Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language

Meliha Şimşek

doi:10.17860/efd.66036

Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language

Öz

Although there have been attempts for a bilingual method that makes active use ofcodeswitching in the foreign language class, exclusive use of the target language remains an undisputedpractice from primary to tertiary education around the world. For this reason, a survey consisting of threeclosed-ended and four open-ended questions was administered to 30 student teachers (Department ofForeign Language Education, METU) in order to investigate their perspectives on mentor teachers’ use ofnative language (L1) and codeswitching in the EFL class. It was found that there is L1-dominance in thepracticum classes and the students’ low level of English is the major excuse for the randomness of L1 use,whereas its sparing uses concentrate on managerial and clarification purposes. While two-thirds of thestudent teachers supported the use of L1 and reported varied benefits of codeswitching, the rest rejected itunder the influence of monolingualism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

dil değiştirme, anadil baskınlığı, tekdillilik

Kaynakça

Atkinson, D. (1987). The Mother Tongue in the Classroom: A Neglected Source?. ELT Journal, 41 (4), 241-247. Retrieved December 27, 2011 from:
Atkinson, D. (1993). Teaching Monolingual Classes. Essex: Longman Group UK Limited.
Barak, L. & Yinon, H. (2005). Different But Similar: Student Teachers’ Perspectives on the Use of L1 in Arab and Jewish EFL Classroom Settings. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18 (1), 91-113.
Retrieved June 16, 2011, from:
Bacherman, D. M. (2007). The Use of Students’ First Language in Second-Language Learning in a Computer-Based Environment. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 3240051).
Beressa, K. (2003). Using L1 In The Efl Classroom: The Case Of The Oromo Language With Particular Reference To Adama Teachers College. M.A. Thesis. Addis Ababa University. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from:
Borg, M. (2004). The Apprenticeship of Observation. ELT Journal, 58 (3), 274-276. Retrieved December 11, 2011, from:
Burden, P. (2000). The Use of ‘Only English’ in a Learner-Centered University Classroom in Japan. RELC Journal, 31 (1), 139-149. Retrieved December 29, 2008, from:

