KASTAMONU KENT ORMANINDA REKREASYONEL KULLANIMIN TOPRAK DİNAMİKLERİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 249 - 262, 26.06.2025

Beyza Baç Senem Güneş Şen

https://doi.org/10.58626/memba.1711199

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki Kastamonu Kent Ormanı’nda rekreasyonel kullanım yoğunluğunun toprak sıkışması ve temel fiziksel ve kimyasal toprak özellikleri üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmiştir. Toprak penetrasyon direnci, hacim ağırlığı, organik madde, pH, elektriksel iletkenlik ve toprak dokusu; üç farklı kullanım alanında (orman, rekreasyon alanı, patika) ve iki derinlikte (0–10 cm ve 10–20 cm) ölçülmüştür. Sonuçlar, artan kullanım yoğunluğunun toprak penetrasyon direnci ve hacim ağırlığı değerlerini anlamlı şekilde yükselttiğini, organik madde miktarının ise özellikle patika ve rekreasyon alanlarında azaldığını ortaya koymuştur. Orman toprakları, en düşük toprak penetrasyon direnci (1.18–1.48 MPa) ve hacim ağırlığı (0.86–0.93 g/cm³) ile en yüksek organik madde içeriğini (9–12.4%) göstermiş olup; bu durum, orman alanlarının toprak sağlığını koruyucu rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Buna karşılık, patika toprakları en yüksek toprak penetrasyon direnci (3.7 MPa’ya kadar), hacim ağırlığı (1.60 g/cm³) ve elektriksel iletkenlik (203–205 µS/cm) değerlerini sergileyerek daha fazla sıkışma ve azalan toprak kalitesini göstermektedir. Toprak pH’ı, orman alanlarında asidik (5.5–5.9) değerlerden, yüksek kullanım alanlarında nötr değer aralığına kadar değişmektedir. Korelasyon analizleri, artan sıkışmanın azalan organik madde miktarıyla ve pH ile elektriksel iletkenlikteki değişimlerle güçlü bir şekilde ilişkili olduğunu doğrulamaktadır. Ayrıca, kullanım yoğunluğu fazla olan alanlarda daha yüksek kum içeriği gibi toprak doku farklılıklarının da sıkışmayı artırdığı belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgular, orman alanlarının toprak sağlığını korumadaki kritik rolünü ortaya koymakta ve kentsel ormanlarda sıkışmayı azaltacak sürdürülebilir yönetim uygulamalarının gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir. Araştırma, insan etkisinin kentsel orman toprakları üzerindeki etkilerini anlamaya katkı sağlamakta ve rekreasyon ile ekosistem koruma arasında denge kurulmasına yönelik stratejiler geliştirilmesine katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Toprak sıkışması , kent orman , rekreasyonel kullanım , toprak özellikleri , Kastamonu

Etik Beyan

Yazarlar; çalışmanın tüm süreçlerinin araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun olduğu, etik kurallara ve bilimsel atıf gösterme ilkelerine uyduğunu beyan etmektedirler.

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

TÜBİTAK 2209A-1919B012326521

Impacts of Recreational Use on Soil Dynamics in Kastamonu Urban Forest

Öz

This study assessed the effects of recreational use intensity on soil compaction and key physical and chemical soil properties in the Kastamonu Urban Forest, Turkey. Soil penetration resistance, bulk density, organic matter pH, electrical conductivity, and soil texture were measured across three land-use types (forest, recreation area, path) at two depths (0–10 cm and 10–20 cm). Results revealed that increasing use intensity significantly elevated soil penetration resistance and bulk density values, while organic matter decreased, particularly in path and recreation areas. Forest soils consistently showed the lowest soil penetration resistance (1.18–1.48 MPa) and bulk density (0.86–0.93 g/cm³) and the highest organic matter (9–12.4%), highlighting their protective role. In contrast, path soils exhibited the highest soil penetration resistance (up to 3.7 MPa), bulk density (1.60 g/cm³), and electrical conductivity (203–205 µS/cm), indicating greater compaction and reduced soil quality. Soil pH ranged from acidic in forest areas (5.5–5.9) to near-neutral in high-use areas. Correlation analyses confirmed strong links between increased compaction and reduced organic matter, along with changes in pH and electrical conductivity. Soil texture differences, with higher sand content in intensively used areas, further contributed to compaction. These findings underscore the critical role of forested areas in maintaining soil health and highlight the need for sustainable management practices to reduce compaction in urban forests. This research contributes to understanding human impacts on urban forest soils and informs strategies to balance recreation and ecosystem conservation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Soil compaction , urban forest , recreational use , soil properties , Kastamonu

