subaltern subject, and migrant mapping. Chicanx-Latinx L. Rev., 36, 163.
23. Dibeh, G., Fakih, A. ve Marrouch, W. (2019). Labor market and institutional drivers of youth irregular migration in the Middle East and North Africa region. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(2), 225-251.
24. Eleftheriadou, M. (2020). Refugee radicalization/militarization in the age of the European refugee crisis: A Composite Model. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(8), 1797-1818.
25. Engbersen, G. ve Van der Leun, J. (2001). The social construction of illegality and criminality. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9, 51-70.
26. Erdoğan, M. M. (2020). Suriyeliler barometresi 2019: Suriyelilerle uyum içinde yaşamın çerçevesi Ankara: Orion Kitabevi.
27. Erol, H. ve Yaylaci, F. G. (2022). Türkiye’deki Afgan Sığınmacılar ve Medya Temsilleri Bağlamında Görüşleri. Göç Dergisi (2), 181-206.
28. Faist, Thomas (2016). Cross-border migration and social inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 323-346.
29. Faist, T. (2018). The transnationalized social question: Migration and the politics of social inequalities in the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press.
30. Ferrer-Gallardo, X. ve Gabrielli, L. (2022). The Ceuta Border Peripeteia: Tasting the Externalities of EU Border Externalization. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(3), 645–655.
31. Galera, G., Giannetto, L., Membretti, A. ve Noya, A. (2018). Integration of Migrants, Refugees, and Asylum Seekers in Remote Areas with Declining Populations. Ağustos 27, 2023 tarihinde https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/integration-of-migrants-refugees-and-asylum-seekers-in-remote-areas-with-declining-populations_84043b2a-en adresinden alındı.
32. García Agustín, Ó. ve Jørgensen, M. B. (2016). Solidarity without borders: Gramscian perspectives on migration and civil society alliances. Londra: Pluto Press.
33. Goodwin-Gill, G. S. (2011). The right to seek asylum: Interception at sea and the principle of non-refoulment. International Journal of Refugee Law, 23(3), 443-457.
34. Göç, E. (2023). Geçici Koruma Kapsaminda Bulunanlarin Suç Oranlarina Dair Algi Araştirmasi: Çankiri İli Örneği. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, 43, 1516-1533.
35. Göztepe, E. (2014). Türkiye Avrupa İnsan Haklari Sözlesmesi’ne ek 4. protokolle bağlı mıdır? Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne bireysel basvuru hakkı açısından bir değerlendirme. Legal Hukuk Dergisi: Rona Aybay’a Armağan, 1121-1150.
36. Hernández-Hernández, F. ve Gil, Juana M. (2018). Life histories and narratives about subalternity: Facing the challenge of the intractable in relation with the Other. EDUCAR 54(1), 15-29.
37. Hilali, A. Z. (2002). The costs and benefits of the Afghan War for Pakistan. Contemporary South Asia, 11(3), 291-310.
38. Hirsch, A. L. ve Bell, N. (2017). The right to have rights as a right to enter: Addressing a lacuna in the international refugee protection regime. Human Rights Review, 18, 417-437.
39. Hoare, Q. (1999). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Elec Books. Hyndman, J. ve Giles, W. (2017). Refugees in extended exile: Living on the edge. Routledge
40. International Organization of Migration (2021). World Migration Report 2022. Nisan 20, 2023 tarihinde https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2022 adresinden alındı.
41. International Organization of Migration (2023). Who is a Migrant? Nisan 22, 2023 tarihinde https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml_34_glossary.pdf adresinden alındı.
42. İçduygu, A. (2015). Syrian refugees in Turkey: The long road ahead. Şubat 11, 2023 tarihinde https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TCM-Protection-Syria. pdf adresinden alındı.
43. İçduygu, A. ve Demiryontar, B. (2022). Türkiye’de Devlet ve Suriyeli Mülteciler: Çelişkili Politikalar ve Araçsal Rasyonellik. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(Özel Sayı), 316-334.
44. Jauhiainen, J. S. ve Eyvazlu, D. (2018). Urbanization, refugees and irregular migrants in Iran, 2017. University of Turku, Department of Geography and Geology, Division of Geography.
