Kuramsal ve Kavramsal Çerçeve Kullanımı: 2019-2023 Yıllarında Yayımlanan Ulusal Matematik Eğitimi Tezlerinin Analizi

Yıl 2024, , 284 - 298, 22.08.2024

Aslıhan Osmanoğlu , Meriç Özgeldi

https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.1505234

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2019-2023 yılları arasında Türkiye'de matematik eğitimi alanında yayımlanan yüksek
lisans ve doktora tezlerinde kuramsal ve kavramsal çerçeve kullanımını incelemektir. Bu amaçla, Yükseköğretim
Kurulu ulusal tez merkezinden indirilen toplam 237 yüksek lisans ve doktora tezi, kullanılan yöntem ve çerçeve
kapsamında analiz edilmiştir. Matematik eğitimi alanındaki yüksek lisans ve doktora tezleri incelendiğinden
çalışmada doküman analizi yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Tezler metodoloji (nicel, nitel, karma araştırma
paradigması) ve çerçeve (kuramsal, kavramsal, kuramsal ve kavramsal, diğer) özelliklerine göre analiz edilmiştir.
Analiz aşamasında, tezlerin türlerine ve yıllara göre dağılımı da incelenmiştir. Bulgular, tez çalışmalarının
çoğunluğunun kuramsal çerçeve kullanılarak nitel yöntemle gerçekleştirildiğini göstermiştir. Bunu, kuramsal
çerçeve kullanılan nicel çalışmalar ve yine kuramsal çerçeve kullanılan karma yöntem çalışmaları takip etmiştir.
Ayrıca, diğer ve kavramsal çerçeve kategorilerinde de nitel çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Kuramsal çerçeve
kullanılan nitel tez çalışmalarının ağırlıklı olduğu ve bunların çoğunlukla yüksek lisans tezleri olduğu ve 2023
yılında yayımlandığı görülmektedir. Bulgular ilgili alan yazın ışığında tartışılarak gelecek araştırmalar için
önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kuramsal çerçeve, kavramsal çerçeve, matematik eğitimi tezleri

Etik Beyan

Çalışma bir doküman analizi olduğundan etik kurul onay belgesi gerektirmemektedir.

Utilization of Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: An Analysis of National Mathematics Education Theses Published in 2019-2023

Öz

This study aimed to examine the use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in master's and
doctoral theses published in the field of mathematics education in Turkiye between 2019 and 2023. For this
purpose, a total of 237 master's and doctoral theses downloaded from the Council of Higher Education national
thesis center were analyzed within the scope of the method and the framework used. Given that master's and
doctoral theses in the field of mathematics education were reviewed, the document analysis method was
utilized. The theses were analyzed based on characteristics: methodology (quantitative, qualitative, mixed
research paradigm) and framework (theoretical, conceptual, theoretical and conceptual, other). In the analysis
phase, the distribution of theses according to types and years was also examined. The findings indicated that
the majority of thesis studies were conducted using a qualitative method within a theoretical framework. This
was followed by quantitative studies using a theoretical framework and mixed-method studies within a
theoretical framework. Additionally, there were qualitative studies classified under other and qualitative
studies using a conceptual framework. The qualitative thesis studies using the theoretical framework were
predominant and that these were mostly master's theses and published in 2023. The findings were discussed in
the light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made for future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Conceptual framework, theoretical framework, mathematics education theses

Kaynakça

• Cepni, S. (2021). How to structure the conceptual and theoretical framework of projects, thesis and research articles? Journal of Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 4(3), 203–216. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1774250
• Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your "house." Administrative Issues Journal, 4(2), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9
• Hughes, S., Davis, T. E., & Imenda, S. N. (2019). Demystifying theoretical and conceptual frameworks: A guide for students and advisors of educational research. J Soc Sci, 58(1-3), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566756.2019/58.1-3.2188
• Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2014.11893249
• Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(7), 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9443-2
• Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 21(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134
• Lynch, J., Ramjan, L. M., Glew, P. J., & Salamonson, Y. (2020). How to embed a conceptual or theoretical framework into a dissertation study design. Nurse Researcher, 28(3), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2020.e1723
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sources book (2nd Ed.). Sage.
• O’Connor, C. & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
• Sahan, A. (2023). Investigation of doctoral level dissertations in the field of mathematics education in Turkey between 2010-2020 in terms of theory, theoretical framework and conceptual framework (Thesis Number: 784780). [Unpublished Master's Thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University].
• Varpio, L., Paradis, E., Uijtdehaage, S., & Young, M. (2020). The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075
• Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (7th Ed.). Seckin.