Proje Numarası

TÜBİTAK 2209A-1919B012326521

Kaynakça

• Adedokun, B.C., McHenry, M.T. & Kirkpatrick, J.B. 2023. Informal camping on the margin of wild country: Early indicators of degradation and potential for some positive nature conservation outcomes. Land Degradation & Development 34: 3867-3880. doi:10.1002/ldr.4722.
• Akbaş, B., Akdeniz, N., Aksay, A. & et al. 2011. 1:1.250 000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Amrein, D., Rusterholz, H.-P. & Baur, B. 2005. Disturbance of suburban Fagus forests by recreational activities: effects on soil characteristics, above-ground vegetation and seed bank. Applied Vegetation Science 8: 175-182.
• Andres-Abellan, M., Benayas del Alamo, J., Landete-Castillejos, T., Lopez-Serrano, F.R., Garcia-Morote, F.A. & Del Cerro-Barja, A. 2005. Impacts of visitors on soil and vegetation of the recreational area "Nacimiento del Rio Mundo" (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 101: 55-67.
• Arocena, J.M., Nepal, S.K. & Rutherford, M. 2006. Visitor-induced changes in the chemical composition of soils in backcountry areas of the Mt Robson Provincial Park, British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 10-19.
• Assouline, S., Tessier, D. & Tavares‐Filho, J. 1997. Effect of compaction on soil physical and hydraulic properties: Experimental results and modeling. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61(2): 390-398.
• Atalay, İ. 2006. Toprak oluşumu, sınıflandırılması ve coğrafyası. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Yayını, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Aydın, M. ve Hınıs, AS (2024). Farklı Taç Kapanışlı Sarıçam Meşcerelerinde Bazı İklim Faktörlerinin Toprak Nemi Üzerine Etkileri. Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi , 10 (2), 85-92.
• Aydın, M., & Demirci, K. (2024). Farklı Arazi Kullanımlarının Yüzeysel Akış Üzerindeki Etkileri. Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 43-54.
• Balcı, V. & İlhan, A. 2006. Türkiye’deki üniversite öğrencilerinin rekreatif etkinliklere katılım düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 4(1): 11-18.
• Ballantyne, M. & Pickering, C.M. 2015a. The impacts of trail infrastructure on vegetation and soils: Current literature and future directions. Journal of Environmental Management 164: 53-64. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.032
• Bölük, E., Eskioğlu, O., Çalık, Y. & Yağan, S. 2023. Köppen iklim sınıflandırmasına göre Türkiye iklimi. T.C. Çevre Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, İklim ve Zirai Meteoroloji Dairesi Başkanlığı, İklim ve İklim Değişikliği Şube Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Bouyoucos, G.J. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the Hydrometer method. Soil Science 42(3): 225-229.
• Burden, R.F. & Randerson, P.F. 1972. Quantitative studies of the effects of human trampling on vegetation as an aid to the management of semi-natural areas. Journal of Applied Ecology 9: 439-457.
• Coder, K.D. 2000. Defining soil compaction: sites & trees. Extension Publication 00-4. Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, ABD.
• Cole, D.N. 1987. Effects of three seasons of experimental trampling on five montane forest communities and a grassland in Western Montana, USA. Biological Conservation 40: 219-244.
• Cole, D.N. 1995. Experimental trampling of vegetation. I. Relationship between trampling intensity and vegetation response. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 203-221.
• Cole, D.N. & Spildie, D.R. 2007. Vegetation and soil restoration on highly impacted campsites in the Eagle Cap Wilderness, Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR 185, USDA, Fort Collins, CO, ABD, 26 s.
• Çakir, M., Makineci, E. & Kumbasli, M. 2010. Comparative study on soil properties in a picnic and undisturbed area of Belgrad forest. İstanbul. Journal of Environmental Biology 31(1): 125-128.