45. Jobard, F. (2014). Riots in France: Political, Proto-political or Anti-political Turmoils? Pritchard, D., Pakes, F. (Ed.), Riot, Unrest and Protest on the Global Stage. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
46. Kabeer, N. (2010). Can the MDGs provide a pathway to social justice? The challenge of intersecting inequalities. Child poverty and inequality new perspectives, 57.
47. Kara, Y. ve Kaya Tilbe, F. (2023). Tarım ve Hayvancılık Sektöründe Çalışan Afgan Göçmenlerde Ekonomik Konumlanma ve Entegrasyon: Trakya Bölgesi Örneği. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(4), 1413-1424.
48. Kayaoglu, A. (2022). Do refugees cause crime? World Development, 154, 105858.
49. Keskin, S. ve Kömür, G. (2023). Türkiye’ye yönelik genç erkek yoğunluklu Afgan göç dalgasının ırkçı söylemler üzerindeki etkisi. Türk & İslam Dünyası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10 (38), 32-53.
50. Khan, A. (2017). Protracted Afghan Refugee Situation: Policy Options for Pakistan. Strategic Studies, 37(1), 42–65.
51. Knight, B. ve Tribin, A. (2023). Immigration and violent crime: Evidence from the Colombia-Venezuela border. Journal of Development Economics, 162, 103039.
52. Koka, E. ve Veshi, D. (2019). Irregular Migration by Sea: Interception and Rescue Interventions in Light of International Law and the EU Sea Borders Regulation. European Journal of Migration and Law, 21(1), 26-52.
53. Kubrin, C. E., Hipp, J. R. ve Kim, Y. (2018). Different than the sum of its parts: Examining the unique impacts of immigrant groups on neighborhood crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(1), 1-36.
54. Kugelman, M. (2024). Tensions Escalate on Pakistani-Afghanistan Border. Mart 20 , 2024 tarihinde https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/03/20/pakistan-afghanistan-cross-border-strike-ttp-taliban/ adresinden alındı.
55. Léonard, M. (2022). 5: Rioting the Residences and Reclaiming the Republic. Racial Diversity in Contemporary France. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.
56. Li, S. S., Liddell, B. J. ve Nickerson, A. (2016). The relationship between post-migration stress and psychological disorders in refugees and asylum seekers. Current Psychiatry Reports, 18(82), 1-9.
57. Lindert, J., Ehrenstein, O. S., Priebe, S., Mielck, A. ve Brähler, E. (2009). Depression and anxiety in labor migrants and refugees – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 69(2), 246-257.
58. Lombardi, L. (2017). Violence against refugee and migrant women. The reproduction of gender discrimination and inequality. Mayıs 12, 2023 tarihinde http://old.ismu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Lombardi_Paper_Violence-against-women_may2017.pdf adresinden alındı.
59. Long, K. (2010). No entry! A review of UNHCR‟ ‘s response to border closures in situations of mass refugee influx. Mayıs 7, 2023 tarihinde https://www.unhcr.org/fr-fr/en/media/no-entry-review-unhcrs-response-border-closures-situations-mass-refugee-influx-katy-long-june adresinden alındı.
60. Loschmann, C., Kuschminder, K. ve Siegel, M. (2014). The root causes of movement: Exploring the determinants of irregular migration from Afghanistan. Irregul. Migr. Res. Programme Occas. Pap. Ser., 11, 1-25.
61. Lukić, N. (2021). Street Gangs, Migration and Ethnicity. Frank van Gemert, Dana Peterson, Inger-Lise Lien (Ed.), Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 5(1), 71-77.
62. Mainwaring, Ċ., Mulvey, G., Piacentini, T., Hales, S. ve Lamb, R. (2020). Migrant Solidarity Work in Times of ‘Crisis’: Glasgow and the Politics of Place. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(4), 74-89.
