Sınıfiçi Biçimlendirici Değerlendirme Yöntemlerinin İngilizce Öğretiminde Kullanımı

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, günümüz öğrencilerinin değişen ihtiyaçları ve biçimlendirici değerlendirmeye yönelik eğilimleri doğrultusunda, araştırma soruları aracılığıyla belirlenmiş olan sorunlara ve konulara çözüm olarak sınıflarda biçimlendirici değerlendirme araçlarını uygulamaktır. Formlar ve yarı yapılandırılmış sorular, bir grup öğretmen adayının dil yeterliliği algıları, kendilerince tanımlanmış dil yeterliliği seviyeleri ve dil yeterliğindeki eksikleri ile birlikte düzeltici geribildirime karşı tutumlarını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, belirli bir grupla çalışırken akademik dürüstlüğü kapsayan, yarı deneysel karma yöntem tasarımını kullanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın katılımcıları, ilk seviye öğretmen eğitimindeki, halen bir devlet üniversitesinin İngilizce Öğretmenliği bölümüne devam eden 60 öğrenciyi kapsamaktadır. Katılımcılar amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenmiştir. Araştırma araçlarından toplanan veri, yazılım programları aracılığıyla işlenmiştir. Nicel veri, bir istatiksel paket programı kullanılarak çözümlenirken, nitel veri, konuyla ilgili betimleyici veri elde etmek amacıyla, tematik içerik analizi yoluyla çözümlenmiştir. Bulgular, günümüz öğrenenlerinin giderek etkileşimli, öğrenci odaklı ve teknoloji ile zengileştirilmiş öğrenme ortamlarını tercih ederken, ayrıca düzeltici geribildirim sağlanmasını da takdir ettiklerine dair güçlü kanıtlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sınıf İçi Değerlendirme
• Düzeltici Geri Bildirim
• Biçimlendirici Değerlendirme Araçları

The Use of Classroom-Based Assessment Techniques in English Language Teaching

Öz

In line with the changing needs of today’s learners, and the emerging trends towards formative assessment, the aim of this research is to implement formative assessment tools in the classroom to serve as solutions for the problems and the issues already pinpointed through the research questions. The forms and semi-structured questions aim to find out a group of teacher candidates’ perceptions of language competencies, self-identified proficiency levels and deficiencies in language as well as their attitudes towards corrective feedback. This study employed quasi-experimental mixed methods design, which involves academic integrity while working with a specific group. The participants of this research are 60 ITE (Initial Teacher Education) students currently attending ELT (English Language Teaching) Department of a State University. The participants were appointed through purposive sampling. The data collected from the research instruments were processed by means of software programs. Quantitative data were analyzed using a statistical package program, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic content analysis to acquire descriptive data about the topic. The findings provide strong evidence that contemporary learners increasingly favor interactive, student-centered and technology-enhanced learning environments while also appreciating the provision of corrective feedback.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Classroom Based Assessment
• Corrective Feedback
• Formative Assessment Tools

Kaynakça

1. Alıcı, D. (2017). Performansa dayalı ölçme. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 123-164. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786055885168.05
2. Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why?. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95-127. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19886
3. Bailey, K., & Brown, J. (1999). Learning about language assesment: Dilemmas, decisions, and directions & new ways of classroom assessment. Learning, 4(2), 1-8. https://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume4/ej14/ej14r1/
4. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.
5. Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language Assessment: Principles and Class-Room Practices (3rd Ed.). Pearson Education.https://www.longmanhomeusa.com/catalog/products/language-assessment-principles-and-classroom-practices/
6. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL quarterly, 32(4), 653-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587999
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Train-the-trainers: Implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.8.2011.7624