• Çelik, A. & Erkmen, Y. 1999. Toprak frezesinde değişik tip bıçaklarla toprak işlemenin kışlık buğdayda tarla filizi çıkışına ve verimine olan etkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 30(1): 55-62.
• Çepel, N. 1996. Toprak İlmi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayın No: 3945, Orman Fakültesi Yayın No: 438, 286 s., İstanbul, Türkiye (Türkçe).
• Deluca, T.H., Patterson IV, W.A., Freimund, W.A. & Cole, D.N. 1998. Influence of llamas, horses, and hikers on soil erosion from established recreation trails in western Montana, USA. Environmental Management 22(2): 255-262.
• dos Santos Pereira, L., Rodrigues, A.M., do Carmo Oliveira Jorge, M., Guerra, A.J.T., Booth, C.A. & Fullen, M.A. 2022. Detrimental effects of tourist trails on soil system dynamics in Ubatuba Municipality, São Paulo State, Brazil. Catena 216: 106431. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106431.
• Gallet, S. & Roze, F. 2001. Resistance of Atlantic heathlands to trampling in Brittany (France): influence of vegetation type, season and weather conditions. Biological Conservation 97: 189-198.
• Gathoni, B., Munayi, S.P. & Wanjira, J. 2022. Impact of recreation activities in the national parks on vegetation, soil, water and wild game in the Central Kenya Region. Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Kenya.
• George, D. & Mallery, M. 2010. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10. baskı). Pearson, Boston, ABD.
• George, S.L. & Crooks, K.R. 2006. Recreation and large mammal activity in an urban nature reserve. Biological Conservation 133(1): 107-117.
• Gomez, A., Powers, R.F., Singer, M.J. & Horwath, W.R. 2002. Soil compaction effects on growth of young ponderosa pine following litter removal in California's Sierra Nevada. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66(4): 1334-1343.
• Gulcur, F. 1974. Physical and Chemical Soil Analysis Methods. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul, Türkiye (Türkçe).
• Güneş Şen, S., & Aydın, M. 2024. Farklı Meşcere Türlerinde Ormanaltı Yağış, Gövdeden Akış ve İntersepsiyonun Belirlenmesi. Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 115-123.
• Güngör, B. Ş. 2018. Cultural ecosystem services and recreational use: a review study in Belgrad Forest, Istanbul. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Sustainability 1(1): 30-55.
• Hakim, L. & Miyakawa, H. 2018. Integrating ecosystem restoration and development of recreation sites in degraded tropical mountain areas in East Java, Indonesia. AIP Conference Proceedings 2019. doi:10.1063/1.5061886.
• Hammitt, W.E. & Cole, D.N. 1999. Wildland recreation ecology and management. Journal of Range Management 52: 678-678.
• Hart, S.C., DeLuca, T.H., Newman, G.S., MacKenzie, M.D. & Boyle, S.I. 2005. Post-fire vegetative dynamics as drivers of microbial community structure and function in forest soils. Forest Ecology and Management 220: 166-184.
• Hegetschweiler, K.T., van Loon, N., Ryser, A., Rusterholz, H.P. & Baur, B. 2009. Effects of fireplace use on forest vegetation and amount of woody debris in suburban forests in Northern Switzerland. Environmental Management 43: 299-310.
• Hubbard, T., Cove, M.V. & Lafferty, D.J. 2022. Human recreation impacts seasonal activity and occupancy of American black bears (Ursus americanus) across the anthropogenic-wildland interface. Scientific Reports 12: 12201.
• Jim, C.Y. 1987. Trampling impacts of recreationists on picnic sites in a Hong Kong country park. Environmental Conservation 14(2): 117-127.
• Jim, C.Y. 1998a. Soil characteristics and management in an urban park in Hong Kong. Environmental Management 22: 683-695.
• Jim, C.Y. 1998b. Urban soil characteristics and limitations for landscape planting in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning 40: 235-249.
• Karaçar, E. & Göker, G. 2017. Orman içi rekreasyon alanlarının ekolojik açıdan incelenmesi. Journal of Recreation and Tourism Research 4(4): 35-42.