63. Martens, P. L. (1997). Immigrants, crime, and criminal justice in Sweden. Crime and Justice, 21, 183-255.
64. McConnell, A. (2016). Mülteci ve Göçmen?. Nisan 26, 2023 tarihinde https://www.unhcr. org/cy/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2018/02/UNHCR_Refugee_or_Migrant_TR.pdf adresinden alındı
65. Miller, D. S. ve Chtouris, S. (2017). Borderland Security and Migration: Balancing Humanitarian Response with Crisis Preparedness & Emergency Management—The Social and Cultural Challenges to Homeland Security. Journal of Applied Security Research, 12, 1 - 6.
66. Mir, A., Olson, R. ve Watkins A. (2022). Afghanistan-Pakistan Border Dispute Heads Up. Mayıs 19, 2024 tarihinde https://www.usip.org/publications/2022/01/afghanistan-pakistan-border-dispute-heats adresinden alındı.
67. Moutselos, M. (2020). Fighting for Their Neighborhood: Urban Policy and Anti-State Riots in France. Social Forces, 98 (4), 1719–1743.
68. Østby, G. (2016). Rural–urban migration, inequality, and urban social disorder: Evidence from African and Asian cities. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 33(5), 491-515.
69. Ocaklı, L. ve Avaner, T. (2024). Kent Güvenliği ve Düzensiz Göç Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme: İzmir’de Zenofobi ve Suç Korkusu. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(4), 1504-1529.
70. Ousey, G.C. ve Kubrin, C. E. (2018). Immigration and crime: Assessing a contentious issue. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 63-84.
71. Özdemir, Z. ve Ayata, A. G. (2018). Dynamics of exclusion and everyday bordering through Schengen visas. Political Geography, 66, 180-188.
72. Özçürümez, S., Hoxha, J. ve Icduygu, A.(2021). Does social cohesion solve forced migration riddles? Troubled concepts and constrained practices in Turkey. Migration Studies, 9(3), 597-616.
73. Özgür, E. M. (2020). Göç, İkametgâh Ayrışması ve Entegrasyon: Türk Kentleri İçin Bir Değerlendirme. Coğrafya Dergisi, (41), 221-240.
74. Öztürk, N. Ö. (2017). Geçici korumanın uluslararası koruma rejimine uyumu üzerine bir inceleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 66(1), 201-264.
75. Perruchoud, R. ve Redpath, J. (2013). Göç terimleri sözlüğü. Şubat 12, 2023 tarihinde https:// publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml31_turkish_2ndedition.pdf adresinden alındı.
76. Quesada, J., Hart, Laurie K. ve Bourgois, P. (2011). Structural vulnerability and health: Latino migrant laborers in the United States. Medical anthropology, 30(4), 339-362.
77. Rylko-Bauer, B. ve Farmer, P. (2016). Structural violence, poverty, and social suffering. Brady, David ve Burton, Linda M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty içinde (s. 47-74). Oxford University Press.
78. Sanandaji, T. (2020). Mass Challenge: The Socioeconomic Impact of Migration to a Scandinavian Welfare State. Cham: Springer International Publishing
79. Schmeidl, S. (2002). (Human) security dilemmas: Long-term implications of the Afghan refugee crisis. Third World Quarterly, 23(1), 7-29.
80. Schneider, D. ve Turshen, M. (2011). Political and social violence: Health effect. Nriuagu, Jerome O. (Der.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Health içinde (s. 623-630). Elsevier Inc.
81. Siviş, S. (2021). Integrating Bottom-up into Top-down: The Role of Local Actors in Labour Market Integration of Syrian Refugees in Turkey. International Migration, 59(4), 190-206.
82. Somay, B. (2008). Çokbilmiş Özne. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
83. Spivak, G. C. (2005). Scattered speculations on the subaltern and the popular. Postcolonial Studies, 8 (4), 475-486.
84. Stageman, D. L. (2020). Immigrants and Crime. CUNY Jay College of Criminal Justice.
85. Starling, C. G., Iyer, A. ve Giesler, R. J. (2022). Today’s wars are fought in the ‘gray zone.’ Here’s everything you need to know about it. Nisan 25, 2024 tarihinde https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/todays-wars-are-fought-in-the-gray-zone-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-it/ adresinden alındı.