Butzkamm, W. (2000). Bilingual Method. In Michael Byram (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning, (pp. 84-87). New York: Routledge. Retrieved August 10, 2011, from:
Ciambrone, D. (2004). Anonymity. In M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (pp. 18-19). California: SAGE Publications.
Cook, V. (1989). Reciprocal Language Teaching: Another Alternative. Modern English Teacher, 16 (3/4), 48-53. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from:
Cook, V. (1999). Going Beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (2), 185- 209. Retrieved December 29, 2009, from:
Cook, V. (2001). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Arnold.
Crawford, J. (2004). Language Choices in the Foreign Language Classroom: Target Language or the Learners’ First Language? RELC Journal, 35 (1), 5-20. Retrieved December 21, 2008, from:
Duff, P. A. & Polio, C. G. (1990). How Much Foreign Language is There in the Foreign Language Classroom? The Modern Language Journal, 74 (2), 154-166. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from:
Ford, K. (2009). Principles and Practices of L1/L2 Use in the Japanese University EFL Classroom. JALT Journal, 31 (1), 63-80. Retrieved August 4, 2011, from:
Gabrielatos, C. (2001). L1 Use in ELT: Not a Skeleton, But a Bone of Contention. Bridges, 6, 33-35. Retrieved December 31, 2009, from:
Gill, S. (2005). The L1 in the L2 Classroom. HLT Magazine, 7 (5). Retrieved August 8, 2011, from:
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate Methodology and Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kang, D-M. (2008). The Classroom Languge Use of a Korean Elementary School EFL Teacher: Another Look at TETE. System, 36 (2), 214-226. Retrieved June 20, 2010, from:
Kim, S. H. O. & Elder, C. (2005). Language Choices and Pedagogic Functions in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Cross-Linguistic Functional Analysis of Teacher Talk. Language Teaching Research, 9 (4), 355-380. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from:
Klapper, J. (1998). Language Learning at School and University: the Great Grammar Debate Continues (II). Language Learning Journal, 18 (1), 22-28. Retrieved August 7, 2011, from:
Lai, M. (1996). Using the L1 Sensibly in English Language Classrooms. Journal of Primary Education, 6 (1&2), 91-99. Retrieved November 25, 2009, from:
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Boston: Heinle.
Leung, C. P. (2010). English Language Teachers' Beliefs and Attitudes in the Pedagogic Use of Cantonese in English Classes in Hong Kong Secondary Schools. B.Ed. Dissertation. Retrieved July 12, 2011, from:
Lotto L. & De Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Effects of Learning Method and Word Type on Acquiring Vocabulary in an Unfamiliar Language. Language Learning Journal, 48 (1), 31-69. Abstract. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from:
Macaro, E. (2001). Analysing Student Teachers’ Codeswitching in Foreign Language Classrooms: Theories and Decision Making. The Modern Language Journal, 85 (4), 531-548. Retrieved September 25, 2009, from:
Macaro, E. (2005). Codeswitching in the L2 Classroom: a Communication and Learning Strategy. In E. Llurda (Ed.), Non-Native Teachers, Perceptions, Challenges and Contributions to the Profession (pp. 63-84). New York: Springer.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing Qualitative Research Fifth Edition. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
McMillan, B. & Rivers, D. (2011). The Practice of Policy: Teacher Attitudes Toward “English-Only”. System, 39(2), 251-263. Retrieved 30 July, 2011, from:
Meij, H. V. D. & Zhao, X. (2010). Codeswitching in English Courses in Chinese Universities. The Modern Language Journal, 94 (3), 396-411. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from:
Meyer, H. (2008). The Pedagogical Implications of L1 Use in the L2 Classroom. Maebashi Kyoai Gakuen College Research Bulletin, 8, 147-160. Retrieved May 24, 2009, from:
Miles, R. (2004). Evaluating the Use of L1 in the English Language Classroom. M.A. Thesis, University of Birmingham. Retrieved April 26, 2008, from:
Polio, C. G. & Duff, P. A. (1994). Teachers’ Language Use in University Foreign Language Classrooms: a Qualitative Analysis of English and Target Language Alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (3), 313-326. Retrieved October 29, 2009, from:
Prince, P. (1996). Second Language Vocabulary Learning: The Role of Context versus Translations as a Function of Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 478-493. Retrieved March 8, 2010, from:
Prodromou, L. (2002). The Liberating Role of the Mother Tongue. In S. Deler & M. Rinvolucri (Eds), Using the Mother Tongue. London: English Teaching Professional Delta Publishing.
Ramachandran, S. D. & Rahim, H. A. (2004). Meaning Recall and Retention: The Impact of the Translation Method on Elementary Level Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. RELC Journal, 35 (2), 161- 178. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from:
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schweers, C. W. (1999). Using the L1 in the L2 Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 37 (2). Retrieved May 25, 2008, from:
Shimizu, M. (2006). Monolingual or Bilingual Policy in the Classroom. Maebashi Kyoai Gakuen College Research Bulletin, 6, 75-89. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from:
Silverman, D. & Marvasti, A. (2008). Doing Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Guide. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Şevik, M. (2007). The Place of Mother Tongue in Foreign Language Classes. Journal of Educational Sciences, 40 (1), 99-199. Retrieved June 15, 2011, from:
Tang, J. (2002). Using L1 in the English Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 40 (1), 36-43. Retrieved December 21, 2008, from:
Turnbull, M. & Arnett, K. (2002). Teachers’ Uses of the Target and First Languages in Second and Foreign Language Classrooms. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 204-218. Retrieved May 30, 2010, from:
Turnbull, M. & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2009). First Language Use in Second and Foreign Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ur, P. (2006). A Course in Language Teaching Practice and Theory Trainee Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Undergraduate Program Course Descriptions (2011). In METU FLE. Retrieved June 2, 2011, from:
Weschler, R. (1997). Uses of Japanese (L1) in the English Classroom: Introducing the FunctionalTranslation Method. The Internet TESL Journal, 3 (11). Retrieved March 20, 2008, from:
Yao, M. (2011). On Attitudes to Teachers’ Code-Switching in EFL Classes. World Journal of English Language, 1 (1), 19-28. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from:
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Zacharias, N. T. (2004). Teachers’ Beliefs About the Use of the Students’ Mother Tongue: a Survey of Tertiary English Teachers in Indonesia. EA Journal, 22 (1), 44-52. Retrieved May 9, 2009, from:

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Meliha Şimşek

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Mart 2012

Gönderilme Tarihi

17 Mart 2012

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2011 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.66036

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA93FT68XK

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şimşek, M. (2012). Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.66036

AMA

1.Şimşek M. Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language. MEÜEFD. 2012;7(1):69-85. doi:10.17860/efd.66036

Chicago

Şimşek, Meliha. 2012. “Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language”. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (1): 69-85. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.66036.

EndNote

Şimşek M (01 Mart 2012) Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7 1 69–85.

IEEE

[1]M. Şimşek, “Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language”, MEÜEFD, c. 7, sy 1, ss. 69–85, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.17860/efd.66036.

ISNAD

Şimşek, Meliha. “Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language”. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7/1 (01 Mart 2012): 69-85. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.66036.

JAMA

1.Şimşek M. Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language. MEÜEFD. 2012;7:69–85.

MLA

Şimşek, Meliha. “Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language”. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 7, sy 1, Mart 2012, ss. 69-85, doi:10.17860/efd.66036.

Vancouver

1.Meliha Şimşek. Student Teachers’ Opinions On Mentor Teachers’ Use Of Native Language. MEÜEFD. 01 Mart 2012;7(1):69-85. doi:10.17860/efd.66036