• Kissling, M., Hegetschweiler, K.T., Rusterholz, H.P. & Baur, B. 2009. Short-term and long-term effects of human trampling on above-ground vegetation, soil density, soil organic matter and soil microbial processes in suburban beech forests. Applied Soil Ecology 42(3): 303-314.
• Korkanç, S.Y. 2014. Impacts of recreational human trampling on selected soil and vegetation properties of Aladag Natural Park, Turkey. Catena 113: 219-225.
• Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B. & Rubel, F. 2006. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15: 259-263.
• Kozlowski, T.T. 1999. Soil compaction and growth of woody plants. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14: 596-619.
• Kutiel, P. & Zhevelev, Y. 2001. Recreational use impact on soil and vegetation at picnic sites in Aleppo pine forests on Mount Carmel, Israel. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 49: 49-56.
• Kutiel, P., Zhevelev, H. & Lavee, H. 2000. Coastal dune ecosystems: Management for conservation objective. III. Soil response to three vegetation types to recreational use. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology 1: 171-179.
• Lei, S.A. 2004. Soil compaction from human trampling, biking, and off-road motor vehicle activity in a blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima) shrubland. Western North American Naturalist 64(1): 125-130.
• Liddle, M.J. 1997. Recreation Ecology: The Ecological Impact of Outdoor Recreation and Ecotourism. Springer, 639 s.
• Liddle, M.J. & Thyer, N.C. 1986. Trampling and fire in a subtropical dry sclerophyll forest. Environmental Conservation 13: 33-39.
• Malmivaara, M., Löfström, I. & Vanha-Majamaa, I. 2002. Anthropogenic effects on understorey vegetation in Myrtillus type urban forests in southern Finland. Silva Fennica 36: 367-381.
• Marion, J.L. & Cole, D.N. 1996. Spatial and temporal variation in soil and vegetation impacts on campsites. Ecological Applications 6: 520-530.
• Mateer, T.J., Rice, W.L., Taff, B.D., Lawhon, B., Reigner, N. & Newman, P. 2021. Psychosocial factors influencing outdoor recreation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 3: 621029.
• Mc Kyes, E. 1985. Soil Cutting and Tillage. Developments in Agricultural Engineering 7. Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., Amsterdam, Hollanda.
• Mingyu, Y., Hens, L., Xiaokun, O. & Wulf, R.D. 2009. Impacts of recreational trampling on sub-alpine vegetation and soils in Northwest Yunnan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 29: 171-175. doi:10.1016/j.chnaes.2009.07.005.
• Monti, P.W. & Mackintosh, E.E. 1979. Effect of camping on surface soil properties in the boreal forest region of northwestern Ontario, Canada. Soil Science Society of America Journal 43(5): 1024-1029.
• Jacsman, J. 1998. Konsequenzen der intensiven Erholungsnutzung für die Wälder im städtischen Raum. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 149: 423–439.
• Niemelä, J. 1999. Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 119-131.
• OGM. 2017. Generel Directorate of Forestry, Department of Non-Wood Products and Services, Statistical Regions. Erişim tarihi: 30 Haziran 2017. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/Baskanliklar/OdunDisiUr unveHizmetler/Sayfalar/Odun-Disi-Urun-veHizmetler.aspx
• Özyuvaci, N. 1971. Topraklarda erozyon eğiliminin tesbitinde kullanılan bazı önemli indeksler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 21: 190-207.
• Özyuvaci, N. 1976. Hydrologic characteristics of the Arnavutköy Creek watershed as influenced by some plant–soil–water relations. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayın No: 2082. Kutulmuş Matbaası, İstanbul, Türkiye (Türkçe).
• Pimentel, D. & Kounang, N. 1998. Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystems 1: 416-426.