86. Stengel, Ri. (2019). Information wars: How we lost the global battle against disinformation & what we can do about it. Atlantic Monthly Press.
87. Stewart, F. (2000). The root causes of humanitarian emergencies. War, Hunger, and Displacement: The origins of humanitarian emergencies, 1, 1-42.
88. Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. Norton.
89. Stock, I., Üstübici, A. ve Schultz, S. U. (2019). Externalization at work: responses to migration policies from the Global South. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(1), 1–9.
90. Stoyanova, V. (2008). The principle of non-refoulement and the right of asylum-seekers to enter state territory. Interdisc. J. Hum. Rts. L., 3, 1, 1-11.
91. Sude, B. H. (2020). Prevention of radicalization to terrorism in refugee camps and asylum centers. Schmid, Alex D. (Der.), Handbook of Terrorism Prevention and Preparedness içinde (s. 238-269). Lahey: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism Press.
92. Taddeo, M. (2020). Information warfare: A philosophical perspective. Millet, Keith W. ve Taddeo, Mariarosaria (Der.), The Ethics of Information Technologies içinde (s. 461-476). Routledge.
93. Tchumkam, H. (2019). Banlieue sounds, or, the right to exist. Steingo, Gavin ve Sykes, Jim (Der.), Remapping Sound Studies içinde (s. 185-202). Duke University Press.
94. Tekin, H. H. (2021). Uluslararası Literatürde Göç ve Suç İlişkisi. SDE Akademi Dergisi, 1(2), 12-40.
95. Terhmina, I. (2021). Black Odysseus: Mediterranean ‘Blues’ and Clandestine Migration in Josue Guebo’s Songe a Lampedusa. Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, 25(3), 305-312.
96. Triandafyllidou, A., Bartolini, L. ve Guidi, C. (2019). Exploring the links between enhancing regular pathways and discouraging irregular migration: a discussion paper to inform future policy deliberations. Ağustos 21 , 2023 tarihinde https://publications.iom.int/system/files/ pdf/exploring_the_links_2019.pdf adresinden alındı.
97. Ulusoy, O., Baldwin-Edwards, M. ve Last, T. (2019). Border policies and migrant deaths at the Turkish-Greek border. New Perspectives on Turkey (60), 3-32.
98. UNHRC (2024). Afghanistan Situation: Voluntary Repatriation of Afghan Refugees. Mayıs 24, 2024 tarihinde https://data.unhcr.org/en/country/pak adresinden alındı.
99. Van Houtum, H. ve Van Naerssen, T. (2002). Bordering, ordering, and othering. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93(2), 125-136.
100. Van Ngo, H., Calhoun, A., Worthington, C., Pyrch, T. ve Este, D. (2017). The Unravelling of Identities and Belonging: Criminal Gang Involvement of Youth from Immigrant Families. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 18(1), 63-84.
101. Villalón, R. (2010). Violence against Latina immigrants: Citizenship, inequality, and community. NYU Press.
102. Vogt, W. A. (2013). Crossing Mexico: Structural violence and the commodification of undocumented Central American migrants. American Ethnologist, 40(4), 764-780.
103. Wagner, J. (2021). The European Union’s model of Integrated Border Management: preventing transnational threats, cross-border crime, and irregular migration in the context of the EU’s security policies and strategies. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 59(4), 424-448.
104. Wagner, U., Tachtsoglou, S., Kotzur, P. F., Friehs, M. ve Kemmesies, U. (2020). Proportion of foreigners negatively predicts the prevalence of xenophobic hate crimes within German districts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(2), 195-205.
105. Weber, H. (2015). National and regional proportion of immigrants and perceived threat of immigration: A three-level analysis in Western Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 56(2), 116-140.
106. Witteveen, D. (2017). The rise of mainstream nationalism and xenophobia in Dutch politics. Journal of Labor and Society, 20(3), 373-378.
107. Worster, W.T. (2012). The evolving definition of the refugee in contemporary international law. Berkeley J. Int’l L., 30(1), 101-167.
108. Zatz, M. S. ve Smith, H. (2012). Immigration, Crime, and Victimization: Rhetoric and Reality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 141-159.