9. Cheng, L., & Fox, J. (2017). Assessment in the language classroom: Teachers supporting student learning. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/ca/assessment-in-the-language-classroom-9781137464835/
10. Chen, H. (2020). A Contrastive Analysis of Classroom-Based Language Assessments. English Language Teaching, 13(5), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n5p110
11. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
12. Council of Europe. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4
13. Çimen, S. S. (2022). Exploring EFL Assessment in Turkey: Curriculum and Teacher Practices. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(1), 531-550. https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/1565
14. DeLuca, C. (2025). Placing students at the centre: new directions for student agency in assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 32(2), 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2025.2523162
15. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
16. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). Research methods. How to design and Evaluate research in Education. McGraw-Hill.
17. Fitriyah, I., Masitoh, F., & Widiati, U. (2022). Classroom-based language assessment literacy and professional development need between novice and experienced EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46539
18. Gelbal, S., & Kelecioğlu, H. (2007). Öğretmenlerin ölçme ve değerlendirme yöntemleri hakkındaki yeterlik algıları ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(33), 135-145. https://izlik.org/JA44RT78AR
19. Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198214057
20. Hu, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). The scientific basis of authentic assessment and its implementation in English as a foreign language education. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 174, p. 01023). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317401023
21. Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732980
22. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667251
23. Lan, C., & Fan, S. (2019). Developing classroom-based language assessment literacy for in-service EFL teachers: The gaps. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.03.003 L ewkowicz, J., & Leung, C. (2021). Classroom-based assessment. Language Teaching, 54(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000506
24. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot et al. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
25. MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
26. Ministry of National Education (MEB). (2025). The Century of Türkiye Education Model: English Language Teaching Curriculum of Türkiye (ELTCoT) (Years 5-6-7-8) Multilingual Foreign Language Programme. MEB. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/program/ingilizce-dersi-2-8.pdf
27. Nguyet, D. T., Huong, L. T. (2023). Students’ perceptions on using rubrics as a peer and self-assessment tool in EFL speaking courses. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 3(3), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.23337
28. Özdemir-Yılmazer, M., & Özkan, Y. (2017). Classroom assessment practices of English language instructors. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 324-345. https://izlik.org/JA22MC88WR
29. Önalan, O., & Karagül, A. E. (2018). A study on Turkish EFL teachers’ beliefs about assessment and its different uses in teaching English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(3), 190-201. https://izlik.org/JA27BP53DS
30. Özkan, Y. Ö., & Özkan, M. (2025). Decoding Teachers' Dilemma: Unveiling the Real Obstacles to Implementing Formative Assessment in the Classroom. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (41), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.41.2062
31. Quainoo, E. A., Asamoah, D., Baidoo-Anu, D., Ye, J., & Akuamoah Boateng, C. (2025). Examining profiles of classroom assessment literacy among basic school teachers. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2558163. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2558163
32. Rozimela, Y., Fatimah, S., Adnan, A., & Tresnadewi, S. (2024). EFL teachers’ perceived productive skills for effective teacher professional development program. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1493-1514. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.37277
33. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235611
34. Torres, J. O. (2019). Positive impact of utilizing more formative assessment over summative assessment in the EFL/ESL Classroom. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2019.91001
35. Turner, C. E. (2012). Classroom assessment. In Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of language testing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220756
36. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Ortaöğretim Genel Müdürlüğü, İngilizce Sınıfiçi Değerlendirme Öğretmen Rehber Kitabı (2023) Erişim Adresi: https://ogmmateryal.eba.gov.tr/kitap/sinif-ici-degerlendirme/ingilizce/index.html
37. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Ortaöğretim Genel Müdürlüğü, Sınıfta Ölçme Değerlendirme Uygulamaları Öğretmenler İçin El Kitabı (2022) Erişim Adresi: https://ogm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_01/05094208_16siniftaolcmedegerlendirmeuygulamalariogretmenelkitabi15.04.20221.pdf
38. Wong, L. L., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39(2), 144-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.05.004
39. Yan, Q., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R. (2022). Exploring classroom-based assessment for young EFL learners in the Chinese context: teachers’ beliefs and practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1051728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051728