• Roovers, P., Verheyen, K., Hermy, M. & Gulinck, H. 2004. Experimental trampling and vegetation recovery in some forest and heathland communities. Applied Vegetation Science 7: 111-118.
• Rusterholz, H.P., Kissling, M. & Baur, B. 2009. Disturbance by human trampling alters the performance, sexual reproduction and genetic diversity in a clonal woodland herb. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11: 17-29.
• Sarah, P., Zhevelev, H.M. & Oz, A. 2016. Human activities modify soil properties in urban parks: a case study of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16: 2538-2547.
• Sargıncı, M., Yeşil, Z.B., Dönmez, A.H. & Yıldız, O. 2021. İstanbul kent ormanında arazi kullanım yoğunluğuna bağlı toprak özelliklerinin değişimi. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 9(2): 899-914.
• Savacı, G., & Abokdar, K. M. M. 2024. Effects of Soil Compaction on Vegetation and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Recreational Areas: A Case Study of Kastamonu. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 24(1), 22-40.
• Settergren, C.D. & Cole, D.M. 1970. Recreation effects on soil and vegetation in the Missouri Ozarks. Journal of Forestry 68(4): 231-233.
• Soane, B.D. & Van Ouwerkerk, C. 2013. Soil Compaction in Crop Production. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Hollanda.
• Stachowiak, C., Crain, B.J., Kroetz, K., Sanchirico, J.N. & Armsworth, P.R. 2022. The impact of recreational use and access on biotic and abiotic disturbances on areas protected by local communities and a state conservation agency. Journal for Nature Conservation 68: 126216.
• Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. 2013. Using multivariate statistics (6. baskı). Pearson, Boston, ABD.
• Talbot, L.M., Turton, S.M. & Graham, A.W. 2003. Trampling resistance of tropical rainforest soils and vegetation in the wet tropics of North east Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 69: 63-69.
• Toleti, B.V.M.R. 2008. Urban forest soil characteristics: a geostatistical analysis of Allan Gardens Park, Toronto, Canada. Master of Spatial Analysis Tezi, Department of Geography, Ryerson University, Toronto, Kanada.
• USDA. 1987. Soil mechanics level I. Module 3 – USDA textural soil classification study guide. National Employee Development Staff, Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, ABD.
• USDA. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Survey Division Staff, Washington, DC, ABD, 139 s.
• Uzun, S. & Müderrisoğlu, H. 2010. Kırsal rekreasyon alanlarında kullanıcı memnuniyeti: Bolu Gölcük ormaniçi dinlenme yeri örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi A(1): 67-82.
• Van-Camp, L., Bujarrabal, B., Gentile, A.R., Jones, R.J.A., Montanarella, L., Olazabal, C. & Selavaradjou, S.K. 2004. Reports of the Technical Working Groups Established Under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxemburg, EUR 21319 EN/6.
• Waltert, B., Wiemken, V., Rusterholz, H.-P., Boller, T. & Baur, B. 2002. Disturbance of forest by trampling: Effects on mycorrhizal roots of seedlings and mature trees of Fagus sylvatica. Plant and Soil 243: 143-154.
• Whalley, W.R., Dumitru, E. & Dexter, A.R. 1995. Biological effects of soil compaction. Soil & Tillage Research 35: 53-68.
• Xuegang, F. & Haosheng, B. 1999. Studies of impacts of tourism on vegetation and soil. Journal of Natural Resources 14(1): 75-78.
• Yildiz, O., Altundağ, E., Çetin, B., Güner, Ş.T., Sarginci, M. & Toprak, B. 2017. Afforestation restoration of saline-sodic soil in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey using gypsum and sulfur. Silva Fennica 51(1B): 1-17.
• Yuksek, T. 2009. Effect of visitor activities on surface soil environmental conditions and aboveground herbaceous biomass in Ayder Natural Park. Clean 37(2): 170-175.
• Zhevelev, H. & Sarah, P. 2008. The effect of visitors’ pressure on the spatial variability of sandy soil in an urban parks in Tel Aviv. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 142: 35-46.